- Dec 11, 2018
- Reaction score
easier to just read it,,, its in simple english,,,AGAIN IF the constitution has been butchered and bastardized from it's true intentyes the dems and repubes tried interpreted it instead of reading it,,,Actually the 16th amendment is not constitutional if you read the history of itbest I can see about the gay marriage issue is they said it was a right which makes sense if you read the first amendment along with the rest of the constitution,,,You're right it doesn't exist until Obama made it an issue and bastardized the constitutionhow can something that doesnt exist be interpreted???again your fighting the wrong argument with the wrong persondeal with that problem,,dont compound it by doing what they did,,,I'm not disagreeing with you but the feds under obama did get involvedthe feds have no authority to be involved in marriage,,,That's why gay marriage is a right and illegals have a right to be in Americathats bullshit,,, just read it,, its in simple english,,,,,,True but it's been butchered and bastardized by American leftists we now need it interpretedno interpretation needed,,,it states its intent in clear english,,,that's sexist how about 9 justices who can correctly interpret the intent of the Constitution namely the bill of rights?
interpreting it has led us into the mess we are in,,,
but youre right,, the left wing democrats and republicans have butchered it,,,
if you read the constitution you would know that,,,
Someone like you or I don't need it interpreted but leftists have comprehensions problems with it.
under the 1st amendment any two people have a right to assemble/marry who they want,,,
and YES if ten people want to marry its none of my business,,,
You said it was none of the feds business who people married I said under the obama years he made it federal business there is no right to marry but people made it a federal issue therefore some need it interpreted for its original intent.
IT DOESNT EXIST,,,
THIS IS WHY i DONT WANT a conservative as SCOTUS pick and want a constitutionalist,,,
The federal income tax is another thing that was added and interpreted incorrectly
The second amendment has been bastardized and interpreted incorrectly
as for income tax,, it was done by amendment so its legal just very wrong,,,,
so it needs another amendment to remove it,,,
and yes the dems and repubes have destroyed the 2nd A because they interpreted it instead of reading it,,,
And since the constitution has been misinterpreted takes us back to what I originally said
"True but it's been butchered and bastardized by American leftists we now need it interpreted"
IT'S NEEDS TO BE INTERPRETED TO GET IT BACK TO IT'S ORIGINAL INTENT.
no interpretation needed,,, just read it,, its in simple english,,,
what history if the 16th did I miss???
It must be interpreted by original constitutional scholars to get us back to it's true intent.