Say it aint so!!

ThisIsMe

Gold Member
Dec 16, 2017
9,997
4,467
210

This isn't the only link to this story so, no need to say "oh, breitbart!"


So, apparently, voting machines can be wrong? But only for democrats?
 

This isn't the only link to this story so, no need to say "oh, breitbart!"


So, apparently, voting machines can be wrong? But only for democrats?

Has the voting machine manufacturer filed a slander suit for Billions yet?
 
And Jeff Bezos has a Union Vote coming up with Amazon...and he's fighting like Hell to avoid Mail In Ballot Use by the Union. Says too much likelihood for Fraud.

With Democrats, Hypocrisy is just another tool in the drawer.

Recent poll found 32% of the nation is Socialist, down from 41% last year. That means the huge majority of Democrats are Socialists...which means Socialists are in control of the empty suit in the White House.

Socialism in America. Its here. Buckle your seatbelt.
 

This isn't the only link to this story so, no need to say "oh, breitbart!"


So, apparently, voting machines can be wrong? But only for democrats?

Has the voting machine manufacturer filed a slander suit for Billions yet?
Oh my, I hope it's dominion...talk about twist of irony....
 

This isn't the only link to this story so, no need to say "oh, breitbart!"


So, apparently, voting machines can be wrong? But only for democrats?
This is the new norm for future elections.
 

This isn't the only link to this story so, no need to say "oh, breitbart!"


So, apparently, voting machines can be wrong? But only for democrats?
I'm surprised they haven't mandated a hand recount. The difference in votes is only 109 out of approx 156,000 for each mandate, which is 0.07%. Most states have mandatory hand counts if the vote is within 0.5 %

This is almost an order of magnitude closer than most states have. Unfortunately in New York, there is no mandatory recount law.


NY doesn't require manual recounts in close elections. Why it ...
www.democratandchronicle.com › albany › 2019/12/16

ALBANY - New York may require automatic manual recounts in close elections, something that is currently ...
 

This isn't the only link to this story so, no need to say "oh, breitbart!"


So, apparently, voting machines can be wrong? But only for democrats?
No, they had to do a correction for a machine error in the presidential election in 2020.
 
So, apparently, voting machines can be wrong? But only for democrats?
No, all such claims are invited to go to court to be adjudicated. The Republican claims got laughed out of court. This one is pending. How do you not get this?
 
And Jeff Bezos has a Union Vote coming up with Amazon...and he's fighting like Hell to avoid Mail In Ballot Use by the Union. Says too much likelihood for Fraud.

With Democrats, Hypocrisy is just another tool in the drawer.

Recent poll found 32% of the nation is Socialist, down from 41% last year. That means the huge majority of Democrats are Socialists...which means Socialists are in control of the empty suit in the White House.

Socialism in America. Its here. Buckle your seatbelt.
Maybe a little socialism will be an improvement, rather than the out of control oligarchic fascism we suffer under now.
 
So, apparently, voting machines can be wrong? But only for democrats?
No, all such claims are invited to go to court to be adjudicated. The Republican claims got laughed out of court. This one is pending. How do you not get this?
No, my point was, it's just ironic that dems vehemently denied that there were voting irregularities and that there were no issues with the voting machines, now, in this state election, when the dem candidate loses, its suddenly "voting machine error!"

The second article says a judge has rejected their claims of voter machine irregularities.
 
No, my point was, it's just ironic that dems vehemently denied that there were voting irregularities and that there were no issues with the voting machines, now, in this state election, when the dem candidate loses, its suddenly "voting machine error!"
True, but that's a lawyer for you. Again, Trump was invited to make his case in court. The public begged him to at least try. The judges ORDERED that they produce evidence. This lawyer has to meet the same standard.
 
No, my point was, it's just ironic that dems vehemently denied that there were voting irregularities and that there were no issues with the voting machines, now, in this state election, when the dem candidate loses, its suddenly "voting machine error!"
True, but that's a lawyer for you. Again, Trump was invited to make his case in court. The public begged him to at least try. The judges ORDERED that they produce evidence. This lawyer has to meet the same standard.
I agree, guiliani stuck his foot in it. I never understood how someone who went through all those hearings and showed all their evidence, and when it came down to the wire, they failed to produce. That was their mistake, but, you can't deny that in many cases, the judges threw out the case before even having a hearing. I always thought justices was supposed to be blind. If you have a grievance, you should be able to take.it to the courts. These courts, however, decided to play judge and jury and rule against them, without giving them the ability to make their case. I find that to be wrong.
 
I never understood how someone who went through all those hearings and showed all their evidence, and when it came down to the wire, they failed to produce.
Uh... because he had none? Now you do understand. He never produced evidence in ANY hearings. He was ordered to produce the evidence in an evidence hearing. He failed and withdrew his fraud claim, cancelling the hearing.
I always thought justices was supposed to be blind.
The judge DEMANDED to see the evidence in a hearing. Rudy refused and withdrew his fraud claims. It's hard to "see" something that doesn't exist, ya know?
 
Nothing new here check out the crying and whining after the 2016 election. So a little twist, now China Joe is a illegitimate president, how does that taste? Maybe someone can find some irrefutable evidence disclosing China meddled in our election, oh there is that issue of Hunters laptop.
 
I never understood how someone who went through all those hearings and showed all their evidence, and when it came down to the wire, they failed to produce.
Uh... because he had none? Now you do understand. He never produced evidence in ANY hearings. He was ordered to produce the evidence in an evidence hearing. He failed and withdrew his fraud claim, cancelling the hearing.
I always thought justices was supposed to be blind.
The judge DEMANDED to see the evidence in a hearing. Rudy refused and withdrew his fraud claims. It's hard to "see" something that doesn't exist, ya know?
There is plenty circumstancial evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election. Anyone who thinks there wasn’t is a fool. Voter fraud occurs in every election. The better question is, was the fraud large enough to sway the election. We likely won’t ever know because the establishment won’t allow a complete and fair investigation, which is yet more circumstancial evidence of fraud.
 
There is plenty circumstancial evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election.
There is none. Zero. That's a lie. There is no evidence of any significant fraud, circumstantial or otherwise. You have absolutely nothing, but you have been inundated with so many lies for 3 months that you have been fooled.
 

Forum List

Back
Top