Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!



i. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 240722 {post•12338}. Blisterfinger Jun’24 Srvwgo: Tell me all about your morality with abortion. blstrfngr 240721 Vrvwgo12338


ii. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!
240722 {post•12341}.

NotfooledbyW 240722 Vrvwgo: I became a dad at twenty with my high school girlfriend. She become a nineteen year old mom. Four years later we had our second daughter. My wife could not take the pill so I got a vasectomy. I have never produced a child that I did not want to keep and raise and be the best dad I can be and I know I never did and never will get my wife pregnant and insist that she terminate that pregnancy.

So why do you want state governments to force full term gestation on women whom you do not know and who do not worship the same God according to your religion? Why do you need to invade the privacy of women who would never invade yours?

nfbw 240722 Vrvwgo12341
 
Last edited:
i. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!! 240722 {post•12338}. Blisterfinger Jun’24 Srvwgo: Tell me all about your morality with abortion. blstrfngr 240721 Vrvwgo12338


ii. Roe v. Wade getting overturned!!
240722 {post•12341}.

NotfooledbyW 240722 Vrvwgo: I became a dad at twenty with my high school girlfriend. She become a nineteen year old mom. Four years later we had our second daughter. My wife could not take the pill so I got a vasectomy. I have never produced a child that I did not want to keep and raise and be the best dad I can be and I know I never did and never will get my wife pregnant and insist that she terminate that pregnancy.

So why do you want state governments to force full term gestation on women whom you do not know and who do not worship the same God according to your religion? Why do you need to invade the privacy of women who would never invade yours?

nfbw 240722 Vrvwgo12341
You didn't answer my question, should I answer yours ? You want abortions up to 9 months ? How about after birth ? What is the question of Morality In that? I really don't care about your personal history. you keep posting the same old shit over and over again it gets kind of boring.
 
You want abortions up to 9 months ?
I answered that in nfbw 240722 Vrvwgo12341

The only woman that was impregnated by me gave birth to my two daughters. I don’t have to worry about it anymore. So no. I didnt want any involvement in any abortions when I could get a woman pregnant and now I will never be involved in a relationship with a pregnant woman so why would you ask me again if I ā€œwantā€ abortions from 6 weeks to nine months.

And there is no such thing as an abortion after childbirth.
 
Last edited:
I answered that in nfbw 240722 Vrvwgo12341

The only woman that was impregnated by me gave birth to my two daughters. I don’t have to worry about it anymore. So no. I didnt want any involvement in any abortions when I could get a woman pregnant and now I will never be involved in a relationship with a pregnant woman so why would you ask me again if I ā€œwantā€ abortions from 6 weeks to nine months.

And there is no such thing as an abortion after childbirth.
Why are you on here advocating abortion?
 
I am not an advocate for abortion. I am opposed to religion in government forcing full term gestation on pregnant woman who do not accept taking the risk of giving birth.
I'm not totally against abortion . Even though I don't like it and think it should be rare . There has to be some regulation on abortion just as there is on many things. I as well have never aborted any children. It is a good feeling. Are you opposed to all laws that may have a religious inflection?
 
" Fee Lance Psycho Logic All Absent Fee Press Endorsement Or Censure "

* Political Science First Principles Of States And Citizens In Nature *

What is the psychobabble?
Typically it is political science from first principles , which overwhelms less valid schema .

Prior to entering into a social civil agreement to improve safety and security , all are subject to a moral relativism within nature - an indifference for event outcomes , and to improve ones probability for survival and for quality of life , then natural freedoms are exchanged for membership in a collective as a greater individual .

A state is comprised of citizens whose constitutional protections are instantiated through a live birth that is the only non incidental and non trivial requirement to become a citizen and , by equitable doctrine , live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen , and any us citizen is entitled legal standing to prevail that proscription of abortion violates the equal protection clause of us 14th amendment .


* Logically Of Course That None In Jurisprudence Should Need Explained *

The basis of roe v wade , as related by black mun , whom wrote the majority opinion , is direct and succinct and in paraphrase states this - " Logically , of course , a legitimate state interest ... not ... prior to live birth . " .

The black mun discerned that given an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth then the requirement of parturition was relative and natural viability was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement .

The roe v wade ruled that states interests could begin at post natural viability and that states could proscribe abortion in third trimester where the developmental stage was referred to as a potential life , as logically , of course , when a state requires live birth to become a citizen , equitable doctrine implies that equal protection , with its concomitant rite to life , is contingent upon a live birth requirement .

The basis of roe v wade has not ever been a rite to privacy , as publicly observable behavior remains discretionary .


* Lying Traitorous Deceitful Seditious Judicial Incompetence Against Of Course Logic *

"Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting ā€œpotential life,ā€ it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis forthis line, and even abortion supporters have found it hardto defend Roe’s reasoning."
 
Last edited:
" Anthropocentric Psychopaths Revile Independence Of The Us Citizen "

* Sanctimonious Sacrosanct Freak Farmer Fanatics *

I'm not totally against abortion . Even though I don't like it and think it should be rare . There has to be some regulation on abortion just as there is on many things. I as well have never aborted any children. It is a good feeling. Are you opposed to all laws that may have a religious inflection?
There is a difference between without cause and with cause abortion .

The without cause abortions are medical abortions that are typically elected by end of first trimester , assuming availability of services .

The with cause abortions are elected due to developmental anomalies , that are detected through ultrasound between 13 and 20 weeks of development , assuming availability of services , and are more likely to occur through dilation and curettage ( d&c ) , while at this stage of development individuals want to deliver a healthy child .

The sanctimonious sacrosanct feign alliances with goad , to substantiate the vain arrogance of its anthropocentric psychopathy , as freak farmer fanatics , as traitors against principles of us republic that promote independence of the individual for determining life , liberty and pursuit of happiness for themselves .
 
" Anthropocentric Psychopaths Revile Independence Of The Us Citizen "

* Sanctimonious Sacrosanct Freak Farmer Fanatics *


There is a difference between without cause and with cause abortion .

The without cause abortions are medical abortions that are typically elected by end of first trimester , assuming availability of services .

The with cause abortions are elected due to developmental anomalies , that are detected through ultrasound between 13 and 20 weeks of development , assuming availability of services , and are more likely to occur through dilation and curettage ( d&c ) , while at this stage of development individuals want to deliver a healthy child .

The sanctimonious sacrosanct feign alliances with goad , to substantiate the vain arrogance of its anthropocentric psychopathy , as freak farmer fanatics , as traitors against principles of us republic that promote independence of the individual for determining life , liberty and pursuit of happiness for themselves .

. Wow what a bunch of crap

" Anthropocentric Psychopaths Revile Independence Of The Us Citizen "

* Sanctimonious Sacrosanct Freak Farmer Fanatics *


There is a difference between without cause and with cause abortion .

The without cause abortions are medical abortions that are typically elected by end of first trimester , assuming availability of services .

The with cause abortions are elected due to developmental anomalies , that are detected through ultrasound between 13 and 20 weeks of development , assuming availability of services , and are more likely to occur through dilation and curettage ( d&c ) , while at this stage of development individuals want to deliver a healthy child .

The sanctimonious sacrosanct feign alliances with goad , to substantiate the vain arrogance of its anthropocentric psychopathy , as freak farmer fanatics , as traitors against principles of us republic that promote independence of the individual for determining life , liberty and pursuit of happiness for themselves .
Wow what a bunch of crap that is. Whoa you're an idiot
 
" Fee Lance Psycho Logic All Absent Fee Press Endorsement Or Censure "

* Political Science First Principles Of States And Citizens In Nature *


Typically it is political science from first principles , which overwhelms less valid schema .

Prior to entering into a social civil agreement to improve safety and security , all are subject to a moral relativism within nature - an indifference for event outcomes , and to improve ones probability for survival and for quality of life , then natural freedoms are exchanged for membership in a collective as a greater individual .

A state is comprised of citizens whose constitutional protections are instantiated through a live birth that is the only non incidental and non trivial requirement to become a citizen and , by equitable doctrine , live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen , and any us citizen is entitled legal standing to prevail that proscription of abortion violates the equal protection clause of us 14th amendment .


* Logically Of Course That None In Jurisprudence Should Need Explained *

The basis of roe v wade , as related by black mun , whom wrote the majority opinion , is direct and succinct and in paraphrase states this - " Logically , of course , a legitimate state interest ... not ... prior to live birth . " .

The black mun discerned that given an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth then the requirement of parturition was relative and natural viability was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement .

The roe v wade ruled that states interests could begin at post natural viability and that states could proscribe abortion in third trimester where the developmental stage was referred to as a potential life , as logically , of course , when a state requires live birth to become a citizen , equitable doctrine implies that equal protection , with its concomitant rite to life , is contingent upon a live birth requirement .

The basis of roe v wade has not ever been a rite to privacy , as publicly observable behavior remains discretionary .


* Lying Traitorous Deceitful Seditious Judicial Incompetence Against Of Course Logic *

"Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting ā€œpotential life,ā€ it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis forthis line, and even abortion supporters have found it hardto defend Roe’s reasoning."
So more psychobabble. Thanks LOL
 
" Fee Lance Psycho Logic All Absent Fee Press Endorsement Or Censure "

* Political Science First Principles Of States And Citizens In Nature *


Typically it is political science from first principles , which overwhelms less valid schema .

Prior to entering into a social civil agreement to improve safety and security , all are subject to a moral relativism within nature - an indifference for event outcomes , and to improve ones probability for survival and for quality of life , then natural freedoms are exchanged for membership in a collective as a greater individual .

A state is comprised of citizens whose constitutional protections are instantiated through a live birth that is the only non incidental and non trivial requirement to become a citizen and , by equitable doctrine , live birth is required for equal protection with a citizen , and any us citizen is entitled legal standing to prevail that proscription of abortion violates the equal protection clause of us 14th amendment .


* Logically Of Course That None In Jurisprudence Should Need Explained *

The basis of roe v wade , as related by black mun , whom wrote the majority opinion , is direct and succinct and in paraphrase states this - " Logically , of course , a legitimate state interest ... not ... prior to live birth . " .

The black mun discerned that given an ability for a fetus to survive an imminent live birth then the requirement of parturition was relative and natural viability was substituted in lieu of a live birth requirement .

The roe v wade ruled that states interests could begin at post natural viability and that states could proscribe abortion in third trimester where the developmental stage was referred to as a potential life , as logically , of course , when a state requires live birth to become a citizen , equitable doctrine implies that equal protection , with its concomitant rite to life , is contingent upon a live birth requirement .

The basis of roe v wade has not ever been a rite to privacy , as publicly observable behavior remains discretionary .


* Lying Traitorous Deceitful Seditious Judicial Incompetence Against Of Course Logic *

"Although the Court acknowledged that States had a legitimate interest in protecting ā€œpotential life,ā€ it found that this interest could not justify any restriction on pre-viability abortions. The Court did not explain the basis forthis line, and even abortion supporters have found it hardto defend Roe’s reasoning."
What an absolute waste of time, you must really be stupid
 
" Limp Busted Nuts Hiding Behind Populous Derpivation Of Informed Consent "

* Little League Name Calls Feigning Surmise Though Idiot Card *

Wow what a bunch of crap that is. Whoa you're an idiot
|So more psychobabble. Thanks LOL
What an absolute waste of time, you must really be stupid
Actually , ad hominem does not work on the level of acumen forwarded by this moniker .

A morpheme is a smallest inflection of sound with which meaning is associated , while eponyms are combinations of morphemes whereby written languages are constructed .

Each language identifies itself with an idiom that relegates non standard idiom of a common language to a realm of idiocy and its actors as idiots .

Try to remember that you is second person accusative and as a consequence of reflection also self incriminating .



 
Last edited:
" Limp Busted Nuts Hiding Behind Populous Derpivation Of Informed Consent "

* Little League Name Calls Feigning Surmise Though Idiot Card *




Actually , ad hominem does not work on the level of acumen forwarded by this moniker .

A morpheme is a smallest inflection of sound with which meaning is associated , while eponyms are combinations of morphemes whereby written languages are constructed .

Each language identifies itself with an idiom that relegates non standard idiom of a common language to a realm of idiocy and its actors as idiots .

Try to remember that you is second person accusative and as a consequence of reflection also self incriminating .



How do you survive being such an idiot?
 
" Paradigm Shift Versus Bleating Sheeple "

* Arrogance Guided And Affirmed By A Fee Press Remiss Of Informed Consent *

How do you survive being such an idiot?
The standard of idiocy depends on an ability to understand and apply an idiom , and it seems that the sanctimonious , sacrosanct , freak , farmer , fanatic ewes with anthropocentric psychosis and a common lunar tick penchant for sin and luciferian mythology are the actual idiots , because the implications and deductions from black mun statement , " logically , of course , a legitimate state interest . . not . . prior to live birth " are obvious and clear to all but the disingenuous or the intellectually retarded .
 
Tell me fooledby do you respect no law that might have religious background as its Foundation?
I respect all laws that are based on public safety and protecting the rights of every person on this planet who has become on a normally memorialized date separated at birth from his or her birthmother.

Laws against what people do in private that displeased this Gid or that God have no place in America. so no I do not respect those.
 
I respect all laws that are based on public safety and protecting the rights of every person on this planet who has become on a normally memorialized date separated at birth from his or her birthmother.

Laws against what people do in private that displeased this Gid or that God have no place in America. so no I do not respect those.
Rights are given to People by God not by governments. Who are you to decide what is good for people and what is not? I think you give yourself way too much credit
 
Rights are given to People by God
It’s not the God of Abraham . You seem to be confused about the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. The former refers to ā€œNatures Godā€ and the latter refers to no particular God or religion.
 
Last edited:
Who are you to decide what is good for people and what is not?
I am not decided that.

I am advocating the opposite of that,

You are deciding to force women to give birth when they choose it’s better for them not to give birth. I am against that,
 
Back
Top Bottom