Actually, no part of your argument disputes any of the established facts, or the voluminous evidence that such coordination went on. Again, that record stands uncontested.
instead you try and parse the facts by noting that there was no evidence that Trump was personally involved
that much is true.
It hardly matters. Only a complete fool would believe that Trumpâs inner circle would routinely coordinate data and activities with the intelligence agencies of a rival country without the full knowledge and approval of the man at the top.
Yet, this is a standard Trumpster argument.
And now you play games over the role of Roger Stone, who was the cutout,
Whether you say so or not, zRoger Stone is the one essential person in Trumpâs inner circle. Even if he wasnât on the campaign payroll. He was there on Jan 6th too.