Salon Implies Secret Service Men "Who Disputed" Hutchinson's "Steering Wheel" Story Are Liars

You're an obedient little ass-kisser. If Hutchinson had been told to say Trump levitated and shot lightning from his fingertips, you'd believe that, too -- because you're an obedient little ass-kisser.
trump KKKult member ^^^^^^^ daveman

If Hutchinson had been told to say ...... what you fail to accept is that Hutchinson was told what to say by team trump, and that, my friend, is witness tampering.
 
Show proof of this actually being debunked.
Unless these 'unnamed' sources are willing to testify under oath, all you have is hearsay from unnamed sources.

You agree with unnamed sources and hearsay as of today.
Nice to know.

Hearsay and unnamed sources is your only story.
Hutchinson's "testimony" is hearsay.

You believe it's true because ORANGE MAN BAD. That's all. That's all the proof you need.

Normal people need more than that.
 
Hutchinson's "testimony" is hearsay.

You believe it's true because ORANGE MAN BAD. That's all. That's all the proof you need.

Normal people need more than that.
First, the J6 committee hearings are not a court of law.

Second, she was very credible hence your freak out over her testimony.

Third, you're not normal.
 
You have no proof. But then, you don't need proof. You were told to believe it, so you do.

Gullible buffoon.
I have her highly credible testimony while you have sycophancy to an orange blob.
 
She retold the secret service story as it was told to her. She stated that in her testimony.
She should never have been allowed to do that. This is the mark of a Stalinesque show trial. It was hearsay and should never have been allowed. Once the existence of these statements was known, the people there should have been called as witnesses. Not second hand Rose.
 
Hutchinson's "testimony" is hearsay.
The part about the SUV and trump grabbing is in FACT Hearsay, and she said that.
She said someone else told her, that is hearsay.

The rest of her testimony was eye witness, first hand observation, her telling what SHE saw and heard, is in FACT, not hearsay.
 
She should never have been allowed to do that. This is the mark of a Stalinesque show trial. It was hearsay and should never have been allowed. Once the existence of these statements was known, the people there should have been called as witnesses. Not second hand Rose.
First, this is a committee hearing, not a court of law.

Additionally, do we know if those SS agents have given private testimony or refused to cooperate.
 

Forum List

Back
Top