Sandman vs Rittenhouse: Which one wins the most lawsuit money?

[EvMetro]

Rittenhouse can't sue anybody. And he might end up paying out civil damages for wrongful death. You are assuming he will be found innocent. But what if he's not?

Because he pointed a gun at people which by law negates his claim of self defense.

The opening post does not ask anything about if anybody can sue, it asks which one you think will end up with the biggest jackpot.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Biden called Kyle a White Supremacist.

 

[Resnic]

And what can he sue them for? Reporting the news?

Calling him a racist, a white supremacist, a murder and so on.

And just so you know defending yourself doesn't make you a murder. They also aren't allowed to call him a murder, that's for the courts to decide.

If you think every news source only reports straight facts and nothing else then I'm sorry, but you're wrong.

 

[justoffal]

Sue them for reporting their hating political agendas. Humans never learn. Time after time in history when liberties are a part of the tribe, they give it up for the snakes who put an enticement in front of them. Rittenhouse is a kid who may make a great soldier if given the opportunity. The tentacles of those who sold out for this are long and intertwined. There are people who I may watch on TV and agree with who can be questionable with their motives. Yours are more in the front as they are safer in their views. Many levels of protection before violence ever gets to the

Libel and slander. Are you even paying attention? Reporting the news? Seriously?! LMFAO.

Sandman made over 100 million
Let's see what Rittenhouse gets

 

[justoffal]

Calling him a racist, a white supremacist, a murder and so on.

And just so you know defending yourself doesn't make you a murder. They also aren't allowed to call him a murder, that's for the courts to decide.

If you think every news source only reports straight facts and nothing else then I'm sorry, but you're wrong.

Finally we are getting some sanity in the judiciary.... after a full ten year wave of Obamite judges that shit all over this country with progressive assaults on the mores and social standards of white Christians.

 

[armadei]

Actually I have. When somebody buys a gun and drives 20 miles to call himself protecting something he has nothing to do with and was not asked to protect, I know that's not somebody who killed 2 people in self defense.

No, you haven't. Because if you did you would know that he worked in Kenosha and had extensive family there. Furthermore this is the United States of America, not Soviet Russia, and Rittenhouse does not need to justify his presence in any public space within her borders.

But if you want to play that game then explain to us why Grosskreutz was FORTY miles from his home, illegally carrying a firearm, and that's acceptable... but not when Rittenhouse does it?

 

[armadei]

He pointed a gun at Rosenbaum before Rosenbaum attacked him.

That is complete horse shit. The state's own witness said that Rosenbaum tried taking Rittenhouse's gun. The state's medical examiner testified that there was gunpowder residue on Rosenbaum's hand, which could only happen if his hand was in close proximity to the barrel, and thus confirming the witness testimony.

What the hell trial have you been watching?

 

[JohnDB]

At this point Rittenhouse is getting some high powered legal and professional advice...where at the moment he is concerned and focused on the trial and probably doesn't want to even think about the rest...it's a coming.

He is a clean cut kid...still suffering from PTSD from that night and the subsequent incarceration. Also a gen z...
He isn't exactly that quick on the uptake...

And at the moment he is watching (as well as everyone else) all the players going forward with their lawsuits like Grosskreutz. (10 million)

He doesn't want to be anywhere near any of those guys or confused with them.

But he does have some money to pay back to some people that loaned him some to pay lawyers and get out of jail. So I think that eventually he will get some good offers from some good litigators to crush some of the people who have attacked him in the media. (Joe Biden, Senators, and news commentators)

 

[DBA]

Actually I have. When somebody buys a gun and drives 20 miles to call himself protecting something he has nothing to do with and was not asked to protect, I know that's not somebody who killed 2 people in self defense.

None of that has anything to do with self-defense, which is in response to an immediate danger.

 

[justoffal]

That is complete horse shit. The state's own witness said that Rosenbaum tried taking Rittenhouse's gun. The state's medical examiner testified that there was gunpowder residue on Rosenbaum's hand, which could only happen if his hand was in close proximity to the barrel, and thus confirming the witness testimony.

What the hell trial have you been watching?

They are not interested in the truth. They are interested in dominating the narrative with any and all propagated non-fact bullshit they can find. It's never ok for

None of that has anything to do with self-defense, which is in response to an immediate danger.

You have to remember you're talking to a guy who thinks that the BLM assassin who shot the NY police officer in the back of the head while he was sitting in his cruiser was defending himself when he did that. Given that one fact you should realize that you're arguing with a box of rocks. These people cannot be reasoned with they are always right no matter what the cause or the effect. They will continue to talk to you and tell you that you're wrong and distract you until they can get their finger on the trigger and pull it after which you will no longer be able to argue with them.

So you have to remember that when they initiate a conversation it's not to have an exchange of ideas it's for you to lose in every way shape and form including and up to your life. Frankly the latter is what they actually prefer.

 

[hadit]

Rittenhouse can't sue anybody. And he might end up paying out civil damages for wrongful death. You are assuming he will be found innocent. But what if he's not?

Because he pointed a gun at people which by law negates his claim of self defense.

Then ran away, which re-establishes it. He was clearly trying to get away from the scene and was pursued by vigilante wannabe's.

 

[IM2]

None of that has anything to do with self-defense, which is in response to an immediate danger.

Yes it does. It means he went looking for trouble and when he "found" it, he then claimed he feared for his life. He was underage, possessed an illegal weapon he took accross state line, he was out past curfew and neither the city gpvernment or state government had called for extra security. Even if they had, Rittenhouse was not a member of the national guard. Everything here stinks of a person who was looking for a reason to shoot people who might very well get away with a double murder.

 

[struth]

Yes it does. It means he went looking for trouble and when he "found" it, he then claimed he feared for his life. He was underage, possessed an illegal weapon he took accross state line, he was out past curfew and neither the city gpvernment or state government had called for extra security. Even if they had, Rittenhouse was not a member of the national guard. Everything here stinks of a person who was looking for a reason to shoot people who might very well get away with a double murder.

wow talk about simply parroting leftist propaganda

the gun wasn’t illegal, that charge was kicked out by the judge, same with the curfew charge…

and everything else doesn’t match the evidence presented at the trial…even by the govt’s own witnesses and supposive victim

thanks for highlighting just how little facts matter to the cultist

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Because he pointed a gun at people which by law negates his claim of self defense

Did you even think about that before posting it???

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Calling him a racist, a white supremacist, a murder and so on.

And just so you know defending yourself doesn't make you a murder. They also aren't allowed to call him a murder, that's for the courts to decide.

If you think every news source only reports straight facts and nothing else then I'm sorry, but you're wrong.

The Democrat Media insists on creating a "race" story where none exists

Ignorant Africans like IM2 lap it up

 

[Coyote]

No, you haven't. Because if you did you would know that he worked in Kenosha and had extensive family there. Furthermore this is the United States of America, not Soviet Russia, and Rittenhouse does not need to justify his presence in any public space within her borders.

But if you want to play that game then explain to us why Grosskreutz was FORTY miles from his home, illegally carrying a firearm, and that's acceptable... but not when Rittenhouse does it?

Why was Rittenhouse 20 miles from his home, illegally armed? Why was a KID ALLOWED, ARMED IN A VOLITILE SITUATION LIKE THAT? It isn’t a game. And, no, I don’t believe this judge is acting in good faith. If Grosskreutz was illegally armed…he wasn’t charged. Huber and Rosenbaum on the other hand lived in Kenosha.

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Why was Rittenhouse 20 miles from his home, illegally armed?

Redirect Notice

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

The governor has had to call put the National Guard incase Rittenhouse is acquitted.

Why?

Because leftists are well known for engaging in INSURRECTION when the government doesn't comply with their demands

 

[CarlinAnnArbor]

Redirect Notice

The tard Coyote can only respond with a "funny" when her ignorance has been exposed

 

[Coyote]

The tard Coyote can only respond with a "funny" when her ignorance has been exposed