Republicans try but can't change history

[Correll]

Why would I fear terrorists who are in jail? As always, you make no sense.

Aw look. YOu pretended to be retarded to dodge my point. How original.


FUCK OFF.

 

[Correll]

Translation: you're full of shit.

No, my words to you were much worse than just you being full of shit. ANd I stand by them. Fucktard.

 

[MarcATL]

Translation: you're full of shit.

Bingo!

 

[Faun]

No, my words to you were much worse than just you being full of shit. ANd I stand by them. Fucktard.

LOL

Who cares that you stand by your hollow deflection?

 

[Correll]

LOL

Who cares that you stand by your hollow deflection?

Any how, speaking of deflections.


Back to the topic.


The 1/6 riot was a riot, ie a violent crime, committed by quite a number of people. They should face Justice, with due process and all their rights respected.


That the leftards are trying to inflate that riot into...something it was not, is them justifying their next level of escalation.


Which will be, even more use of government force against their political enemies.

 

[Faun]

Any how, speaking of deflections.


Back to the topic.


The 1/6 riot was a riot, ie a violent crime, committed by quite a number of people. They should face Justice, with due process and all their rights respected.


That the leftards are trying to inflate that riot into...something it was not, is them justifying their next level of escalation.


Which will be, even more use of government force against their political enemies.

Insurrection Day was an attempt to subvert our Constitution to prevent the Congressional certification of a duly elected president.

BLM riots were not that ^^^

Deflect away.

 

[Coyote]

By your standards if I carry a spork i'm armed.

Are you kidding? More and more they are pushing the



You got a mob led by political radicals intent on an "insurrection", the mob leaders would have a mechanism in mind for it to work.


You got a mob that is just rioting, because they are pissed off. Then no, they would not think about a mechanism.



That's the point. It was a riot, NOT an insurrection.

What you are doing is splitting hairs and playing games with semantics. The mob was a mixture of people from those with a plan to use violence in an attempt to overturn an election (they certainly believed Trump would back them) to those who got swept up in the moment. Their mechanism? Violence.

 

[Correll]

Insurrection Day was an attempt to subvert our Constitution to prevent the Congressional certification of a duly elected president.

BLM riots were not that ^^^

Deflect away.

Right. Our one little riot, is worse than your 4 years of riots, cause, reasons.

 

[Correll]

What you are doing is splitting hairs and playing games with semantics. The mob was a mixture of people from those with a plan to use violence in an attempt to overturn an election (they certainly believed Trump would back them) to those who got swept up in the moment. Their mechanism? Violence.

No, YOU are the one playing games with semantics. Violence is not a "mechanism", it is at best PART of a mechanism.

There was no way that the events of that day would have done any more than they did, a slight delay in a formality.

 

[martybegan]

When do angry fired up mobs think about mechanisms?

Being an insurrectionist requires an actual ability to perform an insurrection, which is why all the charges have been trespass, assault, and interfering with government workers/property.

Unlike the CHAZ/CHOP people who actually took over portions of a city FOR MONTHS, and haven't been charged for an ACTUAL insurrection.

 

[danielpalos]

No, YOU are the one playing games with semantics. Violence is not a "mechanism", it is at best PART of a mechanism.

There was no way that the events of that day would have done any more than they did, a slight delay in a formality.

Their Intent was all that matters for legal purposes. Mens rea matters.

 

[Faun]

Right. Our one little riot, is worse than your 4 years of riots, cause, reasons.


View attachment 518410

Yeah, that reason being the attempt to void the Constitution. Nothing as important as some black thug throwing a Molotov cocktail at a building.

 

[Correll]

Their Intent was all that matters for legal purposes. Mens rea matters.

Sayihng legal purposes, when Dems are involved is like...well, your normal speaking in gibberish.

 

[Correll]

Yeah, that reason being the attempt to void the Constitution. Nothing as important as some black thug throwing a Molotov cocktail at a building.

Your excuses are dismissed as partisan nonsense. That has repeatedly been refuted. YOu are a liar.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Insurrection Day was an attempt to subvert our Constitution to prevent the Congressional certification of a duly elected president.

BLM riots were not that ^^^

Deflect away.

CHAZ was precisely gthe same thing. Supported and defended by the left. No deflection but deny away

 

[Faun]

Your excuses are dismissed as partisan nonsense. That has repeatedly been refuted. YOu are a liar.

LOL

Not my problem you're too retarded to comprehend the difference.

 

[Faun]

CHAZ was precisely gthe same thing. Supported and defended by the left. No deflection but deny away

CHAZ in no way threatened our Constitution.

Try harder next time.

 

[Oddball]

Being an insurrectionist requires an actual ability to perform an insurrection, which is why all the charges have been trespass, assault, and interfering with government workers/property.

Unlike the CHAZ/CHOP people who actually took over portions of a city FOR MONTHS, and haven't been charged for an ACTUAL insurrection.

And she's the deflecting aand projecting balloon head accusing others of playing semantic games.

Ima need to order a dozen irony-o-meters off of Evilbay today....Just this morning, several of them have been blown up.

 

[Soupnazi630]

CHAZ in no way threatened our Constitution.

Try harder next time.

Wrong

They overthrew local ELECTED government whiuch is also basded on constitutional law.

You are either lying or stupid but you are wrong DEAL WITH IT

 

[danielpalos]

Sayihng legal purposes, when Dems are involved is like...well, your normal speaking in gibberish.

Wrong

They overthrew local ELECTED government whiuch is also basded on constitutional law.

You are either lying or stupid but you are wrong DEAL WITH IT

How did they do that? And, "squatting" is not the same as actively trying to "sabotage" due process of Government.