S.C. school brat told friends before cop encounter: "Get yall phones out". She did it purposely.

[TyroneSlothrop]

 

[paddymurphy]

He'll be working at Dennys where he can make slams all day.

He's gonna settle a wrongful termination lawsuit for 200k or so....and he'll be working for Lexington County within a year.

Just like the girl he attacked planned it? Right, you useless twat.

She did. Only an idiot thinks this wasn't a setup. That's why you shit stains are saying, "If he could get sucked in by that, he deserves to be fired."

She did not. You are as fucking stupid and dishonest as the OP.

When you are blowing Buc90, come back andcment.

 

[reconmark]

What really burns you is that you are reduced to an old powerless bigot that can only run his mouth on the web.
No more slapping Black folk without an ass whooping coming.
Must suck to live in this America of your making...lol.

Quite the contrary. In 2016, Trump kicks ass, Bernie, Joe, and the Hildabeast get retired to an old folks home. Sharpton gets jammed in to looney bin, and we all live happily ever after. Got it ?

PS - then you'll just be a powerless old AA bigot, wasting away, with nobody to pander to.

Notice how America has changed for the better against your strongest objections.

Black people pass you socially, homosexuals no longer hide from you, women dont have to accept as husbands, white skin is increasingly no longer a sign of instant competence and priveledges.

Despite hoover, kkk,ccc,segregation,jim crow,lynchings,rapes and beatings, you have still lost.

 

[reconmark]

The girl's actions weren't cited as a cause for termination.

Source ? Link ?

Source: A brain you idiot.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

He's gonna settle a wrongful termination lawsuit for 200k or so....and he'll be working for Lexington County within a year.

Just like the girl he attacked planned it? Right, you useless twat.

She did. Only an idiot thinks this wasn't a setup. That's why you shit stains are saying, "If he could get sucked in by that, he deserves to be fired."

She did not. You are as fucking stupid and dishonest as the OP.

When you are blowing Buc90, come back andcment.

What's with the fixation on cock sucking? Are you trying to tell us all something?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Senor Douche

ROFLMNAO!

Every time this would-be 'contributor' posts, this scene comes to mind:

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

... bigot ...

The absolute coolest thing about the use of the word bigot, is that where such is used to define another... such is a demonstration of the literal meaning of the word.

It's a paradox, which is naturally lost on the intellectually less fortunate. Which just adds to the hilarity!

 

[LoneLaugher]

So, you got fired too?

No.

BTW, lying Leftist, tell us some more about how this poor girl just lost her mother now that we know the truth that you twats were full of shit the entire time.

Quit cause you couldn't hack it? Does it make you feel manly to hate this child you know nothing about?

I know she wasn't bereaved like you lying Leftists claimed she was. I know she's not the victim you made her out to be.

Stop lying, Leftists!

And you know you're a gutless **** who comes here and tries to make up for it by attacking your betters.

Uh huh.

Stop lying, Leftists!

Singular. No "s" at the end.

 

[reconmark]

... bigot ...

The absolute coolest thing about the use of the word bigot, is that where such is used to define another... such is a demonstration of the literal meaning of the word.

It's a paradox, which is naturally lost on the intellectually less fortunate. Which just adds to the hilarity!

In other words you admit to being one of the less fortunate...not really a revelation.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

... bigot ...

The absolute coolest thing about the use of the word bigot, is that where such is used to define another... such is a demonstration of the literal meaning of the word.

It's a paradox, which is naturally lost on the intellectually less fortunate. Which just adds to the hilarity!

In other words you admit to being one of the less fortunate...not really a revelation.

Oh! Deflection and misdirection? Now that is a FINE means of concession.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[reconmark]

... bigot ...

The absolute coolest thing about the use of the word bigot, is that where such is used to define another... such is a demonstration of the literal meaning of the word.

It's a paradox, which is naturally lost on the intellectually less fortunate. Which just adds to the hilarity!

In other words you admit to being one of the less fortunate...not really a revelation.

Oh! Deflection and misdirection? Now that is a FINE means of concession.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Example of the " less fortunate."

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

... bigot ...

The absolute coolest thing about the use of the word bigot, is that where such is used to define another... such is a demonstration of the literal meaning of the word.

It's a paradox, which is naturally lost on the intellectually less fortunate. Which just adds to the hilarity!

In other words you admit to being one of the less fortunate...not really a revelation.

Oh! Deflection and misdirection? Now that is a FINE means of concession.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Example of the " less fortunate."

LOL! WHAT? A Re-Concession? And so soon... .

Your Re-Concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[jc456]

These Nasty fucks defending this shit carried out by the Officer are the same Nasty fucks who have cheered every God damn disrespect shown to the President of the United States of America...they now are concerned with "a lack of respect for Authority figures "... Seriously you fucks are insufferable in your phony hypocritical idiocy.... GVuess what Bull shit squadron the POTUS is the Commander In Chief of the Nations Armed Forces...he is the number one Authority figure and you all have been grossly irresponsibly disrespectful to the N th degree to Obama...

Ahh, what a cry baby. S

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career.
The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

And you can't turn your speculation into fact.

the threat was removed

 

[jc456]

These kids are being taught to disrespect all authority and that if you don't agree with the rules...fuck it. And if someone tries to make you follow rules....cause a scene and you win..

Yep, and that's a pretty fucked up thing to do to a kid.

And the Regressive Left calls others racist.
.

Yes only the left uses that word, misrepresentation is a leftist dream

 

[Hutch Starskey]

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

Nor do you. That is not in evidence. You all snicker and high five each other over the idea the " lefties lie". The sad truth is every time one of you have been pushed on this it's always the political conspiracy fallback excuse. We all know that is the lie.
I believe the outrage people felt was not based in race but simply that this was a school officer who's purpose is to protect the school and savaged a child unnecessarily.
It's sad really that you and others on here are so jaded and cynical that you have to believe that just to get you head around it.

 

[jc456]

This girl's refusal to move warranted the officer to forcibly remove her. He did his job, she wasn't hurt. School shouldn't stop for every princess that throws a tantrum.

His job will be flipping burgers from this point on.

He'll be working at Dennys where he can make slams all day.

He's gonna settle a wrongful termination lawsuit for 200k or so....and he'll be working for Lexington County within a year.

Just like the girl he attacked planned it? Right, you useless twat.

Exactly

 

[reconmark]

... bigot ...

The absolute coolest thing about the use of the word bigot, is that where such is used to define another... such is a demonstration of the literal meaning of the word.

It's a paradox, which is naturally lost on the intellectually less fortunate. Which just adds to the hilarity!

In other words you admit to being one of the less fortunate...not really a revelation.

Oh! Deflection and misdirection? Now that is a FINE means of concession.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Example of the " less fortunate."

LOL! WHAT? A Re-Concession? And so soon... .

Your Re-Concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Apparently the definition of concession escapes you.
If it makes you feel somewhat intelligent to parrot a word you have no idea the meaning of please feel free to keep parroting it.
However I accept your concession as to not understand the meaning of words you post.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

Nor do you. That is not in evidence. You all snicker and high five each other over the idea the " lefties lie". The sad truth is every time one of you have been pushed on this it's always the political conspiracy fallback excuse. We all know that is the lie.
I believe the outrage people felt was not based in race but simply that this was a school officer who's purpose is to protect the school and savaged a child unnecessarily.
It's sad really that you and others on here are so jaded and cynical that you have to believe that just to get you head around it.

What outrage? From Jesse Jackson? From Black Lives Matter? Sorry, but the manufactured outrage of political activist groups isn't real outrage. All the real outrage is on BEHALF of Deputy Ben Fields, or haven't you been paying attention?

 

[jc456]

Would any of this have happened if the girl had just followed instructions at any number of points in the event?

I'll answer that for you, since I never expect straight answers here:

No.
.

The girl's actions weren't cited as a cause for termination.

So?
.

So why keep saying if she had listened it would never have happened? That's irrelevant.

What?!

The actions that led to this whole incident are irrelevant?

You can do better than that.
.

The reasons for his actions are not relevant to his use of excessive force. Why is that so hard for dipshits like you to understand?

Because we believe in it. What is it you don't get?

 

[jc456]

So?
.

So why keep saying if she had listened it would never have happened? That's irrelevant.

What?!

The actions that led to this whole incident are irrelevant?

You can do better than that.
.

Irrelevant to his termination? Yes.
The girl's background and actions are not cited as reasons for his termination.

I didn't bring up the termination, you did. You asked and answered a question that I had not asked. A straw man.

Spinning and deflecting for the girl's bad behavior only enables future bad behavior, I don't know why this isn't obvious.

Does that matter to you?
.

And not addressing abusive and excessive force baba cop only encourages and enables future use of excessive force by this officer and others.

Pin a medal on that cop