The only difference is that Rush Limbaugh isn't around to say "I hope Biden fails"
Or to call college girls "whores" because they want birth control in their health plan.
^ the problem is not separating taxes so people who believe in funding people's personal health choices can do so WITHOUT imposing on people who believe it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to regulate health choices through federal govt.
THAT is what causes the conflict.
It does not justify the namecalling which is still an ad hominem attack, as well as offensive and sexist.
But the Left fails to address and acknowledge the unlawful Discrimination by Creed by continuing to push Statist beliefs through Govt that violate equal rights to exercise and defend Constitutional Beliefs.
Constitutional beliefs allow the free exercise of right to health care by individuals and states. But not vice versa. The unlawful establishment and imposition of Statist beliefs in health care through federal mandates VIOLATE Constitutional beliefs in limits and process that require Constitutional Convention and Amendment to approve such legislation expanding federal duties in order to represent taxpayers consent and protect due process before depriving individuals of liberty and free choice.
Moonglow C_Clayton_Jones
Sorry , but your excuses for Rush are unnecessary everyone knows he did it for the fame and notoriety. If I can get Viagra for free through my medical provider then women should be able to get birth control.
Dear
Moonglow
Forgiving people is not the same as excusing it.
When his remarks were first made, I pointed out the same things,
that in ADDITION to being offensive and sexist and unnecessary attacks,
the controversy and offense DISTRACTS FROM THE REAL ISSUE.
If you keep focusing on Rush, and whether people are attacking or defending him personally
THAT IS STILL A DISTRACTION.
BOTH things are wrongful.
BOTH the sexist offensive attacks on the student.
AND the CORE ISSUE being ignored for political bullying.
That is why the problems are not being solved.
We are not agreeing to address the conflicts between
STATIST liberal beliefs (in running personal agenda through federal govt) and
LIBERTARIAN conservative beliefs in PROTECTING personal decisions FROM federal regulations and mandates.
Can we please agree to quit talking past and around the issue?
It seems pointless for both sides to shoot blanks past each other's heads.
Why can't we address the REAL "Elephant" (or "Donkey") in the room?
It isn't just "Christian vs LGBT" or "Liberal vs Conservative"
but the issue is bullying to push ONE set of BELIEFS (whether political beliefs, religious or personal morals)
THROUGH FEDERAL GOVT AND MAKING THIS MANDATORY
TO COMPLY WITH FEDERALLY REGULATED TERMS OF SOCIAL POLICIES AND DECISIONS.
When can we have an HONEST OPEN conversation about
THAT issue, of federal regulations of PERSONAL policies?
(whether LGBT, or health and reproductive policy decisions etc.)