Rules for Spilling American Blood

Rule #1: Never have been in the military.
Rule #2: None of your relatives are in the military.
Rule #3: No one in your family has ever been in the military.

If the first three rules are ok, fire away. Who cares. If they are captured or die they are losers after all.*

*Actual Trump statements.
More accurately, he called them "suckers and losers".
 
So youre OK with a nuke exploding in an American city.
Why would you do that and where are you storing your nuke? The only country that has ever nuked human beings should make the rules on who can and can`t have a nuke to defend themselves? I don`t think so.
 
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.
Around 1941 Americans and their politicians didn't think that Hitler was worth any American blood. Hitler wasn't an imminent threat to us. He was Europe's problem. Thank God the Japanese woke us up to how much of a threat Hitler was to the entire world, and to us. Hitler was very close to getting the A bomb first and if he had done that we would all be speaking German now. We dodged a very huge bullet back then. The world should have taken Hitler out before he got as powerful as he did.
 
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.
Did BArry Hussein get Congress to declare war when he bombed 8 countries, Simp?
 
Of Fvck off...

Here is what I said in 2016 and 2015:













The only thing selective is your nicotine addled memory.
Thanks for your opinion.

I disagree, and we are meeting the conditions in your OP, just not as fast as I'd like, but there it is.

Your concept of what is of value in conflict is meaningless in this context.
 
Thanks for your opinion.

I disagree, and we are meeting the conditions in your OP, just not as fast as I'd like, but there it is.

Your concept of what is of value in conflict is meaningless in this context.
Really? Why is that?
 
My understanding is that our main objective was to stop whatever nuclear capabilities they are developing. It seems to me like bombs alone should be enough to cripple that capability at least for decades to come. I don't understand why it has to be deeper than that. We've crippled their economy and blown up their nuclear program. If we just left, right now, they're already in a position where they'd be crippled for decades. They're not going to be building nukes any time soon.

All that's left now is for us to decide how many more resources to waste.

Didn't someone ASSURE us that he "obliterated" their nuclear program last summer? Was he lying to us then too?

Iran’s Nuclear Facilities Have Been Obliterated — and Suggestions Otherwise are Fake News
 
If we are going to put America's blood and treasure at risk, it must always be with a clear vision of:

1. A critical and vital national interest or American lives are at risk.

2. Congress declares war.

3. We send in the troops, no holds barred, no punches pulled, and with overwhelming force, take care of the problem.

4. And then we leave.

I don’t think anything in the middle east is worth a drop of American blood but if we’re going to do it...the above should be the hurdles that have to be cleared.

My Dad was a WWII Vet. Enlisted when he turned 17, served on CV-19 had his 18 birthday a month after being injured during a Kamikaze attack. He was also 'anti-war' in a similar way. He was for peace but if it's war, it's total war
 
My Dad was a WWII Vet. Enlisted when he turned 17, served on CV-19 had his 18 birthday a month after being injured during a Kamikaze attack. He was also 'anti-war' in a similar way. He was for peace but if it's war, it's total war
Yeah, that's my "thing" on all of this. If "it" (whatever the CIC says "it" is) is important enough for one soldier to die for the cause, it's important enough to support him or her with the full weight of the nation.
 
15th post
Around 1941 Americans and their politicians didn't think that Hitler was worth any American blood. Hitler wasn't an imminent threat to us. He was Europe's problem. Thank God the Japanese woke us up to how much of a threat Hitler was to the entire world, and to us. Hitler was very close to getting the A bomb first and if he had done that we would all be speaking German now. We dodged a very huge bullet back then. The world should have taken Hitler out before he got as powerful as he did.

Well, FDR did get a declaration of war, transformed the economy to a wartime economy, and ensured a comprehensive victory.

Unless you're a moron, you wouldn't say that having to go back into the middle east for the 3rd time in 30 years--as we are doing now--is preferable to what FDR did.

But you're just that moronic, aren't you?
 
Rule #1: Never have been in the military.
Rule #2: None of your relatives are in the military.
Rule #3: No one in your family has ever been in the military.

If the first three rules are ok, fire away. Who cares. If they are captured or die they are losers after all.*

*Actual Trump statements.

Nope
 
Back
Top Bottom