Satellite data show Earth's glaciers in massive decline

[Grumblenuts]

Like it or not, Biden has signed it now too!

 

[gipper]

Global CO2 emissions must be brought to zero. To do that, every nation's emissions must be brought to zero. The US is one of "every nation". I live and vote in the US, not in China. The Chinese understand the problem and they are working on it. They are in a different position than the US having industrialized only recently. They signed the Kyoto protocol and the Paris Accord. We did not sign Kyoto and Trump tried to pull us from the Paris Accord. We have no moral standing to criticize China.

Zero carbon emissions is entirely impractical and delusional. China is building coal power plants like crazy. They aren’t trying to refuse co2 emissions. They are increasing them.

Do you have any evidence showing zero carbon emissions will stop warming?

 

[Grumblenuts]

Climate Change: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide

In the past 60 years, carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased 100 times faster than it did during the end of the last ice age.

www.climate.gov

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Like it or not, Biden has signed it now too!

Like it or not, it's still not a treaty. Still not binding.

 

[gipper]

Like it or not, Biden has signed it now too!

Like it or not, it's still not a treaty. Still not binding.

It’s symbolic and that’s enough for some Biden supporters. Much like Ears who opened drilling to the Arctic, Old Joe has approved oil drilling on public land. Oh, but they meant well unlike Don. LOL.
Biden Issues Dozens of Oil Drilling Permits in First Few Days
Obama's approval of Arctic drilling 'undermines his climate message'

 

[Grumblenuts]

Like it or not, Biden has signed it now too!

Like it or not, it's still not a treaty. Still not binding.

Yeah, dream on, dream on, dream until your dreams come true! Babampbabamp..

 

[gipper]

Like it or not, Biden has signed it now too!

Like it or not, it's still not a treaty. Still not binding.

Yeah, dream on, dream on, dream until your dreams come true! Babampbabamp..

So you really think it’s binding?

 

[Grumblenuts]

It is binding. Get a grip, gip.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Yeah, laugh it up, Froddster:

Is the agreement legally binding?​

Yes. The agreement is considered a “treaty” under international law, but only certain provisions are legally binding. The issue of which provisions to make binding was a central concern for many countries, in particular the United States, which wanted an agreement the president could accept without seeking congressional approval. Meeting that test precluded binding emission targets and new binding financial commitments. The agreement, however, includes binding procedural commitments – such as the requirements to maintain successive NDCs and to report on progress in implementing them.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is binding. Get a grip, gip.

How many votes did it get in the Senate?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Yeah, laugh it up, Froddster:

Is the agreement legally binding?​

Yes. The agreement is considered a “treaty” under international law, but only certain provisions are legally binding. The issue of which provisions to make binding was a central concern for many countries, in particular the United States, which wanted an agreement the president could accept without seeking congressional approval. Meeting that test precluded binding emission targets and new binding financial commitments. The agreement, however, includes binding procedural commitments – such as the requirements to maintain successive NDCs and to report on progress in implementing them.

The agreement is considered a “treaty” under international law,

Why the quotes?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Climate Change Nothing To Do With Population "

* We Need More People *

The left wants mass immigration to bolster labor so they can eschew in the populism of socialism and communism , all while blubbering about climate change while making no correlation between it an global population .

So keep the stupidity to yourself until you pull your heads out your ass .

 

[Crick]

I reject your claim that "the left wants mass immigration". Your next phrase is meaningless because you don't know what the word "eschew" means. Finally, you make the very common mistake (among deniers) of suggesting we cannot work on two problems at the same time. Obviously, fossil fuel are being consumed by people and the industries that support them. And obviously, overpopulation is a problem that needs to be dealt with (more than is currently the case). But warning of one does not mean we wish or plan to ignore the other. So, keep YOUR stupidity to yourself, eh.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Remembering To Avoid Not Including Half Truths "

* Religion Of Secular Humanism Ulterior Motives *

I reject your claim that "the left wants mass immigration". Your next phrase is meaningless because you don't know what the word "eschew" means. Finally, you make the very common mistake (among deniers) of suggesting we cannot work on two problems at the same time. Obviously, fossil fuel are being consumed by people and the industries that support them. And obviously, overpopulation is a problem that needs to be dealt with (more than is currently the case). But warning of one does not mean we wish or plan to ignore the other. So, keep YOUR stupidity to yourself, eh.

The term eschew was used incorrectly , or correctly , depending upon whether the title and subtitle were written in contradiction .

The left wants mass immigration for its populism as it jousts for control of the economy and social systems through authoritarianism of a bureaucratic collective that focuses on the value of distressed labor for political purposes without regard for the utility of supply or demand for labor actually warranted .

Everything being produced and razed to provide for the global population affects the climate and there is a direct proportion between the two .

Keep warning about climate change , about pollution , about animal extinction , about carrying capacity , but when you utter those words do not forget to address the principle cause for it which is the unrestrained growth in the hue mammon population .

 

[Crick]

"Hue mammon population"? You have 60 minutes from your first posting to edit your mistakes.

 

[Crick]

" Remembering To Avoid Not Including Half Truths "

* Religion Of Secular Humanism Ulterior Motives *

I reject your claim that "the left wants mass immigration". Your next phrase is meaningless because you don't know what the word "eschew" means. Finally, you make the very common mistake (among deniers) of suggesting we cannot work on two problems at the same time. Obviously, fossil fuel are being consumed by people and the industries that support them. And obviously, overpopulation is a problem that needs to be dealt with (more than is currently the case). But warning of one does not mean we wish or plan to ignore the other. So, keep YOUR stupidity to yourself, eh.

The term eschew was used incorrectly , or correctly , depending upon whether the title and subtitle were written in contradiction .

The left wants mass immigration for its populism as it jousts for control of the economy and social systems through authoritarianism of a bureaucratic collective that focuses on the value of distressed labor for political purposes without regard for the utility of supply or demand for labor actually warranted .

Everything being produced and razed to provide for the global population affects the climate and there is a direct proportion between the two .

Keep warning about climate change , about pollution , about animal extinction , about carrying capacity , but when you utter those words do not forget to address the principle cause for it which is the unrestrained growth in the hue mammon population .

Did you not write the title and sub-title and shouldn't you thus know whether or not they were written in contradiction? If you did NOT write them, you owe us some quote marks and an attribution.

You will have to explain to me - at some other time and at some other place - what "regard for the utility of supply or demand for labor" it is that you believe warranted but ignored by the left. Do you believe the left ignore unemployment figures and labor statistics? Or do you simply hope to make a clever-sounding argument for restrictions on immigration?

I will make mention of overpopulation when and where I see fit. Feel free to do the same, particularly if you do it in appropriate threads. The topic of THIS thread, of which I am the OP, is the global loss of glacial ice revealed by satellite data. If you have a comment on THAT topic, I would love to chat about it with you.

 

[ding]

BREAKING NEWS: Glaciers STILL melt during interglacial cycles.

 

[Crick]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

View attachment 487665

Exactly!
That's why Michael Mann won't release his hockey stick data.
How many court cases has he lost so far? LOL!

 

[Crick]

I'm sure you can tell us.