martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 93,422
- 43,672
- 2,300
Both parties are guilty of trying to apply unconstitutional filters to the nomination process for SCOTUS. Just because something is precedent does not mean it is constitutional.
Prior to the civil rights movement SCOTUS upheld segregation....something that was never constitutional.
Which the Roe nuts conveniently ignore. Wasn't overturning Plessey in violation of Stare Decisis?