No, ending these programs would be constitutional... if we elected to do so
By "we" I assume you mean the degenerate, sorry, socialist parasites who cling to the out-dated and out-of-step democrat party that would turn America into a complete welfare state, reliant on the few entities who would continue to produce for the benefit of the swelling numbers of sucklings who refuse to take responsibility for their own lives until the country ceased to exist as the Framers of the Constitution anticipated - the "flounders," as you like to call them, right?
As is having them also constitutional according to our current interpretation of our laws.
"Our" laws? Are you trying to pass yourself off as an American? LOL!!
The world belongs to the LIVING, not to the dead.
Which has absolutely nothing to do with anything.
The flounder fathers wrote a document that did NOT ties our hands with specific laws.
The "flounder fathers" would have put you and your ilk on a slow boat to England to join your comrades in your love of tyranny over the human spirit.
They understood, like those of you who imagine that there is a right "literal" interpretation of the Constitution do not, that one cannot bind the FUTURE generations to the vision of the current generation.
Then what was the purpose of a Constitution that has served us well for over 200 years and has made us the envy of the civilized world, where most of the rest of the population of your ideal "socialist" nations are yearning to come to escape the dirty, diseased, backwater lands they live in?
Most of us would not be able to VOTE, if we'd stuck to the constitution that our floundering fathers originally wrote.
I'm sure you are one that would have been disenfranchised in those days when the vote was a priviledge earned by loyalty to the Constitution, pride in country, willingness to defend America, and abiding love for one's own home; not given to any riff-raff who managed to crawl here for what's in it for him. Your kind are the ones who are gnawing away at the foundations of this great country for the purpose of the ever-discredited institutions of collectivism, socialism and communism.
Now who here wants to come out in favor of only allowing a very small percentage of the population to vote?
I will be proud to state that I am in favor of disenfranchising all the people on welfare, those with reduced mental abilities, criminals, lay-abouts, and all other leeches whose only interests lie in what they can get from the taxpayers.
Who here wants to come out in favor of once again allowing slavery?
Now you are becoming ridiculous and asinine for the purpose of stirring emotions. If we adopt your type of government, we will all be slaves to the state as you well know, but refuse to admit. To what end do you desire to change a system that has worked magnificently for all these years and is now beset with the likes of you and your comrades in an effort to change us into your and Obama's vision of a communist utopia?
THAT would be a literal interpretation of the constitution that our floundering fathers passed.
It is my personal opinion that your "floundering fathers" are the same ones who are presently stirring up all the turmoil and wars in the Middle East.
Now I know some of you would be in favor of those changes to our society
Junior, you don't know anything except what your radical socialist teachers have beaten into your "skull full of mush."
I also know most of you who would like thise things, don't have the balls to openly admit it.
Like I said, you know very little, if anything, about life and politics.
