Seahawks SUCK !!!!

[Montrovant]

Put another way, Blair Walsh was 32 of 33 on FGs inside of 30 yards prior to that game. I don't know if his one miss was a miss or a block. He also missed only 1 extra point in 109 attempts prior to the distance change this season.

I don't know if I can find stats on the Seahawks from inside the 5 or something like that, but I would guess the percentage is lower for them scoring TDs than Walsh's kicking percentage.

To put it another way. It was just a comment.

The point was not to make an exact statistical comparison. It was about the similar despair the losing fans experienced as each team snatched a loss from the jaws of victory in the last seconds of the games. There were exactly 26 seconds left in both games as the tables were tuned.

I was asking if Seattle fans should feel bad for the Vikings fans. I decided not as there were no consultation messages offer me or any that I saw from NE fans directed toward Seahawk fans.

What you did was compare the plays as being about luck. Seattle did not block the kick, nor disrupt it particularly. It was bad play by the Vikings. New England called the correct play on defense in the Super Bowl, their player made a great play, it wasn't just some duck thrown by Wilson into the Patriots' hands, the Hawks receiver didn't fall down on the play, nothing like that. As usual you refuse to give credit to the Patriots for the play.

The difference between the plays, the huge difference, is that New England absolutely deserves credit for the Super Bowl play and absolutely it was a good defensive play that made it happen, while in the Vikings game the Seahawks did nothing special to cause the miss, it was just a bad kick.

Fans of every team that lose a close game in the last seconds are upset. You compared the two plays as both being nothing but luck, which is, again, where calling you a homer comes in.

The kick previous to the missed kick was almost blocked by Sherman. Richard missed the block by less than an inch. The Vikings kicker did not shank or miss kick the ball. It went straight. I'm thinking he kicked the ball to the left of center intentionally to prevent the ball being blocked. But....

You are STILL missing the point I was making.

I couldn't care less if you think I am a "homer". Obviously I am a fan of the Hawks. That's not up for debate nor is it a secret.

I WAS TALKING ONLY ABOUT IF SEAHAWK FANS SHOULD HAVE EMPATHY FOR VIKINGS FANS BECAUSE OF THE GUT WRENCHING TURN OF EVENTS AND THEIR LOSS.

In BOTH situations the Hawks and the Vikings were mere seconds from an almost certain victory. Whether one situation was more or less almost certain is irrelevant to the point I was attempting to make.

BOTH teams made mistakes that caused their losses. The Hawks could have called a different play featuring different personnel such as a fake inside run with Wilson operating the dive/run/option with him running around one or the other end and keeping the ball. THAT play has been used MANY times and almost always successful. The Viking kicker could have just frigging kicked the ball straight. Again THAT is not the debate I was attempting to inspire.

I was simply questioning if Hawk fans should offer some kind of condolences towards Vikings fans. As I recall the NE fans here and at the other sites I view offered no such empathy.

Do you get it YET??? Probably not. I'm guessing you get lost frequently. Even with maps and GPS available...simply because you ignorantly believe you are right in all circumstances.

What point you are trying to make doesn't change the fact that you went about it by comparing the two plays as being based on luck. What, do you think the only thing that matters is the main point of your post and all the details should just be ignored?

Where did I post that both play's outcomes were based on luck? The only thing for sure is that both plays had unexpected last second outcomes. Both team's fans were pretty sure they had the game won. Both teams ended with losses. Should the Hawk's fans be any more empathetic than the NE fans were to the Hawk's faithful? THAT is the ONLY point I was attempting to bring up. All that minutia won't change how the fans should deal with the loss...or the win. Recent history suggests that the winners shouldn't give a damn what the loser's are going though.

You said this :

NE got lucky with probably the dumbest play/personnel call in Super Bowl History on the part of Daryll Bevell and Ricardo Lockette being the slant receiver with no experience as a slant receiver.

when describing how the plays were similar. I don't know if you've ever said anything which would indicate that New England called the right play and that Butler made a great play on the throw. It's always about how it was a terrible play by Seattle, New England was lucky, yadda yadda. That's how you always post : everything is about the Seahawks, not the other teams. It's actually surprising that you haven't been painting this game as being about Seattle's greatness somehow.

I don't care if Seattle fans are empathetic about the way the game ended or not. I'm just pointing out how everything you post regarding the Seahawks, no matter the circumstance, is homerish. Objective analysis seems beyond you when it comes to Seattle.

 

[HUGGY]

To put it another way. It was just a comment.

The point was not to make an exact statistical comparison. It was about the similar despair the losing fans experienced as each team snatched a loss from the jaws of victory in the last seconds of the games. There were exactly 26 seconds left in both games as the tables were tuned.

I was asking if Seattle fans should feel bad for the Vikings fans. I decided not as there were no consultation messages offer me or any that I saw from NE fans directed toward Seahawk fans.

What you did was compare the plays as being about luck. Seattle did not block the kick, nor disrupt it particularly. It was bad play by the Vikings. New England called the correct play on defense in the Super Bowl, their player made a great play, it wasn't just some duck thrown by Wilson into the Patriots' hands, the Hawks receiver didn't fall down on the play, nothing like that. As usual you refuse to give credit to the Patriots for the play.

The difference between the plays, the huge difference, is that New England absolutely deserves credit for the Super Bowl play and absolutely it was a good defensive play that made it happen, while in the Vikings game the Seahawks did nothing special to cause the miss, it was just a bad kick.

Fans of every team that lose a close game in the last seconds are upset. You compared the two plays as both being nothing but luck, which is, again, where calling you a homer comes in.

The kick previous to the missed kick was almost blocked by Sherman. Richard missed the block by less than an inch. The Vikings kicker did not shank or miss kick the ball. It went straight. I'm thinking he kicked the ball to the left of center intentionally to prevent the ball being blocked. But....

You are STILL missing the point I was making.

I couldn't care less if you think I am a "homer". Obviously I am a fan of the Hawks. That's not up for debate nor is it a secret.

I WAS TALKING ONLY ABOUT IF SEAHAWK FANS SHOULD HAVE EMPATHY FOR VIKINGS FANS BECAUSE OF THE GUT WRENCHING TURN OF EVENTS AND THEIR LOSS.

In BOTH situations the Hawks and the Vikings were mere seconds from an almost certain victory. Whether one situation was more or less almost certain is irrelevant to the point I was attempting to make.

BOTH teams made mistakes that caused their losses. The Hawks could have called a different play featuring different personnel such as a fake inside run with Wilson operating the dive/run/option with him running around one or the other end and keeping the ball. THAT play has been used MANY times and almost always successful. The Viking kicker could have just frigging kicked the ball straight. Again THAT is not the debate I was attempting to inspire.

I was simply questioning if Hawk fans should offer some kind of condolences towards Vikings fans. As I recall the NE fans here and at the other sites I view offered no such empathy.

Do you get it YET??? Probably not. I'm guessing you get lost frequently. Even with maps and GPS available...simply because you ignorantly believe you are right in all circumstances.

What point you are trying to make doesn't change the fact that you went about it by comparing the two plays as being based on luck. What, do you think the only thing that matters is the main point of your post and all the details should just be ignored?

Where did I post that both play's outcomes were based on luck? The only thing for sure is that both plays had unexpected last second outcomes. Both team's fans were pretty sure they had the game won. Both teams ended with losses. Should the Hawk's fans be any more empathetic than the NE fans were to the Hawk's faithful? THAT is the ONLY point I was attempting to bring up. All that minutia won't change how the fans should deal with the loss...or the win. Recent history suggests that the winners shouldn't give a damn what the loser's are going though.

You said this :

NE got lucky with probably the dumbest play/personnel call in Super Bowl History on the part of Daryll Bevell and Ricardo Lockette being the slant receiver with no experience as a slant receiver.

when describing how the plays were similar. I don't know if you've ever said anything which would indicate that New England called the right play and that Butler made a great play on the throw. It's always about how it was a terrible play by Seattle, New England was lucky, yadda yadda. That's how you always post : everything is about the Seahawks, not the other teams. It's actually surprising that you haven't been painting this game as being about Seattle's greatness somehow.

I don't care if Seattle fans are empathetic about the way the game ended or not. I'm just pointing out how everything you post regarding the Seahawks, no matter the circumstance, is homerish. Objective analysis seems beyond you when it comes to Seattle.

You are correct. It IS all about the Seahawks. At least you get THAT!

 

[antiquity]

To put it another way. It was just a comment.

The point was not to make an exact statistical comparison. It was about the similar despair the losing fans experienced as each team snatched a loss from the jaws of victory in the last seconds of the games. There were exactly 26 seconds left in both games as the tables were tuned.

I was asking if Seattle fans should feel bad for the Vikings fans. I decided not as there were no consultation messages offer me or any that I saw from NE fans directed toward Seahawk fans.

What you did was compare the plays as being about luck. Seattle did not block the kick, nor disrupt it particularly. It was bad play by the Vikings. New England called the correct play on defense in the Super Bowl, their player made a great play, it wasn't just some duck thrown by Wilson into the Patriots' hands, the Hawks receiver didn't fall down on the play, nothing like that. As usual you refuse to give credit to the Patriots for the play.

The difference between the plays, the huge difference, is that New England absolutely deserves credit for the Super Bowl play and absolutely it was a good defensive play that made it happen, while in the Vikings game the Seahawks did nothing special to cause the miss, it was just a bad kick.

Fans of every team that lose a close game in the last seconds are upset. You compared the two plays as both being nothing but luck, which is, again, where calling you a homer comes in.

The kick previous to the missed kick was almost blocked by Sherman. Richard missed the block by less than an inch. The Vikings kicker did not shank or miss kick the ball. It went straight. I'm thinking he kicked the ball to the left of center intentionally to prevent the ball being blocked. But....

You are STILL missing the point I was making.

I couldn't care less if you think I am a "homer". Obviously I am a fan of the Hawks. That's not up for debate nor is it a secret.

I WAS TALKING ONLY ABOUT IF SEAHAWK FANS SHOULD HAVE EMPATHY FOR VIKINGS FANS BECAUSE OF THE GUT WRENCHING TURN OF EVENTS AND THEIR LOSS.

In BOTH situations the Hawks and the Vikings were mere seconds from an almost certain victory. Whether one situation was more or less almost certain is irrelevant to the point I was attempting to make.

BOTH teams made mistakes that caused their losses. The Hawks could have called a different play featuring different personnel such as a fake inside run with Wilson operating the dive/run/option with him running around one or the other end and keeping the ball. THAT play has been used MANY times and almost always successful. The Viking kicker could have just frigging kicked the ball straight. Again THAT is not the debate I was attempting to inspire.

I was simply questioning if Hawk fans should offer some kind of condolences towards Vikings fans. As I recall the NE fans here and at the other sites I view offered no such empathy.

Do you get it YET??? Probably not. I'm guessing you get lost frequently. Even with maps and GPS available...simply because you ignorantly believe you are right in all circumstances.

What point you are trying to make doesn't change the fact that you went about it by comparing the two plays as being based on luck. What, do you think the only thing that matters is the main point of your post and all the details should just be ignored?

Where did I post that both play's outcomes were based on luck? The only thing for sure is that both plays had unexpected last second outcomes. Both team's fans were pretty sure they had the game won. Both teams ended with losses. Should the Hawk's fans be any more empathetic than the NE fans were to the Hawk's faithful? THAT is the ONLY point I was attempting to bring up. All that minutia won't change how the fans should deal with the loss...or the win. Recent history suggests that the winners shouldn't give a damn what the loser's are going though.

You said this :

NE got lucky with probably the dumbest play/personnel call in Super Bowl History on the part of Daryll Bevell and Ricardo Lockette being the slant receiver with no experience as a slant receiver.

when describing how the plays were similar. I don't know if you've ever said anything which would indicate that New England called the right play and that Butler made a great play on the throw. It's always about how it was a terrible play by Seattle, New England was lucky, yadda yadda. That's how you always post : everything is about the Seahawks, not the other teams. It's actually surprising that you haven't been painting this game as being about Seattle's greatness somehow.

I don't care if Seattle fans are empathetic about the way the game ended or not. I'm just pointing out how everything you post regarding the Seahawks, no matter the circumstance, is homerish. Objective analysis seems beyond you when it comes to Seattle.

Well since this is mainly a thread about the Seahawks, yes I can understand posters posting pro-Seattle stuff...and actually I understand anti Seahawks fans posting....that is not hard to understand. And since you haven't, that I recall, said anything about which team you support I think you are here doing nothing but spamming.
Come on loser...tell me which loser team you support?
But you are right about one thing for sure....I don't give a damn about any team the Hawks sent to the sidelines to watch the Hawks play the follow week.
Am I a Seattle Seahawks homie.....you damn well believe it.

 

[Montrovant]

What you did was compare the plays as being about luck. Seattle did not block the kick, nor disrupt it particularly. It was bad play by the Vikings. New England called the correct play on defense in the Super Bowl, their player made a great play, it wasn't just some duck thrown by Wilson into the Patriots' hands, the Hawks receiver didn't fall down on the play, nothing like that. As usual you refuse to give credit to the Patriots for the play.

The difference between the plays, the huge difference, is that New England absolutely deserves credit for the Super Bowl play and absolutely it was a good defensive play that made it happen, while in the Vikings game the Seahawks did nothing special to cause the miss, it was just a bad kick.

Fans of every team that lose a close game in the last seconds are upset. You compared the two plays as both being nothing but luck, which is, again, where calling you a homer comes in.

The kick previous to the missed kick was almost blocked by Sherman. Richard missed the block by less than an inch. The Vikings kicker did not shank or miss kick the ball. It went straight. I'm thinking he kicked the ball to the left of center intentionally to prevent the ball being blocked. But....

You are STILL missing the point I was making.

I couldn't care less if you think I am a "homer". Obviously I am a fan of the Hawks. That's not up for debate nor is it a secret.

I WAS TALKING ONLY ABOUT IF SEAHAWK FANS SHOULD HAVE EMPATHY FOR VIKINGS FANS BECAUSE OF THE GUT WRENCHING TURN OF EVENTS AND THEIR LOSS.

In BOTH situations the Hawks and the Vikings were mere seconds from an almost certain victory. Whether one situation was more or less almost certain is irrelevant to the point I was attempting to make.

BOTH teams made mistakes that caused their losses. The Hawks could have called a different play featuring different personnel such as a fake inside run with Wilson operating the dive/run/option with him running around one or the other end and keeping the ball. THAT play has been used MANY times and almost always successful. The Viking kicker could have just frigging kicked the ball straight. Again THAT is not the debate I was attempting to inspire.

I was simply questioning if Hawk fans should offer some kind of condolences towards Vikings fans. As I recall the NE fans here and at the other sites I view offered no such empathy.

Do you get it YET??? Probably not. I'm guessing you get lost frequently. Even with maps and GPS available...simply because you ignorantly believe you are right in all circumstances.

What point you are trying to make doesn't change the fact that you went about it by comparing the two plays as being based on luck. What, do you think the only thing that matters is the main point of your post and all the details should just be ignored?

Where did I post that both play's outcomes were based on luck? The only thing for sure is that both plays had unexpected last second outcomes. Both team's fans were pretty sure they had the game won. Both teams ended with losses. Should the Hawk's fans be any more empathetic than the NE fans were to the Hawk's faithful? THAT is the ONLY point I was attempting to bring up. All that minutia won't change how the fans should deal with the loss...or the win. Recent history suggests that the winners shouldn't give a damn what the loser's are going though.

You said this :

NE got lucky with probably the dumbest play/personnel call in Super Bowl History on the part of Daryll Bevell and Ricardo Lockette being the slant receiver with no experience as a slant receiver.

when describing how the plays were similar. I don't know if you've ever said anything which would indicate that New England called the right play and that Butler made a great play on the throw. It's always about how it was a terrible play by Seattle, New England was lucky, yadda yadda. That's how you always post : everything is about the Seahawks, not the other teams. It's actually surprising that you haven't been painting this game as being about Seattle's greatness somehow.

I don't care if Seattle fans are empathetic about the way the game ended or not. I'm just pointing out how everything you post regarding the Seahawks, no matter the circumstance, is homerish. Objective analysis seems beyond you when it comes to Seattle.

Well since this is mainly a thread about the Seahawks, yes I can understand posters posting pro-Seattle stuff...and actually I understand anti Seahawks fans posting....that is not hard to understand. And since you haven't, that I recall, said anything about which team you support I think you are here doing nothing but spamming.
Come on loser...tell me which loser team you support?
But you are right about one thing for sure....I don't give a damn about any team the Hawks sent to the sidelines to watch the Hawks play the follow week.
Am I a Seattle Seahawks homie.....you damn well believe it.

I've said plenty of times I am a Niners fan. You know what I didn't do after they lost the Super Bowl? Say that Baltimore won based on luck.

 

[Billo_Really]

The kick previous to the missed kick was almost blocked by Sherman. Richard missed the block by less than an inch. The Vikings kicker did not shank or miss kick the ball. It went straight. I'm thinking he kicked the ball to the left of center intentionally to prevent the ball being blocked. But....

You are STILL missing the point I was making.

I couldn't care less if you think I am a "homer". Obviously I am a fan of the Hawks. That's not up for debate nor is it a secret.

I WAS TALKING ONLY ABOUT IF SEAHAWK FANS SHOULD HAVE EMPATHY FOR VIKINGS FANS BECAUSE OF THE GUT WRENCHING TURN OF EVENTS AND THEIR LOSS.

In BOTH situations the Hawks and the Vikings were mere seconds from an almost certain victory. Whether one situation was more or less almost certain is irrelevant to the point I was attempting to make.

BOTH teams made mistakes that caused their losses. The Hawks could have called a different play featuring different personnel such as a fake inside run with Wilson operating the dive/run/option with him running around one or the other end and keeping the ball. THAT play has been used MANY times and almost always successful. The Viking kicker could have just frigging kicked the ball straight. Again THAT is not the debate I was attempting to inspire.

I was simply questioning if Hawk fans should offer some kind of condolences towards Vikings fans. As I recall the NE fans here and at the other sites I view offered no such empathy.

Do you get it YET??? Probably not. I'm guessing you get lost frequently. Even with maps and GPS available...simply because you ignorantly believe you are right in all circumstances.

**** that Vikings' kicker! As a Rams fan, I hate the Vikings. I can't stand the Vikings. Anyway the Vikings can lose, is fine by me.

**** the Vikings!

 

[HUGGY]

The kick previous to the missed kick was almost blocked by Sherman. Richard missed the block by less than an inch. The Vikings kicker did not shank or miss kick the ball. It went straight. I'm thinking he kicked the ball to the left of center intentionally to prevent the ball being blocked. But....

You are STILL missing the point I was making.

I couldn't care less if you think I am a "homer". Obviously I am a fan of the Hawks. That's not up for debate nor is it a secret.

I WAS TALKING ONLY ABOUT IF SEAHAWK FANS SHOULD HAVE EMPATHY FOR VIKINGS FANS BECAUSE OF THE GUT WRENCHING TURN OF EVENTS AND THEIR LOSS.

In BOTH situations the Hawks and the Vikings were mere seconds from an almost certain victory. Whether one situation was more or less almost certain is irrelevant to the point I was attempting to make.

BOTH teams made mistakes that caused their losses. The Hawks could have called a different play featuring different personnel such as a fake inside run with Wilson operating the dive/run/option with him running around one or the other end and keeping the ball. THAT play has been used MANY times and almost always successful. The Viking kicker could have just frigging kicked the ball straight. Again THAT is not the debate I was attempting to inspire.

I was simply questioning if Hawk fans should offer some kind of condolences towards Vikings fans. As I recall the NE fans here and at the other sites I view offered no such empathy.

Do you get it YET??? Probably not. I'm guessing you get lost frequently. Even with maps and GPS available...simply because you ignorantly believe you are right in all circumstances.

What point you are trying to make doesn't change the fact that you went about it by comparing the two plays as being based on luck. What, do you think the only thing that matters is the main point of your post and all the details should just be ignored?

Where did I post that both play's outcomes were based on luck? The only thing for sure is that both plays had unexpected last second outcomes. Both team's fans were pretty sure they had the game won. Both teams ended with losses. Should the Hawk's fans be any more empathetic than the NE fans were to the Hawk's faithful? THAT is the ONLY point I was attempting to bring up. All that minutia won't change how the fans should deal with the loss...or the win. Recent history suggests that the winners shouldn't give a damn what the loser's are going though.

You said this :

NE got lucky with probably the dumbest play/personnel call in Super Bowl History on the part of Daryll Bevell and Ricardo Lockette being the slant receiver with no experience as a slant receiver.

when describing how the plays were similar. I don't know if you've ever said anything which would indicate that New England called the right play and that Butler made a great play on the throw. It's always about how it was a terrible play by Seattle, New England was lucky, yadda yadda. That's how you always post : everything is about the Seahawks, not the other teams. It's actually surprising that you haven't been painting this game as being about Seattle's greatness somehow.

I don't care if Seattle fans are empathetic about the way the game ended or not. I'm just pointing out how everything you post regarding the Seahawks, no matter the circumstance, is homerish. Objective analysis seems beyond you when it comes to Seattle.

Well since this is mainly a thread about the Seahawks, yes I can understand posters posting pro-Seattle stuff...and actually I understand anti Seahawks fans posting....that is not hard to understand. And since you haven't, that I recall, said anything about which team you support I think you are here doing nothing but spamming.
Come on loser...tell me which loser team you support?
But you are right about one thing for sure....I don't give a damn about any team the Hawks sent to the sidelines to watch the Hawks play the follow week.
Am I a Seattle Seahawks homie.....you damn well believe it.

I've said plenty of times I am a Niners fan. You know what I didn't do after they lost the Super Bowl? Say that Baltimore won based on luck.

Then you should do the right thing and start a "9ers Suck!" thread. Now that I stop and think about it I do recall a few peeps that support the Niners. Atheania or whatever her cute ass is was one. Dunno? When she went moderator all over us the team that moved to Santa Clara and fired one of the best coaches in the NFL started sucking. You can really tell if someone is a fairweather fan if they fail to represent when the losses roll in.

 

[Montrovant]

What point you are trying to make doesn't change the fact that you went about it by comparing the two plays as being based on luck. What, do you think the only thing that matters is the main point of your post and all the details should just be ignored?

Where did I post that both play's outcomes were based on luck? The only thing for sure is that both plays had unexpected last second outcomes. Both team's fans were pretty sure they had the game won. Both teams ended with losses. Should the Hawk's fans be any more empathetic than the NE fans were to the Hawk's faithful? THAT is the ONLY point I was attempting to bring up. All that minutia won't change how the fans should deal with the loss...or the win. Recent history suggests that the winners shouldn't give a damn what the loser's are going though.

You said this :

NE got lucky with probably the dumbest play/personnel call in Super Bowl History on the part of Daryll Bevell and Ricardo Lockette being the slant receiver with no experience as a slant receiver.

when describing how the plays were similar. I don't know if you've ever said anything which would indicate that New England called the right play and that Butler made a great play on the throw. It's always about how it was a terrible play by Seattle, New England was lucky, yadda yadda. That's how you always post : everything is about the Seahawks, not the other teams. It's actually surprising that you haven't been painting this game as being about Seattle's greatness somehow.

I don't care if Seattle fans are empathetic about the way the game ended or not. I'm just pointing out how everything you post regarding the Seahawks, no matter the circumstance, is homerish. Objective analysis seems beyond you when it comes to Seattle.

Well since this is mainly a thread about the Seahawks, yes I can understand posters posting pro-Seattle stuff...and actually I understand anti Seahawks fans posting....that is not hard to understand. And since you haven't, that I recall, said anything about which team you support I think you are here doing nothing but spamming.
Come on loser...tell me which loser team you support?
But you are right about one thing for sure....I don't give a damn about any team the Hawks sent to the sidelines to watch the Hawks play the follow week.
Am I a Seattle Seahawks homie.....you damn well believe it.

I've said plenty of times I am a Niners fan. You know what I didn't do after they lost the Super Bowl? Say that Baltimore won based on luck.

Then you should do the right thing and start a "9ers Suck!" thread. Now that I stop and think about it I do recall a few peeps that support the Niners. Atheania or whatever her cute ass is was one. Dunno? When she went moderator all over us the team that moved to Santa Clara and fired one of the best coaches in the NFL started sucking. You can really tell if someone is a fairweather fan if they fail to represent when the losses roll in.

Meh, the Niners sucked before Harbaugh, they suck now, they'll get better and suck again. These things go in cycles for most teams.

After living in Tampa for a long time and seeing the Bucs go from the joke of professional sports to winning the SB, I'm confident the Niners will get back eventually.

 

[antiquity]

Then you should do the right thing and start a "9ers Suck!" thread. Now that I stop and think about it I do recall a few peeps that support the Niners. Atheania or whatever her cute ass is was one. Dunno? When she went moderator all over us the team that moved to Santa Clara and fired one of the best coaches in the NFL started sucking. You can really tell if someone is a fairweather fan if they fail to represent when the losses roll in.

Yeah...I think a Santa Clara 49er thread would be appropriate. I am sure it would suck without any input help from Seahawks fans

 

[HUGGY]

Where did I post that both play's outcomes were based on luck? The only thing for sure is that both plays had unexpected last second outcomes. Both team's fans were pretty sure they had the game won. Both teams ended with losses. Should the Hawk's fans be any more empathetic than the NE fans were to the Hawk's faithful? THAT is the ONLY point I was attempting to bring up. All that minutia won't change how the fans should deal with the loss...or the win. Recent history suggests that the winners shouldn't give a damn what the loser's are going though.

You said this :

NE got lucky with probably the dumbest play/personnel call in Super Bowl History on the part of Daryll Bevell and Ricardo Lockette being the slant receiver with no experience as a slant receiver.

when describing how the plays were similar. I don't know if you've ever said anything which would indicate that New England called the right play and that Butler made a great play on the throw. It's always about how it was a terrible play by Seattle, New England was lucky, yadda yadda. That's how you always post : everything is about the Seahawks, not the other teams. It's actually surprising that you haven't been painting this game as being about Seattle's greatness somehow.

I don't care if Seattle fans are empathetic about the way the game ended or not. I'm just pointing out how everything you post regarding the Seahawks, no matter the circumstance, is homerish. Objective analysis seems beyond you when it comes to Seattle.

Well since this is mainly a thread about the Seahawks, yes I can understand posters posting pro-Seattle stuff...and actually I understand anti Seahawks fans posting....that is not hard to understand. And since you haven't, that I recall, said anything about which team you support I think you are here doing nothing but spamming.
Come on loser...tell me which loser team you support?
But you are right about one thing for sure....I don't give a damn about any team the Hawks sent to the sidelines to watch the Hawks play the follow week.
Am I a Seattle Seahawks homie.....you damn well believe it.

I've said plenty of times I am a Niners fan. You know what I didn't do after they lost the Super Bowl? Say that Baltimore won based on luck.

Then you should do the right thing and start a "9ers Suck!" thread. Now that I stop and think about it I do recall a few peeps that support the Niners. Atheania or whatever her cute ass is was one. Dunno? When she went moderator all over us the team that moved to Santa Clara and fired one of the best coaches in the NFL started sucking. You can really tell if someone is a fairweather fan if they fail to represent when the losses roll in.

Meh, the Niners sucked before Harbaugh, they suck now, they'll get better and suck again. These things go in cycles for most teams.

After living in Tampa for a long time and seeing the Bucs go from the joke of professional sports to winning the SB, I'm confident the Niners will get back eventually.

I hope so too. As brief as it was I enjoyed the rivalry.

 

[Montrovant]

You said this :
when describing how the plays were similar. I don't know if you've ever said anything which would indicate that New England called the right play and that Butler made a great play on the throw. It's always about how it was a terrible play by Seattle, New England was lucky, yadda yadda. That's how you always post : everything is about the Seahawks, not the other teams. It's actually surprising that you haven't been painting this game as being about Seattle's greatness somehow.

I don't care if Seattle fans are empathetic about the way the game ended or not. I'm just pointing out how everything you post regarding the Seahawks, no matter the circumstance, is homerish. Objective analysis seems beyond you when it comes to Seattle.

Well since this is mainly a thread about the Seahawks, yes I can understand posters posting pro-Seattle stuff...and actually I understand anti Seahawks fans posting....that is not hard to understand. And since you haven't, that I recall, said anything about which team you support I think you are here doing nothing but spamming.
Come on loser...tell me which loser team you support?
But you are right about one thing for sure....I don't give a damn about any team the Hawks sent to the sidelines to watch the Hawks play the follow week.
Am I a Seattle Seahawks homie.....you damn well believe it.

I've said plenty of times I am a Niners fan. You know what I didn't do after they lost the Super Bowl? Say that Baltimore won based on luck.

Then you should do the right thing and start a "9ers Suck!" thread. Now that I stop and think about it I do recall a few peeps that support the Niners. Atheania or whatever her cute ass is was one. Dunno? When she went moderator all over us the team that moved to Santa Clara and fired one of the best coaches in the NFL started sucking. You can really tell if someone is a fairweather fan if they fail to represent when the losses roll in.

Meh, the Niners sucked before Harbaugh, they suck now, they'll get better and suck again. These things go in cycles for most teams.

After living in Tampa for a long time and seeing the Bucs go from the joke of professional sports to winning the SB, I'm confident the Niners will get back eventually.

I hope so too. As brief as it was I enjoyed the rivalry.

The problem lies in having the two teams being playoff caliber at the same time. It could be that the Niners won't get back to winning until this Seattle team has finished its run.

 

[TrinityPower]

Did anyone else hear that Holmgren has expressed interest in being the 49ers head coach?

 

[antiquity]

Well since this is mainly a thread about the Seahawks, yes I can understand posters posting pro-Seattle stuff...and actually I understand anti Seahawks fans posting....that is not hard to understand. And since you haven't, that I recall, said anything about which team you support I think you are here doing nothing but spamming.
Come on loser...tell me which loser team you support?
But you are right about one thing for sure....I don't give a damn about any team the Hawks sent to the sidelines to watch the Hawks play the follow week.
Am I a Seattle Seahawks homie.....you damn well believe it.

I've said plenty of times I am a Niners fan. You know what I didn't do after they lost the Super Bowl? Say that Baltimore won based on luck.

Then you should do the right thing and start a "9ers Suck!" thread. Now that I stop and think about it I do recall a few peeps that support the Niners. Atheania or whatever her cute ass is was one. Dunno? When she went moderator all over us the team that moved to Santa Clara and fired one of the best coaches in the NFL started sucking. You can really tell if someone is a fairweather fan if they fail to represent when the losses roll in.

Meh, the Niners sucked before Harbaugh, they suck now, they'll get better and suck again. These things go in cycles for most teams.

After living in Tampa for a long time and seeing the Bucs go from the joke of professional sports to winning the SB, I'm confident the Niners will get back eventually.

I hope so too. As brief as it was I enjoyed the rivalry.

The problem lies in having the two teams being playoff caliber at the same time. It could be that the Niners won't get back to winning until this Seattle team has finished its run.

If and when the Seahawk finish their run? I think Santa Clara fans will have to wait for Both Arizona and the up and coming Rams to finish their run when it comes as well. One of the main reason the 49ers went into a tail spin, of course and not the only reason was getting rid of Alex Smith who has now leads the Chiefs to eleven wins in a row. Getting back into the mix is finding football talent to get them there and right now Santa Clara has none.

 

[Montrovant]

I've said plenty of times I am a Niners fan. You know what I didn't do after they lost the Super Bowl? Say that Baltimore won based on luck.

Then you should do the right thing and start a "9ers Suck!" thread. Now that I stop and think about it I do recall a few peeps that support the Niners. Atheania or whatever her cute ass is was one. Dunno? When she went moderator all over us the team that moved to Santa Clara and fired one of the best coaches in the NFL started sucking. You can really tell if someone is a fairweather fan if they fail to represent when the losses roll in.

Meh, the Niners sucked before Harbaugh, they suck now, they'll get better and suck again. These things go in cycles for most teams.

After living in Tampa for a long time and seeing the Bucs go from the joke of professional sports to winning the SB, I'm confident the Niners will get back eventually.

I hope so too. As brief as it was I enjoyed the rivalry.

The problem lies in having the two teams being playoff caliber at the same time. It could be that the Niners won't get back to winning until this Seattle team has finished its run.

If and when the Seahawk finish their run? I think Santa Clara fans will have to wait for Both Arizona and the up and coming Rams to finish their run when it comes as well. One of the main reason the 49ers went into a tail spin, of course and not the only reason was getting rid of Alex Smith who has now leads the Chiefs to eleven wins in a row. Getting back into the mix is finding football talent to get them there and right now Santa Clara has none.

I disagree. The Niners went to an NFC Championship and a SB with Kaepernick. The problem was the clash between Harbaugh and management. Now that they've hired Kelly, I worry about the same issue coming up.

Well, I also worry that the Niners don't have anything like the right personnel for a fast-paced Chip Kelly offense.

As far as waiting for the Cards and Rams, that's not really the issue. All of the NFC West teams could be playoff calibre at the same time. As far as the Seattle/SF rivalry is concerned, where Arizona and (now)LA stand doesn't really matter much.

 

[HUGGY]

Then you should do the right thing and start a "9ers Suck!" thread. Now that I stop and think about it I do recall a few peeps that support the Niners. Atheania or whatever her cute ass is was one. Dunno? When she went moderator all over us the team that moved to Santa Clara and fired one of the best coaches in the NFL started sucking. You can really tell if someone is a fairweather fan if they fail to represent when the losses roll in.

Meh, the Niners sucked before Harbaugh, they suck now, they'll get better and suck again. These things go in cycles for most teams.

After living in Tampa for a long time and seeing the Bucs go from the joke of professional sports to winning the SB, I'm confident the Niners will get back eventually.

I hope so too. As brief as it was I enjoyed the rivalry.

The problem lies in having the two teams being playoff caliber at the same time. It could be that the Niners won't get back to winning until this Seattle team has finished its run.

If and when the Seahawk finish their run? I think Santa Clara fans will have to wait for Both Arizona and the up and coming Rams to finish their run when it comes as well. One of the main reason the 49ers went into a tail spin, of course and not the only reason was getting rid of Alex Smith who has now leads the Chiefs to eleven wins in a row. Getting back into the mix is finding football talent to get them there and right now Santa Clara has none.

I disagree. The Niners went to an NFC Championship and a SB with Kaepernick. The problem was the clash between Harbaugh and management. Now that they've hired Kelly, I worry about the same issue coming up.

Well, I also worry that the Niners don't have anything like the right personnel for a fast-paced Chip Kelly offense.

As far as waiting for the Cards and Rams, that's not really the issue. All of the NFC West teams could be playoff calibre at the same time. As far as the Seattle/SF rivalry is concerned, where Arizona and (now)LA stand doesn't really matter much.

Kelly is the best pick for the 9ers. I believe he could turn Kaepernick around and make him a winner again..and it won't take very long.

 

[antiquity]

If and when the Seahawk finish their run? I think Santa Clara fans will have to wait for Both Arizona and the up and coming Rams to finish their run when it comes as well. One of the main reason the 49ers went into a tail spin, of course and not the only reason was getting rid of Alex Smith who has now leads the Chiefs to eleven wins in a row. Getting back into the mix is finding football talent to get them there and right now Santa Clara has none.

I disagree. The Niners went to an NFC Championship and a SB with Kaepernick. The problem was the clash between Harbaugh and management. Now that they've hired Kelly, I worry about the same issue coming up.

Well, I also worry that the Niners don't have anything like the right personnel for a fast-paced Chip Kelly offense.

As far as waiting for the Cards and Rams, that's not really the issue. All of the NFC West teams could be playoff calibre at the same time. As far as the Seattle/SF rivalry is concerned, where Arizona and (now)LA stand doesn't really matter much.

Kaepernick didn't have much too do with the 49ers getting into a super bowl....it was the talent around him, making up a strong defense and a strong receiving core that got them there. When both that defense and players like Crabtree went on their way for varies reason, some drug problems and others having trouble with the law, it didn't matter who was quarterbacking.... be it Kaepernick or the present clown.

 

[antiquity]

Kelly is the best pick for the 9ers. I believe he could turn Kaepernick around and make him a winner again..and it won't take very long.

Are you sure Kaepernick will be with the 49ers next year? If the 49ers want to rebuild they will have to shed some players to make room with extra money to pay some free agents.

 

[Papageorgio]

Kelly is the best pick for the 9ers. I believe he could turn Kaepernick around and make him a winner again..and it won't take very long.

Are you sure Kaepernick will be with the 49ers next year? If the 49ers want to rebuild they will have to shed some players to make room with extra money to pay some free agents.

Who do you replace him with? Gabbert? Kaepernick is a good fit for a Kelly type system. There was talk around the league that Kaepernick was going to go to the Eagles this off season, before Kelly was fired.

Time will tell but I think Kaepernick will do well under Kelly.

 

[Montrovant]

If and when the Seahawk finish their run? I think Santa Clara fans will have to wait for Both Arizona and the up and coming Rams to finish their run when it comes as well. One of the main reason the 49ers went into a tail spin, of course and not the only reason was getting rid of Alex Smith who has now leads the Chiefs to eleven wins in a row. Getting back into the mix is finding football talent to get them there and right now Santa Clara has none.

I disagree. The Niners went to an NFC Championship and a SB with Kaepernick. The problem was the clash between Harbaugh and management. Now that they've hired Kelly, I worry about the same issue coming up.

Well, I also worry that the Niners don't have anything like the right personnel for a fast-paced Chip Kelly offense.

As far as waiting for the Cards and Rams, that's not really the issue. All of the NFC West teams could be playoff calibre at the same time. As far as the Seattle/SF rivalry is concerned, where Arizona and (now)LA stand doesn't really matter much.

Kaepernick didn't have much too do with the 49ers getting into a super bowl....it was the talent around him, making up a strong defense and a strong receiving core that got them there. When both that defense and players like Crabtree went on their way for varies reason, some drug problems and others having trouble with the law, it didn't matter who was quarterbacking.... be it Kaepernick or the present clown.

Yes, but the same would have been true with Smith. He was rarely much more than a game manager, the playoff game against the Saints being an exception. On the other hand, Kaepernick was a huge part of that win over GB in the playoffs, so that comparison is a wash.

 

[HUGGY]

Kelly is the best pick for the 9ers. I believe he could turn Kaepernick around and make him a winner again..and it won't take very long.

Are you sure Kaepernick will be with the 49ers next year? If the 49ers want to rebuild they will have to shed some players to make room with extra money to pay some free agents.

Without researching Kaepernick's contract as I recall it was highly performance based. A fast running QB with his experience you don't just find under a rock. A large part of what the 9ers had a couple of years ago was a very good Defense. It would be stupid to put all of the 9ers woes on the QB.

The Pistol and the Read Option require a top notch RB threat. That and a mobile QB which they already have in house.

I think much of the 9ers problem has been the steady emergence of the rest of the NFC West.

At this time there are no weaklings that any team in our conference can count on as a "gimmie". That will be a higher mountain to climb than anything heading into the next couple of seasons. If the 9ers must start from scratch and rebuild, the fans and the ownership have to accept being at or near the bottom of the NFC West until they have put together a serious challenger.

 

[HUGGY]

A BIG shout out to Carroll, Wilson, Okung, Bevell, Cable and Richards for the most embarrassing first half of playoff football I have ever witnessed.

Yes indeed at least today The Seahawks Sucked".