When has Trump ever told the truth?Says you with no evidence. That makes you a liar.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When has Trump ever told the truth?Says you with no evidence. That makes you a liar.
JC are you dumb or what. You think they were just left on the floor you retarded idiot???
LOLOLOL.........We'll sort it out dingleberry
Nah, I’d love to….but I can’t find any leftist willing to back up their assertions….And you’re proving to be no different…Debates require people to read and respond to arguments.
Something you’ve decided not to do.
not everyone can be a certified genius like you sweet cheeksYou want to claim that the entire FBI is willing to lie just to unfairly target trump. That is one of the stupidest things I have ever heard, and I have read a lot of stupid right wing posts.
We get it…lefties hate Trump….When has Trump ever told the truth?
No, you don't get it......Trump lies!We get it…lefties hate Trump….
Hi Coyote . No. I think your questions are a bit partisan. But a President taking temporary possession of documents isn’t concerning at all. Why should it be? And if “refusing” [sic] to return them was so concerning, why would the NA and government lawyers have engaged in “negotiations” over them for so long?Putting aside partisanship….and any what abouts, doesn’t it concern you that those documents were first, taken by Trump and second, refused to be returned?
It isn’t serious national security if it has been declassified.That is serious national security information. If it was deliberate, why?
How so?Even claiming it was declassified is still horrible.
Maybe there’s not legitimate reason for them to remain classified? You don’t seem to include that possibility on your argument.It means he cared so little (or was dangerously stupid) that he had not problem with those documents becoming publically available even to foreign governments.
Of course you can. You’re just not trying.This is what I simply cannot understand.
No, I do get it … people like you wake up every morning sneering at the mirror saying how much you hate Trump….Well, get prepared, He’s going to be your President again if he runs.No, you don't get it......Trump lies!
Another brain dead question from little Dildo_really.When has Trump ever told the truth?
This country is not going to elect a wannabe Russian!No, I do get it … people like you wake up every morning sneering at the mirror saying how much you hate Trump….Well, get prepared, He’s going to be your President again if he runs.
Right, because our miliary wouldn't fight to protect the blue cities as hard as they would to protect the red ones. You know you are an idiot, right?And that is why if they come to our territory in a war many will help them. They will take deep blue cities over easily anyway.
But do you always have to gather all the crazies into one big pile?not everyone can be a certified genius like you sweet cheeks
Lol….this is going to be fun to watch your melt down….This country is not going to elect a wannabe Russian!
I'm not a patty melt.Lol….this is going to be fun to watch your melt down….
I'm not a patty melt.
I disagree.Hi Coyote . No. I think your questions are a bit partisan.
But a President taking temporary possession of documents isn’t concerning at all. Why should it be?
I think that answer is easy. They are dealing with an ex president in an unprecedented and sensitive situation With potential for a lot of fall out. You and I would not be treated that way.And if “refusing” [sic] to return them was so concerning, why would the NA and government lawyers have engaged in “negotiations” over them for so long?
It isn’t serious national security if it has been declassified.
Maybe, but if so, why wasn’t it done through normal channels?How so?
Maybe there’s not legitimate reason for them to remain classified? You don’t seem to include that possibility on your argument.
Of course you can. You’re just not trying.
I disagree.
A bit less.Because he hasn’t been president for two years
Not 1.5 years even. So?AND there are laws that define what a president is supposed to do with them when he leaves office, not two years later.
So, you imagine this is unprecedented? Any support for that?I think that answer is easy. They are dealing with an ex president in an unprecedented and sensitive situation With potential for a lot of fall out.
I don’t plan on ever being President or former President. However, the PRA is still not a criminal statute.You and I would not be treated that way.
That doesn’t mean much since you and I don’t know what was classified. What were they classified for? For example, did they classify something to conceal some of their own prior behavior? If an agent’s director has knowingly engaged in “official” behavior of a “dubious” nature for partisan political reasons, the paperwork would be best kept untraveled. Hey! Maybe we mark it “top secret.” That just might work! (Their subjective reason to mark it “classified” might not have any relationship to a genuine concern.)It is either way. If it was declassified it was done so outside of normal channels and procedures, which means no checks and balances or agency input. No president “knows” everything about everything. They can’t. That’s why why the have a team of advisors and specialists. Based on statements to date that did not happen. The supposed “declassification” was unilateral and sloppy.
When was it done? I can’t claim to know. But I’ll assume you don’t know, either. What if this was material he was reviewing concerning the “Russia Russia Russia” nonsense of the “Pee tapes” or maybe some information about the Ukrainian bribery matter or some information about the questioned election activity? I’d say any person could reasonably conclude that the need for confidentiality in those “cases” was bullshit.Maybe, but if so, why wasn’t it done through normal channels?
I don’t know. Do you? Heck, for that matter, on what basis do you claim that they actually did contain such information? The fact that some FBI agent(s) said so it that the DOJ claimed it? I wonder if they are reliable here?How often are top secret documents containing information on our agents and assets completely declassified?
Is what good? Your speculation? It’s ok. I guess the better question is “is it true?” Or, are you (just possibly) being misled?Question to you: is this good?
You’re allowed.
A bit less.
Not 1.5 years even. So?
So, you imagine this is unprecedented? Any support for that?
You don’t have to be POTUS….rich, famous…that’ll help.I don’t plan on ever being President or former President. However, the PRA is still not a criminal statute.
That doesn’t mean much since you and I don’t know what was classified. What were they classified for?
For example, did they classify something to conceal some of their own prior behavior? If an agent’s director has knowingly engaged in “official” behavior of a “dubious” nature for partisan political reasons, the paperwork would be best kept untraveled. Hey! Maybe we mark it “top secret.” That just might work! (Their subjective reason to mark it “classified” might not have any relationship to a genuine concern.)
Was it done? The only thing we is that 588 days, 17 hours and 38 minutes after he lost his job, he is claiming he de-classified them. Without any evidence or corroboration.When was it done? I can’t claim to know. But I’ll assume you don’t know, either.
What if this was material he was reviewing concerning the “Russia Russia Russia” nonsense of the “Pee tapes” or maybe some information about the Ukrainian bribery matter or some information about the questioned election activity? I’d say any person could reasonably conclude that the need for confidentiality in those “cases” was bullshit.
The National Archive identified missing material, so it isn’t just the DoJ.I don’t know. Do you? Heck, for that matter, on what basis do you claim that they actually did contain such information? The fact that some FBI agent(s) said so it that the DOJ claimed it? I wonder if they are reliable here?
Is what good? Your speculation? It’s ok. I guess the better question is “is it true?” Or, are you (just possibly) being misled?
What reason?By the way. I’m not claiming I know, either. But I have reason the believe that this search warrant thing isn’t what it appears to be.
No, I do get it … people like you wake up every morning sneering at the mirror saying how much you hate Trump….Well, get prepared, He’s going to be your President again if he runs.
Only a fool bets politics….you a fool sure enoughWanna make a 2 tier bet?
I'll bet you 50 bucks that Trump will not run again.
If Trump does for whatever reason decide to throw his hat in the ring again, I'll bet you 1,000 dollars that he doesn't win. Hell, even if he does throw his hat in the ring, he's gonna be extremely lucky if he makes it through the primaries and becomes the GOP candidate again. Republicans are starting to see who he really is, and he's starting to become toxic to them.