a. Liberals.
b. Demographic shift.
c. Over half the country is against illegal immigration.
a. you are more liberal than I am.
b. what demographic is being shifted?
c. so am I. Why do you lump me in with those that are not? Seems sort of dishonest.
a. People generally identify as groups, based on "skin color". It effects the cultures they embrace and have real world consequences that effect me and mine. D'uh.
b. Obviously that is a big part of it.
a. Is that a good thing? Skin color is purely a function of biology, logically it makes no sense to separate people by it.
b. you know it is a big part of it, yet you see some grand conspiracy going on also.
a. People separate themselves into groups. That you find it "illogical" doesn't change that, nor the consequences from it.
b. Your use of the term "conspiracy" is just spin. Consider it dismissed. My point stands. Obviously what you cited, is a part of it. But the immigration act of 65 is also an even bigger part of it.
We are having the conversation. It is a small conversation, on a internet forum, unlikely to have much impact. And it is likely only a matter of time, before you or some other lib, manages to bog down any discussion with the standard lib package, (race card, personal attacks,ect)
Because people like you, expect to be able to pepper a debate, with personal insults and slurs and then act like the aggrieved party, when someone calls you on it.
It is an tactic designed to prevent real debate. Because on some level, you know that your position is bullshit.
So, you claim to know "people like me" tactics, but you still fall for them and let them drive you off your message. Is that on you or "people like me"?[/QUOTE]
People like you. Your actions are on you. That you want to shift the blame for your actions to another, is ironically, a standard liberal tactic.