S.C. school brat told friends before cop encounter: "Get yall phones out". She did it purposely.

[irosie91]

the very first thing he did he removed her stuff from the desk...in Military parlance "shaping the battlefield"...that means he came for a battle... and he delivered....

Did he speak to her while "clearing the battle field" ? Did he have any information about her before the event in question? What "stuff"?

Her stuff, her school computer that was on top of her desk and the child behind her also who can be seen

Rosie is just trying to find anything to deflect from the point. Unless she had a gun and was holding the class hostage the feral chimp cop had no excuse for his behavior. Thats why he got his ass fired.

wrong again-----she simply had to continue to be disruptive to the class and
REFUSE a perfectly LEGAL order from the teacher and then the cop. Unlike
you I worked for a living------during an off time I even did some substitute teaching
in my son's school. One day I had to PHYSICALLY pull a kid who was climbing
out of the window----I was not particularly gentle-------the TEACHER is responsible for getting the teaching done and should not have to deal with a snot nose who DECIDES that she is immune
from being told what to do. I feel for the teacher----whether he/she is black/white---------the snotty brat had to be removed. The kid is lucky I did not complain to
the vice principle who would likely have slammed him in the head. I had such a
good reputation for being a pushover that my kids went wild. AS for the bitch with
the cell phone-----did it ever occur to you what scum like her do to the learning
atmosphere. Do you ever complain about the READING LEVELS attained
by kids in some inner city schools?

the very first thing he did he removed her stuff from the desk...in Military parlance "shaping the battlefield"...that means he came for a battle... and he delivered....

Did he speak to her while "clearing the battle field" ? Did he have any information about her before the event in question? What "stuff"?

Her stuff, her school computer that was on top of her desk and the child behind her also who can be seen

Rosie is just trying to find anything to deflect from the point. Unless she had a gun and was holding the class hostage the feral chimp cop had no excuse for his behavior. Thats why he got his ass fired.

wrong again-----she simply had to continue to be disruptive to the class and
REFUSE a perfectly LEGAL order from the teacher and then the cop. Unlike
you I worked for a living------during an off time I even did some substitute teaching
in my son's school. One day I had to PHYSICALLY pull a kid who was climbing
out of the window----I was not particularly gentle-------the TEACHER is responsible for getting the teaching done and should not have to deal with a snot nose who DECIDES that she is immune
from being told what to do. I feel for the teacher----whether he/she is black/white---------the snotty brat had to be removed. The kid is lucky I did not complain to
the vice principle who would likely have slammed him in the head. I had such a
good reputation for being a pushover that my kids went wild. AS for the bitch with
the cell phone-----did it ever occur to you what scum like her do to the learning
atmosphere. Do you ever complain about the READING LEVELS attained
by kids in some inner city schools?

Vice principle? And you wonder about the literacy of inner city kids.

yes---"vice principle" usually male------this was a euphemism for high school
employee in charge of "discipline" in my state. Where do you see a problem
with my "literacy". That person was so designated in the High School I attended
and also in one in which I did some "substitute teaching" ----in another town

 

[irosie91]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

In this case it doesn't matter a damn what the girl did, not after the cop lost it. When she's back in one piece you can give her detention but you don't get to blame someone else for making you violent. What the hell ever happen to all that Personal Responsibility dogma, seems like you morons somehow think that doesn't apply to He-Man the Enforcer...

she was not in ONE PIECE? do you know anything about actual INJURIES?

 

[Desperado]

This all started after the liberals outlawed discipline in the classrooms.
You did not hear about this crap 20 years ago because it did not happen.

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Did he speak to her while "clearing the battle field" ? Did he have any information about her before the event in question? What "stuff"?

Her stuff, her school computer that was on top of her desk and the child behind her also who can be seen

Rosie is just trying to find anything to deflect from the point. Unless she had a gun and was holding the class hostage the feral chimp cop had no excuse for his behavior. Thats why he got his ass fired.

wrong again-----she simply had to continue to be disruptive to the class and
REFUSE a perfectly LEGAL order from the teacher and then the cop. Unlike
you I worked for a living------during an off time I even did some substitute teaching
in my son's school. One day I had to PHYSICALLY pull a kid who was climbing
out of the window----I was not particularly gentle-------the TEACHER is responsible for getting the teaching done and should not have to deal with a snot nose who DECIDES that she is immune
from being told what to do. I feel for the teacher----whether he/she is black/white---------the snotty brat had to be removed. The kid is lucky I did not complain to
the vice principle who would likely have slammed him in the head. I had such a
good reputation for being a pushover that my kids went wild. AS for the bitch with
the cell phone-----did it ever occur to you what scum like her do to the learning
atmosphere. Do you ever complain about the READING LEVELS attained
by kids in some inner city schools?

Did he speak to her while "clearing the battle field" ? Did he have any information about her before the event in question? What "stuff"?

Her stuff, her school computer that was on top of her desk and the child behind her also who can be seen

Rosie is just trying to find anything to deflect from the point. Unless she had a gun and was holding the class hostage the feral chimp cop had no excuse for his behavior. Thats why he got his ass fired.

wrong again-----she simply had to continue to be disruptive to the class and
REFUSE a perfectly LEGAL order from the teacher and then the cop. Unlike
you I worked for a living------during an off time I even did some substitute teaching
in my son's school. One day I had to PHYSICALLY pull a kid who was climbing
out of the window----I was not particularly gentle-------the TEACHER is responsible for getting the teaching done and should not have to deal with a snot nose who DECIDES that she is immune
from being told what to do. I feel for the teacher----whether he/she is black/white---------the snotty brat had to be removed. The kid is lucky I did not complain to
the vice principle who would likely have slammed him in the head. I had such a
good reputation for being a pushover that my kids went wild. AS for the bitch with
the cell phone-----did it ever occur to you what scum like her do to the learning
atmosphere. Do you ever complain about the READING LEVELS attained
by kids in some inner city schools?

Vice principle? And you wonder about the literacy of inner city kids.

yes---"vice principle" usually male------this was a euphemism for high school
employee in charge of "discipline" in my state. Where do you see a problem
with my "literacy". That person was so designated in the High School I attended
and also in one in which I did some "substitute teaching" ----in another town

Princi-pal. Remember, he's your Pal...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

In this case it doesn't matter a damn what the girl did, not after the cop lost it. When she's back in one piece you can give her detention but you don't get to blame someone else for making you violent. What the hell ever happen to all that Personal Responsibility dogma, seems like you morons somehow think that doesn't apply to He-Man the Enforcer...

she was not in ONE PIECE? do you know anything about actual INJURIES?

According to the reports, yes I do. Bruised torso, arm in a cast or sling, rug burns and bruises on her face. No pictures yet but that is what her attorney says. Take it with a grain of salt of course.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Senor Douche

 

[irosie91]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

In this case it doesn't matter a damn what the girl did, not after the cop lost it. When she's back in one piece you can give her detention but you don't get to blame someone else for making you violent. What the hell ever happen to all that Personal Responsibility dogma, seems like you morons somehow think that doesn't apply to He-Man the Enforcer...

she was not in ONE PIECE? do you know anything about actual INJURIES?

According to the reports, yes I do. Bruised torso, arm in a cast or sling, rug burns and bruises on her face. No pictures yet but that is what her attorney says. Take it with a grain of salt of course.

Paint-------I know what lawyers do and say. I know CLOSE UP-------I have evaluated the "INJURIES" of hundreds of arrestees. It ain't easy-----it is time consuming because it was my practice to credit EVERY COMPLAINT until ------
I could demonstrate it false

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

You all sound alike to me, you think I'm going to go back and figure out which one of you specifically lied about her mother? She was being a lawless punk because she's a lawless punk, not because of an understandable loss at home. Yeah, that makes a difference.

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

I agree all the way up to "the officer fucked up good." He didn't. It's why Sheriff Glossyboots couldn't specify a policy he violated. When somebody resists arrest, they risk getting hurt because the officer is forced to escalate to gain compliance. Forcible arrest is never pretty and I've made several of them where the suspect struggled and that struggle had to be stopped by decisive action. That's exactly what happened in the video. So what Ben Fields has coming to him is about $1.5 million because there's no way the gutless coward of a sheriff is going to be able to justify his actions in court when his decision is cross examined.

 

[Mac1958]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

I agree all the way up to "the officer fucked up good." He didn't. It's why Sheriff Glossyboots couldn't specify a policy he violated. When somebody resists arrest, they risk getting hurt because the officer is forced to escalate to gain compliance. Forcible arrest is never pretty and I've made several of them where the suspect struggled and that struggle had to be stopped by decisive action. That's exactly what happened in the video. So what Ben Fields has coming to him is about $1.5 million because there's no way the gutless coward of a sheriff is going to be able to justify his actions in court when his decision is cross examined.

Well, it sounds like you know more about that stuff than I.

The sad thing is the element of "black culture" that not only condones resisting arrest, but seems to expect it. Look at the deaths such as Micheal Brown, the many that happen after/during the time the perp has resisted arrest. The PC Police never mention that because it would blow their story. They specifically avoid it.

Those who enable this behavior continue to cause great damage, and they evidently don't care.
.

 

[jc456]

No I get it. I'm not the type of person who can't see both sides of an argument. I totally get it. Someone with that temper maybe shouldn't be a school cop. BUT, maybe someone like that should be. And maybe we should have come down hard on the kid and send a message that you must respect the law. I think we sent the wrong message. I'm a liberal and I'm even sick of PC.
.

The cop should respect the law and not assault a child under color of law....

Did his job

 

[jc456]

She will not be charged with any crime.

You know this how?

Because I am not a fucking moron like you.

So you don't know. You sound like a fucking moron guessing what the DA will or will not do.

As opposed to sounding like a moron for pushing a narrative about the wrong girl , an imaginary wrongful termination settlement or the idea that the sheriff somehow folded to political pressure.
If we're comparing, Paddy has far more credibility.

Like anyone gives a shit who you think has credibility.

He thinks he's special

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

I agree all the way up to "the officer fucked up good." He didn't. It's why Sheriff Glossyboots couldn't specify a policy he violated. When somebody resists arrest, they risk getting hurt because the officer is forced to escalate to gain compliance. Forcible arrest is never pretty and I've made several of them where the suspect struggled and that struggle had to be stopped by decisive action. That's exactly what happened in the video. So what Ben Fields has coming to him is about $1.5 million because there's no way the gutless coward of a sheriff is going to be able to justify his actions in court when his decision is cross examined.

Well, it sounds like you know more about that stuff than I.

The sad thing is the element of "black culture" that not only condones resisting arrest, but seems to expect it. Look at the deaths such as Micheal Brown, the many that happen after/during the time the perp has resisted arrest. The PC Police never mention that because it would blow their story. The specifically avoid it.

Those who enable this behavior continue to cause great damage, and they evidently don't care.
.

The kids I feel sorry for because they are taking their cues from adults and if this forum is an example of many adults out there, they are being encouraged to hate the cops and they are making heroes out of those who resist arrest. It used to be our highest social priority to set a good example for the next generation, but no more.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

In this case it doesn't matter a damn what the girl did, not after the cop lost it. When she's back in one piece you can give her detention but you don't get to blame someone else for making you violent. What the hell ever happen to all that Personal Responsibility dogma, seems like you morons somehow think that doesn't apply to He-Man the Enforcer...

she was not in ONE PIECE? do you know anything about actual INJURIES?

There were no injuries of any kind, that were not 100% the responsibility of the 'person' that attacked the deputy.

What 'injuries' there were, so sufficient to cause her ambulance chaser to slap a cast on her arm, so as to go after the County's liability insurance policy.

 

[jc456]

Right hand. She punched his upper chest trying to hit his face.

No she did not...he puts one hand on her throat and the other he used to grab the bottom of the chair and flip up ...the kid feeling herself falling backwards tried to grab at the officer's shoulder as she is falling...that is flailing helplessly not punching ......she sits there is grabbed by the throat first then thrown backwards...notice how close the cop comes to wiping out an uninvolved student back of the victim...the front leg of the desk that was closest to the officer hits the kids computer I think...

Nice take down

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

In this case it doesn't matter a damn what the girl did, not after the cop lost it. When she's back in one piece you can give her detention but you don't get to blame someone else for making you violent. What the hell ever happen to all that Personal Responsibility dogma, seems like you morons somehow think that doesn't apply to He-Man the Enforcer...

she was not in ONE PIECE? do you know anything about actual INJURIES?

There were no injuries of any kind, that were not 100% the responsibility of the 'person' that attacked the deputy.

What 'injuries' there were, so sufficient to cause her ambulance chaser to slap a cast on her arm, so as to go after the County's liability insurance policy.

It will be interesting if this generates a criminal probe for insurance fraud. There's no mention of an XRAY showing any bones broken. This too will be material to the upcoming lawsuit.

 

[jc456]

You know this how?

Because I am not a fucking moron like you.

So you don't know. You sound like a fucking moron guessing what the DA will or will not do.

As opposed to sounding like a moron for pushing a narrative about the wrong girl , an imaginary wrongful termination settlement or the idea that the sheriff somehow folded to political pressure.
If we're comparing, Paddy has far more credibility.

Like anyone gives a shit who you think has credibility.

I don't care if you give a shit. Actually I prefer that you don't. It's far more entertaining watching you repeatedly make an ass out of yourself.

And it's funny watching you condone hostage taking by a student.

 

[sealybobo]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

In this case it doesn't matter a damn what the girl did, not after the cop lost it. When she's back in one piece you can give her detention but you don't get to blame someone else for making you violent. What the hell ever happen to all that Personal Responsibility dogma, seems like you morons somehow think that doesn't apply to He-Man the Enforcer...

she was not in ONE PIECE? do you know anything about actual INJURIES?

According to the reports, yes I do. Bruised torso, arm in a cast or sling, rug burns and bruises on her face. No pictures yet but that is what her attorney says. Take it with a grain of salt of course.

I'm sure a neck brace too in court.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

He got fired for excessive force, a good thing.