Republican Impeachment Report: Dems Have No Evidence On President Trump, No Crimes Committed

[Siete]

He lied UNDER OATH....HOW TRULY STUPID YOU ARE....ROTFLMFAO!!!

He lied about receiving a consensual blow job. Trump lied about using our government to extort dirt on his political opponent from our allies. You really don't see the difference?

yet i never see you upset at the DNC for working with the Ukraine to dig up dirt on Trump.

You got an example of the DNC using congressional approved funds to extort dirt on a political opponent? No, the Biden incident isn't the same thing.

they were a bit more covert than that. but we have evidence out the unholy penis it happened. you won't acknowledge it and you want people to pay attention to your childlike rants and insistence trump did something WORSE than bilk american taxpayers out of billions at this point.

homey ain't gonna go down that rathole with you. when you want to play in reality, give me a shout. til then, dream on.

If they really believed the manufactured dirt on that, like you do.... then why hasn't this So called PROOF of Biden corruption, been given to the DOJ so they can have the legal predicate to open an investigation???

Trump tells his drones what to parrot and he doesnt know his ass from Alabama ..

that says it all ........

 

[NightFox]

sure they are.....

And this is not a criminal trial... it is an impeachment.

It's not an Impeachment Either. That happens in The Senate if THE SENATE agrees holding an Impeachment is Worth their time.

LOL, say what?

... which country are you referring to? because it's certainly not the one where the Constitution of the United States is the law of the land

"The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." -- Article I, Section 2, Clause 5, Constitution of the United States

Both Houses of Congress have to agree on Impeachment. Having The Sole Power of Impeachment means to begin The IMPEACHMENT PROCESS.

ROFLMAO! thanks for proving beyond a shadow of doubt that you don't understand the difference between impeachment and removal from office, not to mention sporting a completely bizarre interpretation of COTUS Article I.

.. on the bright side, it's always nice when the peanut gallery provides a bit of comic relief.

What do they call this "Removal From Office Trial"?

A Trial, any other stupid questions you need answered?

For your edification....

Impeachment by definition is an accusation or more accurately indictment and is solely invested within the HoR
Removal from office happens when/if the accused is convicted in a trial which is solely the invested within the Senate and presided by the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS.

Bill Clinton was impeached by the HoR however he wasn't convicted in the Senate Trial and thus wasn't removed from office, get it now or do you require diagrams?

 

[Siete]

It's not an Impeachment Either. That happens in The Senate if THE SENATE agrees holding an Impeachment is Worth their time.

LOL, say what?

... which country are you referring to? because it's certainly not the one where the Constitution of the United States is the law of the land

"The House of Representatives shall choose their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment." -- Article I, Section 2, Clause 5, Constitution of the United States

Both Houses of Congress have to agree on Impeachment. Having The Sole Power of Impeachment means to begin The IMPEACHMENT PROCESS.

ROFLMAO! thanks for proving beyond a shadow of doubt that you don't understand the difference between impeachment and removal from office, not to mention sporting a completely bizarre interpretation of COTUS Article I.

.. on the bright side, it's always nice when the peanut gallery provides a bit of comic relief.

What do they call this "Removal From Office Trial"?

A Trial, any other stupid questions you need answered?

For your edification....

Impeachment by definition is an accusation or more accurately indictment and is solely invested within the HoR
Removal from office happens when/if the accused is convicted in a trial which is solely the invested within the Senate and presided by the Chief Justice of the SCOTUS.

Bill Clinton was impeached by the HoR however he wasn't convicted in the Senate Trial and thus wasn't removed from office, get it now or do you require diagrams?

that stupid sob wont give you an honest answer, he just slinks away after you hand him his ass, and drops the convo.

 

[White 6]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

The first sentence left out some things. When referring to the "Top Republican law makers" it is worth noting that they are, in fact, minority member in the House of Representatives, indeed minority members on their committee. The majority does not share the minority opinion. The report is an opinion piece with no more actual weight than what I am writing. It apparently did not exonerate anybody or any action. The majority did not suddenly shout "if we had only known", and can call off the inquiry.
Nothing much to note in 2nd paragraph except possibly, if some of these guys mentioned had had any stomach to exercise any over-site as was their job under the Constitution of the United States, we might not be here now.
Third paragraph gave news. Trump going to NATO. I don't know why he didn't send the VP. Trump doesn't like or support NATO. He seems to support Russia more. I can't imagine why. I do not. In case you haven't cared or guessed. I am from the "Black Boot" Army. The cold war Army that backed Ronald Reagan's policies and ploys at a time when Russia and it's Soviet Union stood as an existential to our way of life. We mostly won the cold war, (thank you very much, I like it here too, and was glad to do my minuscule part) yet much of the threat remains. That corrupt totalitarian government and it X-KGB President are little changed in philosophy from the Old Soviet (only sneakier), and only fools such as our President trust them. He should restrain his instinct to vocally support his hero, especially when he is on foreign soil meeting with Allies that our official foreign policy publicly supports.
Fourth paragraph has these "heroes of the right", characterizing Trumps corruption concerns as "legitimate". I guess they were not legitimate 4 years ago when their party was in the majority and could investigate anything they had convictions to stand up and fight for, but did not, until Uncle Joe was running against their boy. Tough stuff! Welcome to Constitutional Democracy 101.
If I were a Trump supporter that did not support the our public foreign policy toward present day Ukraine, or the evaluations, and reports of all our intelligence services, both houses of congress, including every congressional committee that investigated under either parties control, that Russia was the primary guilty foreign government that interfered in our 2016 election and most likely to interfere in the 2020 election, I might characterizes their "evidence" likewise, but I can't stand with those guys. I have read and listened and seen testimony during the inquiry. The only way this will be settled is impeachment and a trial before the Senate. I have, (at least for the moment) lost faith in the Republican Party I often voted with, for so many years. I look forward to listening and hearing witness and evidence presented before the Senate chambers if I am allowed to, and will peacefully abide by the Constitutional finality of that chamber's vote as to whether he stays or goes, over his latest crooked, political scheme. After all, I still support support the oath I took to The Constitution.

 

[The Purge]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

The first sentence left out some things. When referring to the "Top Republican law makers" it is worth noting that they are, in fact, minority member in the House of Representatives, indeed minority members on their committee. The majority does not share the minority opinion. The report is an opinion piece with no more actual weight than what I am writing. It apparently did not exonerate anybody or any action. The majority did not suddenly shout "if we had only known", and can call off the inquiry.
Nothing much to note in 2nd paragraph except possibly, if some of these guys mentioned had had any stomach to exercise any over-site as was their job under the Constitution of the United States, we might not be here now.
Third paragraph gave news. Trump going to NATO. I don't know why he didn't send the VP. Trump doesn't like or support NATO. He seems to support Russia more. I can't imagine why. I do not. In case you haven't cared or guessed. I am from the "Black Boot" Army. The cold war Army that backed Ronald Reagan's policies and ploys at a time when Russia and it's Soviet Union stood as an existential to our way of life. We mostly won the cold war, (thank you very much, I like it here too, and was glad to do my minuscule part) yet much of the threat remains. That corrupt totalitarian government and it X-KGB President are little changed in philosophy from the Old Soviet (only sneakier), and only fools such as our President trust them. He should restrain his instinct to vocally support his hero, especially when he is on foreign soil meeting with Allies that our official foreign policy publicly supports.
Fourth paragraph has these "heroes of the right", characterizing Trumps corruption concerns as "legitimate". I guess they were not legitimate 4 years ago when their party was in the majority and could investigate anything they had convictions to stand up and fight for, but did not, until Uncle Joe was running against their boy. Tough stuff! Welcome to Constitutional Democracy 101.
If I were a Trump supporter that did not support the our public foreign policy toward present day Ukraine, or the evaluations, and reports of all our intelligence services, both houses of congress, including every congressional committee that investigated under either parties control, that Russia was the primary guilty foreign government that interfered in our 2016 election and most likely to interfere in the 2020 election, I might characterizes their "evidence" likewise, but I can't stand with those guys. I have read and listened and seen testimony during the inquiry. The only way this will be settled is impeachment and a trial before the Senate. I have, (at least for the moment) lost faith in the Republican Party I often voted with, for so many years. I look forward to listening and hearing witness and evidence presented before the Senate chambers if I am allowed to, and will peacefully abide by the Constitutional finality of that chamber's vote as to whether he stays or goes, over his latest crooked, political scheme. After all, I still support support the oath I took to The Constitution.

That is why they can present articles of phony impeachment and the majority of DEMONRATS subversives and saboteurs can send those articles to the Senate where Trump doesnt need a majority of Senators to impeach him, all he needs is that the 67 senator threshold is never met, and he would need 20 or so Republicans to vote with you Anti-Americans...and THAT will NEVER HAPPEN....and NOW he has more ammunition to use against the ABNORMALS, come election time to say, look at how many millions the party of INFANTICIDE has wasted trying to impeach me, while they could have been doing the peoples business for at least half a year and didnt do infrastructure the AMC trade bill, and probably still hundreds of other Bill's that lay dormant on Piglousi's desk!....I think THAT will play well with the electorate who sees that unemployment is at an all time low and overv80% of the working man has more money in his pocket than anytime under the Surrender Monkey, And even did away with the onerous obozocare mandate!!!....Counter that!

 

[konradv]

OMG republicans exonerated Trump?! Shit I didn’t see that coming! Well, I guess that’s it then. Trump has the utmost integrity and sense of morality. Just ask republicans.

Just ask Muller he found nothing with unlimited resources and money.

If nothing was found why does the White House persist in blocking testimony and documents that Congress has subpoenaed?

I believe the narrative coming from the Donny Regime is that this is a Congressional fishing expedition to which they are not inclined to willingly supply more bait.

You're using that "if you have nothing to hide then you'd give us everything we ask for" logic that is the stock & trade of overreach, let Congress make their case for whatever materials they deem relevant to the Judicial Branch if they are so inclined.

Usaully, well in the past at least they have almost always been able come to a compromise. But they are proceediing.....

A U.S. district judge denied the Justice Department’s request for a stay on testimony from former White House counsel Don McGahn.

U.S. District Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote in a 17-page opinion that a long-term stay on her opinion last week requiring McGahn testify in front of the House Judiciary Committee could cause “grave harm” to the investigation.

“This Court has no doubt that further delay of the Judiciary Committee’s enforcement of its valid subpoena causes grave harm to both the Committee’s investigation and the interests of the public more broadly,” Jackson wrote.

Judge denies request for stay on McGahn testimony

Who the FUCK in AMERICA names their kid KENTAJI?

Anyone that wants to, you nazi.

 

[iceberg]

He lied UNDER OATH....HOW TRULY STUPID YOU ARE....ROTFLMFAO!!!

He lied about receiving a consensual blow job. Trump lied about using our government to extort dirt on his political opponent from our allies. You really don't see the difference?

yet i never see you upset at the DNC for working with the Ukraine to dig up dirt on Trump.

You got an example of the DNC using congressional approved funds to extort dirt on a political opponent? No, the Biden incident isn't the same thing.

they were a bit more covert than that. but we have evidence out the unholy penis it happened. you won't acknowledge it and you want people to pay attention to your childlike rants and insistence trump did something WORSE than bilk american taxpayers out of billions at this point.

homey ain't gonna go down that rathole with you. when you want to play in reality, give me a shout. til then, dream on.

If they really believed the manufactured dirt on that, like you do.... then why hasn't this So called PROOF of Biden corruption, been given to the DOJ so they can have the legal predicate to open an investigation???

It's coming which is why the dems are going afterctrmp so hard.

But amazing. You were ready to believe trump/Russia shit cause that's what they told you to believe. It was a proven lie but you simply don't care.

Rah Rah little cheerleader.

 

[White 6]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

The first sentence left out some things. When referring to the "Top Republican law makers" it is worth noting that they are, in fact, minority member in the House of Representatives, indeed minority members on their committee. The majority does not share the minority opinion. The report is an opinion piece with no more actual weight than what I am writing. It apparently did not exonerate anybody or any action. The majority did not suddenly shout "if we had only known", and can call off the inquiry.
Nothing much to note in 2nd paragraph except possibly, if some of these guys mentioned had had any stomach to exercise any over-site as was their job under the Constitution of the United States, we might not be here now.
Third paragraph gave news. Trump going to NATO. I don't know why he didn't send the VP. Trump doesn't like or support NATO. He seems to support Russia more. I can't imagine why. I do not. In case you haven't cared or guessed. I am from the "Black Boot" Army. The cold war Army that backed Ronald Reagan's policies and ploys at a time when Russia and it's Soviet Union stood as an existential to our way of life. We mostly won the cold war, (thank you very much, I like it here too, and was glad to do my minuscule part) yet much of the threat remains. That corrupt totalitarian government and it X-KGB President are little changed in philosophy from the Old Soviet (only sneakier), and only fools such as our President trust them. He should restrain his instinct to vocally support his hero, especially when he is on foreign soil meeting with Allies that our official foreign policy publicly supports.
Fourth paragraph has these "heroes of the right", characterizing Trumps corruption concerns as "legitimate". I guess they were not legitimate 4 years ago when their party was in the majority and could investigate anything they had convictions to stand up and fight for, but did not, until Uncle Joe was running against their boy. Tough stuff! Welcome to Constitutional Democracy 101.
If I were a Trump supporter that did not support the our public foreign policy toward present day Ukraine, or the evaluations, and reports of all our intelligence services, both houses of congress, including every congressional committee that investigated under either parties control, that Russia was the primary guilty foreign government that interfered in our 2016 election and most likely to interfere in the 2020 election, I might characterizes their "evidence" likewise, but I can't stand with those guys. I have read and listened and seen testimony during the inquiry. The only way this will be settled is impeachment and a trial before the Senate. I have, (at least for the moment) lost faith in the Republican Party I often voted with, for so many years. I look forward to listening and hearing witness and evidence presented before the Senate chambers if I am allowed to, and will peacefully abide by the Constitutional finality of that chamber's vote as to whether he stays or goes, over his latest crooked, political scheme. After all, I still support support the oath I took to The Constitution.

That is why they can present articles of phony impeachment and the majority of DEMONRATS subversives and saboteurs can send those articles to the Senate where Trump doesnt need a majority of Senators to impeach him, all he needs is that the 67 senator threshold is never met, and he would need 20 or so Republicans to vote with you Anti-Americans...and THAT will NEVER HAPPEN....and NOW he has more ammunition to use against the ABNORMALS, come election time to say, look at how many millions the party of INFANTICIDE has wasted trying to impeach me, while they could have been doing the peoples business for at least half a year and didnt do infrastructure the AMC trade bill, and probably still hundreds of other Bill's that lay dormant on Piglousi's desk!....I think THAT will play well with the electorate who sees that unemployment is at an all time low and overv80% of the working man has more money in his pocket than anytime under the Surrender Monkey, And even did away with the onerous obozocare mandate!!!....Counter that!

Hi Purge, If they do, (in fact) vote to submit impeachment articles to the US Senate, he will at that time be officially "Impeached", just as Bill Clinton was impeached. The Senate is where he is tried after he is impeached to decide what to do about it. I never intimated a high belief he would be removed. Lets see.., DEMON RATS, subversives and saboteurs doesn't sound effective for a debate message room, but I am kinda new at it. It would sound better of some scruffy old guy screaming pointlessly on a street corner trying to get attention. Trump may very well repeat your INFANTICIDE sentence at a rally. It is just like something he might say. I'm sure it would be a hit! You should send it to him. He might give you a cookie or a big red apple. "Piglousi"? "Surrender Monkey"? "obozocare"? You cannot actually defeat ideas and beliefs based on someone's values and understanding of the constitution with 5th grade name calling, especially when used to excess. By the way, if "Bill" is laying on someones desk, I would appreciate it if you sent him back to Tennessee, it is Racoon season and if he is laying on someone's desk, That dog won't hunt. If you know a working man who keeps 80% more in his pocket, he is to be commended, for doing hard work in his own self interest, possibly at two or three low paying part time jobs without a 401K plan. If you actually know his guy, you should direct him to a competent financial counselor. My sister-in-law uses one in Nashville. He is really quite good. Thanks for playing "change the subject". You lose. Next! You should get more bran in your diet or maybe a dose of EX-Lax, but be careful. I saw the results when someone gave a whole bar to a gorilla at the Chicago Zoo. It was AWFUL! Hope I am getting the hang of this message board thing.

 

[The Purge]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

The first sentence left out some things. When referring to the "Top Republican law makers" it is worth noting that they are, in fact, minority member in the House of Representatives, indeed minority members on their committee. The majority does not share the minority opinion. The report is an opinion piece with no more actual weight than what I am writing. It apparently did not exonerate anybody or any action. The majority did not suddenly shout "if we had only known", and can call off the inquiry.
Nothing much to note in 2nd paragraph except possibly, if some of these guys mentioned had had any stomach to exercise any over-site as was their job under the Constitution of the United States, we might not be here now.
Third paragraph gave news. Trump going to NATO. I don't know why he didn't send the VP. Trump doesn't like or support NATO. He seems to support Russia more. I can't imagine why. I do not. In case you haven't cared or guessed. I am from the "Black Boot" Army. The cold war Army that backed Ronald Reagan's policies and ploys at a time when Russia and it's Soviet Union stood as an existential to our way of life. We mostly won the cold war, (thank you very much, I like it here too, and was glad to do my minuscule part) yet much of the threat remains. That corrupt totalitarian government and it X-KGB President are little changed in philosophy from the Old Soviet (only sneakier), and only fools such as our President trust them. He should restrain his instinct to vocally support his hero, especially when he is on foreign soil meeting with Allies that our official foreign policy publicly supports.
Fourth paragraph has these "heroes of the right", characterizing Trumps corruption concerns as "legitimate". I guess they were not legitimate 4 years ago when their party was in the majority and could investigate anything they had convictions to stand up and fight for, but did not, until Uncle Joe was running against their boy. Tough stuff! Welcome to Constitutional Democracy 101.
If I were a Trump supporter that did not support the our public foreign policy toward present day Ukraine, or the evaluations, and reports of all our intelligence services, both houses of congress, including every congressional committee that investigated under either parties control, that Russia was the primary guilty foreign government that interfered in our 2016 election and most likely to interfere in the 2020 election, I might characterizes their "evidence" likewise, but I can't stand with those guys. I have read and listened and seen testimony during the inquiry. The only way this will be settled is impeachment and a trial before the Senate. I have, (at least for the moment) lost faith in the Republican Party I often voted with, for so many years. I look forward to listening and hearing witness and evidence presented before the Senate chambers if I am allowed to, and will peacefully abide by the Constitutional finality of that chamber's vote as to whether he stays or goes, over his latest crooked, political scheme. After all, I still support support the oath I took to The Constitution.

That is why they can present articles of phony impeachment and the majority of DEMONRATS subversives and saboteurs can send those articles to the Senate where Trump doesnt need a majority of Senators to impeach him, all he needs is that the 67 senator threshold is never met, and he would need 20 or so Republicans to vote with you Anti-Americans...and THAT will NEVER HAPPEN....and NOW he has more ammunition to use against the ABNORMALS, come election time to say, look at how many millions the party of INFANTICIDE has wasted trying to impeach me, while they could have been doing the peoples business for at least half a year and didnt do infrastructure the AMC trade bill, and probably still hundreds of other Bill's that lay dormant on Piglousi's desk!....I think THAT will play well with the electorate who sees that unemployment is at an all time low and overv80% of the working man has more money in his pocket than anytime under the Surrender Monkey, And even did away with the onerous obozocare mandate!!!....Counter that!

Hi Purge, If they do, (in fact) vote to submit impeachment articles to the US Senate, he will at that time be officially "Impeached", just as Bill Clinton was impeached. The Senate is where he is tried after he is impeached to decide what to do about it. I never intimated a high belief he would be removed. Lets see.., DEMON RATS, subversives and saboteurs doesn't sound effective for a debate message room, but I am kinda new at it. It would sound better of some scruffy old guy screaming pointlessly on a street corner trying to get attention. Trump may very well repeat your INFANTICIDE sentence at a rally. It is just like something he might say. I'm sure it would be a hit! You should send it to him. He might give you a cookie or a big red apple. "Piglousi"? "Surrender Monkey"? "obozocare"? You cannot actually defeat ideas and beliefs based on someone's values and understanding of the constitution with 5th grade name calling, especially when used to excess. By the way, if "Bill" is laying on someones desk, I would appreciate it if you sent him back to Tennessee, it is Racoon season and if he is laying on someone's desk, That dog won't hunt. If you know a working man who keeps 80% more in his pocket, he is to be commended, for doing hard work in his own self interest, possibly at two or three low paying part time jobs without a 401K plan. If you actually know his guy, you should direct him to a competent financial counselor. My sister-in-law uses one in Nashville. He is really quite good. Thanks for playing "change the subject". You lose. Next! You should get more bran in your diet or maybe a dose of EX-Lax, but be careful. I saw the results when someone gave a whole bar to a gorilla at the Chicago Zoo. It was AWFUL! Hope I am getting the hang of this message board thing.

You have to learn in the scheme of life this forum means less than nothing, and we all enjoy it in different ways... I enjoy doing what I do and calling names, it is my entertainment. Others may have a different agenda....you can take it for what it has turned out to be. A place where. As a DEMONRAT, you can lie your ass off, and as a patriot, you can counter them with fact and your opinion...A free country until the Dimwits take it over. So enjoy it while you can!...You seem to be one of the low 2 digit IQ boys who use subterfuge as a means of spewing your leftist thoughts...I will enjoy slapping you around!

 

[lantern2814]

Yet with all of this supposed “solid evidence”, the cowardly Dims STILL won’t call for a vote. Why? Easy. Pisslosi doesn’t have the votes. Any Dim voting for this is toast. In the unlikely event enough Dims commit political suicide, all you’ll hear in the senate is “objection, hearsay”. Then the reply of “sustained”. Meaning Dims will have ZERO evidence to submit.

 

[DGS49]

All the Democrats (and their Deep State) witnesses proved was that President Trump thought about doing something "irregular," that, at worst, might have been "improper." There is no indication whatsoever that he would have allowed the funding to expire at the end of the fiscal year, and in fact there is no indication that he wanted to harm the Ukrainians or their new President in any way. He merely wanted an investigation, based on what can be easily termed, "the appearance of impropriety" by a former United States Vice President. And lest one forget, TRUMP made the decision to provide military aid which his predecessor DECLINED TO DO. So if withholding military aid for two (2) months was detrimental to the security of the United States (which is a ridiculous statement, but Democrats still make it), then O'Bama was much, much worse.

Trump's apparent irregular intention doesn't even rise to the level of "conspiracy." Conspiracy requires that, if not interrupted, the crime would be committed. For whatever reason, Trump decided not to continue the threat of withholding funds, which he clearly had the power to do. No conspiracy prosecution would get off the ground under circumstances where the would-be perpetrators decided, on their own, not to go forward. They only go to trial when the would-be perps ARE PREVENTED from going forward.

Conceptually, my biggest complaint about the vacuous Democrat case is the ridiculous position that investigating the Biden's was for Trump's personal benefit, and for no other purpose. It is as though Biden's running for office gives him a Free Pass with respect to examining his actions as VP. It is simply nonsense, and they know it.

 

[BlindBoo]

There is no indication whatsoever that he would have allowed the funding to expire at the end of the fiscal year, and in fact there is no indication that he wanted to harm the Ukrainians or their new President in any way.

Right. He was just fighting fire with fire. He wanted the Ukrainians to fight political corruption in their country by helping him use them in his politically corrupt scheme to harm his political opponents in this country.

Democrat case is the ridiculous position that investigating the Biden's was for Trump's personal benefit, and for no other purpose. It is as though Biden's running for office gives him a Free Pass with respect to examining his actions as VP.

Why do you think the President can order a foreign nation to publicly announce an investigating of an American citizen on his word alone?

Can he order his AG to do the same, based on his word alone?

 

[The Purge]

There is no indication whatsoever that he would have allowed the funding to expire at the end of the fiscal year, and in fact there is no indication that he wanted to harm the Ukrainians or their new President in any way.

Right. He was just fighting fire with fire. He wanted the Ukrainians to fight political corruption in their country by helping him use them in his politically corrupt scheme to harm his political opponents in this country.

Democrat case is the ridiculous position that investigating the Biden's was for Trump's personal benefit, and for no other purpose. It is as though Biden's running for office gives him a Free Pass with respect to examining his actions as VP.

Why do you think the President can order a foreign nation to publicly announce an investigating of an American citizen on his word alone?

Can he order his AG to do the same, based on his word alone?

As the Surrender Monkey did, foreign aid is something you give in order to get that foreign country to enact either law or policy that is helpful to America....if you will a gift with strings attached and if that foreign country doesn't like the STRING . they can always REFUSE THE AID!

 

[White 6]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

The first sentence left out some things. When referring to the "Top Republican law makers" it is worth noting that they are, in fact, minority member in the House of Representatives, indeed minority members on their committee. The majority does not share the minority opinion. The report is an opinion piece with no more actual weight than what I am writing. It apparently did not exonerate anybody or any action. The majority did not suddenly shout "if we had only known", and can call off the inquiry.
Nothing much to note in 2nd paragraph except possibly, if some of these guys mentioned had had any stomach to exercise any over-site as was their job under the Constitution of the United States, we might not be here now.
Third paragraph gave news. Trump going to NATO. I don't know why he didn't send the VP. Trump doesn't like or support NATO. He seems to support Russia more. I can't imagine why. I do not. In case you haven't cared or guessed. I am from the "Black Boot" Army. The cold war Army that backed Ronald Reagan's policies and ploys at a time when Russia and it's Soviet Union stood as an existential to our way of life. We mostly won the cold war, (thank you very much, I like it here too, and was glad to do my minuscule part) yet much of the threat remains. That corrupt totalitarian government and it X-KGB President are little changed in philosophy from the Old Soviet (only sneakier), and only fools such as our President trust them. He should restrain his instinct to vocally support his hero, especially when he is on foreign soil meeting with Allies that our official foreign policy publicly supports.
Fourth paragraph has these "heroes of the right", characterizing Trumps corruption concerns as "legitimate". I guess they were not legitimate 4 years ago when their party was in the majority and could investigate anything they had convictions to stand up and fight for, but did not, until Uncle Joe was running against their boy. Tough stuff! Welcome to Constitutional Democracy 101.
If I were a Trump supporter that did not support the our public foreign policy toward present day Ukraine, or the evaluations, and reports of all our intelligence services, both houses of congress, including every congressional committee that investigated under either parties control, that Russia was the primary guilty foreign government that interfered in our 2016 election and most likely to interfere in the 2020 election, I might characterizes their "evidence" likewise, but I can't stand with those guys. I have read and listened and seen testimony during the inquiry. The only way this will be settled is impeachment and a trial before the Senate. I have, (at least for the moment) lost faith in the Republican Party I often voted with, for so many years. I look forward to listening and hearing witness and evidence presented before the Senate chambers if I am allowed to, and will peacefully abide by the Constitutional finality of that chamber's vote as to whether he stays or goes, over his latest crooked, political scheme. After all, I still support support the oath I took to The Constitution.

That is why they can present articles of phony impeachment and the majority of DEMONRATS subversives and saboteurs can send those articles to the Senate where Trump doesnt need a majority of Senators to impeach him, all he needs is that the 67 senator threshold is never met, and he would need 20 or so Republicans to vote with you Anti-Americans...and THAT will NEVER HAPPEN....and NOW he has more ammunition to use against the ABNORMALS, come election time to say, look at how many millions the party of INFANTICIDE has wasted trying to impeach me, while they could have been doing the peoples business for at least half a year and didnt do infrastructure the AMC trade bill, and probably still hundreds of other Bill's that lay dormant on Piglousi's desk!....I think THAT will play well with the electorate who sees that unemployment is at an all time low and overv80% of the working man has more money in his pocket than anytime under the Surrender Monkey, And even did away with the onerous obozocare mandate!!!....Counter that!

Hi Purge, If they do, (in fact) vote to submit impeachment articles to the US Senate, he will at that time be officially "Impeached", just as Bill Clinton was impeached. The Senate is where he is tried after he is impeached to decide what to do about it. I never intimated a high belief he would be removed. Lets see.., DEMON RATS, subversives and saboteurs doesn't sound effective for a debate message room, but I am kinda new at it. It would sound better of some scruffy old guy screaming pointlessly on a street corner trying to get attention. Trump may very well repeat your INFANTICIDE sentence at a rally. It is just like something he might say. I'm sure it would be a hit! You should send it to him. He might give you a cookie or a big red apple. "Piglousi"? "Surrender Monkey"? "obozocare"? You cannot actually defeat ideas and beliefs based on someone's values and understanding of the constitution with 5th grade name calling, especially when used to excess. By the way, if "Bill" is laying on someones desk, I would appreciate it if you sent him back to Tennessee, it is Racoon season and if he is laying on someone's desk, That dog won't hunt. If you know a working man who keeps 80% more in his pocket, he is to be commended, for doing hard work in his own self interest, possibly at two or three low paying part time jobs without a 401K plan. If you actually know his guy, you should direct him to a competent financial counselor. My sister-in-law uses one in Nashville. He is really quite good. Thanks for playing "change the subject". You lose. Next! You should get more bran in your diet or maybe a dose of EX-Lax, but be careful. I saw the results when someone gave a whole bar to a gorilla at the Chicago Zoo. It was AWFUL! Hope I am getting the hang of this message board thing.

You have to learn in the scheme of life this forum means less than nothing, and we all enjoy it in different ways... I enjoy doing what I do and calling names, it is my entertainment. Others may have a different agenda....you can take it for what it has turned out to be. A place where. As a DEMONRAT, you can lie your ass off, and as a patriot, you can counter them with fact and your opinion...A free country until the Dimwits take it over. So enjoy it while you can!...You seem to be one of the low 2 digit IQ boys who use subterfuge as a means of spewing your leftist thoughts...I will enjoy slapping you around!

Good luck with that. I probably won't respond in kind.

 

[Care4all]

also - it's known that the Ukraine NEVER KNEW that aid was even coming, much less being withheld.

that is simply not true and proven not true, but yet you still believe the right wing lies about it... the hearings showed that the Ukraine knew all about the military aid/DC meeting and it being held back in exchange for a public announcement in to investigating the Bidens.... in fact, the Ukrainians contacted the US GOVT diplomat contacts here in DC, the day of the phone call, inquiring about the aid, according to the testimony by witnesses, and Sondland testified he told them, and there is Giuliani talking to OMB to hold the money, back in April.

Besides the fact that it is utterly ridiculous that the Ukraine would not know about the aid when it was passed by congress in February 2019 and announced in all the newspapers..everyone knew there was aid allotted to them and how much, by our Congress for 7 months and waiting.

 

[The Purge]

Top Republican lawmakers finalized a report Monday exonerating President Donald Trump from any wrongdoing regarding Ukraine just as Democrats with the House Judiciary Committee prepare to launch their own impeachment inquiry into the president, according to a report reviewed by SaraACarter.com.

Ranking Chairman Devin Nunes, with the House Intelligence Committee; Rep. Jim Jordan, ranking member and Ranking member of the House Oversight Committee and Rep. Michael McCaul, ranking member of the Committee on Foreign Affairs issued the report. It noted that the impeachment inquiry is nothing more than the Democrats ‘orchestrated campaign to upend our political system.”

President Trump departed Washington D.C. Monday to a NATO gathering in London and before he left he criticized House Democrats for moving forward with impeachment proceedings. The House Judiciary Committee is planning to hold its first hearing on impeachment Wednesday. Trump’s lawyers declined the invitation from Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler to testify.

Nunes, Jordan and McCaul, noted in the report that despite all the legitimate concerns the President had regarding Ukraine corruption and the Bidens, there was absolutely no evidence presented during the hearings suggesting that Trump intended to withhold aid unless the Ukrainians investigated the situation.

“The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump pressured President Zelensky to initiate investigations for the purpose of benefiting the President in the 2020 election,” the 110 page report states. “The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump covered up the summary of his phone conversation with President Zelensky. The evidence does not support the accusation that President Trump obstructed the Democrats’ impeachment inquiry.”

(Excerpt) Read more at saraacarter.com ...

-----------'

Who said they need evidence? It’s the seriousness of the charge that matters. The dimwits are going to ride this horse until its 4 legs drop off....You go girls!

The first sentence left out some things. When referring to the "Top Republican law makers" it is worth noting that they are, in fact, minority member in the House of Representatives, indeed minority members on their committee. The majority does not share the minority opinion. The report is an opinion piece with no more actual weight than what I am writing. It apparently did not exonerate anybody or any action. The majority did not suddenly shout "if we had only known", and can call off the inquiry.
Nothing much to note in 2nd paragraph except possibly, if some of these guys mentioned had had any stomach to exercise any over-site as was their job under the Constitution of the United States, we might not be here now.
Third paragraph gave news. Trump going to NATO. I don't know why he didn't send the VP. Trump doesn't like or support NATO. He seems to support Russia more. I can't imagine why. I do not. In case you haven't cared or guessed. I am from the "Black Boot" Army. The cold war Army that backed Ronald Reagan's policies and ploys at a time when Russia and it's Soviet Union stood as an existential to our way of life. We mostly won the cold war, (thank you very much, I like it here too, and was glad to do my minuscule part) yet much of the threat remains. That corrupt totalitarian government and it X-KGB President are little changed in philosophy from the Old Soviet (only sneakier), and only fools such as our President trust them. He should restrain his instinct to vocally support his hero, especially when he is on foreign soil meeting with Allies that our official foreign policy publicly supports.
Fourth paragraph has these "heroes of the right", characterizing Trumps corruption concerns as "legitimate". I guess they were not legitimate 4 years ago when their party was in the majority and could investigate anything they had convictions to stand up and fight for, but did not, until Uncle Joe was running against their boy. Tough stuff! Welcome to Constitutional Democracy 101.
If I were a Trump supporter that did not support the our public foreign policy toward present day Ukraine, or the evaluations, and reports of all our intelligence services, both houses of congress, including every congressional committee that investigated under either parties control, that Russia was the primary guilty foreign government that interfered in our 2016 election and most likely to interfere in the 2020 election, I might characterizes their "evidence" likewise, but I can't stand with those guys. I have read and listened and seen testimony during the inquiry. The only way this will be settled is impeachment and a trial before the Senate. I have, (at least for the moment) lost faith in the Republican Party I often voted with, for so many years. I look forward to listening and hearing witness and evidence presented before the Senate chambers if I am allowed to, and will peacefully abide by the Constitutional finality of that chamber's vote as to whether he stays or goes, over his latest crooked, political scheme. After all, I still support support the oath I took to The Constitution.

That is why they can present articles of phony impeachment and the majority of DEMONRATS subversives and saboteurs can send those articles to the Senate where Trump doesnt need a majority of Senators to impeach him, all he needs is that the 67 senator threshold is never met, and he would need 20 or so Republicans to vote with you Anti-Americans...and THAT will NEVER HAPPEN....and NOW he has more ammunition to use against the ABNORMALS, come election time to say, look at how many millions the party of INFANTICIDE has wasted trying to impeach me, while they could have been doing the peoples business for at least half a year and didnt do infrastructure the AMC trade bill, and probably still hundreds of other Bill's that lay dormant on Piglousi's desk!....I think THAT will play well with the electorate who sees that unemployment is at an all time low and overv80% of the working man has more money in his pocket than anytime under the Surrender Monkey, And even did away with the onerous obozocare mandate!!!....Counter that!

Hi Purge, If they do, (in fact) vote to submit impeachment articles to the US Senate, he will at that time be officially "Impeached", just as Bill Clinton was impeached. The Senate is where he is tried after he is impeached to decide what to do about it. I never intimated a high belief he would be removed. Lets see.., DEMON RATS, subversives and saboteurs doesn't sound effective for a debate message room, but I am kinda new at it. It would sound better of some scruffy old guy screaming pointlessly on a street corner trying to get attention. Trump may very well repeat your INFANTICIDE sentence at a rally. It is just like something he might say. I'm sure it would be a hit! You should send it to him. He might give you a cookie or a big red apple. "Piglousi"? "Surrender Monkey"? "obozocare"? You cannot actually defeat ideas and beliefs based on someone's values and understanding of the constitution with 5th grade name calling, especially when used to excess. By the way, if "Bill" is laying on someones desk, I would appreciate it if you sent him back to Tennessee, it is Racoon season and if he is laying on someone's desk, That dog won't hunt. If you know a working man who keeps 80% more in his pocket, he is to be commended, for doing hard work in his own self interest, possibly at two or three low paying part time jobs without a 401K plan. If you actually know his guy, you should direct him to a competent financial counselor. My sister-in-law uses one in Nashville. He is really quite good. Thanks for playing "change the subject". You lose. Next! You should get more bran in your diet or maybe a dose of EX-Lax, but be careful. I saw the results when someone gave a whole bar to a gorilla at the Chicago Zoo. It was AWFUL! Hope I am getting the hang of this message board thing.

You have to learn in the scheme of life this forum means less than nothing, and we all enjoy it in different ways... I enjoy doing what I do and calling names, it is my entertainment. Others may have a different agenda....you can take it for what it has turned out to be. A place where. As a DEMONRAT, you can lie your ass off, and as a patriot, you can counter them with fact and your opinion...A free country until the Dimwits take it over. So enjoy it while you can!...You seem to be one of the low 2 digit IQ boys who use subterfuge as a means of spewing your leftist thoughts...I will enjoy slapping you around!

Good luck with that. I probably won't respond in kind.

Excellent!!!

 

[The Purge]

also - it's known that the Ukraine NEVER KNEW that aid was even coming, much less being withheld.

that is simply not true and proven not true, but yet you still believe the right wing lies about it... the hearings showed that the Ukraine knew all about the military aid and it being held back in exchange for a public announcement in to investigating the Bidens.... in fact, the Ukrainians contacted the US GOVT diplomats the day of the phone call, inquiring about the aid, according to the testimony by witnesses, and Sondland testified he told them, and there is Giuliani talking to OMB to hold the money, back in April.

Besides the fact that it is utterly ridiculous that the Ukraine would not know about the aid when it was passed by congress in February and announced in all the newspapers..everyone knew there was aid allotted to them by our Congress for 7 months and waiting.

C4A I'm not going to call you a liar again...
But you are a liar!

Doesn't matter to you emails, texts and testimonies where Ukraine had no idea that the aid was tied up, but you go ahead and post whatever your deranged little mind believe . Others of us prefer the truth!

 

[iceberg]

also - it's known that the Ukraine NEVER KNEW that aid was even coming, much less being withheld.

that is simply not true and proven not true, but yet you still believe the right wing lies about it... the hearings showed that the Ukraine knew all about the military aid and it being held back in exchange for a public announcement in to investigating the Bidens.... in fact, the Ukrainians contacted the US GOVT diplomat contacts here in DC, the day of the phone call, inquiring about the aid, according to the testimony by witnesses, and Sondland testified he told them, and there is Giuliani talking to OMB to hold the money, back in April.

Besides the fact that it is utterly ridiculous that the Ukraine would not know about the aid when it was passed by congress in February and announced in all the newspapers..everyone knew there was aid allotted to them by our Congress for 7 months and waiting.

I showed several links in my next post. link up or shut the fuck up.

 

[Care4all]

also - it's known that the Ukraine NEVER KNEW that aid was even coming, much less being withheld.

that is simply not true and proven not true, but yet you still believe the right wing lies about it... the hearings showed that the Ukraine knew all about the military aid and it being held back in exchange for a public announcement in to investigating the Bidens.... in fact, the Ukrainians contacted the US GOVT diplomat contacts here in DC, the day of the phone call, inquiring about the aid, according to the testimony by witnesses, and Sondland testified he told them, and there is Giuliani talking to OMB to hold the money, back in April.

Besides the fact that it is utterly ridiculous that the Ukraine would not know about the aid when it was passed by congress in February and announced in all the newspapers..everyone knew there was aid allotted to them by our Congress for 7 months and waiting.

I showed several links in my next post. link up or shut the fuck up.

Ukraine Knew of Aid Freeze in July, Says Ex-Top Official in Kyiv


Ukraine Knew of Aid Freeze in July, Says Ex-Top Official in Kyiv
Ukraine’s government learned of the military aid freeze during the Trump administration’s pressure campaign — and tried to keep that knowledge from going public, an ex-deputy foreign minister said.

 

[Care4all]

also - it's known that the Ukraine NEVER KNEW that aid was even coming, much less being withheld.

that is simply not true and proven not true, but yet you still believe the right wing lies about it... the hearings showed that the Ukraine knew all about the military aid and it being held back in exchange for a public announcement in to investigating the Bidens.... in fact, the Ukrainians contacted the US GOVT diplomats the day of the phone call, inquiring about the aid, according to the testimony by witnesses, and Sondland testified he told them, and there is Giuliani talking to OMB to hold the money, back in April.

Besides the fact that it is utterly ridiculous that the Ukraine would not know about the aid when it was passed by congress in February and announced in all the newspapers..everyone knew there was aid allotted to them by our Congress for 7 months and waiting.

C4A I'm not going to call you a liar again...
But you are a liar!

Doesn't matter to you emails, texts and testimonies where Ukraine had no idea that the aid was tied up, but you go ahead and post whatever your deranged little mind believe . Others of us prefer the truth!

I told you, I don't lie... Admitting, I am misinformed sometimes, but it is not intentional!


Ukraine Knew of Aid Freeze in July, Says Ex-Top Official in Kyiv

Ukraine Knew of Aid Freeze in July, Says Ex-Top Official in Kyiv
Ukraine’s government learned of the military aid freeze during the Trump administration’s pressure campaign — and tried to keep that knowledge from going public, an ex-deputy foreign minister said.