RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA conspiracy theorist Adam Schiff claims Kash Patel is a conspiracy theorist.

[TimFitz]

Where does Mueller say Russians were at the Trump campaign headquarters? He said Trump tower.


Looks like we have another lie by you.

If you’re going to make it up, at least make an effort not to be ridiculous when you’re doing it.

Now, you’re trying to fald]sely assert that the Russians were only in the building????

Just plain stupid!

Russian Dirt on Clinton? ‘I Love It,’ Donald Trump Jr. Said (Published 2017)

Email exchanges reviewed by The Times offer a detailed unspooling of how an eager Donald Trump Jr. came to meet with a Kremlin-connected lawyer.

www.nytimes.com

 

[TimFitz]

i refuted everything. I provided a link to the Mueller Report, and a link to the story about the FEC charging the DNC and CLinton..

Why do you continue to lie?

You did not refute anything. Not a word.

 

[struth]

Now, you’re just making it up.

You have yet to refute or even challenge a single fact I cited.

You want to believe, so you do.

Fact never mattered to the Trump mob.

MUELLER:

Yes.
COLLINS:

Thank you. Is it true, the evidence gathered during your investigation -- given the questions that you've just answered, is it true the evidence gathered during your investigation did not establish that the president was involved in the underlying crime related to Russian election interference as stated in Volume 1, page 7?
MUELLER:

We found insufficient evidence of the president's culpability.
COLLINS:

So that would be a yes.
MUELLER:

Pardon?
COLLINS:

That would be a yes.
MUELLER:

Yes.
COLLINS:

Thank you. Isn't it true the evidence did not establish that the president or those close to him were involved in the charged (ph) Russian computer hacking or active measure conspiracies or that the president otherwise had unlawful relationships with any Russian official, Volume 2, page 76? Correct?
MUELLER:

I will leave the answer to our report.
COLLINS:

So that is a yes. Is that any (ph) true your investigation did not establish that members of the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with Russian government in election interference activity, Volume 1, page 2; Volume 1, page 173?
MUELLER:

Thank you. Yes.

Robert Mueller's testimony before Congress: Full transcript

Read the testimony of former special counsel Robert Mueller after questioning by lawmakers about possible obstruction of justice by Trump and the 2016 Russia Investigation.

www.nbcnews.com

 

[struth]

If you’re going to make it up, at least make an effort not to be ridiculous when you’re doing it.

Now, you’re trying to fald]sely assert that the Russians were only in the building????

Just plain stupid!

Russian Dirt on Clinton? ‘I Love It,’ Donald Trump Jr. Said (Published 2017)

Email exchanges reviewed by The Times offer a detailed unspooling of how an eager Donald Trump Jr. came to meet with a Kremlin-connected lawyer.

www.nytimes.com

who doesn't love Russian dirt on Clinton?

Why do the Russians have so much dirt on the CLintons?

 

[struth]

You did not refute anything. Not a word.

you said the Trump campaign conspired with Russia. That's been debunked and refuted.

Robert Mueller's testimony before Congress: Full transcript

Read the testimony of former special counsel Robert Mueller after questioning by lawmakers about possible obstruction of justice by Trump and the 2016 Russia Investigation.

www.nbcnews.com

COLLINS:

Thank you. Is it true, the evidence gathered during your investigation -- given the questions that you've just answered, is it true the evidence gathered during your investigation did not establish that the president was involved in the underlying crime related to Russian election interference as stated in Volume 1, page 7?
MUELLER:

We found insufficient evidence of the president's culpability.
COLLINS:

So that would be a yes.
MUELLER:

Pardon?
COLLINS:

That would be a yes.
MUELLER:

Yes.

 

[jc456]

The substantial body of evidence is already readily available.

You just want to go on pretending that it isn’t.

Post shit's evidence then. I dare you!! I know you can't but since you made this statement implies you've seen it.

Let's go cuck

 

[jc456]

I have the facts.

You have the meme.

Case closed.

you think you have the documents and testimony of Shit's information? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha you really are a fkwad.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Now, you’re just making it up.

You have yet to refute or even challenge a single fact I cited.

You want to believe, so you do.

Fact never mattered to the Trump mob.

I caught you being dumb to the point where you apologized to me. Just stop your nonsense. Your Trump hatred blinds you.

 

[TimFitz]

Wait so trumps “inner circle” wasn’t the campaign? Hahaha

You are such a troll

You just got done saying, and repeating that Roger Stone , who was, and is, part of Trump’s inner circle was not part of the campaign.

You refuted your own claim before you even made it.

Which side of your mouth will you talk out of next!

 

[TimFitz]

you think you have the documents and testimony of Shit's information? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha you really are a fkwad.

“documents and testimony of Shit's information”

What does that even mean? It’s incoherent.

Don’t like the facts?

Refute them. Produce evidence.

You won’t, of course. You can’t.

 

[struth]

You just got done saying, and repeating that Roger Stone , who was, and is, part of Trump’s inner circle was not part of the campaign.

You refuted your own claim before you even made it.

Which side of your mouth will you talk out of next!

where did I say Roger Stone was part of any "inner circle?" I didn't

He also wasn't part of the campaign.

 

[TimFitz]

where did I say Roger Stone was part of any "inner circle?" I didn't

He also wasn't part of the campaign.

So, now you’re saying that Roger Stone was and is not part of Trump’s inner circle?

That’s so flagrantly false that it hardly bears refuting!

 

[struth]

So, now you’re saying that Roger Stone was and is not part of Trump’s inner circle?

That’s so flagrantly false that it hardly bears refuting!

quote me saying he was....

 

[jc456]

“documents and testimony of Shit's information”

What does that even mean? It’s incoherent.

Don’t like the facts?

Refute them. Produce evidence.

You won’t, of course. You can’t.

i just did you ****. I said post Shit's evidence, and you shit yourself.

 

[TimFitz]

i refuted everything. I provided a link to the Mueller Report, and a link to the story about the FEC charging the DNC and CLinton..

Why do you continue to lie?

Actually, no part of your argument disputes any of the established facts, or the voluminous evidence that such coordination went on. Again, that record stands uncontested.

instead you try and parse the facts by noting that there was no evidence that Trump was personally involved

that much is true.

It hardly matters. Only a complete fool would believe that Trump’s inner circle would routinely coordinate data and activities with the intelligence agencies of a rival country without the full knowledge and approval of the man at the top.

Yet, this is a standard Trumpster argument.

And now you play games over the role of Roger Stone, who was the cutout,

Whether you say so or not, zRoger Stone is the one essential person in Trump’s inner circle. Even if he wasn’t on the campaign payroll. He was there on Jan 6th too.

 

[struth]

Ye

Actually, no part of your argument disputes any of the established facts, or the voluminous evidence that such coordination went on. Again, that record stands uncontested.

instead you try and parse the facts by noting that there was no evidence that Trump was personally involved

that much is true.

It hardly matters. Only a complete fool would believe that Trump’s inner circle would routinely coordinate data and activities with the intelligence agencies of a rival country without the full knowledge and approval of the man at the top.

Yet, this is a standard Trumpster argument.

And now you play games over the role of Roger Stone, who was the cutout,

Whether you say so or not, zRoger Stone is the one essential person in Trump’s inner circle. Even if he wasn’t on the campaign payroll. He was there on Jan 6th too.

Yes, the record is clear, mueller found no conspiracy between the trump campaign and russia

He was very clear about that

 

[TimFitz]

Where does Mueller say Russians were at the Trump campaign headquarters? He said Trump tower.


Looks like we have another lie by you.

pages 110-123

 

[struth]

pages 110-123

Nowhere does it say on those pages that Russians were at Trump campaign HQ. This in fact is what it says:

The Russian attorney who spoke at the meeting, Natalia Veselnitskaya, had previously worked for the Russian government and maintained a relationship with that government throughout this period of time. She claimed that funds derived from illegal activities in Russia were provided to Hillary Clinton and other Democrats. Trump Jr. requested evidence to support those claims, but Veselnitskaya did not provide such information. She and her associates then turned to a critique of the origins of the Magnitsky Act, a 2012 statute that imposed financial and travel sanctions on Russian officials and that resulted in a retaliatory ban on adoptions of Russian children. Trump Jr. suggested that the issue could be revisited when and if candidate Trump was elected. After the election, Veselnitskaya made additional efforts to follow up on the meeting, but the Trump Transition Team did not engage.

https://www.justice.gov/archives/sco/file/1373816/dl

Another nothing burger

 

[SeaMajor7]

Subverted demoralized zombies like Mr. Fitz here are impervious to facts and information that goes against their programming.
True facts and information cannot be processed by these people.
Debate is futile.

 

[jc456]

Subverted demoralized zombies like Mr. Fitz here are impervious to facts and information that goes against their programming.
True facts and information cannot be processed by these people.
Debate is futile.

I couldn't have said that any fking better.

The 2+2=5 gang. They are always right no matter the subject or fact.