Now they want Rosenstein impeached the guy who just got 12 indictments Sometimes it's difficult telling Repubs from their russian pals
Eddie, you're dumb as dogshit, but less pleasant to be around.
Grand Inquisitor Mewler-Torquemada indicted 13 Russian nationalists 6 months ago. So what happened with those? Why were the indictments dismissed? Oh, because the Russians called the scumbag Inquisitors bluff and went to court? Yep, Torquemada never expected them to actually defend themselves, in fact the corrupt ****** was indicting companies that didn't even exist - basically pulling names out of the phonebook. Corrupt pile of shit that Mewler is.
So you Stalinist pigs had a bad week last week, flat out traitor Strzok may be immune to our laws, but made for VERY bad optics, partly because of his contempt and clear position as an elite not subject to law.
The Inquisition suffered a black eye, so Torquemada threw a hail mary to try and distract from the disaster. He indicted 12 Russians on the same gamble, hoping they will not stand up forthemselves
I mean, what would the corrupt **** do if they show up and say "let's see the evidence?"
He'll do what he did when he was caught ******* the dog with the 13 Russians, he will dismiss and depend on the corrupt press to sweep it under the rug.
Do you have a link to the indictments being dismissed, because court docs says Concord Management and Consulting and the Mueller team are due back in court on Aug. 17.
Report: Mueller's Indictment of Russian Company Is Facing Dismissal Over Legal Incompetence
{
The motion continues, “As such, Count One of the Indictment appears to be facially invalid because it fails to charge an essential element of the offense of conspiracy to defraud the United States by impairing, obstructing and defeating the functions of the FEC and the DOJ, that is, that the Defendant acted willfully, in this case meaning that Defendant was aware of the FEC and FARA requirements, agreed to violate those requirements, and ultimately acted with intent to violate those requirements.”
Concord Management’s Monday motion contains at least one reference to U.S. case law where similar indictments were dismissed because they failed to adequately track statutory language. In other words, Concord Management is arguing that Mueller and his army of attorneys charged Concord Management (and other Russian entities) with a vague-sounding “crime” that isn’t actually a crime.
In fact, Concord Management’s motion explicitly says as much, claiming, “[T]he DOJ never brought any case like the instant Indictment, that is, an alleged conspiracy by a foreign corporation to ‘interfere’ in a Presidential election by allegedly funding free speech. The obvious reason for this is that no such crime exists in the federal criminal code.”
Because Mueller’s indictment was apparently sloppy (or intentionally vague) in this regard, Concord Management is asking the court to inspect the language of the grand jury instructions–with the hope that the court agrees the indictment actually failed to include all of the elements of the crime charged. As the motion notes, under U.S. law, indictments must contain all such elements.}
