FETUS at GESTATION AGE 16 WEEKS: “I cannot think therefore I ain’t”
NFBW: There is no scientific, humane, moral, religious, philosophical or common sense reason for a pro-choice person to be as
Unkotare sermonized on January 11, 2022 in POST -
#813 telling me that I am trying to falsely convince myself that my pro-choice position is not inherently immoral.
Unkotare expresses the absurd and pitifully weak and unscientific main MAGA “Baby Killer” argument against a political position that favors women having full autonomy over their own bodies at a time when they carry
a fetus that has no brain of it’s own and the mother’s brain is what keeps that brainless and therefore braindead fetus alive.
The remaining exchanges are reference material that prove there is no science to the
pro-brainless-life mobilized movement in America.
THEREFORE ONLY thinking humans seriously devoted to reason truth, facts and politics need read further as well as all those who have joined the ranks of civilized humanity who favor using the brain that god or mother nature gave them to good use for the betterment of mankind.
••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
NFBW: Republicans are facing an "intellectual and moral and political collapse" as they turn to increasingly anti-democracy and anti-free speech and anti-“freedom of conscience” unAmerican conduct. •••• MAGA’s now have DeSantis appeasing Putin as the leader of white Christian Russia who do not want Trump’s mentor to be defeated by “woke” Ukrainians getting help from Joe Biden, •••• Opposition to Dobbs and anti-choice politicians has to be what stops pro/Putin MAGA voters from giving Putin his genocidal control of Ukraine less than a century after the Holocaust of European Jews. Zelinski is Jewish so we must as patriotic Americans devoted to protecting democracy not ending it, have his back,
•
Reference: January 14, 2022 USMB Keeping political outrage against Dobbs and more DEM wins alive:
BobB220527-
#57 to:0055 “A human being is a human being, at every stage of his life.”
NFBW: to
Bob Blaylock 0055 : “What you say is not in dispute. Fact is during the earliest stage of a human being’s prenatal development it has no brain. It can’t say “I think therefore I am” …. Think about it if you have a brain.o
ChuzLife190202-
#76 • Funny that we have just as much evidence (I think significantly more) to support the fact that a child's life begins at conception, than we have in the way of evidence to "prove" the theories of gravity, evolution . . . . {etc}
Flopper190202-
#87 to:0076
Flopper • “The question of whether a human life begins at conception or birth or some stage of development is something science can't answer because it depends on how a person defines a human life and there is certainly strong difference of opinion on that issue. Theories are based on accepted truths.”
ChuzLife190202-
#89 to:0087 •
Chuz Life • Really? •••• Are you claiming that human beings somehow MORPH out of one organism that is NOT a human being and into an organism that
NFBW: to
Chuz Life 0089 • it’s a living human organism at conception, but at conception the human organism does not have a brain making it unlike all of us persons who post on this message board.
RogueAI220114-
#312 00.0 • “The theory of gravity can be tested in laboratories across the planet, each netting the same result. The theory of evolution, not so
RogueAI220114-
#325 to:0322 • “You’re not a scientist or are science literate are you ? •••• If you want to speak volumes about science . , at least look up the word “science” in a dictionary”
RogueAI220114-
#340 • “I am very much in support of science and the betterment of our species. I do not support the broken orthodoxy that seems to have bogged down modern science.”
Dagosa220114-
#341 to:0334 • Not any monkey. Only the common ancestral of both. It isn’t like an ape today will evolve into a man. They have no need. Their environment doesn’t demand it.
CaptCaveman220114-#339 to:0336 • The only thing you know for sure on this earth is, "I think, therefore I am". You know you exist, anything past that is open to interpretation.
RogueAI220114-
#347 to:0341 • The problem I see is in the practice. The theory can only account for so much. Taking the 'common ancestors' into account sounds fine on paper yet attempting to apply the idea even theoretically requires some significant leaps of faith. Nor does this relate to just one or two species, but multiple species over time. The boundaries of logic begin to fray when attempting to accept the numerous inter-species breeding, each resulting in viable offspring who then usurp both progenitor species, not once but multiple times. Do the math on that and perhaps you too will begin to question current orthodoxy
Dagosa220114-
#354 to:0347 • So, what’s your point ?
If it could account for everything, we’d call it a religion. That’s NOT. what science is all about. We aren’t expected to have all the answers. Only by expanding a theory beyond the limits of the prevailing evidence by inject more, can one improve upon their understanding.
you deniers have no idea how far reaching evolution theory is. Get you head out of fix news ass and do some research at any medical science or any science web site…..or are you too afraid.
Food, climate change, medicine etc are all related to evolution. Afraid to Google ?
RogueAI220114-
#358 to:0354 • Deniers only exist in the closed minds of True Believers. You can't explain things and have a hissy fit when confronted. It is dolts like you that have closed off innovation and news lines of thinking in continued support of broken orthodoxy.
AbuAfac220114-
#365 to:0358 YOU ARE THE DENIER AND A FRAUD. •••• You can't answer me denier. .•••• THIRD TIME
AbuAfac220114-
#365 to:0312
abu afak • We have overwhelming Physical evidence for Evolution. •••• What in Court would be called "Proof beyond a reasonable doubt." •••• A great circumstantial case, plenty good enough to hang a man. ••••
(
Captain Caveman too) But true proof, as sci would use it is not 90%. Not 99.9%. •••• Only math has absolute 100% 'proof' (2+2=4) •••• Some sciences, like astronomy, are also not lab-able but observational. •••• Though the Hard evidence for Evo has been piling up for 160 years. •••• Many new sciences since, and all relevant ones not only don't contradict it, but some help confirm it. (lab-tested DNA, Isotopic dating, etc), •••• And all new found fossils consistent in age/strata, and in finding tweeners that only Evolution (not creationism) could and does predict. •••• One fossil out of place of millions found could have blown it. None has.
RogueAI220114-
#370 to:0365 • You only accept ideas that confirm your preconceptions and lash out like children by proclaiming any dissent is denial of science.
0371 AbuAfak220114-
#371 to:0370 • We all have ideas. •••• Apparently you can't explain or defend yours. •••• Show me I'm wrong. •••• That's what this place is for. It's not for worship. •••• We do have a religion section tho. •••• Problem is you can't defend your belief v mine (what I posted to you) and you know it. •••• So it's YOU who are the denier.
0372 RogueAI220114-#372 to:0371 • Funny I have never mentioned or argued religion anywhere on these forums.
0402 AbuAfak220115-
#402 to:0372 • Still whiffed my post and it's facts THREE
NFBW221105-
#806 to:2284 • While true,
it is true also that a new genetically distinct human being that has never existed before and will never exist again factually and in all reality lives it’s first 24 weeks during pregnancy as a biologically functioning part of an existing genetically distinct human being that has never existed before and will never exist again, and she has a natural right to terminate her own pregnancy in private and in order to prevent harm to herself and to her economic conditions in life. • No scientist is able to prove, using any science available to humankind, that a woman does not have that natural right. It is your religion that decides that for you. So if you believe that a woman is murdering an innocent unborn life if she decides to terminate her own pregnsncy, don’t get an abortion if you get pregnant and don’t Herschel Walker a woman if you do get a woman pregnant.
Unkotare221105-#813 to:0806 • Keep trying to convince yourself that your pro-death position isn't inherently immoral.
ding220716-
#2,284 ding “At conception a very specific human being has come into existence. One that has never existed before and will never exist again. Each state can decide for themselves when rights are conveyed.”
ZEN’d2302230759
