EX CIA director John Brennan claims probe into Trump Russia collusion hoax is attempt to “harass and hurt reputationally, professionally, financially”

[Man With A Plan]

Wrong. I was directly responding to your statement that claimed Hillary’s dossier was the dirtiest political trick ever by highlighting a much more serious one

Asking for the truth is a dirtier trick than paying for a lie? Only with the Left... (eye roll)

 

[SweetTea]

Let me guess

Your gonna continue speculating until Trump is in the ground

We can speculate that if a bank was robbed, those guys we saw running away from the bank dressed in all black, wearing masks and carrying large bags just might have been the bank robbers. I know, it’s a stretch but…

 

[Lesh]

We can speculate that if a bank was robbed, those guys we saw running away from the bank dressed in all black, wearing masks and carrying large bags just might have been the bank robbers. I know, it’s a stretch but…

You go from pure speculation to hardcore fantasy

 

[SweetTea]

You go from pure speculation to hardcore fantasy

Not at all. My analogy fits. You guys choose to dismiss the guys running out of the bank as purely coincidental because they are your best buddies. Nobody with any common sense can’t see what went on with the entire Trump/Russian collusion nonsense.

 

[Lesh]

Not at all. My analogy fits. You guys choose to dismiss the guys running out of the bank as purely coincidental because they are your best buddies. Nobody with any common sense can’t see what went on with the entire Trump/Russian collusion nonsense.

Still fantasy

 

[Marener]

We can speculate that if a bank was robbed, those guys we saw running away from the bank dressed in all black, wearing masks and carrying large bags just might have been the bank robbers. I know, it’s a stretch but…

And we can speculate that when Trump tells Zelensky he should do him a favor and simultaneously holds up foreign aid to Ukraine, those would be part of a quid pro quo.

I know it’s a stretch, but …

 

[SweetTea]

And we can speculate that when Trump tells Zelensky he should do him a favor and simultaneously holds up foreign aid to Ukraine, those would be part of a quid pro quo.

I know it’s a stretch, but …

And you did…

 

[Marener]

And you did…

The question is, why didn’t you?

 

[SweetTea]

The question is, why didn’t you?

Why is that the question? You are off the hook?

But to answer anyway, Trump didn’t say I would like you to do this or else. He simply said I would like you to do this. The only reason Democrats had a problem with it is because they were protecting their future presidential candidate from a potential coverup that just happened to involve Ukraine. Even more, why would it matter? Investigating corruption of the Biden’s was a matter of national security that just so happened to also have ties to politics. Was Trump, as President, supposed to ignore it just because Biden was an opponent?

What was the difference when Biden point blank told Ukraine he was withholding money unless they did xyz?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Lush and Moroner are just FAKING ignorance and are using SELECTIVE AMNESIA here.
Complete waste of time explaining REALITY to these demented avenger subverted demoralized Stalinist Marxist Leninist zombie ASSHOLES.

 

[Marener]

Why is that the question? You are off the hook?

But to answer anyway, Trump didn’t say I would like you to do this or else. He simply said I would like you to do this. The only reason Democrats had a problem with it is because they were protecting their future presidential candidate from a potential coverup that just happened to involve Ukraine. Even more, why would it matter? Investigating corruption of the Biden’s was a matter of national security that just so happened to also have ties to politics. Was Trump, as President, supposed to ignore it just because Biden was an opponent?

What was the difference when Biden point blank told Ukraine he was withholding money unless they did xyz?

It’s a question because your standards seem to differ depending on who we are talking about.

Oh, I get it. You don’t think it had anything to do with the fact that Biden was his political opponent. It was just a coincidence.

Just another “speculation” that Trump told Zelensky to go after Biden despite there not being any federal investigation, a few months after Biden announced his candidacy, was to harm his candidacy and help his own political campaign.

I know it’s a stretch, but…

 

[SweetTea]

It’s a question because your standards seem to differ depending on who we are talking about.

Oh, I get it. You don’t think it had anything to do with the fact that Biden was his political opponent. It was just a coincidence.

Just another “speculation” that Trump told Zelensky to go after Biden despite there not being any federal investigation, a few months after Biden announced his candidacy, was to harm his candidacy and help his own political campaign.

I know it’s a stretch, but…

And it was a stretch to believe the Clintons and Obama had anything to do with the fake Trump/Russian collusion narrative? Gotcha.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Not at all. My analogy fits. You guys choose to dismiss the guys running out of the bank as purely coincidental because they are your best buddies. Nobody with any common sense can’t see what went on with the entire Trump/Russian collusion nonsense.

Steele dossier NEVER VERIFIED.

You only have to go that far. The whole thing was BULLCRAP.