New York Times Reports the Primary Fundraising Mechanism of Democrats Willfully Accepted Foreign Donations

$10 million is nothing ever since Citizens United. My point is that foreign funds are all over the place in our elections and legislators don't seem to care. ActBlue is singled out because of some perceived slight by Trump or he would never care about it.
Citizens United doesn’t allow foreign donations that the Demafasict party so deeply needs
 

" New York Times Reports the Primary Fundraising Mechanism of Democrats Willfully Accepted Foreign Donations



April 3, 2026 | Sundance |

ActBlue is to the Democrat party fundraising machine as WinRed is to the Republican side of the equation.​


In a rather stunning outline by the New York Times [SEE HERE] the progressive outlet is reporting of serious concerns within the leadership of ActBlue related to their willfully blind reception of foreign sources of money to fund Democrat candidates.




The remarkable aspect is not just that ActBlue takes foreign funds, but rather the New York Times revealing internal legal discussions about it. According to the Times reporting, the Eric Holder law firm Covington & Burling, the primary legal mechanism for the ActBlue/DNC machinery, lies at the heart of the matter."




If foreign nations fund Democrat candidates, isn't that foreign election interference? I recall the Communist Chinese gov't funding the campaigns of Bill Clinton and Al Gore.
That's pretty bad when the NYT is reporting it.
 
Japanese person: "In our country, they're doing this messed-up thing where they take taxes from the citizens and use it to raise delinquent foreigners on welfare.

"Korean person: "Our government is doing the same thing."

Chinese person: "Ours too."

Russian person: "Ours too."

American person: "Ours too."

Canadian person: "Ours too."

European person: "Ours too."

What's going on here?

 

" New York Times Reports the Primary Fundraising Mechanism of Democrats Willfully Accepted Foreign Donations



April 3, 2026 | Sundance |

ActBlue is to the Democrat party fundraising machine as WinRed is to the Republican side of the equation.​


In a rather stunning outline by the New York Times [SEE HERE] the progressive outlet is reporting of serious concerns within the leadership of ActBlue related to their willfully blind reception of foreign sources of money to fund Democrat candidates.




The remarkable aspect is not just that ActBlue takes foreign funds, but rather the New York Times revealing internal legal discussions about it. According to the Times reporting, the Eric Holder law firm Covington & Burling, the primary legal mechanism for the ActBlue/DNC machinery, lies at the heart of the matter."




If foreign nations fund Democrat candidates, isn't that foreign election interference? I recall the Communist Chinese gov't funding the campaigns of Bill Clinton and Al Gore.
again, explained in this rather lengthy video, but it's there.

 
But Trump accepting Billions from foreigners (with no oversight) for his "Board Of Peace" membership is all hunky-dorey.
If I understand you correctly, you're agreeing with me that dem fraud is bad.
 
Back
Top Bottom