Republicans have already lost this election

[MarcATL]

There is one thing about the right wing of the Republican party aka (Tea Party member) that they never think about. How do we win the White House. This is usually the last consideration, (if at all that they think about.) Most of them live in conservative states--where most of the candidates they select can win a district, or house seat, or even possibly a U.S. Senate seat--but if an election goes past the state line--they're blind.

A Tea Party member does not know that the Republican Party is the minority party at 41 million, Democrats are stronger at 46 million, and Independents make up for largest voting block in this country, representing 40% of the entire electorate.

For quite some time, a Tea Party member's only news sources comes from 3 or more daily hours of right wing talk radio, and political entertainment programs on FOX news. They typically know nothing else, other than what they have been told by these right wing talk show hosts. If they read anything it will come out of a right wing news site, which of course is written by the right wing. Any other news source is not believed.

They've been repeatedly told that Mitt Romney lost the 2012 election because he was not conservative enough. Why shouldn't they believe it, it came out of Rush Limbaugh's mouth on many occasions and probably several other right wing shows. But the truth is Romney's fate was sealed long before he even became the nominee. Accomplished by the Evangelical wing of the party dragging abortion, who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what is "legal Legitimate rape" questions, which OFFENDED women into Obama's column. Republicans lost women by double digits, younger women by 36 points. This is what secured a 2nd term for Barack Obama.
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-e...der-gap-2012-vote-largest-gallup-history.aspx
How women ruled the 2012 election and where the GOP went wrong - CNNPolitics.com

Regardless though, they didn't know they had a woman problem, they were never told that. They have believed for 4 years that they needed a more conservative candidate. So they found one. His name is Ted Cruz. They have followed him around cheered him on, donated a lot of money to him. Why? Because right wing talk show hosts supported him. "He's conservative enough to win the White House, they think." Ted Cruz would never win Independents or women. He has a far right stance on abortion. This country is center, it always has been, it always will be. Ted Cruz also has another huge problem. He was born in Canada. Now certainly the Tea Party knows that for 4 long years they, along with right wing talk show hosts, and Donald Trump hounded Obama for a birth certificate. He finally produced one showing himself born on U.S. soil, to shut them up. What does the Tea Party do next? They put up a candidate to run for POTUS that was born in Canada. This has to come from a group that is so politically inept--to actually believe that there would be no blow back by supporting a candidate that was actually born in Canada.

So enter Donald Trump. He and his supporters have already managed to chase off another 17% of the population, when Republicans needed at least 46% of this block to win the White House. They are now solidly in the Democrat column. Trump is polling at a negative 75% with Hispanics.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump

So you have the largest voting block (women) that were chased off in 2012, which secured a 2nd term for Barack Obama. Now in 2016 another large voting block (Hispanics) are now in the Democrat column.

It doesn't matter who the GOP nominee is now--the Tea Party has already rino'd itself right into a Hillary Clinton Presidency before the first primary ballot was even cast. And frankly with these numbers it would not surprise me to see Republicans lose the Senate and a ton of seats in the house. What the Trump supporter failed to realize is that Republicans across the entire southwest of this country depend on Hispanics to win elections. Without them, they lose.

I'm shocked that I actually agree with you.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[The Rabbi]

So Hillary's numbers are dwindling while a septagenerian socialist gathers momentum against her. Bloomberg is thinking of a third party run, that will decimate Hillary's numbers even more. And somehow the GOP is in trouble? Nope, don't think so.

That's the problem. In '48 Republicans thought Truman was in trouble because he had Dems running against him from the right and left. Let people think Hillary's wounded. She's still the leader by most metrics.

No, she isnt. Unless you want to count "Unfavorability." Then she is the clear leader.

 

[oreo]

tl;dr

But I can recognize your seasonal brand of sour grapes pretty quickly...you've got a bad case of the redass because your candidate isn't going to win, place or show.

But the good news is, as you've conceded defeat, no need for you to continue posting.

See you in 2019. Buh-bye.

You've already lost this election. It's in the MATH. It's because of your political ignorance. There is no way for Republicans to win this election, regardless of who the GOP nominee is. You have offended women (the largest voting block in 2012) and now in 2016 another large voting block, Hispanics are solidly in the Democrat column.
Column: Trump exploits rational political ignorance

Hillary Clinton is going to paint this country blue from sea to shining sea on Election night. Be assured though that Rush Limbaugh and all the others will be there for you the next morning to give you another B.S. reason as to why you lost. You'll swallow it hook, line & sinker, and then you can start the process all over again for 2020.

There comes a time, like with blacks, who were once Republicans, until President Hoover--that you lose these blocks and they never come back. You're no longer trusted.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

tl;dr

But I can recognize your seasonal brand of sour grapes pretty quickly...you've got a bad case of the redass because your candidate isn't going to win, place or show.

But the good news is, as you've conceded defeat, no need for you to continue posting.

See you in 2019. Buh-bye.

You've lost already. It's because of your political ignorance. There is no way for Republicans to win this election, regardless of who the GOP nominee is. You have offended women (the largest voting block) and now Hispanics another large voting block.

Hillary Clinton is going to paint this country blue from sea to shining sea on Election night. Be assured though that Rush Limbaugh and all the others will be there for you the next morning to give you another B.S. reason as to why you lost. You'll swallow it hook, line & sinker, and then you can start the process all over again for 2020.

So, you think women are going to vote for the woman who covered up years of sexual abuse against women by her husband?

Laughable.

 

[Redfish]

tl;dr

But I can recognize your seasonal brand of sour grapes pretty quickly...you've got a bad case of the redass because your candidate isn't going to win, place or show.

But the good news is, as you've conceded defeat, no need for you to continue posting.

See you in 2019. Buh-bye.

You've lost already. It's because of your political ignorance. There is no way for Republicans to win this election, regardless of who the GOP nominee is. You have offended women (the largest voting block) and now Hispanics another large voting block.

Hillary Clinton is going to paint this country blue from sea to shining sea on Election night. Be assured though that Rush Limbaugh and all the others will be there for you the next morning to give you another B.S. reason as to why you lost. You'll swallow it hook, line & sinker, and then you can start the process all over again for 2020.

So, you think women are going to vote for the woman who covered up years of sexual abuse against women by her husband?

Laughable.

don't you understand? sexual abuse of women is OK if you are a democrat. Lying and corruption are encouraged if you are a democrat. Breaking the law is ignored if you are a democrat.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

tl;dr

But I can recognize your seasonal brand of sour grapes pretty quickly...you've got a bad case of the redass because your candidate isn't going to win, place or show.

But the good news is, as you've conceded defeat, no need for you to continue posting.

See you in 2019. Buh-bye.

You've lost already. It's because of your political ignorance. There is no way for Republicans to win this election, regardless of who the GOP nominee is. You have offended women (the largest voting block) and now Hispanics another large voting block.

Hillary Clinton is going to paint this country blue from sea to shining sea on Election night. Be assured though that Rush Limbaugh and all the others will be there for you the next morning to give you another B.S. reason as to why you lost. You'll swallow it hook, line & sinker, and then you can start the process all over again for 2020.

So, you think women are going to vote for the woman who covered up years of sexual abuse against women by her husband?

Laughable.

don't you understand? sexual abuse of women is OK if you are a democrat. Lying and corruption are encouraged if you are a democrat. Breaking the law is ignored if you are a democrat.

I think they are just counting on a lot of voters not being old enough to know about this.

 

[Slade3200]

Trump will win. The silent White majority will come out and vote for him. It's time to return a White true natural born Citizen back to the oval office.

You just embarrass yourself with comments like that. Best to leave the grown up talk to the grown ups... Why don't you go shoot things in your back yard while we take care of business.

My comments are the truth.

Your comments are YOUR truth not that of the masses. Under normal circumstances i'd respect your opinions but in this case you present nothing respectable... There's no room for biggits in todays world... Y'all just slow us down

 

[oreo]

I know. Let's just not vote! There ya go..

Here is a pretty good article describing this effect, (not that Rubio could win either). He has pissed off Hispanics and backed off his immigration reform bill--so they won't vote for him. In fact, he has already announced he won't be seeking a 2nd term. Ted Cruz--also won't be winning his 2nd term. They both live in heavily populated Hispanic states.

Let’s Elect Hillary Now

 

[oreo]

ok you say so. can you now give us a break from all your boo hooing threads and break your crystal ball while you're at it. thanks

Math is very specific--and not considered a Crystal ball.

 

[oreo]

Trump will win. The silent White majority will come out and vote for him. It's time to return a White true natural born Citizen back to the oval office.

You just embarrass yourself with comments like that. Best to leave the grown up talk to the grown ups... Why don't you go shoot things in your back yard while we take care of business.

My comments are the truth.

Your comments are YOUR truth not that of the masses. Under normal circumstances i'd respect your opinions but in this case you present nothing respectable... There's no room for biggits in todays world... Y'all just slow us down

Do the math yourself. I base my opinions on election history and math, based on the demographics of the national electorate. Right now a Republican win for the White House is so far out of reach it's impossible for any GOP candidate.

In your efforts to get a non-Establishment candidate you have rino'd yourselves right into a Hillary Clinton Presidency, with a probable loss of the Senate and a ton of seats in the house.

 

[Slade3200]

So, you think women are going to vote for the woman who covered up years of sexual abuse against women by her husband?

Laughable.

I think you should give women more credit than that... I'm not a Hillary supporter but I can also see that the majority of women are not going to base their vote on how Hillary handled her husbands affair. She has worked for many years on many issues that support women's rights, equal pay, family leave, right to choose etc. These are things that actually effect the lives of women and these are the things that most people base their vote on. Stop feeding into the right wing buzz topics and act like they actually make an impact. Nobody cares about Bill's cigar anymore...

 

[oreo]

So Hillary's numbers are dwindling while a septagenerian socialist gathers momentum against her. Bloomberg is thinking of a third party run, that will decimate Hillary's numbers even more. And somehow the GOP is in trouble? Nope, don't think so.

That's the problem. In '48 Republicans thought Truman was in trouble because he had Dems running against him from the right and left. Let people think Hillary's wounded. She's still the leader by most metrics.

No, she isnt. Unless you want to count "Unfavorability." Then she is the clear leader.

Bloomberg is a REPUBLICAN--LOL

 

[oreo]

tl;dr

But I can recognize your seasonal brand of sour grapes pretty quickly...you've got a bad case of the redass because your candidate isn't going to win, place or show.

But the good news is, as you've conceded defeat, no need for you to continue posting.

See you in 2019. Buh-bye.

You've lost already. It's because of your political ignorance. There is no way for Republicans to win this election, regardless of who the GOP nominee is. You have offended women (the largest voting block) and now Hispanics another large voting block.

Hillary Clinton is going to paint this country blue from sea to shining sea on Election night. Be assured though that Rush Limbaugh and all the others will be there for you the next morning to give you another B.S. reason as to why you lost. You'll swallow it hook, line & sinker, and then you can start the process all over again for 2020.

So, you think women are going to vote for the woman who covered up years of sexual abuse against women by her husband?

Laughable.

Yeah they're going to vote for the 1st woman Presidential nominee in this nations history. Furthermore, I don't think Hillary was in the Oval Office when Bill was getting BJ's from Monica Lewinsky--so Hillary gets a pass on that one--LOL

 

[Slade3200]

So Hillary's numbers are dwindling while a septagenerian socialist gathers momentum against her. Bloomberg is thinking of a third party run, that will decimate Hillary's numbers even more. And somehow the GOP is in trouble? Nope, don't think so.

That's the problem. In '48 Republicans thought Truman was in trouble because he had Dems running against him from the right and left. Let people think Hillary's wounded. She's still the leader by most metrics.

No, she isnt. Unless you want to count "Unfavorability." Then she is the clear leader.

Bloomberg is a REPUBLICAN--LOL

He's been all 3:
Democratic (Before 2001)
Republican (2001–2007)
Independent (2007–present)

 

[The Rabbi]

So Hillary's numbers are dwindling while a septagenerian socialist gathers momentum against her. Bloomberg is thinking of a third party run, that will decimate Hillary's numbers even more. And somehow the GOP is in trouble? Nope, don't think so.

That's the problem. In '48 Republicans thought Truman was in trouble because he had Dems running against him from the right and left. Let people think Hillary's wounded. She's still the leader by most metrics.

No, she isnt. Unless you want to count "Unfavorability." Then she is the clear leader.

Bloomberg is a REPUBLICAN--LOL

Wrong.

 

[guno]

There is one thing about the right wing of the Republican party aka (Tea Party member) that they never think about. How do we win the White House. This is usually the last consideration, (if at all that they think about.) Most of them live in conservative states--where most of the candidates they select can win a district, or house seat, or even possibly a U.S. Senate seat--but if an election goes past the state line--they're blind.

A Tea Party member does not know that the Republican Party is the minority party at 41 million, Democrats are stronger at 46 million, and Independents make up for largest voting block in this country, representing 40% of the entire electorate.

For quite some time, a Tea Party member's only news sources comes from 3 or more daily hours of right wing talk radio, and political entertainment programs on FOX news. They typically know nothing else, other than what they have been told by these right wing talk show hosts. If they read anything it will come out of a right wing news site, which of course is written by the right wing. Any other news source is not believed.

They've been repeatedly told that Mitt Romney lost the 2012 election because he was not conservative enough. Why shouldn't they believe it, it came out of Rush Limbaugh's mouth on many occasions and probably several other right wing shows. But the truth is Romney's fate was sealed long before he even became the nominee. Accomplished by the Evangelical wing of the party dragging abortion, who's not going to pay for birth control pills, and what is "legal Legitimate rape" questions, which OFFENDED women into Obama's column. Republicans lost women by double digits, younger women by 36 points. This is what secured a 2nd term for Barack Obama.
Why Romney Lost And Republicans Keep Losing
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-e...der-gap-2012-vote-largest-gallup-history.aspx
How women ruled the 2012 election and where the GOP went wrong - CNNPolitics.com

Regardless though, they didn't know they had a woman problem, they were never told that. They have believed for 4 years that they needed a more conservative candidate. So they found one. His name is Ted Cruz. They have followed him around cheered him on, donated a lot of money to him. Why? Because right wing talk show hosts supported him. "He's conservative enough to win the White House, they think." Ted Cruz would never win Independents or women. He has a far right stance on abortion. This country is center, it always has been, it always will be. Ted Cruz also has another huge problem. He was born in Canada. Now certainly the Tea Party knows that for 4 long years they, along with right wing talk show hosts, and Donald Trump hounded Obama for a birth certificate. He finally produced one showing himself born on U.S. soil, to shut them up. What does the Tea Party do next? They put up a candidate to run for POTUS that was born in Canada. This has to come from a group that is so politically inept--to actually believe that there would be no blow back by supporting a candidate that was actually born in Canada.

So enter Donald Trump. He and his supporters have already managed to chase off another 17% of the population, when Republicans needed at least 46% of this block to win the White House. They are now solidly in the Democrat column. Trump is polling at a negative 75% with Hispanics.
GOP Win Will Need More Than 40 Percent Of Latino 2016 Vote, Says Study
Latino conservatives: If Donald Trump is the nominee, we will not work to elect him
Poll: 75% of Latinos Have Negative View of Donald Trump

So you have the largest voting block (women) that were chased off in 2012, which secured a 2nd term for Barack Obama. Now in 2016 another large voting block (Hispanics) are now in the Democrat column.

It doesn't matter who the GOP nominee is now--the Tea Party has already rino'd itself right into a Hillary Clinton Presidency before the first primary ballot was even cast. And frankly with these numbers it would not surprise me to see Republicans lose the Senate and a ton of seats in the house. What the Trump supporter failed to realize is that Republicans across the entire southwest of this country depend on Hispanics to win elections. Without them, they lose.

the teacrackers live in places that are very insulated from the educated parts of the country, their world view is very narrow , rube like pants crappers who aren't grounded in reality, they "think" they bring the country back to the 1950's, angry bitter people

 

[Elvis Obama]

How do the independent/undecideds feel?

i am an Independent Conservative, i also do NOT "feel", i THINK and BELIEVE, and i BELIEVE at this point in time there is NOT one demorat honest and trustworthy enough to even be a visitor to the WH or the Capitol building!!

This is such a strange thread. I never understand people who want something, so they argue it MUST be that way. Here you are pretending to be an independent so you can claim to represent what independents think. You're a rabid conservative. You'd rather suck on a shotgun than vote for a Democrat. You have absolutely no clue what independents are thinking. Does is comfort you to engage in these silly games of certitude?

 

[Elvis Obama]

if the leading GOP candidate can't sway the minorities and swing voters, he's got no chance..He better start pouring on the sugar...

You mean pandering like the Democrats did with all sorts of things?

Yeah, pandering. What ALL politicians do. Are you really that naive, to believe that Democrats are the only politicians who say whatever they need to say to get elected?

 

[Conservative65]

if the leading GOP candidate can't sway the minorities and swing voters, he's got no chance..He better start pouring on the sugar...

You mean pandering like the Democrats did with all sorts of things?

Yeah, pandering. What ALL politicians do. Are you really that naive, to believe that Democrats are the only politicians who say whatever they need to say to get elected?

Let's see. Contraceptives, healthcare, immigration/amnesty, etc. Sounds like pandering to me.

Difference is Democrats expect the government to do for them. I don't.

 

[Elvis Obama]

if the leading GOP candidate can't sway the minorities and swing voters, he's got no chance..He better start pouring on the sugar...

You mean pandering like the Democrats did with all sorts of things?

Yeah, pandering. What ALL politicians do. Are you really that naive, to believe that Democrats are the only politicians who say whatever they need to say to get elected?

Let's see. Contraceptives, healthcare, immigration/amnesty, etc. Sounds like pandering to me.

Difference is Democrats expect the government to do for them. I don't.

You are incapable of responding to anything non-partisan, aren't you? ALL politicians pander. You, very, very pathetically, want to pretend it's only Democrats. I support Democratic candidates, but I don't fool myself into thinking they're saints.