Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No it's actually the truth and you or any of the other racist republicans can handle it. It's what you bitches always do when you have no rebuttal.
No, you just are too much of a fucktard to teach anyone anything beneficial to a human being.When you can't dispute the facts...
And Republicans are the KKK today.
... but whatever you say, snowflake.
What exactly does this have to do with The Republican record on race in America?Shame black countries traded their people for slavery. Shame slavery still exists in some black African communities as well.
Ancient history, only interesting to nerds and race baiters.Some of the Republicans here are clearly ignorant of their record on race.
The racist history of the Democratic party is well documented. The Democratic Party was founded in 1828. Slavery had been in this country since at least 1619. Slavery existed for 209 years before the democratic party existed. Republicans today love telling blacks how the Democratic Party was pro-slavery and how it was the Republican Party that freed the slaves. There is a lot modern republicans choose not to tell blacks as they try luring blacks into supporting a move back into Jim Crow. First, not all Republicans were for racial equality. The Party had several factions in the beginning. One was the Radical Republicans. The Radical Republicans were for the eradication of slavery. They were not conservatives. Frederick Douglass was a Radical Republican. Lincoln was moderate politically. He opposed the expansion of slavery but did not believe in racial equality.
“I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black ... I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be a position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
Those who have studied Lincoln claim that his views evolved. Did they? The Second Confiscation Act in 1862 had provisions for the colonization of blacks who chose to leave. Both Dr. Henry Louis Gates and the 1619 Project have written about a meeting between blacks and Lincoln whereby he made insulting comments to them, blamed blacks for the Civil War, and demanded they accept his plan to resettle blacks outside of America. According to both sources, on Aug. 14, 1862, Lincoln met with black representatives at the White House to try getting blacks to accept getting shipped out of the country. They refused.
Arthur Zilversmit, Lincoln and the Problem of Race: A Decade of Interpretations, Journal of the Abraham Lincoln Association, Volume 2, Issue 1, 1980, pp. 22-45, U-M Library Digital Collections j/jala/2629860.0002.104?view=text;rgn=main
Henry Louis Gates Jr., Did Lincoln Want to Ship Black People Back to Africa? https://www.theroot.com/did-lincoln-want-to-ship-black people-back-to-africa-1790858389
End of Pt.1
When you can't dispute the facts...
And here is more white fragility. Way off topic, a personal attack, all because he can't dispute the lies he's trying to tell about the republican party.No, you just are too much of a fucktard to teach anyone anything beneficial to a human being.
What "facts" am I disputing, dickhead?
The fact that you're a total dumbass and that all you want is "reparations" for being black?
If so, you're pretty fragile, brah. Best not mess with me; I'll break you and your stupidity.
Another bout of white fragility. A white man, ignorant of history trolling.Let me know when you get around to some real facts.
Facts are truth which stand on their own and cannot be disputed.
You're nothing but a white-hating, victimizing race-baiter.
Fact.
So what? Rush taught right and wrong. Sharpton and Jackson taught to hate, divisiveness, and victimhood. See the difference?Rush Limbaugh died worth 800 million dollars. He died being worth 80 to 100 times worth more than Al Sharpton or Jackson and Jackson is a college graduate. He was a nobody selling peanuts at Royals games who flunked out of college. He got rich race baiting whites. Each of the men you mention have admitted progress, but the fact is we still have a ways to go. "Progress" according to white extremists is not progess in the black community.
Harris roasted Biden for being a racist in the Democrat debates ... then sold herself for the price of being his VP.
Biden's bff was a Grand Wizard of the KKK.
What part of what I asserted isn't true?And here is more white fragility. Way off topic, a personal attack, all because he can't dispute the lies he's trying to tell about the republican party.
Look at this Uncle Tom StepNFetch for a Grand Wizard..naw, he was higher than that, of the Ku Klux Klan.Here we see more off topic white fragility. You and others here are republican and white supremacists, so shut the fuck up about Robert Byrd.
They cleared everybody out and poof! There's my grandma! Wtf?!
Betting against that would be stupid.
I have asked that you not use the word kaffir. Kaffir is the South African n word. Do not try using Asian when you comment because Asians face the same white racism as we do. Now as I don't give a damn what you're not concerned about and your ignorance is apparent in this discussion. This is the topic:Obviously you are and always will be.
I personally don't care about the situation of Black Americans before 1960 (unlike Lefties&Libs who also care more about animals then humans) - since it is part of history - which no one can change. And has absolutely no impact on today's US Black community.
I care only about what Black Africans did/achieved form 1960 onward or rather 1970 - by themselves - and not waiting for others to do everything for them.
In 1960 if a Chinese Singaporean (I grew up in that country) was walking on the wrong designated side of the road - it wouldn't have been a surprise that some English master used a cane to beat him up or to make him walk or bypass in a certain distance. Pure fucking racism. If a Chinese was not of Roman Catholic faith he was barred from entering a Catholic school (the best ones at the time). If he was not of wealthy and prominent status - No Chinese was allowed to enter European clubs or becoming a member.
So they formed their own clubs, schools and business associations - just as they had already done for a thousand years and more- due to an existing culture.
The same applied to e.g. Malaysia or Indonesia (where the Dutch beat the locals around) or in Indochina by the French. Very and exceptionally different from how Filipinos were treated by their American masters. Yes there was segregation in parts till 1930, but no latent racism of White Americans towards Filipinos. This already proves that White Americans were far less racist then their European Colonial counterparts.
As I had stated before already many times - all these South-East-Asian countries became independent nations from 1950 and 1960 onward - and ALL developed and managed to enhance their living style and sociology-culture. Totally in contra to the disaster in Africa. The latter due to reasons you simply refuse to acknowledge.
And in the USA the vast majority of Blacks - were and are foremost not willing to adapt to the White system - that had granted them the same rights and e.g. access to education and all state run institutions, as well as the private sector as to any other race or ethnicity in the USA. And after 50 years the majority of Black Americans is behaving exactly as their brothers and sisters in Africa, wild, unruly and asocial.
And people like you try to play others for stupid - fabricating nonsense about poor Black Americans being at a disadvantage due to supposed White, Asian and Jewish racism. Whilst again ignoring as to how Kaffir's managed to totally fuck up, previous enhanced and rich African countries, they themselves live in. If Black Americans would run the USA - they would manage to do exactly the same to the USA, and then ask Europeans and anyone else they can get a hold off - to send them money.
There is another black racist here whose favorite word is "cuck" to describe white men.Someone thinks saying "white fragility" over and over is a substitute for an intellectual point. Lulz.
What exactly does this have to do with The Republican record on race in America?
Because what you said is not accurate and there are slaves in white European countries today.
Not to mention Alabama and Mississippi.Poor fellow, he doesn't wanna talk about racism within his own party, nor how his people make slaves of his own people.
Slavery in the Sahel states of Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Chad and Sudan in particular, continues a centuries-old pattern of hereditary servitude. Other forms of traditional slavery exist in parts of Ghana, Benin, Togo and Nigeria.
I know what America was, an I also know that Anthony Johnson was neither the first slave owner nor is the guy pictured Anthony Johnson.America wasnt the United States moron it was a Colony of England, who brought not only black indentured servants, but white indentured servants also, and when their contract was over after 7 years they would be free and get land to plow as a free person. But and there is always a but, a black man sued the courts to keep his servants and won, so that was the first slaves of the New World, thanks to a black man..
I think you have achieved Super Fucktardedness.I know what America was, an I also know that Anthony Johnson was neither the first slave owner nor is the guy pictured Anthony Johnson.
The First Slave Owner in America Was Not a Black Man
The Claim
A Black man named Anthony Johnson was the first person to own slaves in America.
Emerging story
Over the last several years, this claim has been widely circulated through blogs, memes, articles, and videos.
In 1640, an indentured servant named John Punch was the first man sentenced to lifelong slavery for attempting to flee from his servitude. Therefore, Hugh Gwyn, the owner of Punch, is recognized as the first legal slave owner in America. Additionally, a man named Samuel Maverick is said to have arrived in Boston with two slaves as far back as 1624.
The image that is often shared with the inaccurate claim does not feature Johnson either, but rather ex-slave and prominent abolitionist Lewis Hayden. Photography was not invented until the 1830s, more than a century after Johnson’s death in 1670.
الصفحة الرئيسية | مسبار
misbar.com
Seem like you're projecting since the tread is about the Republican record on race, not slavery in Africa. Blacks did not make Jim Crow in America. Republicans helped do that by ending reconstruction and 4 votes out of 7 that made separate but equal the law of this land. You seem unable to discuss this and if you want to talk about what happened in Africa, start a thread.Poor fellow, he doesn't wanna talk about racism within his own party, nor how his people make slaves of his own people.
Slavery in the Sahel states of Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Chad and Sudan in particular, continues a centuries-old pattern of hereditary servitude. Other forms of traditional slavery exist in parts of Ghana, Benin, Togo and Nigeria.
