See it with your own eyes.

[gipper]

Do you really have no clue how ignorant your post looks?

I don’t think so. Do you deny you’ve bought all the lies and propaganda about 10/7 and have allowed it to justify a genocide? The corporate media told you what to believe and you believe the lies.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Let me give you my opinion.

The problem is not that the media isn't doing it's job. It's that you don't like what the media is telling you. I say this with respect.

It's a function of how people get their information. Before you didn't have a choice between MSM and wherever you get your information. Now you do. If you don't like what CNN is telling you, you can just go on YouTube were anyone with a laptop and an opinion can make a quick buck on confirming your biases.

I speak from the experiences I've had on this board. Over the years I've gotten in the habit of being very particular of my sourcing here. Preferring primary sources wherever I can find them. What I've noticed is that no matter how unimpeachable the source. It still gets rejected by people.

The examples you give illustrate this point. Jan 6th happened, I saw it with my own eyes. It happened because of Trump refusing to concede the election, I sourced his tweets calling people to the Capitol. Although he lost all the lawsuits contesting the election, I sourced the court documents attesting to that. Trump pressured the DOJ to lie about their investigations. I sourced the memo he wanted them to release. He pressured governors and his own VP to not certify. I sourced a phone call to Kemp, and his tweets to Pence. Several RIGHT-WING media outlets had to settle Fox for hundreds of millions for propagating lies. I sourced those court documents. Trump's campaign forged electoral college votes. I sourced their letter. Etc.etc.

These are all things I've seen with my own eyes and sourced, not once using the media. Yet you assert he somehow didn't do what I know he did.

That's not a failure of the media. That's a failure of you.

Feel free to challenge what I said. I'll be happy to source.

Show the alleged pressure.

 

[gipper]

It is fine for me
I'm not a lunatic like you.

Lol. I’m a lunatic for opposing genocide and non-stop wars pushed by the elite you obey like a good little serf.

If only you could think instead of parroting the establishment. Big Brother lives you.

 

[otto105]

Trump had nothing to do with Heratige foundation PJCT 2025. I took a look at it and it is a vauge monster list of this and that in language I am not smart enough to understand. I got not time to figure out even one page of one chapter. It was complicated and no specifics.


So nice try with your CNN MSLSD pablum you big dumb Baby. Get off the boards posting nonsese you have no idea about.//

Fat Elvis is friends with the chief architect of the project and has been pictured on airplane trips with him.

140 former Fat Elvis employees worked on the project.

JD coucher fucker wrote the forward for the project.

It was created with Fat Elvis in mind.

 

[22lcidw]

Progressive City Newspapers were once Democratic. Then they were Liberal. now they are Progressive Socialist on the way to Communist. In those areas they citizens get this endless stream of this type of propaganda. A half century ago half the children in the city I grew up in went to Parochial School. Today a good percentage of the schools and churches are closed. People were democrat in the city as it was mostly that. However, there were left leaning, moderate and conservative democrats. With about 20% of the city Republican. The changeover happened around the same time. For Catholics Vatican 2 became the norm. Not as strict as before. Newspapers in Prog cities became Liberal. The government started to become massive from the 1960's legislations on social programs. Cities and states raised taxes in huge percentages. Even with the Republican Revolution balancing the budget in the 1990's it was not done with real foundation cuts and the social programs kept expanding with no programs enacted. We then gave away our manufacturing in trade deals after selling our major name products overseas a decade and more before as huge companies closed down and could not compete with foreign nation who did it cheaper and better. Many of those privileged employees though got good pensions and a hefty check when their companies closed down. That took us to W. and Obama and onward.

 

[gipper]

It's like you didn't read anything I said, lol.

Yes, of course we have a ruling class comprised of very wealthy individuals. And yes, of course they support crony capitalism.

But cronyism / corporatism is actually collectivist. It's obviously not the same as free market capitalism. In fact, although I'm not an expert, I would say it goes in the exact opposite direction.

Again, you keep using the words "left" and "right"... As I just said, because people have different definitions in mind when it comes to those words, it's very misleading to use them.

Instead of using the words left or right, I would say Kamala is a statist and globalist. And the type of system the globalists want is collectivist, in other words, they don't care about the rights of the individual. And those at the top decide what they think is best for everyone. (The "greater good" is a load of BS, we can see that by looking at totalitarian systems that are rooted in collectivism....those in control of it at the very top always live like kings while everyone else is miserable.)

I hope I'm being clear here. And if you didn't, I hope you watch that first video I posted. He goes into all of this and if you watch the other parts of the same talk, he goes into it all in depth.

I read it. It doesn’t really matter. The oligarchy that controls everything is evil and doesn’t concern itself with the ideas of conservatism and liberalism or right and left. All they care about is increasing there wealth and power with the goal of controlling the masses.
My point is the duopoly dupes like to claim absurd accusations against each other, when the fact is the two parties are very much alike.

 

[Billiejeens]

I read it. It doesn’t really matter. The oligarchy that controls everything is evil and doesn’t concern itself with the ideas of conservatism and liberalism or right and left. All they care about is increasing there wealth and power with the goal of controlling the masses.
My point is the duopoly dupes like to claim absurd accusations against each other, when the fact is the two parties are very much alike.

So?

 

[buttercup]

I read it. It doesn’t really matter. The oligarchy that controls everything is evil and doesn’t concern itself with the ideas of conservatism and liberalism or right and left. All they care about is increasing there wealth and power with the goal of controlling the masses.

My point is the duopoly dupes like to claim absurd accusations against each other, when the fact is the two parties are very much alike.

No need to tell me that, that's one of the things I've been saying all along!

That's the thing that too many people just don't grok.

The oligarchs at the very top control both "sides" and constantly play both sides against each other. And although they want a collectivist and strict authoritarian system for everyone else, they will continue to live like kings, and not be affected by their system. Similar to how it has been historically in communist or other totalitarian regimes.

 

[Billiejeens]

No need to tell me that, that's one of the things I've been saying all along!

That's the thing that too many people just don't grok.

The oligarchs at the very top control both "sides" and constantly play both sides against each other. And although they want a collectivist and strict authoritarian system for everyone else, they will continue to live like kings, and not be affected by their system. Similar to how it has been historically in communist or other totalitarian regimes.

So?

 

[buttercup]

So?

They are evil and don't care about any of us, and don't care about freedom or individual rights or the principles that this country was founded on.

Their strategies are often very deceptive, they trick people into doing things that we ordinarily wouldn't do.

Their goals are very bad news for EVERYONE, "right" or "left".

So I'm kind of amazed that you would say, "So?".....I mean, unless you just didn't know that we're not talking about good honest people.

 

[Billiejeens]

They are evil and don't care about any of us, and don't care about freedom or individual rights or the principles that this country was founded on.

Their strategies are often very deceptive, they trick people into doing things that we ordinarily wouldn't do.

Their goals are very bad news for EVERYONE, "right" or "left".

So I'm kind of amazed that you would say, "So?".....I mean, unless you just didn't know that we're not talking about good honest people.

And?

 

[buttercup]

And?

Ok, so you're fine with evil people taking us toward the NWO. Got it.

I couldn't disagree more, but you do you.

 

[Billiejeens]

Ok, so you're fine with evil people taking us toward the NWO. Got it.

I couldn't disagree more, but you do you.

So you aren't fine with it,

What's your plan?

 

[buttercup]

So you aren't fine with it,

What's your plan?

My plan? For one thing, I don't put my trust in governments or politicians. I know this might sound gloom and doomish, but personally I think our country is too far gone to reverse course. So the only thing I feel I can do is try to expose it. But the good news is, some of us know who wins in the end. The true power of this world. So that's another thing that I try to do, help people to see the bigger picture.

 

[Theowl32]

In essence, we have two right wing parties working in tandem to protect enrich and empower the 1%.

Wow

 

[IDIOCRACY]

If you live in a woke city you need to take a long, hard look at your local media. Can these information sources be trusted? Are the local media in the city too closely aligned with World Economic Forum and its plans to undermine the United States with ICLEI and Agenda 21 policies to change the voting demographics of the country?

Did your city broadsheet join a coalition of other newspapers to block the free speech of a former US president saying that his criticism of the press was a threat to democracy. Why would any newspaper join other newspapers to stem free speech? The answer of course is that actual free speech is dangerous to a status quo that has a decidedly socialist agenda and something to hide.

UN Agenda 21 and ICLEI: Is "sustainable development" something the American people want?

At 77 years old I have memories of what I was taught in school. One of the key points I recall is that I was told the main difference between democracy and totalitarianism is that in a democracy the press is there to inform the people and regularly investigate the existing power structure to keep it honest. In totalitarian countries the press functions as public relations for the established status quo. The press in authoritarian countries is essentially a propaganda arm of the government.

The instructors I had as a young citizen were survivors of the Great Depression and a world war, and I felt confident that they were telling me the truth. I still believe they gave me useful information. In closed, centrally planned societies like the former Soviet Union and East Germany critics of the government were routinely arrested and charged with crimes against the state. People in those societies would watch as dissidents were jailed along with their supporters, and many would assume state offenders were guilty of serious crimes. After all, the people in power and the subservient press were clearly saying that the troublemakers were trying to overthrow the state. We were told that could never happen here because we have democracy with a vigilant press that would expose it.

Did you see what they did to a former US president who was not part of a cabal to fundamentally change America? These people just substituted the word state for the word democracy and then accused the president of being an existential threat to the state which was now what democracy is all about. In other words, the state, not the people, decides what democracy is. New woke socialism in your city has redefined democracy as something owned exclusively by the state so socialism in now democracy. Do you see how clever that is? This is the same dark verbal virtuosity that was used by the communists in the Cold War.

All you have to do is look around and see what is happening. You need to see it with your own eyes not the distorted lens the state is providing for you.

Respect.............Is it too late? I don't have much faith considering what the public has become, and what they're bringing.

 

[Leo123]

If you live in a woke city you need to take a long, hard look at your local media. Can these information sources be trusted? Are the local media in the city too closely aligned with World Economic Forum and its plans to undermine the United States with ICLEI and Agenda 21 policies to change the voting demographics of the country?

Did your city broadsheet join a coalition of other newspapers to block the free speech of a former US president saying that his criticism of the press was a threat to democracy. Why would any newspaper join other newspapers to stem free speech? The answer of course is that actual free speech is dangerous to a status quo that has a decidedly socialist agenda and something to hide.

UN Agenda 21 and ICLEI: Is "sustainable development" something the American people want?

At 77 years old I have memories of what I was taught in school. One of the key points I recall is that I was told the main difference between democracy and totalitarianism is that in a democracy the press is there to inform the people and regularly investigate the existing power structure to keep it honest. In totalitarian countries the press functions as public relations for the established status quo. The press in authoritarian countries is essentially a propaganda arm of the government.

The instructors I had as a young citizen were survivors of the Great Depression and a world war, and I felt confident that they were telling me the truth. I still believe they gave me useful information. In closed, centrally planned societies like the former Soviet Union and East Germany critics of the government were routinely arrested and charged with crimes against the state. People in those societies would watch as dissidents were jailed along with their supporters, and many would assume state offenders were guilty of serious crimes. After all, the people in power and the subservient press were clearly saying that the troublemakers were trying to overthrow the state. We were told that could never happen here because we have democracy with a vigilant press that would expose it.

Did you see what they did to a former US president who was not part of a cabal to fundamentally change America? These people just substituted the word state for the word democracy and then accused the president of being an existential threat to the state which was now what democracy is all about. In other words, the state, not the people, decides what democracy is. New woke socialism in your city has redefined democracy as something owned exclusively by the state so socialism in now democracy. Do you see how clever that is? This is the same dark verbal virtuosity that was used by the communists in the Cold War.

All you have to do is look around and see what is happening. You need to see it with your own eyes not the distorted lens the state is providing for you.

The Democrat Party is guided by Marxists who, as part of their typical takeover, change language, blame others for what they themselves do, foment distrust in the citizenry and propagandize children.

 

[Leo123]

You state this yet support our government’s heinous actions in Palestine and Ukraine. WTF!

You need to open your eyes.

You support Hamas then?

 

[Billiejeens]

Wow

The 1% that literally pay for everything these idiots take for granted and make the country function day in and day out.

 

[Billiejeens]

You support Hamas then?

He does