Russian hackers are better than we thought. They stole Clinton's emails from the NSA, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner.
Maybe we should hire Anonymous, Wikileaks or Russian hackers
to find whatever dirt was dug up on Justice Roberts to make him
scrap his original argument against ACA and suddenly support it.
I've heard it had to be nekkid pictures of somebody, incriminating enough to whip him into going along.
Yes....let the hate come thru.....good....
Dear
Weatherman2020
Who is being hateful?
I believe in including and representing people of all parties equally in public policy.
That's not hateful but forgiving and respectful of people of all views and approaches.
I just ask they respect and protect each other's views from other conflicting beliefs,
and quit bullying one over the other. I believe in conflict resolution and consensus,
or else agreeing to separate policies and funding where people's beliefs diverge
so much they need to support their own separate programs and not impose on each other!
Can you tell me where in there, there is any "hate" for any group?
I can't stand some people's personalities and object to their beliefs,
but I will still include their party and encourage them to manage their own programs
so they can protect their interests and have their equal free exercise of religion.
Just don't impose it on others, or yes, I do "hate bullying, abuse and corruption"
making people pay for other people's wrongs or beliefs or problems that could have solved
had their own beliefs been funded and supported instead of rejected.
But yet I will still seek correction and inclusion of all parties, regardless of belief.
And regardless of wrongs done that I ask be corrected so good faith relations are restored.
I believe the Restorative Justice approach, with equal inclusion and conflict resolution,
to redress all grievances and objections in order to resolve all problems and concerns,
is the most constitutional consistent and ethical approach
to equal protection of the laws and preventing discrimination by creed.
Where is the hate in that approach to consensus and inclusion?