Republicans lead us to Marxism, Dems saving us from it

[Blues Man]

Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.

FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.

SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.

1. Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
2. Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
3. Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)

THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.

CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.


LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades

View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf

Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins

The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...

www.gmo.com

View attachment 495795

Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation

This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …

ntguardian.wordpress.com

Productivity has been driven by technology not laborers.

It used to be a skilled craftsman was needed for the production of many goods. Now any moron who can learn how to push a button can turn out more products in a day than a team of skilled craftsmen could in months.

Not according to Marxist, they think people demanded a computer so labor invented it and built it

they think people demanded a television so labor invented it and built it

they think people demanded a cellphone so labor invented it and built it


they think people demanded a pocket fisherman so labor invented it and built it

When in reality it's all just the opposite

 

[22lcidw]

Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.

FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.

SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.

1. Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
2. Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
3. Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)

THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.

CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.


LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades

View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf

Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins

The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...

www.gmo.com

View attachment 495795

Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation

This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …

ntguardian.wordpress.com

The problem with all your babble is you refuse to see that even the lowest income people have a far better life than poor did 200 years ago. Everyone’s life standard is raised, as opposed to Marxist run shit holes where their living standards are flushed down the toilet.

I don’t know a single Marxist. What the hell are you babbling about? I’m pushing to avoid the Marxist progression. Don’t you see the Republican platform is pushing us to Marxism?

Yeah. that's the way you avoid pushing us to the Marxist progression, by pushing us closer to it. That's what every Marxist says.

You're an idiot.

You haven’t offered anything up except “no you’re an idiot”. The unbalance in wealth and income is dangerous to our National fabric. Are you not worried about it at all? What do you suggest to move us back to closer historical levels or wealth and income distribution?

1. Raise capital gains tax to equal income tax.
2. Raise taxes only on $400k and up
3. Raise minimum wage to $15
4. Guarantee healthcare access to all.
5. Raise corporate taxes to historic levels - it was 35% under Clinton’s balanced budget
6. Guarantee college access to all
7. Cut corporate welfare of kickbacks to favored industries
8. Reduce military spending
9. Increase infrastructure spending
10. Guarantee daycare access to employed.

Is it dangerous? Says who? History shows that the minute a society starts moving closer to a amore even distribution of wealth the result is a revolution. No matter how even the distribution of wealth, scum like you will claim it's "extreme." One thing we know, the recommendations of leftwing radicals are dangerous.

I suggest you take all your share-the-wealth schemes and stick them where the sun don't shine. One thing that moved us away from a more even distribution of wealth is the demand of union assholes that prevented so-called "hostile takeovers." Those are how you get rid of entrenched management with multi-million dollar salaries. Every time leftwingers try to fix something, they make it worse.

Scum? Im a father of 2 boys, one in Medical School, the other still in high school, spent 10 years as an Elder at a mega church, have been on mission trips overseas and I’m generally an all around nice guy who makes a boatload of 1% money as an executive.

I happen to think there is too much imbalance in equity right now. Why is the current proportion optimal? Why is any restructuring a slide towards evil? What can’t we make some adjustments to improve the balance?

Perhaps you never worked with bums or people who do not have to do all the things others must. And not worried to be judged by that as some might.

 

[Turtlesoup]

Oh by the way, down here in Florida McDonalds is offering starting positions $12 and hour, Buc-Ees is 15 dollars an hour. More than the minimum wage of the state of Florida. Supply and demand...Not Marxism...

View attachment 495803

I saw a TacoBELL in Sarasota offering a $500 sign on bonus for employees last week. WaWA gas station in my area is doing the same...........We are hurting for employees out here.......but home and rent prices have shot up so much that attracting people willing to work these jobs not able to afford to live here.

 

[John T. Ford]

Not helpful. I already knew you were intolerant.

When being exposed for being the America Haiting Marxist POS you are ....

Play the race card.

So typical.

Racism and Intolerance the very core of Marxism you Dumbass!!

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You’re getting out more from social security than you paid in. High and might leech on society. Your welcome. It’s younger men like me who fund your lifestyle. Plus your generation borrowed $20T dollars from those of Us still working in debt. Those roads you drive on are unpaid. You are a dead beat. The nerve really.

Clearly the answer is to kill all the "leeches" who have the nerve to still exist in a society that was
created this way long before they themselves were born.
I hope you understand how it is when you hit your date of termination in this "Logan's Run" world
you clearly imply support for.

And I hope you don't forget all the other dead beats that can't or won't pull their own weight.
I.E. anyone on any form of government assistance. All illegals of course, because what they take
out of the public kitty can't possibly be covered by what uneducated, unskilled menial workers
put in, if they put anything at all into government coffers, which they don't (save for sales tax
on cigarettes and beer, which is a pitifully small amount).

As far as borrowing $20 trillion dollars from you, blame should go where it belongs.
And if Big Spending Joe Biden, and friends and supporters, have their way that's not all they
want to take from you and the people who will come long after you.

Of course your precious put upon generation is but one link in a theoretical chain. And those behind
you will be bailing your sorry ass out. So maybe you should pull up your diapers and get
back to work, you ingrate bitch.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Not according to Marxist, they think people demanded a computer so labor invented it and built it

they think people demanded a television so labor invented it and built it

they think people demanded a cellphone so labor invented it and built it


they think people demanded a pocket fisherman so labor invented it and built it

Karl Marx himself was a lazy mostly unemployed bum. He was jealous that some people were
hard working industrious types with a drive that far surpassed his own, of which there was none.

So he spent much of his time in beer halls drinking and bitching about the rich.
And he developed a philosophy that justified his gimme, gimme gimme ideas.

And other weak minded fools liked the idea of simply taking the money of the rich and
giving it to the other envious slobs like Marx himself.