Remodeling Maidiac
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #1
You're so stupid you keep voting the same asshats into office that keep ripping me off. Be it taxes or regulations you keep giving them the power to fuck me over & I'm sick of it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Grampa Murked UYou're so stupid you keep voting the same asshats into office that keep ripping me off. Be it taxes or regulations you keep giving them the power to fuck me over & I'm sick of it.
TldrGrampa Murked UYou're so stupid you keep voting the same asshats into office that keep ripping me off. Be it taxes or regulations you keep giving them the power to fuck me over & I'm sick of it.
1. Let party politicians be in charge of managing the resources of the people who vote for them
as reps of that party affiliation, similar to religious organizations people are free to join and fund.
Similar to Hindus follow the people they choose to put in charge. Muslims and Catholics also.
Let each party manage its policies and resources to itself, without imposing on any other
person or group who didn't agree to be part of that company, church or party.
We don't allow two religious groups to nominate their top candidate, then whoever
wins get to impose their beliefs on the whole nation to pay for and be under.
Why do we allow this for political beliefs and parties acting as religious cults?
2. In addition to separating beliefs by party,
we can demand equal Constitutional rights and protections
by CONSENSUS on policies that involve beliefs.
That way as long as laws are written by Consensus of the major
parties and candidates, it cannot be biased all one way or another, or else
the opposing reps would strike it down as such.
If Consensus were the standard to ensure NEUTRALITY and
equal inclusion, representation, protection and consent of people of all beliefs and interests,
then that would serve "as a check on itself"
We couldn't pass a biased policy without one side or the other yelling FOUL.
So it is our own party politics, of letting the bigger bully "rule by majority"
and impose by coercion that sets us up to be bullied into submission.
If we say no, this only applies to SECULAR policies we AGREE to leave to majority rule,
but policies of BELIEFS ,including health care and benefits, require CONSENSUS
between party representatives, then we could ensure our grievances and objections
are taken into account, in the democratic and legislative process, or else we reject the policy
and demand that it be revised and corrected to remove or resolve the issue of conflict or objection.
You're so stupid you keep voting the same asshats into office that keep ripping me off. Be it taxes or regulations you keep giving them the power to fuck me over & I'm sick of it.
TldrGrampa Murked UYou're so stupid you keep voting the same asshats into office that keep ripping me off. Be it taxes or regulations you keep giving them the power to fuck me over & I'm sick of it.
1. Let party politicians be in charge of managing the resources of the people who vote for them
as reps of that party affiliation, similar to religious organizations people are free to join and fund.
Similar to Hindus follow the people they choose to put in charge. Muslims and Catholics also.
Let each party manage its policies and resources to itself, without imposing on any other
person or group who didn't agree to be part of that company, church or party.
We don't allow two religious groups to nominate their top candidate, then whoever
wins get to impose their beliefs on the whole nation to pay for and be under.
Why do we allow this for political beliefs and parties acting as religious cults?
2. In addition to separating beliefs by party,
we can demand equal Constitutional rights and protections
by CONSENSUS on policies that involve beliefs.
That way as long as laws are written by Consensus of the major
parties and candidates, it cannot be biased all one way or another, or else
the opposing reps would strike it down as such.
If Consensus were the standard to ensure NEUTRALITY and
equal inclusion, representation, protection and consent of people of all beliefs and interests,
then that would serve "as a check on itself"
We couldn't pass a biased policy without one side or the other yelling FOUL.
So it is our own party politics, of letting the bigger bully "rule by majority"
and impose by coercion that sets us up to be bullied into submission.
If we say no, this only applies to SECULAR policies we AGREE to leave to majority rule,
but policies of BELIEFS ,including health care and benefits, require CONSENSUS
between party representatives, then we could ensure our grievances and objections
are taken into account, in the democratic and legislative process, or else we reject the policy
and demand that it be revised and corrected to remove or resolve the issue of conflict or objection.
[/QUOTE]You're so stupid you keep voting the same asshats into office that keep ripping me off. Be it taxes or regulations you keep giving them the power to fuck me over & I'm sick of it.
Sounds serious. You should do something about it. Move to Texas; they have no regulations there at all.
Brian: The sixties brought the hippie breed,
And decades later things have changed indeed
We lost the values but we kept the weed
You've got a lot to see.
The Reagan years have laid the frame
For movies stars to play the White House game
We're not too far from voting Feldman/Haim
You've got a lot to see.
The town of Vegas has got a different face
Cause it's a family place with lots to do.
Where in the fifties a man could mingle with scores
Of all the seediest whores, well now his children can too.
You've heard it from the canine's mouth,
The country's changed, that is except the South, and you'll agree
No one really knows, my dear lady friend
Just quite how it all will end
So hurry, 'cause you've got a lot to see.
The baldness gene was cause for dread
But that's a fear that you can put to bed
They'll shave your ass and glue it on your head
You've got a lot to see.
The PC-age has moved the bar,
A word like "redneck" is a step too far.
The proper term is "country music star"
You've got a lot to see.
Our flashy cell phones make people mumble,
"Gee whiz- look how important he is, his life must rule!"
You'll get a tumor, but on your surgery day
The doc will see it and say, "Wow, you must really be cool!"
Tom Tucker: There's lots of things you may have missed
Mayor Adam West: Like Pee Wee and his famous wrist
Cleveland: Or Sandy Duncan's creepy phony eye.
Neil Goldman: That awesome Thundercats cartoon.
Diane Simmons: Neil Armstrong landing on the moon.
Meg Griffin: Neil Armstrong? Wait, was he the trumpet guy?
Brian: So let's go see the USA
They'll treat you right unless you're black or gay or Cherokee
But you can forgive the world and its flaws
And follow me there because
You've still got a hell of a lot to see.
You've got a lot to see!
You're too serious for me. I came to have fun & you're making me think. Stop it damnitTldrGrampa Murked UYou're so stupid you keep voting the same asshats into office that keep ripping me off. Be it taxes or regulations you keep giving them the power to fuck me over & I'm sick of it.
1. Let party politicians be in charge of managing the resources of the people who vote for them
as reps of that party affiliation, similar to religious organizations people are free to join and fund.
Similar to Hindus follow the people they choose to put in charge. Muslims and Catholics also.
Let each party manage its policies and resources to itself, without imposing on any other
person or group who didn't agree to be part of that company, church or party.
We don't allow two religious groups to nominate their top candidate, then whoever
wins get to impose their beliefs on the whole nation to pay for and be under.
Why do we allow this for political beliefs and parties acting as religious cults?
2. In addition to separating beliefs by party,
we can demand equal Constitutional rights and protections
by CONSENSUS on policies that involve beliefs.
That way as long as laws are written by Consensus of the major
parties and candidates, it cannot be biased all one way or another, or else
the opposing reps would strike it down as such.
If Consensus were the standard to ensure NEUTRALITY and
equal inclusion, representation, protection and consent of people of all beliefs and interests,
then that would serve "as a check on itself"
We couldn't pass a biased policy without one side or the other yelling FOUL.
So it is our own party politics, of letting the bigger bully "rule by majority"
and impose by coercion that sets us up to be bullied into submission.
If we say no, this only applies to SECULAR policies we AGREE to leave to majority rule,
but policies of BELIEFS ,including health care and benefits, require CONSENSUS
between party representatives, then we could ensure our grievances and objections
are taken into account, in the democratic and legislative process, or else we reject the policy
and demand that it be revised and corrected to remove or resolve the issue of conflict or objection.
It's the SOLUTION Grampa Murked U
Declare both parties to be political religions,
then separate their policies and funding requirements from govt. Just like other religious organizations.
Their platforms become optional, just like religions are chosen by followers to fund or participate or not!
They can manage their own resources by their own members.
This cannot be required for public taxpayers who don't choose that affiliation and belief system.
Because the parties have political beliefs, such as right to health care and right to marriage,
you can't be forced to support those through govt against YOUR beliefs.
How to achieve this?
Reject each policy that discriminates against your beliefs
as "biased by creed" and requiring a CONSENSUS ON LAW to replace it,
or else it is REMOVED from public policy until then.
The ACA would be scrapped until a CONSENSUS is reached
(or programs are separated by party and by choice which to fund).
The marriage laws would be on hold until a CONSENSUS per state is reached
that equally accommodates all taxpayers (or else remove and separate it by party).
etc.
I don't live anywhere near Texas idiotTexas deserves grumps
Grumps deserves texas
I don't live anywhere near Texas idiotTexas deserves grumps
Grumps deserves texas
The money in pols is the bigger problem .