- Thread starter
- #61
Actually making people suffer for the consequences of their criminal behavior, for starters.What hope do you have in terms of justice?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually making people suffer for the consequences of their criminal behavior, for starters.What hope do you have in terms of justice?
Please explain if you understand American Justice: innocent until proven guilty; no one is above the law; due diligence by the Court; the Prosecutor and the Defense for the Defendant and the Victim(s)
I bet it strained you to say that, because most of the time you all are defending the bull crap going on in liberal la la land.Foolish partisan grouping of an Idiot-gram ^^^:
due diligence is to take reasonable steps in order to satisfy a legal requirement. He didn't use due diligence, and he was rightly recalled.
- Prosecutor's job is to seek justice
- This Prosecutor did not seek justice for the victims
- A good Prosecutor's use due diligence***
- He's a DINO, not a liberal, not a progressive.
Laws do not create high crimes, the cost of housing or homelessness.Why is it that liberals vote against their interests? The mayors, prosecutors, judges, council members create cities with laws that create high crime, high housing costs, homelessness, that all hurt the residence of the city and yet the liberals keep electing these far left loons that keep the pattern going.
Yeah, they do. We call them Democratic policies.Laws do not create high crimes, the cost of housing or homelessness.
Representatives for George Soros no longer want to be associated with disgraced prosecutor Chesa Boudin now that he's been rebuked by the liberal voters of San Francisco, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.
Hours after Boudin was recalled by double-digits on Tuesday, representatives for the liberal billionaire contacted the Free Beacon to reject its characterization of Boudin as a "George Soros darling." The Soros representatives from public relations firm BerlinRosen say he never contributed to Boudin, and that it is wrong to label Boudin a "Soros prosecutor."
"We disagree with any analysis that labels any prosecutor as a ‘Soros prosecutor'—each candidate stands on their own," said the BerlinRosen representative. "Justice & Public Safety PAC, the political action committee through which Mr. Soros supports prosecutor candidates, has not supported—in the past or in the present, directly or indirectly—Boudin."
Soros Stiff-Arms Chesa Boudin After San Francisco Voters Kick Him to Curb - Washington Free BeaconThe Free Beacon has characterized Boudin as a "Soros prosecutor" in the past and never received a correction request from the billionaire's representatives. This is likely because, while it is true that Soros has never directly contributed to his campaigns, Boudin is one of Soros's favorite prosecutors. The Soros-funded group Fair and Just Prosecution, for example, has Boudin featured in its "meet the movement" section.
Soros additionally funds a network of liberal organizations that raised Boudin more than $600,000 for his election, according to the Washington Times, and contributed directly to groups fighting to oppose his recall.
Smart Justice California Action Fund donated almost $180,000 to oppose Boudin's recall. The group received funding from the California Justice & Public Safety PAC, which was stood up in 2018 thanks to $3.65 million from Soros.
Fair and Just Prosecution, the group that features Boudin as a face of its movement, is funded by the Tides Center, which received more than $30 million from Soros's Open Society Foundation between 2016 and 2020. The liberal justice reform group has hosted conferences that feature its favored prosecutors. Boudin attended one of those conferences in December and stood shoulder to shoulder for a group picture with district attorneys that have received direct funding from Soros, including Philadelphia district attorney Larry Krasner and Los Angeles district attorney George Gascon.
Really. What's you background in life and in education?I do, seemingly far better than you ever will.
Yeah, they do. We call them Democratic policies.
That would be experience with real life and real education to you.Really. What's you background in life and in education?
Simple Simon fits you nicely, this comment and your statement in #63 above are both foolish.
Policies and laws do make a difference otherwise there is no sense in having any laws or policies, thanks for confirming for me how lefties vote against their own interests.Laws do not create high crimes, the cost of housing or homelessness.
Taxes are required to support necessary and sufficient law enforcement, and law enforcement along with prosecutors, jails, probation officers and defense attorneys are overwhelmed as are the jails and State Prisons.
All elected pols want their jobs and they're all responsible for making tax laws. Democrats support taxes to defend civil rights, the Constitution's Bill of Rights and a myriad amount of bills that ultimately tax the public.
Of course you didn't want to respond to my entire #60 comments, to wit:Actually making people suffer for the consequences of their criminal behavior, for starters.
The last phrase doesn't explain how lefties vote against their own interests. Please provide examples.Policies and laws do make a difference otherwise there is no sense in having any laws or policies, thanks for confirming for me how lefties vote against their own interests.
Unless they are always innocent, no matter what a jury says. What counts is that Democrats like you say they are.innocent until proven guilty
Look to Washington DC, Nancy Pelosi's husband, and 512 riots in 2020 to prove that demonstrably false.no one is above the law
There are none when it comes to felons that match the liberal demographic criteria.due diligence by the Court
The criminal needs not to fear the prosecutor, nor should the victim of said criminal expect any defense.the Prosecutor and the Defense for the Defendant and the Victim(s)
Which victims? The actual victims or the ones victimized by so-called "systemic racism"?"Unfortunately the SF DA negated due diligence and victims never were awarded justice."
Hopefully, they learned a lesson from their mistake of electing the wrong person for the job.How much you wanna bet the next groomer they elect DA will be even worse.
I don't have more, if I did I would be able to get more from you than making unsupported claims. You posted you know more about justice and the courts than do I. Prove what you have in codes, courts, arrests, writing reports, testifying under oath, etc. etc. as I have.Nicknames and labels are all you have for me. How disappointing.
The actual victims, but you would know that in context, you're smart alright, a smart aleck, defined as a person who is irritating because they behave as if they know everything.Which victims? The actual victims or the ones victimized by so-called "systemic racism"?
You don't make any sense:Unless they are always innocent, no matter what a jury says. What counts is that Democrats like you say they are.
Look to Washington DC, Nancy Pelosi's husband, and 512 riots in 2020 to prove that demonstrably false.
There are none when it comes to felons that match the liberal demographic criteria.
The criminal needs not to fear the prosecutor, nor should the victim of said criminal expect any defense.