So Weinstein kept the press quiet about Moore.
Interesting twist on this conspiracy theory?
And?
And?
That's it? I win a conjunction and a question mark??
Weinstein --- for whatever reason and I don't profess to know what it is, maybe it was just "time" --- opened the floodgates for women victims to start telling their stories. Not that there wasn't already a trickle --- Weiner, Ensign, all those Rump stories ignited by the audiotape --- but Weinstein seems to have opened the floodgates.
You seem to have started from a premise that these women's stories were some kind of political operation, rather than what they simply are............ women's stories.
Why do you hate women?
And?
That's it? I win a conjunction and a question mark??
Weinstein --- for whatever reason and I don't profess to know what it is, maybe it was just "time" --- opened the floodgates for women victims to start telling their stories. Not that there wasn't already a trickle --- Weiner, Ensign, all those Rump stories ignited by the audiotape --- but Weinstein seems to have opened the floodgates.
You seem to have started from a premise that these women's stories were some kind of political operation, rather than what they simply are............ women's stories.
Why do you hate women?
Oh, you forgot about Cosby?
And since when has a political foe not used rumors that where COMMON KNOWLEDGE against their opponent?
You thinking the Democrats wanted him winning, not once, but twice?
Go one.....
Yeah sure, like his fellow perv The Angry Creamsicle in the White House - Creepy Roy is full of hot air.
(CNN) Alabama Republican Senate candidate Roy Moore says he will sue the Washington Post over its report alleging he pursued sexual relationships with teenagers -- including a 14-year-old -- when he was in his 30s.
"The Washington Post published another attack on my character and reputation because they are desperate to stop my political campaign. These attacks said I was with a minor child and are false and untrue -- and for which they will be sued," Moore said Sunday night during a campaign speech in Huntsville, Alabama.
Roy Moore threatens to sue Washington Post over report - CNNPolitics
Does he realize that if he does that, he's going to have to take the stand to defend pedophilia?
At worst it would be the MF version of pederasty, not pedophilia.
The other 3 stories involved 17-18 year olds, which can consent in Alabama and other states.
The question still remains is it appropriate behavior for a thirty year old to prefer High School girls
And?
That's it? I win a conjunction and a question mark??
Weinstein --- for whatever reason and I don't profess to know what it is, maybe it was just "time" --- opened the floodgates for women victims to start telling their stories. Not that there wasn't already a trickle --- Weiner, Ensign, all those Rump stories ignited by the audiotape --- but Weinstein seems to have opened the floodgates.
You seem to have started from a premise that these women's stories were some kind of political operation, rather than what they simply are............ women's stories.
Why do you hate women?
Oh, you forgot about Cosby?
And since when has a political foe not used rumors that where COMMON KNOWLEDGE against their opponent?
You thinking the Democrats wanted him winning, not once, but twice?
Go one.....
Yes I forgot Cosby and I'm sure myriad others. Tiger Woods too. Neither of whom have anything to do with politics, as doesn't Weinstein. As I said it's been building up, like an orgasm.
And once again you're launching from a premise of "political operation" rather than "women speaking". I still want to know, why do you hate women? Obviously Cosby, Weinstein, Wood, whatzisname that other actor, and others, got the same finger pointed at them without a "political operation".
As far as "what Democrats wanted" I wouldn't think his getting elected to the bench was much of a concern especially since he kept coming in with his own rope. I suspect it was an amusement at most.
"Go one" what?
And?
That's it? I win a conjunction and a question mark??
Weinstein --- for whatever reason and I don't profess to know what it is, maybe it was just "time" --- opened the floodgates for women victims to start telling their stories. Not that there wasn't already a trickle --- Weiner, Ensign, all those Rump stories ignited by the audiotape --- but Weinstein seems to have opened the floodgates.
You seem to have started from a premise that these women's stories were some kind of political operation, rather than what they simply are............ women's stories.
Why do you hate women?
Oh, you forgot about Cosby?
And since when has a political foe not used rumors that where COMMON KNOWLEDGE against their opponent?
You thinking the Democrats wanted him winning, not once, but twice?
Go one.....
Yes I forgot Cosby and I'm sure myriad others. Tiger Woods too. Neither of whom have anything to do with politics, as doesn't Weinstein. As I said it's been building up, like an orgasm.
And once again you're launching from a premise of "political operation" rather than "women speaking". I still want to know, why do you hate women? Obviously Cosby, Weinstein, Wood, whatzisname that other actor, and others, got the same finger pointed at them without a "political operation".
As far as "what Democrats wanted" I wouldn't think his getting elected to the bench was much of a concern especially since he kept coming in with his own rope. I suspect it was an amusement at most.
"Go one" what?
