I think some basic terms and definitions are appropriate. Abiogenesis (the beginning of life), is separate and distinct from biological evolution. Among the relevant science community, biological evolution is not in question.Many people believe that we evolved as the result of some huge cosmic accident, and those same people would probably believe that a tornado could blow through a junk yard and leave a fully functional 767 in it's wake.This fails as an appeal to ignorance fallacy.I believe that humans are too arrogant in thinking that they can determine our true origins by using science. We make our hypotheses based on “laws of nature” that we assume have to be true. I believe that The secrets of the universe are far too advanced for the human mind to comprehend. We as a species need to humble ourselves and realize that we are not in charge of anything, and that god determines all.
That science has yet to determine the origins of the universe doesn’t mean ‘god’ is the ‘answer.’
However, science has determined much about the origin of the universe - here is another example of how the Bible and science go hand in hand:
Job 38:33
Do you know the laws governing the heavens,+
Or can you impose their* authority on the earth?
When Moses wrote the book of Job (c. 1513 BCE) no human even knew there were such laws. Thankfully, science has discovered many of those laws. One reason they have discovered those laws is that they do have authority on the earth so earthling scientists can study them.
For example, the law of conservation of matter and energy embodied in the formula E-Mc^2. This law puts to an end the mythical teachings about our universe coming from nothing - since that would violate E=Mc^2. In fact, we can calculate how much energy was involved in creating the mass of 10^79 amu (atomic mass units) estimated by Eddington years ago.
Btw - some still have blind faith that the universe came from nothing! Believe it or not, some believe the laws of our universe did not come from a lawgiver!
Yet thread title is correct in that while science does tell us many details about the laws and properties of our universe, science does not tell who did this or how this was done. But science can tell us what was done!
The "junkyard" analogy is a tired, tedious, creationist meme and one that suggests the creationists are profoundly and willfully ignorant about evolution. Yes, it's unlikely that a tornado blowing through a junkyard could assemble a 747. That has nothing to do with biological evolution. Biological organisms evolve. Mechanical airplane parts do not.
Seems pretty simple.