S.C. Nominee Neil Gorsuch Has A Big Decision To Make!

[JimofPennsylvan]

The Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a huge, life changing, decision to make in light of the developments on his confirmation proceedings. The Democrats have over forty votes to block a motion to end debate on his confirmation and with certainty plan on voting that way on the motion. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likewise has indicated with certainty that if the Democrats do this filibuster he will change the rules on what is needed to end debate on the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee specifically change the rules from sixty votes needed for the motion to pass to fifty-one votes. In the current climate of hyper-partisanship in Washington and considering that the Republicans hold fifty-two Senate seats it should be taken as a given that Senator McConnell will be able to change the rule in this way.



Senator McConnell is completely tunnel visioned about this Gorsuch confirmation repeatedly saying that one way or the other the confirmation is passing by this friday. Senator McConnell is unwilling to see that both parties position have a legitimate claim to being right the Republicans should have held hearings and a vote on the Merrick Garland nomination the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election if the ideological balance of the court is at stake. On the Republican side the constitution doesn't have a time mandate on holding the confirmation process the Republicans did nothing illegal with the Garland nomination. Senator McConnell doesn't see his duty as putting America's long-term interests above having the right outcome occur on a single issue. In this same vein Senator McConnell says on this overall issue that the American people have spoken on the Supreme Court issue with the past November elections giving all three centers of power in Washington to the Republicans and the Democrats should listen; Senator McConnell is giving a self-serving spin here what the last elections have told us is that the American people desperately want significant economic improvement in America that is why they voted in Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress road in on his coattails, this election provided no national consensus on the direction of the Supreme Court. Moreover, if Senator McConnell wants to reference this past election as dictating the country's direction here in this past November election the American people did not give the Republican Party fifty six Senate seats therefore the Republican party doesn't have a popular mandate to unilaterally impose its will on this issue.



Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court. Many Senators have quite artfully described the harm that will be done by this rule change when they say it will forever change the Supreme Court causing more Judges to be seated on the court that hold extreme ideology in part reducing the stability and reliability in America's legal system. This writers a little spiritual and along those lines believes in really significant matters what goes around comes around and if one is involved in really hurting America one should not be surprised if significant bad luck befalls one; in 2015 former Senator Majority leader had an accident that left him blind in one eye whose to say that maybe this wouldn't have happened if Senator Reid earlier in 2015 did not do that terrible thing to America changing the threshold of votes needed to end confirmation debate from 60 to 51 for Federal Court nominees to U.S. District and Appellate courts making America's Judiciary more partisan!

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election

Please point out the article and section where the Senate is obligated to provide the president the advice and consent necessary to grant the president the authority to appoint a Supreme Court Justice.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a huge, life changing, decision to make in light of the developments on his confirmation proceedings. The Democrats have over forty votes to block a motion to end debate on his confirmation and with certainty plan on voting that way on the motion. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likewise has indicated with certainty that if the Democrats do this filibuster he will change the rules on what is needed to end debate on the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee specifically change the rules from sixty votes needed for the motion to pass to fifty-one votes. In the current climate of hyper-partisanship in Washington and considering that the Republicans hold fifty-two Senate seats it should be taken as a given that Senator McConnell will be able to change the rule in this way.



Senator McConnell is completely tunnel visioned about this Gorsuch confirmation repeatedly saying that one way or the other the confirmation is passing by this friday. Senator McConnell is unwilling to see that both parties position have a legitimate claim to being right the Republicans should have held hearings and a vote on the Merrick Garland nomination the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election if the ideological balance of the court is at stake. On the Republican side the constitution doesn't have a time mandate on holding the confirmation process the Republicans did nothing illegal with the Garland nomination. Senator McConnell doesn't see his duty as putting America's long-term interests above having the right outcome occur on a single issue. In this same vein Senator McConnell says on this overall issue that the American people have spoken on the Supreme Court issue with the past November elections giving all three centers of power in Washington to the Republicans and the Democrats should listen; Senator McConnell is giving a self-serving spin here what the last elections have told us is that the American people desperately want significant economic improvement in America that is why they voted in Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress road in on his coattails, this election provided no national consensus on the direction of the Supreme Court. Moreover, if Senator McConnell wants to reference this past election as dictating the country's direction here in this past November election the American people did not give the Republican Party fifty six Senate seats therefore the Republican party doesn't have a popular mandate to unilaterally impose its will on this issue.



Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court. Many Senators have quite artfully described the harm that will be done by this rule change when they say it will forever change the Supreme Court causing more Judges to be seated on the court that hold extreme ideology in part reducing the stability and reliability in America's legal system. This writers a little spiritual and along those lines believes in really significant matters what goes around comes around and if one is involved in really hurting America one should not be surprised if significant bad luck befalls one; in 2015 former Senator Majority leader had an accident that left him blind in one eye whose to say that maybe this wouldn't have happened if Senator Reid earlier in 2015 did not do that terrible thing to America changing the threshold of votes needed to end confirmation debate from 60 to 51 for Federal Court nominees to U.S. District and Appellate courts making America's Judiciary more partisan!

/---- Ask Dingy Harry: On November 21, 2013, the Democratic Party, led by Majority Leader Harry Reid overrode the filibuster of a nomination with a simple majority vote to change the rules.[7] As a result, for instance, judicial nominees to federal courts and a president's executive-branch nominations can be freed up for a confirmation vote by a simple majority vote of the Senate. Nominees to the Supreme Court can still be blocked by 41 Senators, however.

 

[Cellblock2429]

The Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a huge, life changing, decision to make in light of the developments on his confirmation proceedings. The Democrats have over forty votes to block a motion to end debate on his confirmation and with certainty plan on voting that way on the motion. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likewise has indicated with certainty that if the Democrats do this filibuster he will change the rules on what is needed to end debate on the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee specifically change the rules from sixty votes needed for the motion to pass to fifty-one votes. In the current climate of hyper-partisanship in Washington and considering that the Republicans hold fifty-two Senate seats it should be taken as a given that Senator McConnell will be able to change the rule in this way.


Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court. Many Senators have quite artfully described the harm that will be done by this rule change when they say it will forever change the Supreme Court causing more Judges to be seated on the court that hold extreme ideology in part reducing the stability and reliability in America's legal system. This writers a little spiritual and along those lines believes in really significant matters what goes around comes around and if one is involved in really hurting America one should not be surprised if significant bad luck befalls one; in 2015 former Senator Majority leader had an accident that left him blind in one eye whose to say that maybe this wouldn't have happened if Senator Reid earlier in 2015 did not do that terrible thing to America changing the threshold of votes needed to end confirmation debate from 60 to 51 for Federal Court nominees to U.S. District and Appellate courts making America's Judiciary more partisan!

/----Senator Schumer appeared Sunday on ABC's This Week and responded to suggestions that the Senate might not confirm the lame-duck President's nomination to replace the late Justice Scalia: "show me the clause [in the Constitution] that says [the] president's only president for three years."

True, Presidents serve four-year terms. But here's a question for Senator Schumer: Can you show me the clause that says the Senate must vote on, let alone confirm, a President's nominee?

I'll save him the effort: There is no such clause in the Constitution.

The Constitution Does Not Require the Senate to Vote on a Nomination

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a huge, life changing, decision to make in light of the developments on his confirmation proceedings. The Democrats have over forty votes to block a motion to end debate on his confirmation and with certainty plan on voting that way on the motion. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likewise has indicated with certainty that if the Democrats do this filibuster he will change the rules on what is needed to end debate on the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee specifically change the rules from sixty votes needed for the motion to pass to fifty-one votes. In the current climate of hyper-partisanship in Washington and considering that the Republicans hold fifty-two Senate seats it should be taken as a given that Senator McConnell will be able to change the rule in this way.



Senator McConnell is completely tunnel visioned about this Gorsuch confirmation repeatedly saying that one way or the other the confirmation is passing by this friday. Senator McConnell is unwilling to see that both parties position have a legitimate claim to being right the Republicans should have held hearings and a vote on the Merrick Garland nomination the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election if the ideological balance of the court is at stake. On the Republican side the constitution doesn't have a time mandate on holding the confirmation process the Republicans did nothing illegal with the Garland nomination. Senator McConnell doesn't see his duty as putting America's long-term interests above having the right outcome occur on a single issue. In this same vein Senator McConnell says on this overall issue that the American people have spoken on the Supreme Court issue with the past November elections giving all three centers of power in Washington to the Republicans and the Democrats should listen; Senator McConnell is giving a self-serving spin here what the last elections have told us is that the American people desperately want significant economic improvement in America that is why they voted in Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress road in on his coattails, this election provided no national consensus on the direction of the Supreme Court. Moreover, if Senator McConnell wants to reference this past election as dictating the country's direction here in this past November election the American people did not give the Republican Party fifty six Senate seats therefore the Republican party doesn't have a popular mandate to unilaterally impose its will on this issue.



Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court. Many Senators have quite artfully described the harm that will be done by this rule change when they say it will forever change the Supreme Court causing more Judges to be seated on the court that hold extreme ideology in part reducing the stability and reliability in America's legal system. This writers a little spiritual and along those lines believes in really significant matters what goes around comes around and if one is involved in really hurting America one should not be surprised if significant bad luck befalls one; in 2015 former Senator Majority leader had an accident that left him blind in one eye whose to say that maybe this wouldn't have happened if Senator Reid earlier in 2015 did not do that terrible thing to America changing the threshold of votes needed to end confirmation debate from 60 to 51 for Federal Court nominees to U.S. District and Appellate courts making America's Judiciary more partisan!

the Republicans should have held hearings and a vote on the Merrick Garland nomination the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election

Just as the US Constitution does not have a deadline for a vote.
Their action was in no way unprecedented.

Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court.

He'll take his seat. The Supreme Court will survive.
It'll also survive after RBG dies and an arch conservative takes her place.

 

[blackhawk]

Sorry but it was Harry Reid who started the country down this road in 2013 when he used the nuclear option for lower court justices and cabinet positions and he knew full well this would lead to it being used for Supreme Court picks somewhere down the line. I didn't agree with what Reid did then and I don't like Republicans doing it now but it is naive to think when one party changes the rules for political gain the other won't when they have the chance. This stuff will continue as long as supporters of both parties continue with the mindset it's only wrong when the other side does it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

The Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a huge, life changing, decision to make in light of the developments on his confirmation proceedings. The Democrats have over forty votes to block a motion to end debate on his confirmation and with certainty plan on voting that way on the motion. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likewise has indicated with certainty that if the Democrats do this filibuster he will change the rules on what is needed to end debate on the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee specifically change the rules from sixty votes needed for the motion to pass to fifty-one votes. In the current climate of hyper-partisanship in Washington and considering that the Republicans hold fifty-two Senate seats it should be taken as a given that Senator McConnell will be able to change the rule in this way.



Senator McConnell is completely tunnel visioned about this Gorsuch confirmation repeatedly saying that one way or the other the confirmation is passing by this friday. Senator McConnell is unwilling to see that both parties position have a legitimate claim to being right the Republicans should have held hearings and a vote on the Merrick Garland nomination the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election if the ideological balance of the court is at stake. On the Republican side the constitution doesn't have a time mandate on holding the confirmation process the Republicans did nothing illegal with the Garland nomination. Senator McConnell doesn't see his duty as putting America's long-term interests above having the right outcome occur on a single issue. In this same vein Senator McConnell says on this overall issue that the American people have spoken on the Supreme Court issue with the past November elections giving all three centers of power in Washington to the Republicans and the Democrats should listen; Senator McConnell is giving a self-serving spin here what the last elections have told us is that the American people desperately want significant economic improvement in America that is why they voted in Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress road in on his coattails, this election provided no national consensus on the direction of the Supreme Court. Moreover, if Senator McConnell wants to reference this past election as dictating the country's direction here in this past November election the American people did not give the Republican Party fifty six Senate seats therefore the Republican party doesn't have a popular mandate to unilaterally impose its will on this issue.



Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court. Many Senators have quite artfully described the harm that will be done by this rule change when they say it will forever change the Supreme Court causing more Judges to be seated on the court that hold extreme ideology in part reducing the stability and reliability in America's legal system. This writers a little spiritual and along those lines believes in really significant matters what goes around comes around and if one is involved in really hurting America one should not be surprised if significant bad luck befalls one; in 2015 former Senator Majority leader had an accident that left him blind in one eye whose to say that maybe this wouldn't have happened if Senator Reid earlier in 2015 did not do that terrible thing to America changing the threshold of votes needed to end confirmation debate from 60 to 51 for Federal Court nominees to U.S. District and Appellate courts making America's Judiciary more partisan!

How is this Gorsuchs decision?

 

[Staidhup]

So all those Dem's that voted for him now are voting against him because he is what? Face it since 1964 only the Liberal bed wetters have rejected Republican nominees and yet the Repubs seem to approve all nominees and work with the bed wetters, for what to save and preserve the Constitution? The tit for tat response from the GOP was nothing more then a taste of their own medicine resulting from Chucky and companies proclamation that Bushes nominee would not be considered until after the election. But then again Chucky and company seem to forget what they say and their obstructionist behavior in the hope others would have forgotten. Unfortunitly for them others do not.

 

[dannyboys]

The Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a huge, life changing, decision to make in light of the developments on his confirmation proceedings. The Democrats have over forty votes to block a motion to end debate on his confirmation and with certainty plan on voting that way on the motion. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likewise has indicated with certainty that if the Democrats do this filibuster he will change the rules on what is needed to end debate on the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee specifically change the rules from sixty votes needed for the motion to pass to fifty-one votes. In the current climate of hyper-partisanship in Washington and considering that the Republicans hold fifty-two Senate seats it should be taken as a given that Senator McConnell will be able to change the rule in this way.



Senator McConnell is completely tunnel visioned about this Gorsuch confirmation repeatedly saying that one way or the other the confirmation is passing by this friday. Senator McConnell is unwilling to see that both parties position have a legitimate claim to being right the Republicans should have held hearings and a vote on the Merrick Garland nomination the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election if the ideological balance of the court is at stake. On the Republican side the constitution doesn't have a time mandate on holding the confirmation process the Republicans did nothing illegal with the Garland nomination. Senator McConnell doesn't see his duty as putting America's long-term interests above having the right outcome occur on a single issue. In this same vein Senator McConnell says on this overall issue that the American people have spoken on the Supreme Court issue with the past November elections giving all three centers of power in Washington to the Republicans and the Democrats should listen; Senator McConnell is giving a self-serving spin here what the last elections have told us is that the American people desperately want significant economic improvement in America that is why they voted in Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress road in on his coattails, this election provided no national consensus on the direction of the Supreme Court. Moreover, if Senator McConnell wants to reference this past election as dictating the country's direction here in this past November election the American people did not give the Republican Party fifty six Senate seats therefore the Republican party doesn't have a popular mandate to unilaterally impose its will on this issue.



Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court. Many Senators have quite artfully described the harm that will be done by this rule change when they say it will forever change the Supreme Court causing more Judges to be seated on the court that hold extreme ideology in part reducing the stability and reliability in America's legal system. This writers a little spiritual and along those lines believes in really significant matters what goes around comes around and if one is involved in really hurting America one should not be surprised if significant bad luck befalls one; in 2015 former Senator Majority leader had an accident that left him blind in one eye whose to say that maybe this wouldn't have happened if Senator Reid earlier in 2015 did not do that terrible thing to America changing the threshold of votes needed to end confirmation debate from 60 to 51 for Federal Court nominees to U.S. District and Appellate courts making America's Judiciary more partisan!

You lame kunt!
You don't even have the moral integrity to use quotation marks in the C&Ps.
In the next four years the REP WILL put another, maybe up to three Conservative judges on the SC. Then 'The First Female President' in US history.......Ivanka Trump will put a couple more on the SC.
I don't give a shit if President Trump plays golf.......like BONOBO did most of his term.
Just preserve America!

 

[aris2chat]

The Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a huge, life changing, decision to make in light of the developments on his confirmation proceedings. The Democrats have over forty votes to block a motion to end debate on his confirmation and with certainty plan on voting that way on the motion. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likewise has indicated with certainty that if the Democrats do this filibuster he will change the rules on what is needed to end debate on the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee specifically change the rules from sixty votes needed for the motion to pass to fifty-one votes. In the current climate of hyper-partisanship in Washington and considering that the Republicans hold fifty-two Senate seats it should be taken as a given that Senator McConnell will be able to change the rule in this way.



Senator McConnell is completely tunnel visioned about this Gorsuch confirmation repeatedly saying that one way or the other the confirmation is passing by this friday. Senator McConnell is unwilling to see that both parties position have a legitimate claim to being right the Republicans should have held hearings and a vote on the Merrick Garland nomination the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election if the ideological balance of the court is at stake. On the Republican side the constitution doesn't have a time mandate on holding the confirmation process the Republicans did nothing illegal with the Garland nomination. Senator McConnell doesn't see his duty as putting America's long-term interests above having the right outcome occur on a single issue. In this same vein Senator McConnell says on this overall issue that the American people have spoken on the Supreme Court issue with the past November elections giving all three centers of power in Washington to the Republicans and the Democrats should listen; Senator McConnell is giving a self-serving spin here what the last elections have told us is that the American people desperately want significant economic improvement in America that is why they voted in Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress road in on his coattails, this election provided no national consensus on the direction of the Supreme Court. Moreover, if Senator McConnell wants to reference this past election as dictating the country's direction here in this past November election the American people did not give the Republican Party fifty six Senate seats therefore the Republican party doesn't have a popular mandate to unilaterally impose its will on this issue.



Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court. Many Senators have quite artfully described the harm that will be done by this rule change when they say it will forever change the Supreme Court causing more Judges to be seated on the court that hold extreme ideology in part reducing the stability and reliability in America's legal system. This writers a little spiritual and along those lines believes in really significant matters what goes around comes around and if one is involved in really hurting America one should not be surprised if significant bad luck befalls one; in 2015 former Senator Majority leader had an accident that left him blind in one eye whose to say that maybe this wouldn't have happened if Senator Reid earlier in 2015 did not do that terrible thing to America changing the threshold of votes needed to end confirmation debate from 60 to 51 for Federal Court nominees to U.S. District and Appellate courts making America's Judiciary more partisan!

He got his conformation to the 10th Circuit unanimously. He is exceedingly qualified for the Supreme Court.
There is not reason for him not sit on the Highest Court.

The objection is not for his skills, it is purely partisan politics.

I hope most of the Dems up for reelection loose their seats over this nonsense. Dems need to work with the other half for the sake of the people and the country. Instead of pulling harder to the left, they should be moving to the middle.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court.

Hurt it how, exactly?

 

[Vastator]

The Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch has a huge, life changing, decision to make in light of the developments on his confirmation proceedings. The Democrats have over forty votes to block a motion to end debate on his confirmation and with certainty plan on voting that way on the motion. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell likewise has indicated with certainty that if the Democrats do this filibuster he will change the rules on what is needed to end debate on the confirmation of a Supreme Court nominee specifically change the rules from sixty votes needed for the motion to pass to fifty-one votes. In the current climate of hyper-partisanship in Washington and considering that the Republicans hold fifty-two Senate seats it should be taken as a given that Senator McConnell will be able to change the rule in this way.



Senator McConnell is completely tunnel visioned about this Gorsuch confirmation repeatedly saying that one way or the other the confirmation is passing by this friday. Senator McConnell is unwilling to see that both parties position have a legitimate claim to being right the Republicans should have held hearings and a vote on the Merrick Garland nomination the US constitution does not make an exception that the confirmation process for a nominee can be put off to after the next presidential election if the ideological balance of the court is at stake. On the Republican side the constitution doesn't have a time mandate on holding the confirmation process the Republicans did nothing illegal with the Garland nomination. Senator McConnell doesn't see his duty as putting America's long-term interests above having the right outcome occur on a single issue. In this same vein Senator McConnell says on this overall issue that the American people have spoken on the Supreme Court issue with the past November elections giving all three centers of power in Washington to the Republicans and the Democrats should listen; Senator McConnell is giving a self-serving spin here what the last elections have told us is that the American people desperately want significant economic improvement in America that is why they voted in Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress road in on his coattails, this election provided no national consensus on the direction of the Supreme Court. Moreover, if Senator McConnell wants to reference this past election as dictating the country's direction here in this past November election the American people did not give the Republican Party fifty six Senate seats therefore the Republican party doesn't have a popular mandate to unilaterally impose its will on this issue.



Based on what is definitely going to play out here Mr. Gorsuch clearly has a decision to make. He must decide if he wants to acquire his Supreme Court seat by dramatically hurting the institution of the Supreme Court. Many Senators have quite artfully described the harm that will be done by this rule change when they say it will forever change the Supreme Court causing more Judges to be seated on the court that hold extreme ideology in part reducing the stability and reliability in America's legal system. This writers a little spiritual and along those lines believes in really significant matters what goes around comes around and if one is involved in really hurting America one should not be surprised if significant bad luck befalls one; in 2015 former Senator Majority leader had an accident that left him blind in one eye whose to say that maybe this wouldn't have happened if Senator Reid earlier in 2015 did not do that terrible thing to America changing the threshold of votes needed to end confirmation debate from 60 to 51 for Federal Court nominees to U.S. District and Appellate courts making America's Judiciary more partisan!

Awww... Us somebody trying to guilt trip Gorsuch? But, but, liberals feelings, and stuff...! Lol!!! Elections have consequences. Maybe now would be a good time for the Left to learn to work with the new power structure, rather than try to hinder it. They're only making things harder on themselves.

 

[2aguy]

Harry Reid said they would end the filibuster if Hilary won but the Republicans held the senate......

Tim Kaime, Hilary's running mate said they would end the filibuster if the Republicans blocked her pick.......

Kaine: Dems will use 'nuclear option' if GOP blocks court nominee

Hillary Clinton's running mate is predicting Democrats will go "nuclear" if Republicans try to stonewall a potential Supreme Court nominee by Clinton.

Tim Kaine on Friday said he believes Senate Democrats will change the chamber's rules if they run into GOP obstruction in 2017.



You left wingers are morons......