Senator Chris Coons asks Republican Senators as to whether Trump can run for a 3rd term. Here are the surprising answers!

Is Trump worth ignoring the Constitution and us becoming an Authoritarian regime?

  • Yes

    Votes: 5 41.7%
  • No

    Votes: 7 58.3%

  • Total voters
    12
Let me see if I have this straight. Trump and supporters defy Washington Establishment, Liberals toe the Progressive Washington Establishment line and somehow those who abhor the party line are "sheep" or 'cult' in your story?

If we apply your analogy of sheep, Trump supporters are the black sheep who have left the fluffy white sheep in the dust.
Trump supporters defy the Constitutional amendments and toe the line to everything Trump says and does, even though it goes against the Constitution or the existing laws. They do not question him about ANYTHING and laud and believe him on everything even though it has been proven that he is a liar, corrupt, and believes in disunity and hate with anyone not agreeing with him.

That is the definition of a cult.

Sheeprepeattrumpfacts.webp
 
He already said that Rubio or Vance should be the nominees.
Yes, and that is what Constitutional laws promote. The OP is not about Coons or what he believes, it is about him asking other Republican Senators if they believe that the 22nd Amendment should be honored, and the replies given not being decisive.
 
interesting and informative to see that so far there have been 4 people that voted in the thread, that say that we should throw the Constitution away and keep an Authoritarian Dictator in office.

If that is not the definition of a cult full of traitors to our nation, then I do not know what it is.
 
Trump supporters defy the Constitutional amendments and toe the line to everything Trump says and does, even though it goes against the Constitution or the existing laws. They do not question him about ANYTHING and laud and believe him on everything even though it has been proven that he is a liar, corrupt, and believes in disunity and hate with anyone not agreeing with him.

That is the definition of a cult.

I'd be interested to hear specifics on Trump supporters 'defiance of Constitutional Amendments" and how he goes against the Constitution and existing laws. Sans the opinion, please. And not including the opinions of those who took the survey. Political forum posts and polls as a whole aren't an accurate representation.
 
Senator Chris Coons asks Republican Senators as to whether Trump can run for a 3rd term. Here are the surprising answers!



It seems that Republicans do not want to support our Constitution.

The Unconstitutional Conservatives

Not too long ago, Republicans believed in the rule of law, limiting the power of government, and protecting individual liberty. Then came Donald Trump.

and here is what would happen if we ignored the Constitution

AI Overview

Ignoring the United States Constitution would likely lead to a rapid descent into an authoritarian regime, as the Constitution serves as the foundational legal framework that limits government power and protects individual rights. Without it, the system of checks and balances, civil liberties, and the rule of law would collapse, allowing those in power to govern unchecked.

The consequences of abandoning the Constitution would unfold across several critical areas:
  • Loss of Civil Liberties: The government could legally restrict or eliminate fundamental rights like freedom of speech, the freedom of the press, the right to bear arms, and protections against unreasonable searches (often guaranteed by the Bill of Rights).
  • Consolidation of Power: The dismantling of the separation of powers means the executive, legislative, and judicial branches would no longer act as checks on one another. This centralization is a defining characteristic of an authoritarian or dictatorial system.
  • Erosion of the Rule of Law: Without the supreme law of the land, legal protections in the criminal justice system—such as the right to a fair trial and habeas corpus—could disappear. This would open the door to arbitrary arrests and detainment without cause.
  • Threats to Democratic Elections: Constitutional provisions regarding the structure of elections and term limits (such as the 22nd Amendment) could be altered or abolished, enabling leaders to extend their rule indefinitely. [1]
  • Economic and Social Instability: The breakdown of constitutional order typically causes severe institutional instability, likely triggering widespread protests, economic disruptions, and a total loss of public faith in government institutions.
Why do the Republicans want this to happen? Is Trump worth it?

I see what you're saying. You're saying that you are scared shitless that if Trump ran for a third term he would win.
 
I'd be interested to hear specifics on Trump supporters 'defiance of Constitutional Amendments" and how he goes against the Constitution and existing laws. Sans the opinion, please. And not including the opinions of those who took the survey. Political forum posts and polls as a whole aren't an accurate representation.
Show where the Constitution allows the vice president, on the day electoral votes are slated to be counted, to decide which states' electors can be discarded and sent back to their respective states to be changed.
 
Not too long ago, Republicans believed in the rule of law, limiting the power of government, and protecting individual liberty. Then came Donald Trump.
Conservatives have long been enemies of the rule of law, limiting the authority of the state, and individual liberties long before Trump.

In fact, Trump is the product of an authoritarian conservative movement hostile to the Constitution and our democratic institutions.
 
Then why the fuk won’t any Republican speak up and say he is ineligible?
Why if it gets your panties in a knot???? Frankly I think the two term limit is wrong but I am not a yank and I was very happy with our Queen of over 70 years. Meh.

Funny though how it is an AMENDMENT....so it CHANGED the Constitution. Still a meh though.

Greg
 
Last edited:
In his first term, Trump realized he was not qualified and surrounded himself with those who were. He was outraged when they would do their jobs and not what he wanted done for him. Sessions and Barr felt his wrath.
Second term he has surrounded himself with unqualified people that were loyal to him
That is why he is on such a rampage.
It’s more likely Trump believed – incorrectly – that he was qualified and allowed those qualified to be appointed for him believing – again, incorrectly – that those qualified people would support him.

Remember that Trump is ignorant of governance and public policy – he wouldn’t know anyone qualified to govern for him; so his handlers appointed qualified people in his first term.

When those qualified people disagreed with Trump, keeping Trump from doing stupid, dangerous things, he made sure during his second term that he would be surrounded by incompetent, corrupt, unqualified sycophants who would allow Trump to do stupid, dangerous things – like start failed, illegal wars and create thug funds to payoff his fellow domestic terrorists with taxpayers’ money.
 
interesting and informative to see that so far there have been 4 people that voted in the thread, that say that we should throw the Constitution away and keep an Authoritarian Dictator in office.

If that is not the definition of a cult full of traitors to our nation, then I do not know what it is.
Nah; the amendment was only approved in 1951 or so. It can be removed just as easily without affecting the rest of the Constitution. lol

Greg
 
Show where the Constitution allows the vice president, on the day electoral votes are slated to be counted, to decide which states' electors can be discarded and sent back to their respective states to be changed.

You're referring to Trump's pushing Pence to refuse to certify.

The Left interprets this as Trump attempting to remain in office despite the vote, in maintenance of their fallacious 'dictator' perspective.

Trump was acting based on his (and others) understanding of the 12th Amendment and a legitimate concern that fraud took place.

How is that acting against? It's the way the system works and why we have a Judicial branch that can make such determinations.

What was the upshot? The election was certified and Trump stepped down, contradicting the conspiracy theories that he wouldn't.

Once Trump declared fraud, out came the Democrat knives to destroy him. I don't believe this was a patriotic act on their part, given the 3 year farce that took place after. The non-stop effort to unseat Trump (that began during his campaign) can also well serve as an example that the priority of the Democrats was and is to unseat anti-Establishment Trump, who demonstrated that his promise to drain the Swamp weren't empty.

And IMO, cheating in Elections is well within the Democrat wheelhouse.

A bit of research will tell you that most if not all US Presidents/admins have been accused of acting against the Constitution in some way. Some have been upheld, some struck down, some unresolved.
 
For at least the last 50 years conservatives have been enemies of the rule of law, limiting the authority of the state, and protecting individual liberty – seeking more government, bigger government at the expense of individual liberty, seeking to disenfranchise voters of color, and seeking to eliminate the right to due process and equal protection of the law.

The myth is that prior to Trump, the GOP was a right of center political party interested in sound governance and responsible public policy – when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.

It’s the authoritarian conservative movement hostile to the Constitution and our democratic institutions that manifested the political malignancy that is Trump.
 
15th post
You do not know that for a fact. He certainly is open to it!



Donald Trump third term proposal

Donald Trump was the 45th and is the 47th president of the United States. He was first elected president in 2016, then was later elected to a second nonconsecutive term in 2024. Trump has repeatedly raised the possibility of remaining in office for more than two terms, despite the Twenty-second Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibiting any person being elected president more than twice. Trump has made inconsistent statements around this topic, sometimes claiming to be joking about the possibility or using it to antagonize his opponents.

Why not? Democrats did it with FDR.
 
Why if it gets your panties in a knot???? Frankly I think the two term limit is wrong but I am not a yank and I was very happy with our Queen of over 70 years. Meh.

Funny though how it is an AMENDMENT....so it CHANGED the Constitution. Still a meh though.

Greg
DId you think it ways wrong when Obama couldn’t run for a third term?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom