True that. She was not in the limo. And, importantly, poster Leo she never ever claimed she was. Rather, she clearly and succinctly described who TOLD the story, when she was told, where she was told, and the context of the telling.
Someone asked in a post above....who do I believe.
Well, I believe that Cassidy Hutchinson was told what she was told and that she faithfully testified to what she was told.
I cannot compare her version to whatever description the SS agents may say, because.......well, because they haven't gone in front of the media to describe the conversation that Hutchinson witnessed.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyperventilating over "Luciferain cults"....seems a tad fringie to those of us out here in rural America. But then, it is sort of humorous in a Mad Magazine/Onion vibe. Bizarro Desk playtime. IMHO.
But beyond that fringie aspect of poster Munkle's suggestion that Cassisdy Hutchinson should be jailed for perjury seems unsupported. I watched all of her testimony. In my view, in my experience, in my sense of veracity and sincerity.....well, Hutchinson checked all the boxes. She came across as sincere, humble, informed, and very careful in what she said. Meaning, she declined to extrapolate or speculate despite questions from the panel that were inviting her to expand.
So, did I believe Cassidy Hutchinson?
Yupper, I did.
Despite my fear of Luciferian cults......or those like Luciferian cults. You know.....like QAnon jackassery cults.
Just sayin'.
----------------------------------------------------------
??????
Hutchinson's testimony was imagined?
By her?
Is that what the poster Yarddog is suggesting?
-------------------------------------------------------
Well, that's a quick morphing from "Luciferian" cultism to "Swamp Creatures"-cultism.
????
There seems to be a fantasy-world that some of our local posters live in.
For whatever reason. Who knows?
Unhappy? Unsuccessful? in their real-world life?
Is QAnon cultism on the menu too?
I dunno.
Well, I don't have answer for that.
I don't even know if it is true.
Is the poster saying the Capitol Police were 'understrength' for expected daily interactions with the public?
How would he know that?
But a relevant fact bearing on any discussion of Police staffing on January 6th......and this applies to both the Capitol Police force, AND....the DC Metro Police and the National Park Police....was that none of those department were expecting a "march". An event that requires permitting by authorities. Permits that are applied for by the organization hosting the march, starting the march, initiating and encouraging the march. Permits that give notice to law enforcement that traffic concerns, barriers, and crowd control tactics need be implemented.
But, despite the understanding and agreement within the Don Trump and White House inner circle that a march was always intended ---but intentionally not shared --- with the City, with the Capitol Police, or the National Park police. Those law enforcement agencies were intentionally kept in the dark by the Trump camp. Why?
Did they desire a un-reinforced police presence? Why?