RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA conspiracy theorist Adam Schiff claims Kash Patel is a conspiracy theorist.

[Nostra]

I don’t need to. The evidence is presented in considerable detail.

BTW, what were Russian intelligence assets doing in the Trump Tower in the middle of an election.

Nope. You have nothing.

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

The substantial body of evidence is already readily available.

You just want to go on pretending that it isn’t.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Still believes there’s a substantial body of evidence Trump dove at the steering wheel.

 

[TimFitz]

Nope. You have nothing.

Then you should have no trouble explaining what Russian intelligence officials were doing meeting with the Trump campaign in the middle of an election.

In what world would a thing like that be seen as anything but compromising, or worse.

 

[Nostra]

Then you should have no trouble explaining what Russian intelligence officials were doing meeting with the Trump campaign in the middle of an election.

In what world would a thing like that be seen as anything but compromising, or worse.

Why should I explain it, Simp?

Mueller spent $45 million investigating it and concluded there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia to influence the election.

Sux to be you.

 

[struth]

Why do you keep repeating what I told you.

Stone was not part of the campaign purposefully. He was Trump’s Russian cutout. It was set up that way. That way, the Russians could keep tabs on the Trump campaign without having to collude with it directly.

I also documented how disappointed the Russians were when they lost Assange.

Cut out Stone, and cut out Assange coordinated the release of the DNC emails that the Russians had given Assange.

The political timing of both releases was obvious, even at the time.

This is covered in so,e detail in the Mueller Report. But you would actually have read it to know that.

So you lied?

 

[TimFitz]

Why should I explain it, Simp?

Mueller spent $45 million investigating it and concluded there was no collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia to influence the election.

Sux to be you.

No, he concluded that there was no evidence that the campaign (aand only the campaign, not Trump’s inner circle) did anything that met the legal definition of collusion.

At the time, no one had ever thought of passing tough laws to punish American political candidates for colluding or coordinating with forfeit=gn governments or their intelligence agencies. Republicans routinely block efforts to do so.

However he did not issue a reccomendation. he referred it back to Barr, who created a deliberately misleading summary and refuted to pursue the matter. Hiding behind the policy of not indicting a sitting President while in office, the evidence is all there, in clear and vivid detail. Not one word of it has ever been challenged or discredited.

More than half the Mueller Report covered Trump’s attempts to obstruct the investigation. There was plenty of very obvious evidence of obstruction of Justice.

This is a pattern in Trump criminality. Trump never contests the charges against him in court. Nor does he ever attempt to deny the available evidence.

he makes noisy denials and adolescent name calling in public, but his legal teams never do anything other than try and delay and obstruct.

I’m not surprised that you won’t explain Trump’s obvious disloyalty to his country.

I’ve asked that question of Trumpsters many many times.

Trumpsters run away EVERY time.

 

[struth]

No, he concluded that there was no evidence that the campaign (aand only the campaign, not Trump’s inner circle) did anything that met the legal definition of collusion.

At the time, no one had ever thought of passing tough laws to punish American political candidates for colluding or coordinating with forfeit=gn governments or their intelligence agencies. Republicans routinely block efforts to do so.

However he did not issue a reccomendation. he referred it back to Barr, who created a deliberately misleading summary and refuted to pursue the matter. Hiding behind the policy of not indicting a sitting President while in office, the evidence is all there, in clear and vivid detail. Not one word of it has ever been challenged or discredited.

More than half the Mueller Report covered Trump’s attempts to obstruct the investigation. There was plenty of very obvious evidence of obstruction of Justice.

This is a pattern in Trump criminality. Trump never contests the charges against him in court. Nor does he ever attempt to deny the available evidence.

he makes noisy denials and adolescent name calling in public, but his legal teams never do anything other than try and delay and obstruct.

I’m not surprised that you won’t explain Trump’s obvious disloyalty to his country.

I’ve asked that question of Trumpsters many many times.

Trumpsters run away EVERY time.

Wait so trumps “inner circle” wasn’t the campaign? Hahaha

You are such a troll

 

[TimFitz]

So you lied?

I said the exact same thing three times in a row.

Everything I said is a documented fact.

 

[struth]

I said the exact same thing three times in a row.

Everything I said is a documented fact.

You claimed that the campaign conspired. That was a lie

 

[Nostra]

No, he concluded that there was no evidence that the campaign (aand only the campaign, not Trump’s inner circle) did anything that met the legal definition of collusion.

At the time, no one had ever thought of passing tough laws to punish American political candidates for colluding or coordinating with forfeit=gn governments or their intelligence agencies. Republicans routinely block efforts to do so.

However he did not issue a reccomendation. he referred it back to Barr, who created a deliberately misleading summary and refuted to pursue the matter. Hiding behind the policy of not indicting a sitting President while in office, the evidence is all there, in clear and vivid detail. Not one word of it has ever been challenged or discredited.

More than half the Mueller Report covered Trump’s attempts to obstruct the investigation. There was plenty of very obvious evidence of obstruction of Justice.

This is a pattern in Trump criminality. Trump never contests the charges against him in court. Nor does he ever attempt to deny the available evidence.

he makes noisy denials and adolescent name calling in public, but his legal teams never do anything other than try and delay and obstruct.

I’m not surprised that you won’t explain Trump’s obvious disloyalty to his country.

I’ve asked that question of Trumpsters many many times.

Trumpsters run away EVERY time.

No collusion.

Sux to be you.

 

[Nostra]

You claimed that the campaign conspired. That was a lie

Yep. He lies, gets caught in the lie, then changes his story to another lie.

 

[struth]

No, he concluded that there was no evidence that the campaign (aand only the campaign, not Trump’s inner circle) did anything that met the legal definition of collusion.

At the time, no one had ever thought of passing tough laws to punish American political candidates for colluding or coordinating with forfeit=gn governments or their intelligence agencies. Republicans routinely block efforts to do so.

However he did not issue a reccomendation. he referred it back to Barr, who created a deliberately misleading summary and refuted to pursue the matter. Hiding behind the policy of not indicting a sitting President while in office, the evidence is all there, in clear and vivid detail. Not one word of it has ever been challenged or discredited.

More than half the Mueller Report covered Trump’s attempts to obstruct the investigation. There was plenty of very obvious evidence of obstruction of Justice.

This is a pattern in Trump criminality. Trump never contests the charges against him in court. Nor does he ever attempt to deny the available evidence.

he makes noisy denials and adolescent name calling in public, but his legal teams never do anything other than try and delay and obstruct.

I’m not surprised that you won’t explain Trump’s obvious disloyalty to his country.

I’ve asked that question of Trumpsters many many times.

Trumpsters run away EVERY time.

There was no obstruction, there was nothing to obstruct. Trump and his campaign didn't conspire with Russia

With that said, the DNC and Clinton did pay a forign national to interfere in the election, and they laundered their payments to him through a law firm.

 

[TimFitz]

You claimed that the campaign conspired. That was a lie

what were Russian intelligence officials doing sitting in Trump Campaign headquarters?

Trump conspired. he and the campaign communicated with Russian operatives throughout their campaign.

The FBI found about it when a Trump campaign “senior foreign policy advisor” blabbed about it.

His campaign conspired. With the Russians throughout the campaign.

Roger Stone did coordinate the use of material that the Russian FSB in the Trump campaign.

Paul Manafort did supply the Russians with the campaigns internal polling data.

Trump associates and campaign officials regularly met with Russian operatives throughout the campaign.

And, of course, the Russians marched right into Trump Tower. Another fact you can’t deny or excuse.

All of this is documented fact. you can’t deny or refute any of it. Not a word.

 

[Nostra]

what were Russian intelligence officials doing sitting in Trump Campaign headquarters?

You claimed the campaign conspired with Russia to effect the election.

Mueller said they didn’t.

You lied.

 

[struth]

what were Russian intelligence officials doing sitting in Trump Campaign headquarters?

they weren't.

try again.

What was happening was the DNC and CLinton were paying foreign nationals to interfere in our election, and laudnered money through a corrupt law firm to do it.

FEC fines Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC over Trump-Russia dossier research​

FEC fines Hillary Clinton campaign and DNC over Trump-Russia dossier research | CNN Politics

Federal election regulators fined Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign and the Democratic National Committee earlier this month for not properly disclosing the money they spent on controversial opposition research that led to the infamous Trump-Russia dossier.

www.cnn.com

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

You can't make this stuff up, folks.

The chief propagandist for the RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA hoax calling someone else a conspiracy theorist.

We are still waiting on all his ironclad evidence he claimed he had for years.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2024/12/15/sen_adam_schiff_conspiracy_theorist_sycophant_kash_patel_is_not_fit_to_lead_fbi.html

How these defects keep getting elected is beyond me. The Cali voter base is filled with imbeciles

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I said the exact same thing three times in a row.

Everything I said is a documented fact.

It really isn’t. But thank you for playing, conspiracy theories of 2016. Your prize is a gift certificate to Starbucks.

 

[Nostra]

what were Russian intelligence officials doing sitting in Trump Campaign headquarters?

Trump conspired. he and the campaign communicated with their

His campaign conspired. With the Russians throughout the campaign.

Roger Stone did coordinate the use of material that the Russian FSB in the Trump campaign.

Paul Manafort did supply the Russians with the campaigns internal polling data.

Trump associates and campaign officials regularly met with Russian operatives throughout the campaign.

And, of course, the Russians marched right into Trump Tower. Another fact you can’t deny or excuse.

All of this is documented fact. you can’t deny or refute any of it. Not a word.

Where does Mueller say Russians were at the Trump campaign headquarters? He said Trump tower.


Looks like we have another lie by you.

 

[TimFitz]

There was no obstruction, there was nothing to obstruct. Trump and his campaign didn't conspire with Russia

With that said, the DNC and Clinton did pay a forign national to interfere in the election, and they laundered their payments to him through a law firm.

Now, you’re just making it up.

You have yet to refute or even challenge a single fact I cited.

You want to believe, so you do.

Fact never mattered to the Trump mob.

 

[struth]

Now, you’re just making it up.

You have yet to refute or even challenge a single fact I cited.

You want to believe, so you do.

Fact never mattered to the Trump mob.

i refuted everything. I provided a link to the Mueller Report, and a link to the story about the FEC charging the DNC and CLinton..

Why do you continue to lie?