- Banned
- #281
I look forward to their testimony.Y'know, if you'd shut the fuck up, you wouldn't look so stupid.
Secret Service: Officials willing to testify after Jan. 6 witness said Trump lunged, grabbed wheel
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I look forward to their testimony.Y'know, if you'd shut the fuck up, you wouldn't look so stupid.
Secret Service: Officials willing to testify after Jan. 6 witness said Trump lunged, grabbed wheel
1. The KKK was the paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party. Get it right.So the videos shown at the hearing
You know, the ones that pointed out and showed KKKult members with guns.
Are those videos telling you a different story?
I do, too...provided they're asked by the committee to testify. Those are long odds, though.I look forward to their testimony.
Pretty sure Schiff can be removed....Mucho waa-waa will be all over cable news then.....Pelosi removed MTG.Enough of this paleface California twit.McCarthy was on - Gutfeld -
last night and made an assurance that once his House Republicans
have a majority he's already got a lot { i can't remember if it was
50 or 500 } papers ready to roll.Meaning serious lawsuits and
Investigations.And that Schiff will be taken off the House Intelligence
Committee along with Swallwell.
I'm not sure how that works.If Schiff can be outright taken off
a Committee,especially since being the Ranking Democrat for years.
But if Pelosi can pull a January 6th Select Hearing which ain't
a hearing AT ALL.then the worlds an open oyster for Republicans
come the first week of January 2023.
Isn't Arkansas their national office?1. The KKK was the paramilitary arm of the Democratic Party. Get it right.
2. I didn't see those videos. And anything that comes out of this committee is automatically suspect.
Only possible problem was He wasn't in the Beast that day.Supports all but the “hand on the steering wheel” and physical altercation.
Trump clearly and forcefully wanted his Mousolini moment and the secret service clearly did not
What did the testimony cover?One has already testified under oath…so there’s that
She was repeating a story told to her. She never said she saw the incident.Only possible problem was He wasn't in the Beast that day.
Another democrat 'factual' hearsay testimony?She was repeating a story told to her. She never said she saw the incident.
She could have been told it was the Beast or she could have assumed it was.
Either way. It doesn't matter.
“We choose truth over facts,” Biden concluded — not seeming to realize facts support the truth, generally speaking.
Another democrat 'factual' hearsay testimony?
Just remember what the president said:
And this inspiring Biden quote:
Here’s the ‘word salad’ President:
"...when they need to ...when they need to dis.....when they need to ah....when they ding the national guard.....we're gonna ....we're gonna depose....the.....we're gonna enforce the....excuse me, employ.....the reconfect act....go out there and dictate companies build and do....but if it waits, it takes a long time....."
Al Sharpton must be his elocution teacher. Perhaps you remember this demonstration:
BTW....the journalist asking the question then asked if she could pose the question to the vice-president elect so as to get a coherent answer......what does that tell you?
What she saw and heard.What did the testimony cover?
And this inspiring Biden quote:
Here’s the ‘word salad’ President:
"...when they need to ...when they need to dis.....when they need to ah....when they ding the national guard.....we're gonna ....we're gonna depose....the.....we're gonna enforce the....excuse me, employ.....the reconfect act....go out there and dictate companies build and do....but if it waits, it takes a long time....."
Al Sharpton must be his elocution teacher. Perhaps you remember this demonstration:
BTW....the journalist asking the question then asked if she could pose the question to the vice-president elect so as to get a coherent answer......what does that tell you?
'Something to the effect of'......What she saw and heard.
She was in the room.'Something to the effect of'......
Takes two to tango, Pal.She was in the room.
You're a sycophant on a message board kissing the ring.
The testimony she presented was credible in the room information which informs us about the disgraceful actions of the previous president.Takes two to tango, Pal.
Her 'testimony' was lawyer speak to prevent her from defamation type legal actions.
After all is said and done, I can't wait to hear all the screaming from the left when the tables are turned, hopefully, in January.
IF Salon is pushing it, Its a lie... At least they are consistent..Uglier and nastier. Now MSM jumping in.
We've got a problem. So let's impugn the honor and integrity of men who swear to instantly lay down their lives for the stability of our nation! Let's get to work!
Officials disputing Hutchinson testimony were Trump "yes men": report
Agents disputed that Trump tried to grab steering wheel, driver. Her lawyer says they should testify under oath.www.salon.com
So hearsay is now admissible?The testimony she presented was credible in the room information which informs us about the disgraceful actions of the previous president.
90% of her testimony was from in the room.So hearsay is now admissible?
Why didn't she do direct quotes?
Oh, it's not a real hearing anyway.