Republicans don't like people voting

sealybobo

Diamond Member
Jun 5, 2008
122,110
21,364
2,210
Michigan
What s At Stake In The Trial Over North Carolina Voting Restrictions

N.C. Trial Outcome Could Sway National Voting Rights Measures It s All Politics NPR

Ahead Of Midterms Voting Rights And Wrongs In North Carolina NPR

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed a North Carolina law to go into effect that eliminates same-day voter registration and reduces the number of early voting days.

Challenge to the Country s Most Restrictive Voting Law Heads to Court League of Women Voters

Even Bush appointed judges say these voting laws or RESTRICTIONS are unconstitutional. They stopped short of saying it these restrictions were done on purpose. Actually one court said they were intentional.
 
What s At Stake In The Trial Over North Carolina Voting Restrictions

N.C. Trial Outcome Could Sway National Voting Rights Measures It s All Politics NPR

Ahead Of Midterms Voting Rights And Wrongs In North Carolina NPR

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed a North Carolina law to go into effect that eliminates same-day voter registration and reduces the number of early voting days.

Challenge to the Country s Most Restrictive Voting Law Heads to Court League of Women Voters

Even Bush appointed judges say these voting laws or RESTRICTIONS are unconstitutional. They stopped short of saying it these restrictions were done on purpose. Actually one court said they were intentional.

Voters should be alive and breathing and citizens of the US. that is what the dems are up to.
 
What s At Stake In The Trial Over North Carolina Voting Restrictions

N.C. Trial Outcome Could Sway National Voting Rights Measures It s All Politics NPR

Ahead Of Midterms Voting Rights And Wrongs In North Carolina NPR

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed a North Carolina law to go into effect that eliminates same-day voter registration and reduces the number of early voting days.

Challenge to the Country s Most Restrictive Voting Law Heads to Court League of Women Voters

Even Bush appointed judges say these voting laws or RESTRICTIONS are unconstitutional. They stopped short of saying it these restrictions were done on purpose. Actually one court said they were intentional.
Who ever heard of same day registration? It doesn't even give the registrar time to put the name on the rolls. Why does the radical left need election day registration? Their voting base is in a freaking coma for the rest of the year? Are democrats still insulting Black people by claiming that they are unable to obtain a photo I.D. in the 21st century? Nobody whines like the radical left.
 
What s At Stake In The Trial Over North Carolina Voting Restrictions

N.C. Trial Outcome Could Sway National Voting Rights Measures It s All Politics NPR

Ahead Of Midterms Voting Rights And Wrongs In North Carolina NPR

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed a North Carolina law to go into effect that eliminates same-day voter registration and reduces the number of early voting days.

Challenge to the Country s Most Restrictive Voting Law Heads to Court League of Women Voters

Even Bush appointed judges say these voting laws or RESTRICTIONS are unconstitutional. They stopped short of saying it these restrictions were done on purpose. Actually one court said they were intentional.

Just because a State tries a scheme for early voting and same day registration doesn't mean they have to keep it forever. They could have removed early voting completely and still been within the Constitution and there is nothing in the Constitution governing registration.
 
What s At Stake In The Trial Over North Carolina Voting Restrictions

N.C. Trial Outcome Could Sway National Voting Rights Measures It s All Politics NPR

Ahead Of Midterms Voting Rights And Wrongs In North Carolina NPR

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed a North Carolina law to go into effect that eliminates same-day voter registration and reduces the number of early voting days.

Challenge to the Country s Most Restrictive Voting Law Heads to Court League of Women Voters

Even Bush appointed judges say these voting laws or RESTRICTIONS are unconstitutional. They stopped short of saying it these restrictions were done on purpose. Actually one court said they were intentional.
Who ever heard of same day registration? It doesn't even give the registrar time to put the name on the rolls. Why does the radical left need election day registration? Their voting base is in a freaking coma for the rest of the year? Are democrats still insulting Black people by claiming that they are unable to obtain a photo I.D. in the 21st century? Nobody whines like the radical left.


Used to be that one could register outside and then go in and vote.

That was back when we were still a free country, before the rabid right declared war on our basic rights.
 
Republicans don't like stupid people voting, or dead ones. The bed wetter fairy tales about oppression and racism will continue regardless.

The fact is all these voter restrictions aren't stopping cheaters they are discouraging people from voting.

Even conservative judges are. And s. Carolina was the state that pushed EVERY policy that was restrictive to voting. Other states pushed 1 or 2 or 3 voter restrictive laws but s. Carolina pushed them all and it was obvious their intentions were devious.

But even if conservative judges agree you'll still argue.

PS. Voter fraud never swung an election. Election fraud like in 2000 and 2004 did though
 
Especially the illegals and the dead folks who like to vote for the Dems so much.
11800371_1643602829191421_6421934976287230886_n.jpg
 
What s At Stake In The Trial Over North Carolina Voting Restrictions

N.C. Trial Outcome Could Sway National Voting Rights Measures It s All Politics NPR

Ahead Of Midterms Voting Rights And Wrongs In North Carolina NPR

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed a North Carolina law to go into effect that eliminates same-day voter registration and reduces the number of early voting days.

Challenge to the Country s Most Restrictive Voting Law Heads to Court League of Women Voters

Even Bush appointed judges say these voting laws or RESTRICTIONS are unconstitutional. They stopped short of saying it these restrictions were done on purpose. Actually one court said they were intentional.

Voters should be alive and breathing and citizens of the US. that is what the dems are up to.

another trick is making sure military votes don't make it to shore in time to be counted
 
Republicans don't like stupid people voting, or dead ones. The bed wetter fairy tales about oppression and racism will continue regardless.

The fact is all these voter restrictions aren't stopping cheaters they are discouraging people from voting.

Even conservative judges are. And s. Carolina was the state that pushed EVERY policy that was restrictive to voting. Other states pushed 1 or 2 or 3 voter restrictive laws but s. Carolina pushed them all and it was obvious their intentions were devious.

But even if conservative judges agree you'll still argue.

PS. Voter fraud never swung an election. Election fraud like in 2000 and 2004 did though

You forgot 1960. Nothing with 2000, 2004 other than the fact Bush won Dems hated it.
 
Republicans don't like stupid people voting, or dead ones. The bed wetter fairy tales about oppression and racism will continue regardless.

The fact is all these voter restrictions aren't stopping cheaters they are discouraging people from voting.

Even conservative judges are. And s. Carolina was the state that pushed EVERY policy that was restrictive to voting. Other states pushed 1 or 2 or 3 voter restrictive laws but s. Carolina pushed them all and it was obvious their intentions were devious.

But even if conservative judges agree you'll still argue.

PS. Voter fraud never swung an election. Election fraud like in 2000 and 2004 did though

How does that discourage anyone from voting? show me a stat that said less people voted because of id laws? Show me a stat that said the actual legitimate outcome was lower.
 
Especially the illegals and the dead folks who like to vote for the Dems so much.
My mom has Alzheimer's. My dad tried to absentee vote for her cause she can't sign they said NOPE

And they made the right decision. You can't vote for someone else, especially someone who isn't mentally aware.
 
One thing that needs to be done is banning the SEIU Union, or any Union from maintaining voting machines, having them in their possession or setting them up. There was Las Vegas Sun Journal article covering how during an election several people complained about no matter how many times the tried vote for Sharon Angle, the vote would go to Harry Reid.

Banning unions from having anything to do with voting machines would help reduce voter fraud. Unions are nothing more than part of the Democratic party's money laundering scheme.
 

Forum List

Back
Top