Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah, with a partisan Democrat hack as presiding judge. This trial is right out of Nazi Germany.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
Imagine the (manufactured) outrage if a Dem (any Dem, anywhere) had said that about a GOP SenatorI hope he goes into a coma for a couple of years.They just took Patrick Leahy to the hospital. Probably fell down drunk and broke his fat lying nose.
I’m citing the Constitution, Stupid.If this trial is Constitutional the Constitution requires Roberts to preside.Then he must be impeached. Why isn’t Nazi impeaching him?Your ignorance of Roberts’ refusal to oversee the Shampeachment trial isn’t my concern.Do you have a link to that?Chief Justice Roberts states he will not participate in this unconstitutional farce.
Should I go with his knowledge of the Constitution, or that of unhinged, single digit IQ Dimwinger fuckwits on an innerweb message board?
Hmmmmm......
Translation: You're citing yourself AS Roberts. As Roberts has never claimed that the impeachment is an 'unconstitutional farce'.
Color me shocked.
You can’t win this.
Who is 'nazi' in your little imagination?
Remember, you're not quoting Roberts. You're quoting yourself. The only one saying that Roberts must be impeached is you, citing yourself as a constitutional authority.
And your source doesn't know what he's talking about.
Says you, citing yourself as the constitutional authority. And you don't know what you're talking about.
The constitution has only this requirement of Roberts: "When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside"
Since Trump is no longer president, Roberts is under no obligation to preside. See how simple that was?
Either it is Constitutional, or he is violating his oath and needs to be impeached.
Or....you don't know what you're talking about.
You are clearly ignorant of what the Constitution says about a Senate Impeachment trial.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
I’m citing the Constitution, Stupid.
You should find someone to read it to you.
The only Impeachment that requires the Chief Justice is for a sitting President. Roberts demurred because he reportedly didn't want to be at the center of this. Precedent says that in cases not involving a sitting President that the VP or President Pro Tem preside. It has happened numerous timesI qouted the Constitution, shitstain. What part of " When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside" didn't you understand?
You are clearly ignorant of what the Constitution says about a Senate Impeachment trial.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
Personally, I'd prefer Roberts do it, but that's not the decision they made. Leahy is going to do his best. He's taking it so seriously, he's giving himself a heart attack.Yeah, with a partisan Democrat hack as presiding judge. This trial is right out of Nazi Germany.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
No such thing as impeaching a private citizen.I’m citing the Constitution, Stupid.
You should find someone to read it to you.
Here's the constitution:
Show me where it says that Roberts must preside over the impeachment trial of an ex-president.
If you're citing the constitution, this will be remarkably easy. If you're citing your imagination, it will be a bit harder.
You just posted that Trump was an EX-PRESIDENT. Now you are arguing he is President.You are clearly ignorant of what the Constitution says about a Senate Impeachment trial.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
Or....you are. Here's everything the constitution has to say on the matter:
"The Senate shall have sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law."
That establishes the Senate's authority. That establishes the punishments. That establishes the requirements of conviction.
So where is the part that says that Trump's impeachment is an 'unconstitutional farce'? Because I'm pretty sure you're citing your imagination on that one.
No such thing as impeaching a private citizen.I’m citing the Constitution, Stupid.
You should find someone to read it to you.
Here's the constitution:
Show me where it says that Roberts must preside over the impeachment trial of an ex-president.
If you're citing the constitution, this will be remarkably easy. If you're citing your imagination, it will be a bit harder.
Your link...”WHEN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS TRIED”.You are clearly ignorant of what the Constitution says about a Senate Impeachment trial.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
Or....you are. Here's everything the constitution has to say on the matter:
"The Senate shall have sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law."
That establishes the Senate's authority. That establishes the punishments. That establishes the requirements of conviction.
So where is the part that says that Trump's impeachment is an 'unconstitutional farce'? Because I'm pretty sure you're citing your imagination on that one.
Show me where the Constitution spells out the procedures for impeaching a private citizen.No such thing as impeaching a private citizen.I’m citing the Constitution, Stupid.
You should find someone to read it to you.
Here's the constitution:
Show me where it says that Roberts must preside over the impeachment trial of an ex-president.
If you're citing the constitution, this will be remarkably easy. If you're citing your imagination, it will be a bit harder.
Says who? That would be you, citing yourself.
Trump was impeached, thus the Senate has authority. Says who? Says the constitution.
"The Senate shall have sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation."
Now why would I ignore the constitution and instead believe your rambling pseudo-legal gibberish?
You just posted that Trump was an EX-PRESIDENT. Now you are arguing he is President.You are clearly ignorant of what the Constitution says about a Senate Impeachment trial.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
Or....you are. Here's everything the constitution has to say on the matter:
"The Senate shall have sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law."
That establishes the Senate's authority. That establishes the punishments. That establishes the requirements of conviction.
So where is the part that says that Trump's impeachment is an 'unconstitutional farce'? Because I'm pretty sure you're citing your imagination on that one.
You can’t win, Stupid.
Your link did just that.You just posted that Trump was an EX-PRESIDENT. Now you are arguing he is President.You are clearly ignorant of what the Constitution says about a Senate Impeachment trial.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
Or....you are. Here's everything the constitution has to say on the matter:
"The Senate shall have sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law."
That establishes the Senate's authority. That establishes the punishments. That establishes the requirements of conviction.
So where is the part that says that Trump's impeachment is an 'unconstitutional farce'? Because I'm pretty sure you're citing your imagination on that one.
You can’t win, Stupid.
Nope. I've never said that Trump is still president. That would be you, citing yourself again.
Show us in the constitution where it says that the Senate has no authority over his impeachment trial after he's left office.
Smiling.....good luck.
Show me where the Constitution spells out the procedures for impeaching a private citizen.No such thing as impeaching a private citizen.I’m citing the Constitution, Stupid.
You should find someone to read it to you.
Here's the constitution:
Show me where it says that Roberts must preside over the impeachment trial of an ex-president.
If you're citing the constitution, this will be remarkably easy. If you're citing your imagination, it will be a bit harder.
Says who? That would be you, citing yourself.
Trump was impeached, thus the Senate has authority. Says who? Says the constitution.
"The Senate shall have sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation."
Now why would I ignore the constitution and instead believe your rambling pseudo-legal gibberish?
You lose again.
I've read it, I've quoted it, and I've remarked on it. It's not up to me, or you, to make this decision. Precedent has been set and they have interpreted the situation the way they have. We've never had a President shit the bed so close to leaving office before, so their decision is theirs to make, and they've made it, despite the efforts of legions of Trumpsters to play Constitutional Lawyer. You're just making noise at this point. You might do better to polish up on why the President doesn't deserve to be convicted, because that train is coming down the track.You are clearly ignorant of what the Constitution says about a Senate Impeachment trial.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
Your link did just that.You just posted that Trump was an EX-PRESIDENT. Now you are arguing he is President.You are clearly ignorant of what the Constitution says about a Senate Impeachment trial.LOL You aren't wiggling your way out this one. It's a valid trial, being conducted in a legal manner, just like the election was. All the crying and whining in the world isn't going to change this, either.
Or....you are. Here's everything the constitution has to say on the matter:
"The Senate shall have sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.
Judgement in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States; but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgement and Punishment, according to Law."
That establishes the Senate's authority. That establishes the punishments. That establishes the requirements of conviction.
So where is the part that says that Trump's impeachment is an 'unconstitutional farce'? Because I'm pretty sure you're citing your imagination on that one.
You can’t win, Stupid.
Nope. I've never said that Trump is still president. That would be you, citing yourself again.
Show us in the constitution where it says that the Senate has no authority over his impeachment trial after he's left office.
Smiling.....good luck.
Are you now claiming Trump is still President?
It's been shown to you that Sec of War was a private citizen when Impeached due to his resignation.No such thing as impeaching a private citizen.