Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Scum? Im a father of 2 boys, one in Medical School, the other still in high school, spent 10 years as an Elder at a mega church, have been on mission trips overseas and I’m generally an all around nice guy who makes a boatload of 1% money as an executive.You haven’t offered anything up except “no you’re an idiot”. The unbalance in wealth and income is dangerous to our National fabric. Are you not worried about it at all? What do you suggest to move us back to closer historical levels or wealth and income distribution?Yeah. that's the way you avoid pushing us to the Marxist progression, by pushing us closer to it. That's what every Marxist says.I don’t know a single Marxist. What the hell are you babbling about? I’m pushing to avoid the Marxist progression. Don’t you see the Republican platform is pushing us to Marxism?The problem with all your babble is you refuse to see that even the lowest income people have a far better life than poor did 200 years ago. Everyone’s life standard is raised, as opposed to Marxist run shit holes where their living standards are flushed down the toilet.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795
Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …ntguardian.wordpress.com
You're an idiot.
Is it dangerous? Says who? History shows that the minute a society starts moving closer to a amore even distribution of wealth the result is a revolution. No matter how even the distribution of wealth, scum like you will claim it's "extreme." One thing we know, the recommendations of leftwing radicals are dangerous.1. Raise capital gains tax to equal income tax.
2. Raise taxes only on $400k and up
3. Raise minimum wage to $15
4. Guarantee healthcare access to all.
5. Raise corporate taxes to historic levels - it was 35% under Clinton’s balanced budget
6. Guarantee college access to all
7. Cut corporate welfare of kickbacks to favored industries
8. Reduce military spending
9. Increase infrastructure spending
10. Guarantee daycare access to employed.
I suggest you take all your share-the-wealth schemes and stick them where the sun don't shine. One thing that moved us away from a more even distribution of wealth is the demand of union assholes that prevented so-called "hostile takeovers." Those are how you get rid of entrenched management with multi-million dollar salaries. Every time leftwingers try to fix something, they make it worse.
Not helpful. I already knew you were intolerant.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …
Leftism is clearly a Mental Disorder ....
Keep in mind this Leftist POS does not believe the Marxist Propaganda he is pushing ....
He knows EVERYTHING about the Left is a LIE !!!
He knows he is pushing Marxist propaganda ....
And, he trolls ALL who call him out.
This is the American Left today folks .....
See this Anti-American POS for what he is .....
I'm an atheist, so your religion doesn't impress me.Scum? Im a father of 2 boys, one in Medical School, the other still in high school, spent 10 years as an Elder at a mega church, have been on mission trips overseas and I’m generally an all around nice guy who makes a boatload of 1% money as an executive.You haven’t offered anything up except “no you’re an idiot”. The unbalance in wealth and income is dangerous to our National fabric. Are you not worried about it at all? What do you suggest to move us back to closer historical levels or wealth and income distribution?Yeah. that's the way you avoid pushing us to the Marxist progression, by pushing us closer to it. That's what every Marxist says.I don’t know a single Marxist. What the hell are you babbling about? I’m pushing to avoid the Marxist progression. Don’t you see the Republican platform is pushing us to Marxism?The problem with all your babble is you refuse to see that even the lowest income people have a far better life than poor did 200 years ago. Everyone’s life standard is raised, as opposed to Marxist run shit holes where their living standards are flushed down the toilet.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …
You're an idiot.
Is it dangerous? Says who? History shows that the minute a society starts moving closer to a amore even distribution of wealth the result is a revolution. No matter how even the distribution of wealth, scum like you will claim it's "extreme." One thing we know, the recommendations of leftwing radicals are dangerous.1. Raise capital gains tax to equal income tax.
2. Raise taxes only on $400k and up
3. Raise minimum wage to $15
4. Guarantee healthcare access to all.
5. Raise corporate taxes to historic levels - it was 35% under Clinton’s balanced budget
6. Guarantee college access to all
7. Cut corporate welfare of kickbacks to favored industries
8. Reduce military spending
9. Increase infrastructure spending
10. Guarantee daycare access to employed.
I suggest you take all your share-the-wealth schemes and stick them where the sun don't shine. One thing that moved us away from a more even distribution of wealth is the demand of union assholes that prevented so-called "hostile takeovers." Those are how you get rid of entrenched management with multi-million dollar salaries. Every time leftwingers try to fix something, they make it worse.
I happen to think there is too much imbalance in equity right now. Why is the current proportion optimal? Why is any restructuring a slide towards evil? What can’t we make some adjustments to improve the balance?
Not equality. That’s a BS goal. A more equal distribution. Heck you guys love the 50’s. It’s way out of balance from then. The right wing for some reason opposes every single attempt to provide a path out for people at the bottom. What gives?I only see one point (#7) that might lead us closer to equality of wealth.
But equality of wealth is a destructive pipe dream anyway.
Doesn’t matter to me your philosophy. Your education level is transparent. What High Schhol did you drop out from?I'm an atheist, so your religion doesn't impress me.Scum? Im a father of 2 boys, one in Medical School, the other still in high school, spent 10 years as an Elder at a mega church, have been on mission trips overseas and I’m generally an all around nice guy who makes a boatload of 1% money as an executive.You haven’t offered anything up except “no you’re an idiot”. The unbalance in wealth and income is dangerous to our National fabric. Are you not worried about it at all? What do you suggest to move us back to closer historical levels or wealth and income distribution?Yeah. that's the way you avoid pushing us to the Marxist progression, by pushing us closer to it. That's what every Marxist says.I don’t know a single Marxist. What the hell are you babbling about? I’m pushing to avoid the Marxist progression. Don’t you see the Republican platform is pushing us to Marxism?The problem with all your babble is you refuse to see that even the lowest income people have a far better life than poor did 200 years ago. Everyone’s life standard is raised, as opposed to Marxist run shit holes where their living standards are flushed down the toilet.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …
You're an idiot.
Is it dangerous? Says who? History shows that the minute a society starts moving closer to a amore even distribution of wealth the result is a revolution. No matter how even the distribution of wealth, scum like you will claim it's "extreme." One thing we know, the recommendations of leftwing radicals are dangerous.1. Raise capital gains tax to equal income tax.
2. Raise taxes only on $400k and up
3. Raise minimum wage to $15
4. Guarantee healthcare access to all.
5. Raise corporate taxes to historic levels - it was 35% under Clinton’s balanced budget
6. Guarantee college access to all
7. Cut corporate welfare of kickbacks to favored industries
8. Reduce military spending
9. Increase infrastructure spending
10. Guarantee daycare access to employed.
I suggest you take all your share-the-wealth schemes and stick them where the sun don't shine. One thing that moved us away from a more even distribution of wealth is the demand of union assholes that prevented so-called "hostile takeovers." Those are how you get rid of entrenched management with multi-million dollar salaries. Every time leftwingers try to fix something, they make it worse.
I happen to think there is too much imbalance in equity right now. Why is the current proportion optimal? Why is any restructuring a slide towards evil? What can’t we make some adjustments to improve the balance?
Every scumbag claims he's a nice guy. You're a Marxist. That's the bottom line.
My argument is clearly laid out. Your preferred platform is self destructive. It’s like trying to swim against a riptide. It will kill you. You have to give into the tide some to end up able to swim out of it.Indeed, how can anything called “Republicans led us to Marxism” be taken seriously? It’s really a satire but these leftwing wackos are so far removed that the satire is real.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …
Quite possibly the dumbest thread ever started here.
Not really. You started this dumbass post. Remember? You claimed the wall was being continued by Biden then you were bitch slapped with reality when the liberals informed you that you were had by Fox News??? Bwahahaha. That was the dumbest thread in a while and you OWN it. Egg meet Fangs face.Quite possibly the dumbest thread ever started here.
www.usmessageboard.com
It's not the government's job to take care of you. Grow the hell up.Minimum wages are so low that they are irrelevant. Your post proves how out of touch the guardrails are and how much the worker is taken advantage of.Who the hell is paying minimum wage besides tip based jobs?
Scum? Im a father of 2 boys, one in Medical School, the other still in high school, spent 10 years as an Elder at a mega church, have been on mission trips overseas and I’m generally an all around nice guy who makes a boatload of 1% money as an executive.You haven’t offered anything up except “no you’re an idiot”. The unbalance in wealth and income is dangerous to our National fabric. Are you not worried about it at all? What do you suggest to move us back to closer historical levels or wealth and income distribution?Yeah. that's the way you avoid pushing us to the Marxist progression, by pushing us closer to it. That's what every Marxist says.I don’t know a single Marxist. What the hell are you babbling about? I’m pushing to avoid the Marxist progression. Don’t you see the Republican platform is pushing us to Marxism?The problem with all your babble is you refuse to see that even the lowest income people have a far better life than poor did 200 years ago. Everyone’s life standard is raised, as opposed to Marxist run shit holes where their living standards are flushed down the toilet.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …
You're an idiot.
Is it dangerous? Says who? History shows that the minute a society starts moving closer to a amore even distribution of wealth the result is a revolution. No matter how even the distribution of wealth, scum like you will claim it's "extreme." One thing we know, the recommendations of leftwing radicals are dangerous.1. Raise capital gains tax to equal income tax.
2. Raise taxes only on $400k and up
3. Raise minimum wage to $15
4. Guarantee healthcare access to all.
5. Raise corporate taxes to historic levels - it was 35% under Clinton’s balanced budget
6. Guarantee college access to all
7. Cut corporate welfare of kickbacks to favored industries
8. Reduce military spending
9. Increase infrastructure spending
10. Guarantee daycare access to employed.
I suggest you take all your share-the-wealth schemes and stick them where the sun don't shine. One thing that moved us away from a more even distribution of wealth is the demand of union assholes that prevented so-called "hostile takeovers." Those are how you get rid of entrenched management with multi-million dollar salaries. Every time leftwingers try to fix something, they make it worse.
I happen to think there is too much imbalance in equity right now. Why is the current proportion optimal? Why is any restructuring a slide towards evil? What can’t we make some adjustments to improve the balance?
What do you do for a living? I bet it gets government handouts.It's not the government's job to take care of you. Grow the hell up.Minimum wages are so low that they are irrelevant. Your post proves how out of touch the guardrails are and how much the worker is taken advantage of.Who the hell is paying minimum wage besides tip based jobs?
What gives with your disingenuous Heads I win, Tails you lose false choices?Not equality. That’s a BS goal. A more equal distribution. Heck you guys love the 50’s. It’s way out of balance from then. The right wing for some reason opposes every single attempt to provide a path out for people at the bottom. What gives?
Non answer.What gives with your disingenuous Heads I win, Tails you lose false choices?Not equality. That’s a BS goal. A more equal distribution. Heck you guys love the 50’s. It’s way out of balance from then. The right wing for some reason opposes every single attempt to provide a path out for people at the bottom. What gives?
I'm retired. I worked from the age of 16 and never got a government handout. I paid into Social Security and Medicare since 1965 and retired in 2012. Every dime I have is mine that I earned.What do you do for a living? I bet it gets government handouts.It's not the government's job to take care of you. Grow the hell up.Minimum wages are so low that they are irrelevant. Your post proves how out of touch the guardrails are and how much the worker is taken advantage of.Who the hell is paying minimum wage besides tip based jobs?
You’re getting out more from social security than you paid in. High and might leech on society. Your welcome. It’s younger men like me who fund your lifestyle. Plus your generation borrowed $20T dollars from those of Us still working in debt. Those roads you drive on are unpaid. You are a dead beat. The nerve really.I'm retired. I worked from the age of 16 and never got a government handout. I paid into Social Security and Medicare since 1965 and retired in 2012. Every dime I have is mine that I earned.What do you do for a living? I bet it gets government handouts.It's not the government's job to take care of you. Grow the hell up.Minimum wages are so low that they are irrelevant. Your post proves how out of touch the guardrails are and how much the worker is taken advantage of.Who the hell is paying minimum wage besides tip based jobs?
www.politifact.com
A more equal distributionNot equality. That’s a BS goal. A more equal distribution. Heck you guys love the 50’s. It’s way out of balance from then. The right wing for some reason opposes every single attempt to provide a path out for people at the bottom. What gives?I only see one point (#7) that might lead us closer to equality of wealth.
But equality of wealth is a destructive pipe dream anyway.
Who is?You’re getting out more from social security than you paid in. High and might leech on society. Your welcome. It’s younger men like me who fund your lifestyle. Plus your generation borrowed $20T dollars from those of Us still working in debt. Those roads you drive on are unpaid. You are a dead beat. The nerve really.I'm retired. I worked from the age of 16 and never got a government handout. I paid into Social Security and Medicare since 1965 and retired in 2012. Every dime I have is mine that I earned.What do you do for a living? I bet it gets government handouts.It's not the government's job to take care of you. Grow the hell up.Minimum wages are so low that they are irrelevant. Your post proves how out of touch the guardrails are and how much the worker is taken advantage of.Who the hell is paying minimum wage besides tip based jobs?
Medicare and Social Security: What you paid compared with what you get
Earlier this week, we published a story and several charts showing that average government spending on each elderly pers
How the fuck does any of that helps me get ahead?You haven’t offered anything up except “no you’re an idiot”. The unbalance in wealth and income is dangerous to our National fabric. Are you not worried about it at all? What do you suggest to move us back to closer historical levels or wealth and income distribution?Yeah. that's the way you avoid pushing us to the Marxist progression, by pushing us closer to it. That's what every Marxist says.I don’t know a single Marxist. What the hell are you babbling about? I’m pushing to avoid the Marxist progression. Don’t you see the Republican platform is pushing us to Marxism?The problem with all your babble is you refuse to see that even the lowest income people have a far better life than poor did 200 years ago. Everyone’s life standard is raised, as opposed to Marxist run shit holes where their living standards are flushed down the toilet.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …
You're an idiot.
1. Raise capital gains tax to equal income tax.
2. Raise taxes only on $400k and up
3. Raise minimum wage to $15
4. Guarantee healthcare access to all.
5. Raise corporate taxes to historic levels - it was 35% under Clinton’s balanced budget
6. Guarantee college access to all
7. Cut corporate welfare of kickbacks to favored industries
8. Reduce military spending
9. Increase infrastructure spending
10. Guarantee daycare access to employed.
Productivity has been driven by technology not laborers.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …
Not according to Marxist, they think people demanded a computer so labor invented it and built itProductivity has been driven by technology not laborers.Republicans are pushing the US towards Marxism while the Democrats are the ones trying to save you from it. Don’t believe me? Look at the evidence.
FIRST, simply Marxism says that ultimately capitalism results in a small group of hyper-winners and an overwhelming number of losers resulting in the losers taking physical control (revolt/revolution) based on a numbers advantage. Then it goes on to suggest some non-class world of utopia.
SECOND, we are steaming towards an inevitable revolution/revolt based on the consolidating number of hyper-winners and overwhelming number of losers, not because of popular culture differences to debate.
- Wages for workers are stagnant in real terms with all the moderate increase coming from top earners (first link)
- Profit margins are at historical highs for capital owners (second/third links)
- Profit margins have been driven by “productivity” increases on the backs of labor without any reward to the worker for being more productive - since the 70’s ripping off the worker has been in vogue as unions dissolved. (Fourth link)
THIRD, this is ALL DRIVEN BY REPUBLICAN POLICY. Republican policies drive lower minimum wages, lower Corporate taxes, fewer corporate regulations to protect workers, shirks providing basic benefits to Americans, and adamantly protects the hoarding of profits through fighting any redistribution tactics of graduated tax rates, inheritance taxes, capital gains.
CONCLUSION, the US capitalism experiment will fail if the Republicans continue to push winners take all losers lose all policies. Giving up some gains to protect the majority of your capital is the only strategy that keeps us in balance. Otherwise the workers will come for all your capital and you are outnumbered. Consider a long term strategy of taking care of the balance or perish in the instability of the only part of Marxism that is inevitable: The large underclass that gets taken advantage of will remediate that imbalance by force.
LINKS:
View attachment 495793
For most Americans, real wages have barely budged for decades
View attachment 495794
https://www.yardeni.com/pub/sp500margin.pdf
View attachment 495795Why We Are Not Worried About Elevated Profit Margins
The U.S. economy faces a severe downturn, which will undoubtedly depress near-term corporate profitability. However, we on the Focused Equity team believe that longer-term concerns about corporate profit margins are overblown. We wanted to share why we remain sanguine that U.S. public companies...www.gmo.com
Did Wages Detach from Productivity in 1973? An Investigation
This is the third and final blog post in my series on income inequality. This post discusses the detachment of compensation from productivity that occured around 1973. I look at the data and use R …
It used to be a skilled craftsman was needed for the production of many goods. Now any moron who can learn how to push a button can turn out more products in a day than a team of skilled craftsmen could in months.
