S.C. school brat told friends before cop encounter: "Get yall phones out". She did it purposely.

[ClosedCaption]

To whom involved and in what way?

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career.
The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

And you can't turn your speculation into fact.

 

[ClosedCaption]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

In this case it doesn't matter a damn what the girl did, not after the cop lost it. When she's back in one piece you can give her detention but you don't get to blame someone else for making you violent. What the hell ever happen to all that Personal Responsibility dogma, seems like you morons somehow think that doesn't apply to He-Man the Enforcer...

she was not in ONE PIECE? do you know anything about actual INJURIES?

According to the reports, yes I do. Bruised torso, arm in a cast or sling, rug burns and bruises on her face. No pictures yet but that is what her attorney says. Take it with a grain of salt of course.

I'm sure a neck brace too in court.

The hospital is in on it too?

 

[bucs90]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

They will do whatever they can to avoid admitting that. Keep standards & expectations low for blacks, don't blame them for anything, never ask them to look in the mirror if you can help it.

Generations of this now, and we're seeing the predictable outcomes. The manifestation of the soft bigotry of reduced expectations.

The officer fucked up good, and will get what's coming to him. But they don't want to blame the girl for anything because of the color of her skin.

That can only hurt her, and far more than what the officer did to her.
.

I agree all the way up to "the officer fucked up good." He didn't. It's why Sheriff Glossyboots couldn't specify a policy he violated. When somebody resists arrest, they risk getting hurt because the officer is forced to escalate to gain compliance. Forcible arrest is never pretty and I've made several of them where the suspect struggled and that struggle had to be stopped by decisive action. That's exactly what happened in the video. So what Ben Fields has coming to him is about $1.5 million because there's no way the gutless coward of a sheriff is going to be able to justify his actions in court when his decision is cross examined.

Well, it sounds like you know more about that stuff than I.

The sad thing is the element of "black culture" that not only condones resisting arrest, but seems to expect it. Look at the deaths such as Micheal Brown, the many that happen after/during the time the perp has resisted arrest. The PC Police never mention that because it would blow their story. The specifically avoid it.

Those who enable this behavior continue to cause great damage, and they evidently don't care.
.

The kids I feel sorry for because they are taking their cues from adults and if this forum is an example of many adults out there, they are being encouraged to hate the cops and they are making heroes out of those who resist arrest. It used to be our highest social priority to set a good example for the next generation, but no more.

These kids are being taught to disrespect all authority and that if you don't agree with the rules...fuck it. And if someone tries to make you follow rules....cause a scene and you win.

How will these morons get by in life when they have a boss at work? Oh wait....Dems plan on them being lifetime welfare queens. They'll never have a boss.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

How will these morons get by in life when they have a boss at work?

Like this:

 

[Mac1958]

These kids are being taught to disrespect all authority and that if you don't agree with the rules...fuck it. And if someone tries to make you follow rules....cause a scene and you win..

Yep, and that's a pretty fucked up thing to do to a kid.

And the Regressive Left calls others racist.
.

 

[sealybobo]

It means that she is completely responsible for setting in motion everything that followed and there are absolutely no mitigating circumstances. You depraved twats making a victim out of her is just sickening.

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

He got fired for excessive force, a good thing.

Black people talk like they are tough but they cry when a cop manhandles them. You want to be hard? Cops gonna come at you hard.

Black people say their parents wooped their asses but then cry about this? If I acted like her that's how my dad would have wooped my ass and he would have made me apologize.

But I have a father.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

We didn't make her a victim. Officer slam did. His boss and the district agree. She set them in motion and officer slam crossed the line from there.
Now, why do you continue to blame her for the actions of a grown man?

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

He got fired for excessive force, a good thing.

Black people talk like they are tough but they cry when a cop manhandles them. You want to be hard? Cops gonna come at you hard.

Black people say their parents wooped their asses but then cry about this? If I acted like her that's how my dad would have wooped my ass and he would have made me apologize.

But I have a father.

When I watch COPS, I especially am amused by the high pitched screaming. That's right, like a primate. Very unmanly.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Has the OP explained why he lied and never straightened out the story?

 

[sealybobo]

Because her actions precipitated his intervention. Duh.

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

He got fired for excessive force, a good thing.

Black people talk like they are tough but they cry when a cop manhandles them. You want to be hard? Cops gonna come at you hard.

Black people say their parents wooped their asses but then cry about this? If I acted like her that's how my dad would have wooped my ass and he would have made me apologize.

But I have a father.

When I watch COPS, I especially am amused by the high pitched screaming. That's right, like a primate. Very unmanly.

I screamed when my dad whipped my ass. God I love that guy. I feel bad for people who didn't have good parents.

 

[paddymurphy]

This girl's refusal to move warranted the officer to forcibly remove her. He did his job, she wasn't hurt. School shouldn't stop for every princess that throws a tantrum.

His job will be flipping burgers from this point on.

He'll be working at Dennys where he can make slams all day.

He's gonna settle a wrongful termination lawsuit for 200k or so....and he'll be working for Lexington County within a year.

Just like the girl he attacked planned it? Right, you useless twat.

 

[paddymurphy]

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

He got fired for excessive force, a good thing.

Black people talk like they are tough but they cry when a cop manhandles them. You want to be hard? Cops gonna come at you hard.

Black people say their parents wooped their asses but then cry about this? If I acted like her that's how my dad would have wooped my ass and he would have made me apologize.

But I have a father.

When I watch COPS, I especially am amused by the high pitched screaming. That's right, like a primate. Very unmanly.

I screamed when my dad whipped my ass. God I love that guy. I feel bad for people who didn't have good parents.

Kinky.

 

[sealybobo]

The officer didn't get fired by his own actions or her actions. He got fired because of the Toy Sheriff who played politics with his career. You expect everyone to agree with you that the video proves he did something wrong. It doesn't. And the many teachers, administrators, students and fellow cops who saw the same video saw nothing wrong with the handling of this situation. It was one guy, who admits his opinion is at odds with the majority, making the decision.

The Toy Sheriff in his shiny little cop costume (fake it until you make it?) does not have the power to turn fiction into fact.

He got fired for excessive force, a good thing.

Black people talk like they are tough but they cry when a cop manhandles them. You want to be hard? Cops gonna come at you hard.

Black people say their parents wooped their asses but then cry about this? If I acted like her that's how my dad would have wooped my ass and he would have made me apologize.

But I have a father.

When I watch COPS, I especially am amused by the high pitched screaming. That's right, like a primate. Very unmanly.

I screamed when my dad whipped my ass. God I love that guy. I feel bad for people who didn't have good parents.

Kinky.

Ew!

 

[paddymurphy]

The girl is entirely blameless for the actions of the officer that led to his termination. He wouldn't have overreacted if he was a balanced mature person.

Would any of this have happened if the girl had just followed instructions at any number of points in the event?

I'll answer that for you, since I never expect straight answers here:

No.
.

The girl's actions weren't cited as a cause for termination.

So?
.

So why keep saying if she had listened it would never have happened? That's irrelevant.

What?!

The actions that led to this whole incident are irrelevant?

You can do better than that.
.

The reasons for his actions are not relevant to his use of excessive force. Why is that so hard for dipshits like you to understand?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

This girl's refusal to move warranted the officer to forcibly remove her. He did his job, she wasn't hurt. School shouldn't stop for every princess that throws a tantrum.

His job will be flipping burgers from this point on.

He'll be working at Dennys where he can make slams all day.

He's gonna settle a wrongful termination lawsuit for 200k or so....and he'll be working for Lexington County within a year.

Just like the girl he attacked planned it? Right, you useless twat.

She did. Only an idiot thinks this wasn't a setup. That's why you shit stains are saying, "If he could get sucked in by that, he deserves to be fired."

 

[paddymurphy]

The girl's actions weren't cited as a cause for termination.

So?
.

So why keep saying if she had listened it would never have happened? That's irrelevant.

What?!

The actions that led to this whole incident are irrelevant?

You can do better than that.
.

Irrelevant to his termination? Yes.
The girl's background and actions are not cited as reasons for his termination.

I didn't bring up the termination, you did. You asked and answered a question that I had not asked. A straw man.

Spinning and deflecting for the girl's bad behavior only enables future bad behavior, I don't know why this isn't obvious.

Does that matter to you?
.

And not addressing abusive and excessive force baba cop only encourages and enables future use of excessive force by this officer and others.

 

[paddymurphy]

This girl's refusal to move warranted the officer to forcibly remove her. He did his job, she wasn't hurt. School shouldn't stop for every princess that throws a tantrum.

His job will be flipping burgers from this point on.

He'll be working at Dennys where he can make slams all day.

He's gonna settle a wrongful termination lawsuit for 200k or so....and he'll be working for Lexington County within a year.

Just like the girl he attacked planned it? Right, you useless twat.

She did. Only an idiot thinks this wasn't a setup. That's why you shit stains are saying, "If he could get sucked in by that, he deserves to be fired."

She did not. You are as fucking stupid and dishonest as the OP.

 

[sealybobo]

So?
.

So why keep saying if she had listened it would never have happened? That's irrelevant.

What?!

The actions that led to this whole incident are irrelevant?

You can do better than that.
.

Irrelevant to his termination? Yes.
The girl's background and actions are not cited as reasons for his termination.

I didn't bring up the termination, you did. You asked and answered a question that I had not asked. A straw man.

Spinning and deflecting for the girl's bad behavior only enables future bad behavior, I don't know why this isn't obvious.

Does that matter to you?
.

And not addressing abusive and excessive force baba cop only encourages and enables future use of excessive force by this officer and others.

If he was abusive its best he go. I get it now. He was known for being abusive. He got caught on camera. Gotta go.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Ok we're getting there.
So we both agree the girl caused a problem.
We agree that intervention was required.
So it seems we agree up to the point where the officer acted. At that point the girl's actions are done and it's the officer acting for those four seconds or so. Where is the girl responsible for the action that got the officer fired?

Questions that won't be touched

 

[TyroneSlothrop]

A 2002 study found black students are more likely to be disciplined for subjective offenses, such as defiance or loitering; white students are more likely to be disciplined for more clear-cut reasons, such as cutting class, smoking, and vandalism. And a sweeping 2012 study of discipline policies in Texas backed this up: Even after controlling for 83 other factors, black students were 31 percent more likely to be suspended for discretionary reasons, rather than because they committed infractions where suspension was a mandatory punishment. That suggests some form of implicit bias is at play that leads to harsher punishment for black students than for others.
The hidden racism of school discipline, in 7 charts

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

His job will be flipping burgers from this point on.

He'll be working at Dennys where he can make slams all day.

He's gonna settle a wrongful termination lawsuit for 200k or so....and he'll be working for Lexington County within a year.

Just like the girl he attacked planned it? Right, you useless twat.

She did. Only an idiot thinks this wasn't a setup. That's why you shit stains are saying, "If he could get sucked in by that, he deserves to be fired."

She did not. You are as fucking stupid and dishonest as the OP.