Russian Hackers Better Than We Thought

[tyroneweaver]

Interesting dynamic between Hillary and confirmations.
She'll want yes people to protect her.
And Congress will be leery.

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

Interesting dynamic between Hillary and confirmations.
She'll want yes people to protect her.
And Congress will be leery.

The House will rake her over the coals to the point she'll break down in public. Can't wait if she wins.

 

[Damaged Eagle]

If Hillary wins I wonder how many congressmen will suddenly have unfortunate accidents or commit suicide over some award they didn't earn.

*****SARCASTIC SMILE*****

 

[JustAnotherNut]

Problem being, if Hillary wins the election, but is forced out or down because of her own undoing......Kaine takes over? Oh please no, that guy doesn't have a clue and we are doomed

 

[emilynghiem]

Maybe we should hire Anonymous, Wikileaks or Russian hackers
to find whatever dirt was dug up on Justice Roberts to make him
scrap his original argument against ACA and suddenly support it.

I've heard it had to be nekkid pictures of somebody, incriminating enough to whip him into going along.

Yes....let the hate come thru.....good....

Dear Weatherman2020
Who is being hateful?

I believe in including and representing people of all parties equally in public policy.
That's not hateful but forgiving and respectful of people of all views and approaches.

I just ask they respect and protect each other's views from other conflicting beliefs,
and quit bullying one over the other. I believe in conflict resolution and consensus,
or else agreeing to separate policies and funding where people's beliefs diverge
so much they need to support their own separate programs and not impose on each other!

Can you tell me where in there, there is any "hate" for any group?
I can't stand some people's personalities and object to their beliefs,
but I will still include their party and encourage them to manage their own programs
so they can protect their interests and have their equal free exercise of religion.

Just don't impose it on others, or yes, I do "hate bullying, abuse and corruption"
making people pay for other people's wrongs or beliefs or problems that could have solved
had their own beliefs been funded and supported instead of rejected.

But yet I will still seek correction and inclusion of all parties, regardless of belief.
And regardless of wrongs done that I ask be corrected so good faith relations are restored.

I believe the Restorative Justice approach, with equal inclusion and conflict resolution,
to redress all grievances and objections in order to resolve all problems and concerns,
is the most constitutional consistent and ethical approach
to equal protection of the laws and preventing discrimination by creed.

Where is the hate in that approach to consensus and inclusion?

If Hillary was honest and transparent she wouldn't be in this mess, would she?

She'd be at the bottom of the heap of mess
instead of at the top making profit off it. Weatherman2020

The people doing the work at the bottom, managing the real solutions,
and what it's really going to take to turn govt and debts around into future investments,
those are the real leaders we need to be investing in and modeling govt after.
The solutions that work, not the hype at the top that wins votes and elections.

The real work is NOT glamorous and CANNOT be explained in 30 second sound bytes
on "how are you going to fix the police and criminal issues".
You won't see it in the news.

Why do you think Trump can't explain what he's going to do either?
It takes working by example, actions not words.

So this whole media game is a bunch of hype.
The real work comes from real workers and they are in all the parties.

There isn't one that is going to save the country without
absolute commitment and partnership with all the others, too.

Anyone who doesn't promote that approach, incorporating all leaders from all parties,
is missing the big picture.
And the rest is hype to get their votes and voters to come out for election, that's all.

Interesting concept of the world thinking success requires you to be corrupt and dishonest with people.

Nope Weatherman2020 don't misunderstand me
I'm saying that to play the games that the legal corporate and political lobbyists
do at that level, yes, you do those things to be successful at THAT game

it is NOT being a success in general, and in the end.

Trump played the game to cut down Cruz to be "successful" in getting the nomination. But it still cost him more overall, where the party is so divided
they couldn't unite in time and now the election is up for grabs, tottering either way

So that wasn't successful in the end, but got him the short term goal
and was successful in playing the game.

Clinton has gotten what she wanted FOR HERSELF by playing worse
games of CYA with people who all collude to cover up what each other does wrong.

But is that going to be successful in SOLVING problems?
no, it's creating more.
it costs more and diverts attention and resources
AWAY from solving real problems that go without help.

the whole campaign game COSTS millions if not billions
while those dollars SHOULD have been invested in sustainable solutions
that BOTH parties can agree on and make work.

Carson and Obama both agree microlending can replace welfare.
But has either invested a dime in promoting it?
No, and look how many millions if not billions each man has
collected to CAMPAIGN, and none of it went into setting
up microlending banks where Black people can learn to
finance and manage their own property ownership to get out of
debt and poverty and dependence on govt.

So Obama may be successful in getting elected twice.
But the Black communities remain stripped of resources
that goes into prisons, into political campaigns,
into favors for corporate sponsors so people can get into office.

What I mean is you can be successful in politics,
and fail at all the real goals and solutions that
are suffering losses because those wins are at the people's expense.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yes....let the hate come thru.....good....

Dear Weatherman2020
Who is being hateful?

I believe in including and representing people of all parties equally in public policy.
That's not hateful but forgiving and respectful of people of all views and approaches.

I just ask they respect and protect each other's views from other conflicting beliefs,
and quit bullying one over the other. I believe in conflict resolution and consensus,
or else agreeing to separate policies and funding where people's beliefs diverge
so much they need to support their own separate programs and not impose on each other!

Can you tell me where in there, there is any "hate" for any group?
I can't stand some people's personalities and object to their beliefs,
but I will still include their party and encourage them to manage their own programs
so they can protect their interests and have their equal free exercise of religion.

Just don't impose it on others, or yes, I do "hate bullying, abuse and corruption"
making people pay for other people's wrongs or beliefs or problems that could have solved
had their own beliefs been funded and supported instead of rejected.

But yet I will still seek correction and inclusion of all parties, regardless of belief.
And regardless of wrongs done that I ask be corrected so good faith relations are restored.

I believe the Restorative Justice approach, with equal inclusion and conflict resolution,
to redress all grievances and objections in order to resolve all problems and concerns,
is the most constitutional consistent and ethical approach
to equal protection of the laws and preventing discrimination by creed.

Where is the hate in that approach to consensus and inclusion?

If Hillary was honest and transparent she wouldn't be in this mess, would she?

She'd be at the bottom of the heap of mess
instead of at the top making profit off it. Weatherman2020

The people doing the work at the bottom, managing the real solutions,
and what it's really going to take to turn govt and debts around into future investments,
those are the real leaders we need to be investing in and modeling govt after.
The solutions that work, not the hype at the top that wins votes and elections.

The real work is NOT glamorous and CANNOT be explained in 30 second sound bytes
on "how are you going to fix the police and criminal issues".
You won't see it in the news.

Why do you think Trump can't explain what he's going to do either?
It takes working by example, actions not words.

So this whole media game is a bunch of hype.
The real work comes from real workers and they are in all the parties.

There isn't one that is going to save the country without
absolute commitment and partnership with all the others, too.

Anyone who doesn't promote that approach, incorporating all leaders from all parties,
is missing the big picture.
And the rest is hype to get their votes and voters to come out for election, that's all.

Interesting concept of the world thinking success requires you to be corrupt and dishonest with people.

Nope Weatherman2020 don't misunderstand me
I'm saying that to play the games that the legal corporate and political lobbyists
do at that level, yes, you do those things to be successful at THAT game

it is NOT being a success in general, and in the end.

Trump played the game to cut down Cruz to be "successful" in getting the nomination. But it still cost him more overall, where the party is so divided
they couldn't unite in time and now the election is up for grabs, tottering either way

So that wasn't successful in the end, but got him the short term goal
and was successful in playing the game.

Clinton has gotten what she wanted FOR HERSELF by playing worse
games of CYA with people who all collude to cover up what each other does wrong.

But is that going to be successful in SOLVING problems?
no, it's creating more.
it costs more and diverts attention and resources
AWAY from solving real problems that go without help.

the whole campaign game COSTS millions if not billions
while those dollars SHOULD have been invested in sustainable solutions
that BOTH parties can agree on and make work.

Carson and Obama both agree microlending can replace welfare.
But has either invested a dime in promoting it?
No, and look how many millions if not billions each man has
collected to CAMPAIGN, and none of it went into setting
up microlending banks where Black people can learn to
finance and manage their own property ownership to get out of
debt and poverty and dependence on govt.

So Obama may be successful in getting elected twice.
But the Black communities remain stripped of resources
that goes into prisons, into political campaigns,
into favors for corporate sponsors so people can get into office.

What I mean is you can be successful in politics,
and fail at all the real goals and solutions that
are suffering losses because those wins are at the people's expense.

You are blending ineffective leadership with criminal leadership. It is one thing to not obtain any results, it is very much another to want positions of power for gain of personal wealth.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Interesting dynamic between Hillary and confirmations.
She'll want yes people to protect her.
And Congress will be leery.

The House will rake her over the coals to the point she'll break down in public. Can't wait if she wins.

If it wasnt so detrimental to the country i'd agree.
If she does win it's going to get interesting around here. By which I mean the entire country.

 

[Norman]

Russian hackers are better than we thought. They stole Clinton's emails from the NSA, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner.

Not only that, they put Clinton's emails onto a server which they operated on her backyard.

Real experts those guys.

We really should declare war with them / nuke them, Hilly is right.

 

[g5000]

Russian hackers are better than we thought. They stole Clinton's emails from the NSA, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner.

Russian hackers suck. They never cracked Clinton's server. Just Podesta's.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Russian hackers are better than we thought. They stole Clinton's emails from the NSA, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner.

Russian hackers suck. They never cracked Clinton's server. Just Podesta's.

Because the dufus got an email that said click here to change your password. Any 10 year old knows that's a scam.
Hillary is an idiot surrounded by idiots.

 

[Siete]

Russian hackers are better than we thought. They stole Clinton's emails from the NSA, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner.

Russian hackers suck. They never cracked Clinton's server. Just Podesta's.

and the WH server ....

Russian hackers behind the damaging cyber intrusion of the State Department in recent months used that perch to penetrate sensitive parts of the White House computer system, according to U.S. officials briefed on the investigation.

never Clinton

 

[TooTall]

I can't stop wondering if American elections can proceed without mentioning Rusians any more...

Putin: I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American people’s choice? America is not some kind of ‘banana republic’, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.

Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club

I can't stop wondering WHY Trump keep admiring and praising Putin thug during his rallies or interviews.
What benefits does he gained by doing that but labeled as Putin puppet. I'm very sure patriotic Americans don't like that. Veterans and active military personnel I know didn't like it. If he want to be friendly with Putin why not do that after he won the election. He will not win anyway....... but why?

Maybe Trump will take Putin a RESET button like Hillary did.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Russian hackers are better than we thought. They stole Clinton's emails from the NSA, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner.

Russian hackers suck. They never cracked Clinton's server. Just Podesta's.

and the WH server ....

Russian hackers behind the damaging cyber intrusion of the State Department in recent months used that perch to penetrate sensitive parts of the White House computer system, according to U.S. officials briefed on the investigation.

never Clinton

Pretty piss poor IT dept Obama has going.

 

[Siete]

I can't stop wondering if American elections can proceed without mentioning Rusians any more...

Putin: I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American people’s choice? America is not some kind of ‘banana republic’, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.

Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club

I can't stop wondering WHY Trump keep admiring and praising Putin thug during his rallies or interviews.
What benefits does he gained by doing that but labeled as Putin puppet. I'm very sure patriotic Americans don't like that. Veterans and active military personnel I know didn't like it. If he want to be friendly with Putin why not do that after he won the election. He will not win anyway....... but why?

Maybe Trump will take Putin a RESET button like Hillary did.

maybe Trump will find Aladdin's Lamp and make enough electoral votes magically appear to win the election.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

I can't stop wondering if American elections can proceed without mentioning Rusians any more...

Putin: I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American people’s choice? America is not some kind of ‘banana republic’, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.

Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club

I can't stop wondering WHY Trump keep admiring and praising Putin thug during his rallies or interviews.
What benefits does he gained by doing that but labeled as Putin puppet. I'm very sure patriotic Americans don't like that. Veterans and active military personnel I know didn't like it. If he want to be friendly with Putin why not do that after he won the election. He will not win anyway....... but why?

In reality, Trump doesn't mention Putin. Democrats took a casual throw away comment early on and are still running with it.

In a way, I can't blame the dimwits too much. Everything else has failed.

 

[Siete]

Russian hackers are better than we thought. They stole Clinton's emails from the NSA, put them on Huma's laptop, and pinned it on Weiner.

Russian hackers suck. They never cracked Clinton's server. Just Podesta's.

and the WH server ....

Russian hackers behind the damaging cyber intrusion of the State Department in recent months used that perch to penetrate sensitive parts of the White House computer system, according to U.S. officials briefed on the investigation.

never Clinton

Pretty piss poor IT dept Obama has going.

if they weren't so busy defending the President from all the half-ass RW conspiracy bullshit, they could focus on national security better.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

How they were able to duplicate Huma's data on Weiners hard drive is ground breaking. Photon reprogramming of prom over 2000 miles away shows our reset button switching is inferior to Putin's. They obviously can change algo's at will.

How a Hillarious supporter can disregard this level of ineptitude, obvious corruption, and entitlement, is beyond any reasonable explanation.

If Hillarious wins who will be the special prosecutor because Comey will resign November 9th?

I'm far from any expert, but I was listening to all this on the radio the other day.

It seems that Huma had access to Hillary's email account on her server. When you sign on from a different computer, it copies all of the emails from that name and password onto the computer one is using.

Supposedly, this all goes on behind the scenes and you are completely unaware of it because it's not like the computer created a file for the new emails it copied.

If all this is true, then what happened was Huma signed in with Hillary's password and it automatically copied all of these emails to her (or her husbands) laptop.

 

[Siete]

I can't stop wondering if American elections can proceed without mentioning Rusians any more...

Putin: I have to ask myself and ask you too: Does anyone seriously imagine that Russia can somehow influence the American people’s choice? America is not some kind of ‘banana republic’, after all, but is a great power. Do correct me if I am wrong.

Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club

I can't stop wondering WHY Trump keep admiring and praising Putin thug during his rallies or interviews.
What benefits does he gained by doing that but labeled as Putin puppet. I'm very sure patriotic Americans don't like that. Veterans and active military personnel I know didn't like it. If he want to be friendly with Putin why not do that after he won the election. He will not win anyway....... but why?

In reality, Trump doesn't mention Putin. Democrats took a casual throw away comment early on and are still running with it.

In a way, I can't blame the dimwits too much. Everything else has failed.

in reality you're full of shit...

Trump gets Full Flop on question of Putin ties