Ron DeSantis leads charge for more coercive conservative government

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Apr 28, 2011
76,759
36,580
2,290
In a Republic, actually
'Back when he was a member of the House Freedom Caucus, Ron DeSantis embraced a classic conservative argument about the threats to American freedom posed by government regulation of the internet.

“If you want government to exercise a power that you like right now, someone else can come in and exercise that power in a way you don’t like,” he said to applause at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in 2017. “Why don’t we just deny government the power to do it to begin with, and let the American people have a free internet and make their own choices?”

Just a few years later, DeSantis reversed himself as Florida’s governor, claiming that technology companies and their political views had become the real threat to liberty. Far from government being the problem, as former president Ronald Reagan had famously argued, DeSantis offered a new law as the solution. He signed a bill that imposed fines of up to $250,000 a day on social media companies that deplatformed candidates for office in his state for any reason.

The move was just one part of his broad embrace of the often coercive power of the government to push back on the private decisions of corporations, banks, academies of higher learning and the national media. He has argued that these institutions now make up an “anointed” regime of elite thought that threatens the country, and that Silicon Valley companies are operating in a way “probably unforeseen by the founding fathers.”'


Of course, DeSantis is not alone among the right pursuing coercive, authoritarian conservative government; indeed, conservatism itself is coercive and authoritarian.
 
So is DeSantis paying rent in leftist minds now?
A few of them are probably developing a mental tic, thinking he will replace Trump and they'll need to stop him or see the country fall into "Right Wing" slavery, or some such idiocy. This is the reason I laugh at those who think choosing anyone but Trump is going to make the Left less crazy.
 
'Back when he was a member of the House Freedom Caucus, Ron DeSantis embraced a classic conservative argument about the threats to American freedom posed by government regulation of the internet.

“If you want government to exercise a power that you like right now, someone else can come in and exercise that power in a way you don’t like,” he said to applause at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in 2017. “Why don’t we just deny government the power to do it to begin with, and let the American people have a free internet and make their own choices?”

Just a few years later, DeSantis reversed himself as Florida’s governor, claiming that technology companies and their political views had become the real threat to liberty. Far from government being the problem, as former president Ronald Reagan had famously argued, DeSantis offered a new law as the solution. He signed a bill that imposed fines of up to $250,000 a day on social media companies that deplatformed candidates for office in his state for any reason.

The move was just one part of his broad embrace of the often coercive power of the government to push back on the private decisions of corporations, banks, academies of higher learning and the national media. He has argued that these institutions now make up an “anointed” regime of elite thought that threatens the country, and that Silicon Valley companies are operating in a way “probably unforeseen by the founding fathers.”'


Of course, DeSantis is not alone among the right pursuing coercive, authoritarian conservative government; indeed, conservatism itself is coercive and authoritarian.
the premise of the OP is a lie,,

theres nothing more coercive than the democrat agenda,,,
 
'Back when he was a member of the House Freedom Caucus, Ron DeSantis embraced a classic conservative argument about the threats to American freedom posed by government regulation of the internet.

“If you want government to exercise a power that you like right now, someone else can come in and exercise that power in a way you don’t like,” he said to applause at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in 2017. “Why don’t we just deny government the power to do it to begin with, and let the American people have a free internet and make their own choices?”

Just a few years later, DeSantis reversed himself as Florida’s governor, claiming that technology companies and their political views had become the real threat to liberty. Far from government being the problem, as former president Ronald Reagan had famously argued, DeSantis offered a new law as the solution. He signed a bill that imposed fines of up to $250,000 a day on social media companies that deplatformed candidates for office in his state for any reason.

The move was just one part of his broad embrace of the often coercive power of the government to push back on the private decisions of corporations, banks, academies of higher learning and the national media. He has argued that these institutions now make up an “anointed” regime of elite thought that threatens the country, and that Silicon Valley companies are operating in a way “probably unforeseen by the founding fathers.”'


Of course, DeSantis is not alone among the right pursuing coercive, authoritarian conservative government; indeed, conservatism itself is coercive and authoritarian.
The right finally wakes up a little & fights back against your authoritarian tactics & you can't handle it.
Those tech companies chose a side so now they can deal with the consequences.
They wouldn't have a problem now if they had stayed the neutral non-biased platform they are supposed to be if they want those protections.
 
'Back when he was a member of the House Freedom Caucus, Ron DeSantis embraced a classic conservative argument about the threats to American freedom posed by government regulation of the internet.

“If you want government to exercise a power that you like right now, someone else can come in and exercise that power in a way you don’t like,” he said to applause at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in 2017. “Why don’t we just deny government the power to do it to begin with, and let the American people have a free internet and make their own choices?”

Just a few years later, DeSantis reversed himself as Florida’s governor, claiming that technology companies and their political views had become the real threat to liberty. Far from government being the problem, as former president Ronald Reagan had famously argued, DeSantis offered a new law as the solution. He signed a bill that imposed fines of up to $250,000 a day on social media companies that deplatformed candidates for office in his state for any reason.

The move was just one part of his broad embrace of the often coercive power of the government to push back on the private decisions of corporations, banks, academies of higher learning and the national media. He has argued that these institutions now make up an “anointed” regime of elite thought that threatens the country, and that Silicon Valley companies are operating in a way “probably unforeseen by the founding fathers.”'


Of course, DeSantis is not alone among the right pursuing coercive, authoritarian conservative government; indeed, conservatism itself is coercive and authoritarian.
Why are you whining? Other governors are even more extreme than DeSantis (Kalifornia, Michigan), so what? You wackos can go live where you want while we real Americans choose the states like Florida and South Carolina where American values are still supported.
 
'Back when he was a member of the House Freedom Caucus, Ron DeSantis embraced a classic conservative argument about the threats to American freedom posed by government regulation of the internet.

“If you want government to exercise a power that you like right now, someone else can come in and exercise that power in a way you don’t like,” he said to applause at Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University in 2017. “Why don’t we just deny government the power to do it to begin with, and let the American people have a free internet and make their own choices?”

Just a few years later, DeSantis reversed himself as Florida’s governor, claiming that technology companies and their political views had become the real threat to liberty. Far from government being the problem, as former president Ronald Reagan had famously argued, DeSantis offered a new law as the solution. He signed a bill that imposed fines of up to $250,000 a day on social media companies that deplatformed candidates for office in his state for any reason.

The move was just one part of his broad embrace of the often coercive power of the government to push back on the private decisions of corporations, banks, academies of higher learning and the national media. He has argued that these institutions now make up an “anointed” regime of elite thought that threatens the country, and that Silicon Valley companies are operating in a way “probably unforeseen by the founding fathers.”'


Of course, DeSantis is not alone among the right pursuing coercive, authoritarian conservative government; indeed, conservatism itself is coercive and authoritarian.


Any time we have a good thing going, someone will push it to the limit. In this case, social media platforms went over the limits of decency. This is why we have retarded traffic laws, because people can't behave themselves and act decent. It's why we have sexual harassments laws. And even those laws get abused by people suing others who didn't actually harassed them.

Social media and the MSM do more to influence elections that the politicians themselves do. Anyone from any country in the world, if they're computer savvy enough, can gather thousands, or even tens of thousands of votes for a bad candidate.
It our responsibility as citizens and voters to fact check things we find online. So the buck stops with us. But most people won't double check anything. If it's what they want to see, then to them it's facts.

I think that for the most part, government tries to not get involved in most things. But when it starts effecting them, like Twitter banning politicians accounts, or allowing a fact to be squelched about something political (Hunter Biden), then it's inevitable for government to step in.

I'm a small government conservative. But I can understand why social media platforms need to be monitored and forced to stay honest. They're a HUGE influence on our election process.
If the internet was just a place to go to learn how to fix your mower, get new air fryer recipes and change a water pump on your 1972 Ford 351, then there'd be no need for the government to hold social media accountable.
 

Forum List

Back
Top