Role of humans in the Global warming scheme

[EMH]

Hang on folks, you are not to blame for Global Warming and this proves you are not.

Climate Etc. Read on blog or Reader Role of Humans in the Global Water Cycle and Impacts on Climate Change​ By curryja on August 4, 2024 by Bruce Peachey and Nobuo Maeda Contemporary climate models only include the impact of water vapor as positive feedback on warming; the impact of direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor has not been seriously considered. ​ Continue reading Role of Humans in the Global Water Cycle and Impacts on Climate Change by Bruce Peachey and Nobuo Maeda Contemporary climate models only include the impact of water vapor as positive feedback on warming; the impact of direct anthropogenic emissions of water vapor has … judithcurry.com

Whether it is Co2 or water vapor, the explanation that the atmosphere is the cause of Earth climate change is completely blown away by the truth that in the past

1 million
50k
20k
10k

years


GREENLAND FROZE WHILE NORTH AMERICA THAWED




So every time you parrot another "gas is the cause" bullshit piece, it is ALREADY COMPLETELY DISCREDITED....

 

[elektra]

Did you just make that up? I'd have thought if that was a true story, you'd have provided a link.

It is a true story, links have been given dozens of times. If you think it is not true, try and link to the study so we can all see that you are a liar.

Everytime you post anything about the scientific consensus, your links prove thousands of scientists were never asked.

Asking for links is a desperate attempt on your part, crick

 

[Crick]

It is a true story, links have been given dozens of times. If you think it is not true, try and link to the study so we can all see that you are a liar.

Everytime you post anything about the scientific consensus, your links prove thousands of scientists were never asked.

Asking for links is a desperate attempt on your part, crick

LINK?

 

[elektra]

LINK?

Go ahead, link. You have before, you made the claim, it is on you to link

 

[task0778]

It’s important to remember that scientists always focus on the evidence, not on opinions. Scientific evidence continues to show that human activities (primarily the human burning of fossil fuels) have warmed Earth’s surface and its ocean basins, which in turn have continued to impact Earth’s climate. This is based on over a century of scientific evidence forming the structural backbone of today's civilization.

Science is done by scientists. IOW, people who have their own agendas and biases. The 'evidence' obtained from experiments and observation depends on the objectivity and integrity of those who conduct them, and it is quite possible to arrange a desired outcome simply by changing the input parameters and assumptions and the process itself. The sad truth is that politics is invasive in Science as well as everywhere else, and therefore is untrustworthy.

So, what do we do about it? Well, when it comes to global warming and climate change we see an alarming trend: every fucking study and trend that portends disaster has been wrong. And these people want trillions of dollars to fight a problem that they have been wrong about for some 30+ years. Sorry, no more.

 

[EMH]

Science is done by scientists. IOW, people who have their own agendas and biases. The 'evidence' obtained from experiments and observation depends on the objectivity and integrity of those who conduct them, and it is quite possible to arrange a desired outcome simply by changing the input parameters and assumptions and the process itself. The sad truth is that politics is invasive in Science as well as everywhere else, and therefore is untrustworthy.

So, what do we do about it? Well, when it comes to global warming and climate change we see an alarming trend: every fucking study and trend that portends disaster has been wrong. And these people want trillions of dollars to fight a problem that they have been wrong about for some 30+ years. Sorry, no more.

THIS is all we ever needed, and should've shut it down decades ago...


THEORY = increasing atmospheric Co2 causes atmospheric warming

DATA = two and only two measures of atmospheric temps, satellites and balloons

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

"satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling."



Translation from NBC slant = the highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed precisely NO WARMING in the atmosphere during decades of rising Co2


Science says = THEORY REJECTED

politicized "the science" "climate science" says FUDGE THE DATA AND CLAIM "WARMING" THAT DOES NOT EXIST