Republicans now stand for lawlessness and disorder

I cited the case of Philando Castile above.

He did not attack the cop.

Neither did Daniel Shaver. Neither did Tamir Rice. Neither did Eric Garner. Neither did Freddie Gray. Neither did John Crawford.
Let's cut the chase to figure out why so few bad cops are worse than so many Blacks murdering so many Blacks....
Practice in a slum or Limousine Liberal.
 
They aren’t wacko but defunding the police isnt mainstream. Neither is school loan forgiveness. Nor is the green new deal. HOWEVER all of those are aspiration ideas that have a more nuanced and palatable solutions: Biden’s environmental compromise with Bernie, funding for mental health and police education, public service loan forgiveness, bankruptcy loan revisions. They generally pin the accelerator down on ideas. Democrats are actually moderate. Not everyone like that.
Actually, the polling suggests that their ideas are more mainstream than advertised. Just check the polling on the issues.
The Blacks in NYC and Chicago are screaming for more cops but that might put you out of business.
 
Let's cut the chase to figure out why so few bad cops are worse than so many Blacks murdering so many Blacks....
Practice in a slum or Limousine Liberal.
We expect accountability for everyone. What's wrong with that?
 
Let's cut the chase to figure out why so few bad cops are worse than so many Blacks murdering so many Blacks....
Practice in a slum or Limousine Liberal.
We expect accountability for everyone. What's wrong with that?
Unlike yourself I expect thugs who misbehave to be accountable.
Slum, MD or Limousine, MD.?
Of course you won't answer because you're obviously one of them and rather irrational.
 
Unlike yourself I expect thugs who misbehave to be accountable.
Unlike me?

I also expect thugs who misbehave to be accountable. Accountability among the police has been a little spotty. Police aren't super keen on policing themselves.
Uh huh.
You know why thugs in Nassau County aren't thugs?
Because if a cop shoots their brains out Whitey won't allow a riot and won't convict the cop.
 
You know why thugs in Nassau County aren't thugs?
Because if a cop shoots their brains out Whitey won't allow a riot and won't convict the cop.
Some people are more tolerant of police brutality than others. That’s not an exaggeration.
 
You know why thugs in Nassau County aren't thugs?
Because if a cop shoots their brains out Whitey won't allow a riot and won't convict the cop.
Some people are more tolerant of police brutality than others. That’s not an exaggeration.
Some people are more tolerant of police doing their job on an inveterate thug than on an inveterate thug.
You can spread all the fertilizer you wish but I have zero sympathy for drug addicts who beat the shit out of their spouses and kids.
 
A bullshit partisan OP with no examples aside from trying to pin 1/6 on Trump <again>.
Look at the big blue cities becoming unlivable due to the rampant crime, and then compare that lawlessness to the 1/6 protest, while totally ignoring all of the blm/antifa riots of 2020.

We'll find out in 2022 and 2024 what kind of country voters want to live in.
There are multiple examples I’m the link. I’d have to paste the whole article in because it’s so thorough. Take the assault on roe v wade in Texas where laws are being passed to circumvent it or any number of election legislation being passed.
1. Everyone can see that the democrat (defund, no bail, no prosecution) policies are NOT working for law abiding citizens.
2. There is no assault on Roe v Wade. If the laws are not legal the USSC will tell us.
3. Same with the states revising election laws, 1t is their Constitutional right to run elections, if unless the USSC steps in.
 
Excellent piece in the WaPo about the Republican approach to law. Say what you want about Republicans but they sure know how to navigate over the edges of ethics and law.


Republicans, once upon a time, fancied themselves as defenders of “law and order.” The essence of the hackneyed phrase was that the law should be dependable, apply impartially and act as a restraint on those in power. Courts were to respect precedent so individuals and civil society could rely on predictable laws. Unlike dictatorships, where “law” is a flimsy facade that autocrats use to further their interests and to intimidate and confuse opponents, Western democracies, conservatives once boasted, delinked the power of the ruler from the operation of the law, making the latter supreme.


No more. Since the disgraced former president took office, Republicans have adopted a different notion of the law. They seek to render it unpredictable, increase the discretion of the state (when their side is in control), and attempt to accomplish what would otherwise be politically untenable through misdirection and harassment
.

In short, Republicans are taking refuge in Kafkaesque rule-making that empowers individuals and state authorities to harass, intimidate and confuse Americans attempting to exercise their fundamental rights. The law becomes a partisan tool to wage against opponents and to further otherwise unpopular social objectives (e.g., criminalizing abortion). It is a recipe for partisan legal administration and election nullification. If they cannot win elections and defend their policy objectives, Republicans appear willing to burn down democratic elections and “equal justice under the law.”
Clean up your house then come see us. Until then pound sand.
 
Excellent piece in the WaPo about the Republican approach to law. Say what you want about Republicans but they sure know how to navigate over the edges of ethics and law.


Republicans, once upon a time, fancied themselves as defenders of “law and order.” The essence of the hackneyed phrase was that the law should be dependable, apply impartially and act as a restraint on those in power. Courts were to respect precedent so individuals and civil society could rely on predictable laws. Unlike dictatorships, where “law” is a flimsy facade that autocrats use to further their interests and to intimidate and confuse opponents, Western democracies, conservatives once boasted, delinked the power of the ruler from the operation of the law, making the latter supreme.


No more. Since the disgraced former president took office, Republicans have adopted a different notion of the law. They seek to render it unpredictable, increase the discretion of the state (when their side is in control), and attempt to accomplish what would otherwise be politically untenable through misdirection and harassment
.

In short, Republicans are taking refuge in Kafkaesque rule-making that empowers individuals and state authorities to harass, intimidate and confuse Americans attempting to exercise their fundamental rights. The law becomes a partisan tool to wage against opponents and to further otherwise unpopular social objectives (e.g., criminalizing abortion). It is a recipe for partisan legal administration and election nullification. If they cannot win elections and defend their policy objectives, Republicans appear willing to burn down democratic elections and “equal justice under the law.”
you think blacks are incompetent and that is racist
 
Op-ed by Jennifer Rubin, a Berkley educated liberal who makes a freaking living at WaPo trashing conservatives. That's all she does. It seems that liberals still ain't aware that they won the election or they ain't happy with what they have.
 
Op-ed by Jennifer Rubin, a Berkley educated liberal who makes a freaking living at WaPo trashing conservatives. That's all she does. It seems that liberals still ain't aware that they won the election or they ain't happy with what they have.
Circle Back Psaki announced from the podium a week or so ago that it was the Republicans who were pushing to defund the police. The Sheep in the press dutifully start to parrot those lies, and the idiot OP buys them hook, line, and sinker.

He is an idiot.
 
A bullshit partisan OP with no examples aside from trying to pin 1/6 on Trump <again>.
Look at the big blue cities becoming unlivable due to the rampant crime, and then compare that lawlessness to the 1/6 protest, while totally ignoring all of the blm/antifa riots of 2020.

We'll find out in 2022 and 2024 what kind of country voters want to live in.
There are multiple examples I’m the link. I’d have to paste the whole article in because it’s so thorough. Take the assault on roe v wade in Texas where laws are being passed to circumvent it or any number of election legislation being passed.
AP News says you’re full of shit.
Give me a red city that is doing well with law and order please. Also how can you support a party that is so destructive to law and order? Democratic Party leaders aren’t looting Targets yet Republican leaders ARE looting democracy and rights.
the scum demonRAT party criminals are looting cities, and people , and democracy and rights.
 
the scum demonRAT party criminals are looting cities, and people , and democracy and rights
Why do you call names? I think it comes from a place of insecurity. Can’t argue the facts use demonrats and socialist marxists in a sentence. Doesn’t even need to make sense. You got this right wing logic thing down cold.
 
the scum demonRAT party criminals are looting cities, and people , and democracy and rights
Why do you call names? I think it comes from a place of insecurity. Can’t argue the facts use demonrats and socialist marxists in a sentence. Doesn’t even need to make sense. You got this right wing logic thing down cold.
no names...its the name of the anti-AMERICA party---scum demonRATS
i don't care if it offends you, or anybody.......they say the TRUTH hurts
 
no names...its the name of the anti-AMERICA party---scum demonRATS
i don't care if it offends you, or anybody.......they say the TRUTH hurts
Like I said insecure. Your entire feed is devoid of intellect or arguments. Just name calling. That’s no way to go through life. Angry and uninformed.
 

Forum List

Back
Top