Senate Democrats May Be Further Harming Their November Election Chances With Supreme Court Nominee

[Lisa558]

Did you oppose it when Reagan and both Bushes did? No you did not. So your opinion isn't worth shit because you're more biased than you accuse Biden of being.

Neither one ruled out 95% of the competition. Biden left us with slim pickings, and perhaps she’s the best he could come up with, given the restrictions against men and whites.

 

[BS Filter]

Deneen Borelli and Candace Owens are eminently qualified Black women. Biden could have nominated either of them. Much smarter than this ding dong.

 

[bendog]

Neither one ruled out 95% of the competition. Biden left us with slim pickings, and perhaps she’s the best he could come up with, given the restrictions against men and whites.

BS. Reagan ruled out all men. Bush selected Thomas because he was black. You're simply a hypocrite.

And that's even giving you the benefit of ignoring whether a person who is black or a woman will have experienced things that a white male cannot have experienced.

 

[bendog]

Deneen Borelli and Candace Owens are eminently qualified Black women. Biden could have nominated either of them. Much smarter than this ding dong.

And Mitch could have given Garland a vote. LOL This is even duplicitous for you.

 

[BS Filter]

BS. Reagan ruled out all men. Bush selected Thomas because he was black. You're simply a hypocrite.

And that's even giving you the benefit of ignoring whether a person who is black or a woman will have experienced things that a white male cannot have experienced.

Bush never said he selected Thomas because he is Black.

 

[surada]

Sad, but last year’s news - and off topic.

You still think COVID is a hoax and Putin is a hero?

 

[bendog]

Bush never said he selected Thomas because he is Black.

Gosh .... it was a coincidence! And obviously no other jurist had credentials better than his. Obviously. LOL

But he was and is qualified.

 

[Lisa558]

BS. Reagan ruled out all men. Bush selected Thomas because he was black. You're simply a hypocrite.

And that's even giving you the benefit of ignoring whether a person who is black or a woman will have experienced things that a white male cannot have experienced.

What difference does it make what a black woman has experienced? She’s not supposed to represent black woman! She is supposed to represent everyone, and make sure the law is applied fairly.

BTW, she’s excusing herself from the Harvard affirmative action case. Given her conflict of interest - she likely benefited from it - it would be wrong for her to weigh in on keeping out Asians in favor of blacks.

 

[Lisa558]

You still think COVID is a hoax and Putin is a hero?

I never said either of those things. You’re a liar, fueled by hate.

 

[BS Filter]

BS. Reagan ruled out all men. Bush selected Thomas because he was black. You're simply a hypocrite.

And that's even giving you the benefit of ignoring whether a person who is black or a woman will have experienced things that a white male cannot have experienced.

What does the experience of being a Black woman have to do with interpretation of the Constitution?

 

[bendog]

What difference does it make what a black woman has experienced? She’s not supposed to represent black woman! She is supposed to represent everyone, and make sure the law is applied fairly.

BTW, she’s excusing herself from the Harvard affirmative action case. Given her conflict of interest - she likely benefited from it - it would be wrong for her to weigh in on keeping out Asians in favor of blacks.

No JUstice represents ANYONE.. For fuck's sake what do you think this is? President's appropriately select people of diverse backgrounds to bring as much understanding to how law affects society.

The "Test" is what happens when the text of a law conflicts with a judge's personal beliefs.

 

[Lisa558]

No JUstice represents ANYONE.. For fuck's sake what do you think this is? President's appropriately select people of diverse backgrounds to bring as much understanding to how law affects society.

The "Test" is what happens when the text of a law conflicts with a judge's personal beliefs.

So why do we need someone with the experience of a black woman, as you said? Her experience as a black woman is irrelevant to her role on the SCOTUS.

Diversity is not a worthy goal. Getting the best people, regardless of race, should be the goal. But not to you racists.

 

[lantern2814]

She wasn't involved in any. That's why it was fair game for the others like Kavanaugh.

How do you know? She hasn’t answered the question. Are you an investigator? Fair game for Kavanaugh? Fuck off cowardly welching troll boy. Or do you even know what a male is?

 

[lantern2814]

Ha, you want a good laugh, just look at Ginni Thomas. She's not even on the SC and she tells the doofus husband what to vote for.

Your link to that seems to be broken. Looks like you pulled that shit out of your ass.

 

[BS Filter]

Gosh .... it was a coincidence! And obviously no other jurist had credentials better than his. Obviously. LOL

But he was and is qualified.

Yep, Thomas is eminently qualified and Bush never said a word about picking a Black man. Thanks. Tell us what the qualifications are for being a Supreme Court Justice.

 

[lantern2814]

They found out he was a drunk, and still is. No telling what that pos did in college.

No telling what this pedo loving “judge” did in college. As well as Xiden and company withholding over 48,000 documents relating to her. Seems there’s lot being covered up here. Her complete idiocy in front of the committee isn’t helping any.

 

[lantern2814]

Like republic mat geatz?

You misspelled Bob Menendez again racist Otto.

 

[lantern2814]

More racist tropes. Good job.
Amy Coney Barrett was the least qualified nominee ever. Not even in Judge Jackson’s league.

Pretty sure Barrett doesn’t want to be in a league with that pedo loving low intelligence Jackson who doesn’t even know what a woman is. Before you spout moron “racist” verbal diarrhea, there are no mention of skin color there.

 

[protectionist]

Colin Powell has died of COVID.

What does that have to do with the quote ?

 

[protectionist]

Did you oppose it when Reagan and both Bushes did? No you did not. So your opinion isn't worth shit because you're more biased than you accuse Biden of being.

When did they do that ? And even IF they did, that doesn't make it OK now.