Now that the law has been overturned, they can shore up the legalities to the wording of a medical necessity.
This isn't rocket science, and nobody is trying to kill anyone who needs a medical procedure.
Sheesh you guys are pulling out all the stops.
yes on the safety of the justices and no the constitution doesnt say the government should take care of people regardless of what the good book says,,It's in the Book of Matthew, which I listened to last night on James Earl Jones reading of the New Testament. It's also mentioned in the first or second chapter of Daniel, which I read last month. I was trying to reread the Old Testament books I hadn't read in a spell earlier this year. Now that I got James Earl Jones cds, I finally am getting to reread the books I have read numerous times in years ago. I think it's a few chapters past the Sermon on the Mount which seems to my memory is in or around Chapter 5, but it's before Chapter 16. lol I listened to the first 16 chapters of Matthew last night.
Not exactly. The Declaration/or/Constitution mimics the good book by declaring all men are created equal, and the new Amendments added when the war between the States was over forbad slavery, through the Equal Rights for Women amendment. It took America 100 years to stop slavery and give voting rights to black men, and another 60 or 70 years to give women voting rights and equal opportunities for all. The New Testament was written a couple of thousand years ago, and it warned mankind that in Christ there is no east or west, meaning we are to help one another on equal terms, regardless of race, clan, sex, etc. We have three branches of government. The once were in accordance with the Bible, but now, with the Executive Branch and the House Chairman, not to mention the Senate majority leader who threatened two Justices by name a few days ago, I'm not sure why they are ignoring Constitutional law that forbids the harrassment of the Judical Branch justices when they are deciding the legality of truly bad earlier judgments that resulted in the deaths of 70,000,000 Americans with a decision that ignored the fact that a child in the womb is not the mother's body, and the mother is not the human being in her stomach area.
By the way, I've put the safety and happiness of our beloved Justices on my prayer list. They are just doing their job, and the majority of them placed abortion decisions in the states where its people live, which the earlier court failed to see. It would have seen if it knew one case would cause 70,000,000 "legalistic" murders of the unborn future American citizens and hard-hitting the dna handed down from the Founders to end in the 70,000,000 children who died before birth. Each state needs to figure out for itself where science places the beginning of a human life. Right now, it's apparent the DNA of a human zygote has the answer whether there are one or two human beings in the same body.
It's clear to me that the small human being with different DNA sequences than either parent is not its mother's body. Not by a long shot.
You're a liar. Lose your job or get the vaccine.
Poverty is not a personal choice, but a reflection of our society. Our culture ignores the root causes which are shaped by society and beyond the control of the individual. Like any disease dealing with the symptoms, crime, drugs, and deteriorating neighborhoods is not a cure it only relives the symptoms. It doesn't matter where the money comes from. If it does deal with the source of the problem, the children, then the money at best will only relieve current suffering and will do little to fix the problem.
You are the LIAR
Patently false.
Government help? So now taking my money at the point of a gun is helping me to donate to charity? And an armed robber robbing me in Manhattan is just helping me be more biblical by donating to the poor robber?
No way to know that. Speculation.
When women are delayed in getting an abortion, they will often change their mind. When they're traveling with the thought of killing their baby on their mind the entire time, many will turn around and go home.
It's not necessarily over, especially as long as the doctrine of substantive due process stands. It could and should be argued that the life of the baby cannot be taken without due process and that the government giving permission to doctors and mothers to take that life violates substantive due process or procedural due process or both. In such a case they would have to, it seems to me, rule that life begins at conception.
So in one post you suggest that Congress can pass a law to make abortion a federal right and the Court would uphold it. Then in this post you suggest that if Congress were to pass a national ban on abortion the Court would be required to overturn it as a States Rights issue. Talk about having it both ways.
Bull crap
Fetal pain as it has been called is simply a reaction to a stimulus. It is not perceived by the fetus in the way and adult perceives pain creating anxiety, fear, and need to escape . Typically a fetus will not experience fetal until 26 week of gestation and very few can experience it during the 1st trimester when 90% of abortions occur.
That's true. I can only tell you how I feel as a conservative. I assume other conservatives feel like I do.
Most certainly. I feel like the left is trying hard to destroy him and his family and all of his companies and all of his employees. If they succeed, it is certainly possible that he becomes a pauper from no fault of his own. That is the classic case of for whom conservatives do have empathy.
Same thing; work or fight. I fight my own Republican congress person because he's a fraud. I donate to his primary opponents. I do what I can.
Wow. This is just sad. Your vote is bought with just a knock on the door? He didn't even have to give you a schilling and you sold your vote? No care for whether his plans or goals align with what you believe, you like him personally?
You just want to date her.
If the court overturned every law that is not in strict adherence to the constitution and without interpretations imposed by the philosophy of the living constitution, it would destroy the Unites States as we know it today. I'm sure many conservatives would welcome it because they hate this country as it is today believing that a new nation founded on the constitution as founders wrote it would arise out of the ashes. Thankfully, there are few that share these beliefs.
