S.C. school brat told friends before cop encounter: "Get yall phones out". She did it purposely.

[ClosedCaption]

The PC Police make things worse when they spin for, deflect for, and enable bad behavior.

You folks have to know this.

Why do you do it?
.

Holy shit.....you've ground to a halt. You can't stop repeating that bullshit and its impeding your forward progress.

Earmuffs, bitch.

No one is taking the bait he's laying so he keep casting that line

Bingo.

You and my little stalker friend know this is about people like you, and you don't have an honest response.

Thanks for that.

And tell us again how you care about black people.
.

You must be referring to the ClosedCaption thread. This is the thread about the cop in SC.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Irrelevant to his termination? Yes.
The girl's background and actions are not cited as reasons for his termination.

If it isn't relative, then why did you Leftists bring it up over and over again that she was just acting out because of her pain in losing her mother?

Stop lying, Leftists!

I don't think anyone can speak to her state of mind except her. Since her name hasn't been released there really is no way to verify any rumors. It's irrelevant anyway. Why do you blame her actions for the officer's termination? That's what I was speaking to.

Now, it's irrelevant, taken right out of the Hillary Clinton playbook. But apparently it was highly relevant as you loons kept cudgeling us about the head with her mental state. Now you're whistling a different tune.

No I'm not. Look through the thread and show me where I said anything about her mother. I can however show you multiple times where you blamed her for the officer's actions.
Why do you blame her for the actions of a grown man.

You all sound alike to me, you think I'm going to go back and figure out which one of you specifically lied about her mother? She was being a lawless punk because she's a lawless punk, not because of an understandable loss at home. Yeah, that makes a difference.

To whom involved and in what way?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

If it isn't relative, then why did you Leftists bring it up over and over again that she was just acting out because of her pain in losing her mother?

Stop lying, Leftists!

I don't think anyone can speak to her state of mind except her. Since her name hasn't been released there really is no way to verify any rumors. It's irrelevant anyway. Why do you blame her actions for the officer's termination? That's what I was speaking to.

Now, it's irrelevant, taken right out of the Hillary Clinton playbook. But apparently it was highly relevant as you loons kept cudgeling us about the head with her mental state. Now you're whistling a different tune.

No I'm not. Look through the thread and show me where I said anything about her mother. I can however show you multiple times where you blamed her for the officer's actions.
Why do you blame her for the actions of a grown man.

You all sound alike to me, you think I'm going to go back and figure out which one of you specifically lied about her mother? She was being a lawless punk because she's a lawless punk, not because of an understandable loss at home. Yeah, that makes a difference.

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

 

[ClosedCaption]

And on a larger scale, this is how American Blacks continue to be victimized,

I thought that the people who abuse others are at fault, not the victims. But I see that doesn't apply to blacks.

Maybe if you stopped defending the cops abuse then the abuse would stop. The same with a molester. It's not the victims fault

 

[Mac1958]

I thought that the people who abuse others are at fault, not the victims. But I see that doesn't apply to blacks.

Yes, I have no doubt that's all you see here.

Poor girl was just attacked for no reason because of the color of her skin.

I believe you, and I remain absolutely fascinated by the power of partisan ideology.
.

 

[bucs90]

And on a larger scale, this is how American Blacks continue to be victimized,

I thought that the people who abuse others are at fault, not the victims. But I see that doesn't apply to blacks.

Maybe if you stopped defending the cops abuse then the abuse would stop. The same with a molester. It's not the victims fault

The victims....are the other students whose day of education this little bitch was interrupting and obviously didn't care she was doing it. The same ones who did a walk-out supporting the cop...including black students. THEY are there to get an education...and are tired of thugs and bitches interrupting it.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I don't think anyone can speak to her state of mind except her. Since her name hasn't been released there really is no way to verify any rumors. It's irrelevant anyway. Why do you blame her actions for the officer's termination? That's what I was speaking to.

Now, it's irrelevant, taken right out of the Hillary Clinton playbook. But apparently it was highly relevant as you loons kept cudgeling us about the head with her mental state. Now you're whistling a different tune.

No I'm not. Look through the thread and show me where I said anything about her mother. I can however show you multiple times where you blamed her for the officer's actions.
Why do you blame her for the actions of a grown man.

You all sound alike to me, you think I'm going to go back and figure out which one of you specifically lied about her mother? She was being a lawless punk because she's a lawless punk, not because of an understandable loss at home. Yeah, that makes a difference.

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Now, it's irrelevant, taken right out of the Hillary Clinton playbook. But apparently it was highly relevant as you loons kept cudgeling us about the head with her mental state. Now you're whistling a different tune.

No I'm not. Look through the thread and show me where I said anything about her mother. I can however show you multiple times where you blamed her for the officer's actions.
Why do you blame her for the actions of a grown man.

You all sound alike to me, you think I'm going to go back and figure out which one of you specifically lied about her mother? She was being a lawless punk because she's a lawless punk, not because of an understandable loss at home. Yeah, that makes a difference.

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

I thought that the people who abuse others are at fault, not the victims. But I see that doesn't apply to blacks.

Yes, I have no doubt that's all you see here.

Poor girl was just attacked for no reason because of the color of her skin.

I believe you, and I remain absolutely fascinated by the power of partisan ideology.
.

Poor girl was just attacked for no reason because of the color of her skin.

Who has said that? I think most people have said it could have been handled differently but not that it was for no reason.

 

[ClosedCaption]

I thought that the people who abuse others are at fault, not the victims. But I see that doesn't apply to blacks.

Yes, I have no doubt that's all you see here.

Poor girl was just attacked for no reason because of the color of her skin.

I believe you, and I remain absolutely fascinated by the power of partisan ideology.
.

What was the reason to physically attack her?

 

[ClosedCaption]

And on a larger scale, this is how American Blacks continue to be victimized,

I thought that the people who abuse others are at fault, not the victims. But I see that doesn't apply to blacks.

Maybe if you stopped defending the cops abuse then the abuse would stop. The same with a molester. It's not the victims fault

The victims.....

You're lying. Did you apologize yet?

 

[jc456]

has no bearing on the situation he walked into, which was an ambush plain and simple. She knew the cop was coming in since the teacher stated so. So the entire plan was to make a scene. mission accomplished. Oh, she got what she asked for.

She planned this all out knowing in advance that specific officer was coming? You sound like a fucking idiot. He wasnt the only SRO there at the school.

Are cops in schools there as disciplinarians?

Nope. Only to provide safety and in the event of criminal acts..apprehension..

let's see the written explanation from the school for the cops being there. Post up that document. Seems you like to get into the documents of the story. and yet fail to ever provide any. Do they call you Pinocchio?

While I feel that all of you cop defenders are a few points below average on the intelligence scale, I think you take the booby prize and are first on the list.

Thanks

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"S.C. school brat told friends before cop encounter: "Get yall phones out". She did it purposely."

Blame the victim fallacy – how typically conservative.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

No I'm not. Look through the thread and show me where I said anything about her mother. I can however show you multiple times where you blamed her for the officer's actions.
Why do you blame her for the actions of a grown man.

You all sound alike to me, you think I'm going to go back and figure out which one of you specifically lied about her mother? She was being a lawless punk because she's a lawless punk, not because of an understandable loss at home. Yeah, that makes a difference.

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

 

[ClosedCaption]

most people have said it could have been handled differently but not that it was for no reason.

Its been said over and over again.

 

[ClosedCaption]

You all sound alike to me, you think I'm going to go back and figure out which one of you specifically lied about her mother? She was being a lawless punk because she's a lawless punk, not because of an understandable loss at home. Yeah, that makes a difference.

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

Very well said Hutch

 

[Hutch Starskey]

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

Very well said Hutch

Thanks. Trying a different tack.Theses threads usually follow a pattern that result in page after page of insults and circular arguments. Trying to cut through some of it.

 

[Mac1958]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

 

[ClosedCaption]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low

most people have said it could have been handled differently but not that it was for no reason.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

In this case it doesn't matter a damn what the girl did, not after the cop lost it. When she's back in one piece you can give her detention but you don't get to blame someone else for making you violent. What the hell ever happen to all that Personal Responsibility dogma, seems like you morons somehow think that doesn't apply to He-Man the Enforcer...