SCOTUS divided over SSM

[Seawytch]

If two men or two women marry- none of that changes.

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

 

[defcon4]

Agree! You are coming to your senses.
h

So we are in agreement- denying marriage to homosexuals helps now one and just harms the children being raised by those two mommies.

So the question is- why do you want to harm those children?

Read your post. "It just harms the children being raised by two momies." You said that.

"Syriusly, post: 11305976, member: 51902"]It just harms the children being raised by two momies.

[/B]
You said it.

Perhaps you don't know what the word 'it' means? Or perhaps you are just a dishonest troll?

Meanwhile- preventing homosexuals from marrying(this is 'it') does not help either the children being raised by single mom's or the children being raised by two mom's or the children being raised by a mommy and daddy.

It [preventing homosexuals from marrying] just harms the children being raised by two momies.

Do you have a grammar issue- or an integrity issue?

You have the issue. The sentence is double spaced from the main body of your response. Detached from the main body. Separate entry. Separate sentence. Public schooling, huh?

Clearly you have an integrity issue.

Meanwhile- preventing homosexuals from marrying does not help either the children being raised by single mom's or the children being raised by two mom's or the children being raised by a mommy and daddy.

It just harms the children being raised by two momies.

Meanwhile- preventing homosexuals from marrying(this is 'it') does not help either the children being raised by single mom's or the children being raised by two mom's or the children being raised by a mommy and daddy.

It [preventing homosexuals from marrying] just harms the children being raised by two momies.

You fucked it up and now trying to spin it with personal attacks.

 

[Seawytch]

Careful, when they get horny after years of cock deprivation you are in for ride, better eat well before engagement.

Yeah... I reckon after a while them rubber dicks lose their effectiveness.

Hmmmm...every third commercial on TV is for erectile dysfunction...

Our fingers and tongues have never let us down.

Males have fingers and tongues also in addition to male appendage.

So? It's attached to the male...to whom we, as lesbians, are not attracted.

If we felt the need for such an appendage, Good Vibrations has them in all styles, colors, shapes, sizes and materials...even glass. (None of them need Viagra although some take batteries)

 

[Syriusly]

So we are in agreement- denying marriage to homosexuals helps now one and just harms the children being raised by those two mommies.

So the question is- why do you want to harm those children?

Read your post. "It just harms the children being raised by two momies." You said that.

"Syriusly, post: 11305976, member: 51902"]It just harms the children being raised by two momies.

[/B]
You said it.

Perhaps you don't know what the word 'it' means? Or perhaps you are just a dishonest troll?

Meanwhile- preventing homosexuals from marrying(this is 'it') does not help either the children being raised by single mom's or the children being raised by two mom's or the children being raised by a mommy and daddy.

It [preventing homosexuals from marrying] just harms the children being raised by two momies.

Do you have a grammar issue- or an integrity issue?

You have the issue. The sentence is double spaced from the main body of your response. Detached from the main body. Separate entry. Separate sentence. Public schooling, huh?

Clearly you have an integrity issue.

Meanwhile- preventing homosexuals from marrying does not help either the children being raised by single mom's or the children being raised by two mom's or the children being raised by a mommy and daddy.

It just harms the children being raised by two momies.

Meanwhile- preventing homosexuals from marrying(this is 'it') does not help either the children being raised by single mom's or the children being raised by two mom's or the children being raised by a mommy and daddy.

It [preventing homosexuals from marrying] just harms the children being raised by two momies.

You fucked it up and now trying to spin it with personal attacks.

You agreed with me that preventing homosexuals from marrying just harms their children.

Now you try to backpeddle.

Like I said- its an integrity thing for you.

 

[defcon4]

If two men or two women marry- none of that changes.

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

Don't call it marriage call it civil union. Don't call your female partner wife or male partner husband of the same sex relationship.

 

[defcon4]

You agreed with me that preventing homosexuals from marrying just harms their children.

I agreed to what you said. ""Syriusly, post: 11305976, member: 51902"]It just harms the children being raised by two momies.

 

[defcon4]

Careful, when they get horny after years of cock deprivation you are in for ride, better eat well before engagement.

Yeah... I reckon after a while them rubber dicks lose their effectiveness.

Hmmmm...every third commercial on TV is for erectile dysfunction...

Our fingers and tongues have never let us down.

Males have fingers and tongues also in addition to male appendage.

So? It's attached to the male...to whom we, as lesbians, are not attracted.

If we felt the need for such an appendage, Good Vibrations has them in all styles, colors, shapes, sizes and materials...even glass. (None of them need Viagra although some take batteries)

Sounds exciting. I love lezbos. As I said I have no issues with them.

 

[Seawytch]

If two men or two women marry- none of that changes.

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

Don't call it marriage call it civil union. Don't call your female partner wife or male partner husband of the same sex relationship.

No. If you don't like the idea of civil marriage, change it for everyone. Until you get them all changed, gay and straight, I have a marriage license issued by the state of CA. Come June it will be recognized in all 50.

 

[bodecea]

Which doesn't help those kids at all.

What doesn't help kids is having two mommies. If you pleasure seekers (male and female alike) would consider the "give and take" part of a working marriage you would not divorce left and right. When there is new "****" coming along you just divorce. Restraint and honoring the contract. Alien concept, huh?

What's wrong about having two mommies?

 

[Jroc]

Which doesn't help those kids at all.

What doesn't help kids is having two mommies. If you pleasure seekers (male and female alike) would consider the "give and take" part of a working marriage you would not divorce left and right. When there is new "****" coming along you just divorce. Restraint and honoring the contract. Alien concept, huh?

What's wrong about having two mommies?

I say one daddy and three mommies

 

[Clementine]

Hillary Clinton Defends Marriage As ˜Sacred Bond Between a Man and a Woman"

"I have had occasion in my life to defend marriage, to stand up for marriage, to believe in the hard work and challenge of marriage. So I take umbrage at anyone who might suggest that those of us who worry about amending the Constitution are less committed to the sanctity of marriage, or to the fundamental bedrock principle that it exists between a man and a woman, going back into the midst of history as one of the founding, foundational institutions of history and humanity and civilization, and that its primary, principal role during those millennia has been the raising and socializing of children for the society into which they are to become adults."

http://www.mrctv.org/blog/flashback-hillary-clinton-defends-marriage-sacred-bond-between-man-and-woman

Of course, this was in 2006. Hillary, like many of her fellow Dems, will go whatever way the current winds blow. Say anything to get elected even if it's a big lie.

I suppose the libs will claim she "evolved" the way Obama did. Of course, that was after being backed into a corner because of Biden's big mouth. It's all such bullshit.

So, what happens next if the court doesn't come through? Will Obama use executive action? If he can wave his magic pen and make immigration laws disappear and create new laws that grant amnesty, I'm sure he can redefine marriage.

 

[bodecea]

If two men or two women marry- none of that changes.

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

Don't call it marriage call it civil union. Don't call your female partner wife or male partner husband of the same sex relationship.

No. If you don't like the idea of civil marriage, change it for everyone. Until you get them all changed, gay and straight, I have a marriage license issued by the state of CA. Come June it will be recognized in all 50.

As do I...and it will be a pleasure to travel all 50 states with my wife come the end of June.

 

[bodecea]

Which doesn't help those kids at all.

What doesn't help kids is having two mommies. If you pleasure seekers (male and female alike) would consider the "give and take" part of a working marriage you would not divorce left and right. When there is new "****" coming along you just divorce. Restraint and honoring the contract. Alien concept, huh?

What's wrong about having two mommies?

I say one daddy and three mommies

I think there's a religion or two that can accommodate you.

 

[Jroc]

Which doesn't help those kids at all.

What doesn't help kids is having two mommies. If you pleasure seekers (male and female alike) would consider the "give and take" part of a working marriage you would not divorce left and right. When there is new "****" coming along you just divorce. Restraint and honoring the contract. Alien concept, huh?

What's wrong about having two mommies?

I say one daddy and three mommies

I think there's a religion or two that can accommodate you.

the court should cover that as well... Discrimination?

 

[Katzndogz]

If two men or two women marry- none of that changes.

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

Don't call it marriage call it civil union. Don't call your female partner wife or male partner husband of the same sex relationship.

No. If you don't like the idea of civil marriage, change it for everyone. Until you get them all changed, gay and straight, I have a marriage license issued by the state of CA. Come June it will be recognized in all 50.

As do I...and it will be a pleasure to travel all 50 states with my wife come the end of June.

You just might not get the same reception everywhere you go.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If two men or two women marry- none of that changes.

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

Don't call it marriage call it civil union. Don't call your female partner wife or male partner husband of the same sex relationship.

And this is an example of the authoritarianism common to most on the right, the propensity to seek to compel conformity through force of law, to enhance the power and authority of the state at the expense of individual liberty.

Marriage law can accommodate same- or opposite-sex couples, when same-sex couples enter into a marriage contract, they are in fact lawfully married, no different than opposite-sex couples.

'Civil unions' are segregation, and just as repugnant to the Constitution.

 

[bodecea]

If two men or two women marry- none of that changes.

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

Don't call it marriage call it civil union. Don't call your female partner wife or male partner husband of the same sex relationship.

We were willing to accept that about 5-10 years ago...it was the Far RW that shot that down. So...it's all the way to marriage now.

 

[bodecea]

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

Don't call it marriage call it civil union. Don't call your female partner wife or male partner husband of the same sex relationship.

No. If you don't like the idea of civil marriage, change it for everyone. Until you get them all changed, gay and straight, I have a marriage license issued by the state of CA. Come June it will be recognized in all 50.

As do I...and it will be a pleasure to travel all 50 states with my wife come the end of June.

You just might not get the same reception everywhere you go.

That's ok...I don't get the same reception for many reasons...some places look down on me because I'm a FEMALE vet...some places look down on me because of my Yankee accent....and so on.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Which doesn't help those kids at all.

What doesn't help kids is having two mommies. If you pleasure seekers (male and female alike) would consider the "give and take" part of a working marriage you would not divorce left and right. When there is new "****" coming along you just divorce. Restraint and honoring the contract. Alien concept, huh?

What's wrong about having two mommies?

I say one daddy and three mommies

I think there's a religion or two that can accommodate you.

the court should cover that as well... Discrimination?

Not with regard to marriage law, no.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

If two men or two women marry- none of that changes.

But it does change. There are no distinct mother of father figures in that so called "family" Girls/boys would not have the affinity to their opposite sex

Do you really not understand that we still have the children whether you let us marry or not? You harm our families by denying civil marriage.

Also, studies show that children do best in two parent households. The gender of the parents don't matter.

Don't call it marriage call it civil union. Don't call your female partner wife or male partner husband of the same sex relationship.

We were willing to accept that about 5-10 years ago...it was the Far RW that shot that down. So...it's all the way to marriage now.

The far right actually did you a favor, however unintended.

'Civil unions' are just as wrong as denying same-sex couples access to marriage law – perhaps more so.