Extensive northern hemisphere continental glaciation begins at 280 ppm. Only a moron would believe that 300 ppm is good.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Satellite data show Earth's glaciers in massive decline
- Thread starter Crick
- Start date
- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,657
- 34,865
- 2,605
No need to worry about this. We will soon experience the cyclical disaster when our sun micro novas and our weakening magnetic field fails to protect us, leading to pole shift.The temperatures over the last several thousand years show VERY clearly that we are not in any normal phase of interglacial warming. The rate of warming we've experienced over the last century and particularly the last 50 years is unprecedented in human history. The melt that warming is creating is also unprecedented. Those of you who want to cling to the belief that this warming is natural and harmless are fooling yourselves into ignoring a real threat.
Grumblenuts
Gold Member
- Oct 16, 2017
- 14,605
- 4,876
- 210
From NASA (rocket scientists, not idiots):No need to worry about this. We will soon experience the cyclical disaster when our sun micro novas and our weakening magnetic field fails to protect us, leading to pole shift.The temperatures over the last several thousand years show VERY clearly that we are not in any normal phase of interglacial warming. The rate of warming we've experienced over the last century and particularly the last 50 years is unprecedented in human history. The melt that warming is creating is also unprecedented. Those of you who want to cling to the belief that this warming is natural and harmless are fooling yourselves into ignoring a real threat.
Also,Many doomsday theorists have tried to take this natural geological occurrence and suggest it could lead to Earth's destruction. But would there be any dramatic effects? The answer, from the geologic and fossil records we have from hundreds of past magnetic polarity reversals, seems to be 'no.'
“There is no indication that we are currently approaching a Maunder-type minimum in solar activity,” Upton said. But even if the Sun dropped into a grand minimum, there’s no reason to think Earth would undergo another Ice Age; not only do scientists theorize that the Little Ice Age occurred for other reasons, but in our contemporary world, greenhouse gases far surpass the Sun’s effects when it comes to changes in Earth’s climate.
Last edited:
From NASA (rocket scientists, not idiots):No need to worry about this. We will soon experience the cyclical disaster when our sun micro novas and our weakening magnetic field fails to protect us, leading to pole shift.The temperatures over the last several thousand years show VERY clearly that we are not in any normal phase of interglacial warming. The rate of warming we've experienced over the last century and particularly the last 50 years is unprecedented in human history. The melt that warming is creating is also unprecedented. Those of you who want to cling to the belief that this warming is natural and harmless are fooling yourselves into ignoring a real threat.
Also,Many doomsday theorists have tried to take this natural geological occurrence and suggest it could lead to Earth's destruction. But would there be any dramatic effects? The answer, from the geologic and fossil records we have from hundreds of past magnetic polarity reversals, seems to be 'no.'
“There is no indication that we are currently approaching a Maunder-type minimum in solar activity,” Upton said. But even if the Sun dropped into a grand minimum, there’s no reason to think Earth would undergo another Ice Age; not only do scientists theorize that the Little Ice Age occurred for other reasons, but in our contemporary world, greenhouse gases far surpass the Sun’s effects when it comes to changes in Earth’s climate.
But even if the Sun dropped into a grand minimum, there’s no reason to think Earth would undergo another Ice Age; not only do scientists theorize that the Little Ice Age occurred for other reasons, but in our contemporary world, greenhouse gases far surpass the Sun’s effects when it comes to changes in Earth’s climate.
Thank goodness. A new ice age would kill billions.
- Thread starter
- #85
Micro novas...? Where did you get that? I want to hear this. Please explain a "micro nova" and how it will cause the Earth's poles to shift. Please.No need to worry about this. We will soon experience the cyclical disaster when our sun micro novas and our weakening magnetic field fails to protect us, leading to pole shift.The temperatures over the last several thousand years show VERY clearly that we are not in any normal phase of interglacial warming. The rate of warming we've experienced over the last century and particularly the last 50 years is unprecedented in human history. The melt that warming is creating is also unprecedented. Those of you who want to cling to the belief that this warming is natural and harmless are fooling yourselves into ignoring a real threat.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
Satellite data show Earth's glaciers in massive decline
Good. For most of the history of the Earth, the planet had no glaciers! Let's finally get back to normal!
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
The world's most renowned climate scientist...
Is she available for parties?
The world's most renowned climate scientist...
Is she available for parties?
Every time she says, "How dare you?", drink a shot!!!
- Jan 8, 2011
- 65,657
- 34,865
- 2,605
Micro novas...? Where did you get that? I want to hear this. Please explain a "micro nova" and how it will cause the Earth's poles to shift. Please.No need to worry about this. We will soon experience the cyclical disaster when our sun micro novas and our weakening magnetic field fails to protect us, leading to pole shift.The temperatures over the last several thousand years show VERY clearly that we are not in any normal phase of interglacial warming. The rate of warming we've experienced over the last century and particularly the last 50 years is unprecedented in human history. The melt that warming is creating is also unprecedented. Those of you who want to cling to the belief that this warming is natural and harmless are fooling yourselves into ignoring a real threat.
toobfreak
Tungsten/Glass Member
The world's most renowned climate scientist...
Is she available for parties?
Every time she says, "How dare you?", drink a shot!!!
Is that what she says? I don't think I've ever bothered to listen to 5 words out of that child's mouth.
themirrorthief
Diamond Member
the sky is falling the sky is falling vote democrat and more importantly...send them lots of cash270 Gt/yr for the last 20 years and accelerating at 48Gt/yr/decade. Enough meltwater each year to cover the island of Ireland 3 meters deep.
Climate change: World's glaciers melting at a faster pace
The meltwater produced now accounts for about a fifth of global sea-level rise.www.bbc.com
themirrorthief
Diamond Member
creepy little weirdo...how long before she does porn?The world's most renowned climate scientist...
Is she available for parties?
Every time she says, "How dare you?", drink a shot!!!
- Thread starter
- #93
It's not the sky. It's the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.the sky is falling the sky is falling vote democrat and more importantly...send them lots of cash270 Gt/yr for the last 20 years and accelerating at 48Gt/yr/decade. Enough meltwater each year to cover the island of Ireland 3 meters deep.
Climate change: World's glaciers melting at a faster pace
The meltwater produced now accounts for about a fifth of global sea-level rise.
- May 20, 2009
- 144,676
- 67,197
- 2,330
It's not the sky. It's the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.the sky is falling the sky is falling vote democrat and more importantly...send them lots of cash270 Gt/yr for the last 20 years and accelerating at 48Gt/yr/decade. Enough meltwater each year to cover the island of Ireland 3 meters deep.
Climate change: World's glaciers melting at a faster pace
The meltwater produced now accounts for about a fifth of global sea-level rise.
Q. By how much must we lower CO2 to save the West Antarctic Ice Sheet?
A. $78 Trillion, but only the USA. The biggest polluter, our CCP brothers, get a free pass
- May 20, 2009
- 144,676
- 67,197
- 2,330
The 5 Countries That Produce the Most Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
China nearly DOUBLES USA CO2 output.
Crick, the choice is clear, tell the CCP to cut back their CO2
China nearly DOUBLES USA CO2 output.
Crick, the choice is clear, tell the CCP to cut back their CO2
- Thread starter
- #96
Global CO2 emissions must be brought to zero. To do that, every nation's emissions must be brought to zero. The US is one of "every nation". I live and vote in the US, not in China. The Chinese understand the problem and they are working on it. They are in a different position than the US having industrialized only recently. They signed the Kyoto protocol and the Paris Accord. We did not sign Kyoto and Trump tried to pull us from the Paris Accord. We have no moral standing to criticize China.
The Chinese understand the problem and they are working on it.
Hilarious!!
Unless, by working on it, you meant laughing at us and boosting their emissions?
They signed the Kyoto protocol and the Paris Accord. We did not sign Kyoto and Trump tried to pull us from the Paris Accord.
We didn't sign the Paris Accord either.
- Thread starter
- #99
The US became a signatory in April of 2016.They signed the Kyoto protocol and the Paris Accord. We did not sign Kyoto and Trump tried to pull us from the Paris Accord.
We didn't sign the Paris Accord either.
The US became a signatory in April of 2016.They signed the Kyoto protocol and the Paris Accord. We did not sign Kyoto and Trump tried to pull us from the Paris Accord.
We didn't sign the Paris Accord either.
Sorry, Obama doesn't get to sign a binding agreement without Senate approval.
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 187
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 177
- Views
- 525
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8110
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-